The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Joint genotypic and phenotypic outcome modeling improves base editing variant effect quantification
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s41588-024-01726-6
Abstract
CRISPR base editing screens are powerful tools for studying disease-associated variants at scale. However, the efficiency and precision of base editing perturbations vary, confounding the assessment of variant-induced phenotypic effects. Here, we provide an integrated pipeline that improves the estimation of variant impact in base editing screens. We perform high-throughput ABE8e-SpRY base editing screens with an integrated reporter construct to measure the editing efficiency and outcomes of each gRNA alongside their phenotypic consequences. We introduce BEAN, a Bayesian network that accounts for per-guide editing outcomes and target site chromatin accessibility to estimate variant impacts. We show this pipeline attains superior performance compared to existing tools in variant classification and effect size quantification. We use BEAN to pinpoint common variants that alter LDL uptake, implicating novel genes. Additionally, through saturation base editing of LDLR , we enable accurate quantitative prediction of the effects of missense variants on LDL-C levels, which aligns with measurements in UK Biobank individuals, and identify structural mechanisms underlying variant pathogenicity. This work provides a widely applicable approach to improve the power of base editor screens for disease-associated variant characterization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
The power of genetic diversity in genome-wide association studies of lipids
Graham, S. E., Clarke, S. L., Wu, K.-H. H., Kanoni, S., Zajac, G. J. M., Ramdas, S., Surakka, I., Ntalla, I., Vedantam, S., Winkler, T. W., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04064-3 · Cited by 972
Self-citationMassively parallel assessment of human variants with base editor screens
Hanna, R. E., Hegde, M., Fagre, C. R., DeWeirdt, P. C., Sangree, A. K., Szegletes, Z., Griffith, A., Feeley, M. N., Sanson, K. R., Baidi, Y., et al. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.05.17.100818 · Cited by 314
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 131
- 10.1038/s41576-019-0127-1 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-018-0579-z · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nprot.2016.135 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.04.003 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.3457470 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ygeno.2015.06.005 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, High-content CRISPR screening, Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 2, 1
- 10.1126/science.1247005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1246981 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature17946 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature24644 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41576-018-0059-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.012 · DOI · Paper page
- 2023, Discovery of target genes and pathways at GWAS loci by pooled single-cell CRISPR screens, Science, 380, eadh7699, 10.1126/science.adh7699 · DOI · Paper page
- 2023, Massively parallel base editing to map variant effects in human hematopoiesis, Cell, 186, 2456, 10.1016/j.cell.2023.03.035 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.041 · DOI
- 2023, Scanning mutagenesis of the voltage-gated sodium channel NaV1.2 using base editing, Cell Rep, 42, 112563, 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112563 · DOI
- 2023, Base editing screens map mutations affecting interferon-γ signaling in cancer, Cancer Cell, 41, 288, 10.1016/j.ccell.2022.12.009 · DOI
- 2021, Single-nucleotide-level mapping of DNA regulatory elements that control fetal hemoglobin expression, Nat. Genet, 53, 869, 10.1038/s41588-021-00861-8 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41587-022-01276-4 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41388-019-0968-2 · DOI
- 2021, Identification of pathogenic variants in cancer genes using base editing screens with editing efficiency correction, Genome Biol, 22, 80, 10.1186/s13059-021-02305-2 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-022-28884-7 · DOI
- 2023, Base editor scanning charts the DNMT3A activity landscape, Nat. Chem. Biol, 19, 176, 10.1038/s41589-022-01167-4 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-020-15796-7 · DOI
- 10.1101/2023.04.12.536656 · DOI
- 2023, Base editor screens for in situ mutational scanning at scale, Mol. Cell, 83, 2167, 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.06.009 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.037 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, EPIC: Inferring relevant cell types for complex traits by integrating genome-wide association studies and single-cell RNA sequencing, PLoS Genet, 18, e1010251, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010251 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41588-018-0081-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 2015, Familial hypercholesterolemia, Cardiol. Clin, 33, 169, 10.1016/j.ccl.2015.01.001 · DOI
- 10.1038/scientificamerican0784-72 · DOI
- 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312706 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkt1113 · DOI · Paper page
- 2023, Systematic elucidation of genetic mechanisms underlying cholesterol uptake, Cell Genomics, 3, 100304, 10.1016/j.xgen.2023.100304 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1055/s-2008-1040407 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41587-020-0453-z · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.aba8853 · DOI · Paper page
