Cited by 291Infant Nutrition and HealthGut microbiota and healthProbiotics and Fermented Foods

Examination of faecal Bifidobacterium populations in breast- and formula-fed infants during the first 18 months of life

Roger, Laure C., Costabile, Adele, Holland, Diane T., Hoyles, Lesley, McCartney, Anne L.·2010·Microbiology

Abstract

Bifidobacteria in the infant faecal microbiota have been the focus of much interest, especially during the exclusive milk-feeding period and in relation to the fortification of infant formulae to better mimic breast milk. However, longitudinal studies examining the diversity and dynamics of the Bifidobacterium population of infants are lacking, particularly in relation to the effects of weaning. Using a polyphasic strategy, the Bifidobacterium populations of breast- and formula-fed infants were examined during the first 18 months of life.Bifidobacterium-specific denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis demonstrated that breast-fed infants harboured greater diversity than formula-fed infants and the diversity of the infants'Bifidobacterium populations increased with weaning. Twenty-seven distinctive banding profiles were observed from ∼1100 infant isolates using ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis, 14 biotypes of which were confirmed to be members of the genus Bifidobacterium. Two profiles (H,Bifidobacterium longum subsp.infantis; and I,Bifidobacterium bifidum) were common culturable biotypes, seen in 9/10 infants, while profile E (Bifidobacterium breve) was common among breast-fed infants. Overall, inter- and intra-individual differences were observed in the Bifidobacterium populations of infants between 1 and 18 months of age, although weaning was associated with increased diversity of the infant Bifidobacterium populations. Breast-fed infants generally harboured a more complex Bifidobacterium microbiota than formula-fed infants.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1099/mic.0.043224-0

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Breast-fed infants generally harbor a more complex and numerous Bifidobacterium microbiota than formula-fed infants.

    “In fact it has been reported that breast-fed infants generally harbor a more complex and numerous Bifidobacterium microbiota than formula-fed infants (19, 20).”

    From Bifidobacteria and Their Health-Promoting Effects (2017) · cites this paper as [20]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roger, L. C., Costabile, A., Holland, D. T., Hoyles, L., & McCartney, A. L.
Affiliations
University of Reading (GB)
Venue
Microbiology
Published
2010-11-01
Volume
156
Issue
11
Pages
3329-3341
ISSN
  • 1350-0872 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-2080
OpenAlex
W2101219158
Cited by
291
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 18
FWCI
15.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CentAUR (University of Reading) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
Bifidobacterium, infant gut microbiota, breastfeeding, infant formula, weaning, microbial diversity, Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium breve, polyphasic identification, RISA, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis
MeSH terms
Bifidobacterium, Breast Feeding, DNA, Bacterial, Feces, Humans, Infant, Longitudinal Studies, Species Specificity, Weaning, DNA, Ribosomal Spacer, Infant Formula, Biodiversity, Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review