- 2021, Small-molecule inhibitors of histone deacetylase improve CRISPR-based adenine base editing, Nucleic Acids Res, 49, 2390, 10.1093/nar/gkab052 · DOI
- 2023, HMGN1 enhances CRISPR-directed dual-function A-to-G and C-to-G base editing, Nat. Commun, 14, 2430, 10.1038/s41467-023-38193-2 · DOI
- 2020, A simple new approach to variable selection in regression, with application to genetic fine mapping, J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B Stat. Methodol, 82, 1273, 10.1111/rssb.12388 · DOI · Paper page
- 2020, Functionally informed fine-mapping and polygenic localization of complex trait heritability, Nat. Genet, 52, 1355, 10.1038/s41588-020-00735-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009285 · DOI · Paper page
- 2023, Base editing rescue of spinal muscular atrophy in cells and in mice, Science, 380, eadg6518, 10.1126/science.adg6518 · DOI
- 10.1016/J.MOLCEL.2021.03.032 · DOI
- 2019, Improving CRISPR-Cas9 Genome Editing Efficiency by Fusion with Chromatin-Modulating Peptides, CRISPR J, 2, 51, 10.1089/crispr.2018.0036 · DOI
- Liu, G. , Yin, K. , Zhang, Q. , Gao, C. & Qiu, J.-L . Modulating chromatin accessibility by transactivation and targeting proximal dsgRNAs enhances Cas9 editing efficiency in vivo. Genome Biol. 20, 145 (2019). · DOI
- 10.2337/db20-2194-PUB · DOI
- 10.1186/s13059-014-0554-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Li, W. et al. Quality control, modeling, and visualization of CRISPR screens with MAGeCK-VISPR. Genome Biol. 16, 281 (2015). · DOI
- 10.1101/gr.245571.118 · DOI
- Daley, T. P. et al. CRISPhieRmix: a hierarchical mixture model for CRISPR pooled screens. Genome Biol. 19, 159 (2018). · DOI
- 10.1038/nature10808 · DOI
- 10.1016/J.AJHG.2021.05.001 · DOI
- 2021, Motif-Raptor: a cell type-specific and transcription factor centric approach for post-GWAS prioritization of causal regulators, Bioinformatics, 37, 2103, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab072 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.009 · DOI
- 2020, Occupancy maps of 208 chromatin-associated proteins in one human cell type, Nature, 583, 720, 10.1038/s41586-020-2023-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature13835 · DOI · Paper page
- 2004, Identification of the DNA binding element of the human ZNF333 protein, J. Biochem. Mol. Biol, 37, 663
- 10.1073/pnas.91.10.4514 · DOI
- 10.1038/41798 · DOI
- 1989, Different combinations of cysteine-rich repeats mediate binding of low density lipoprotein receptor to two different proteins, J. Biol. Chem, 264, 21682, 10.1016/S0021-9258(20)88240-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev.biochem.74.082803.133354 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/27.1.260 · DOI
- 10.1038/ng.2797 · DOI
- 10.1101/2023.01.06.23284280 · DOI
- Chen, T. & Guestrin, C . XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. arXiv [cs.LG] (2016). · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, Coronary artery disease risk of familial hypercholesterolemia genetic variants independent of clinically observed longitudinal cholesterol exposure, Circ. Genom. Precis. Med, 15, e003501
- 2020, Proteostasis Regulation in the Endoplasmic Reticulum: An Emerging Theme in the Molecular Pathology and Therapeutic Management of Familial Hypercholesterolemia, Front. Genet, 11, 570355, 10.3389/fgene.2020.570355 · DOI
- 10.1110/ps.8.7.1492 · DOI
- 2016, Functional analysis of the p.(Leu15Pro) and p.(Gly20Arg) sequence changes in the signal sequence of LDL receptor, Atherosclerosis, 250, 9, 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.04.022 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90046-4 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M110.105718 · DOI
- 10.1093/NAR/GKAB1061 · DOI · Paper page
- Webb, B. & Sali, A . Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER. Curr. Protoc. Protein Sci. 86, 2.9.1-2.9.37 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.12.004 · DOI
- 2023, DDMut: predicting effects of mutations on protein stability using deep learning, Nucleic Acids Res, 51, W122, 10.1093/nar/gkad472 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.4023714 · DOI
- 10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106 · DOI · Paper page
- Love, M. I. , Huber, W. & Anders, S . Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2308-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 2017, Estimating the selective effects of heterozygous protein-truncating variants from human exome data, Nat. Genet, 49, 806, 10.1038/ng.3831 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth.3027 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/gim.2015.30 · DOI · Paper page
- Brnich, S. E. et al. Recommendations for application of the functional evidence PS3/BS3 criterion using the ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation framework. Genome Med. 12, 3 (2019). · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.07.059 · DOI · Paper page
- 2019, Trajectories of Blood Lipid Concentrations Over the Adult Life Course and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and All-Cause Mortality: Observations From the Framingham Study Over 35 Years, J. Am. Heart Assoc, 8, e011433, 10.1161/JAHA.118.011433 · DOI
- 2016, A systematic review of current studies in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia by use of national familial hypercholesterolemia registries, Curr. Opin. Lipidol, 27, 388, 10.1097/MOL.0000000000000300 · DOI
- 2023, The landscape of tolerated genetic variation in humans and primates, Science, 380, eabn8153, 10.1126/science.abn8197 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.08.016 · DOI · Paper page
- 2012, Low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) family orchestrates cholesterol homeostasis, Yale J. Biol. Med, 85, 19
- 10.1097/MOL.0000000000000114 · DOI · Paper page
- 2023, Systematic elucidation of genetic mechanisms underlying cholesterol uptake, Cell Genomics, 3, 100304, 10.1016/j.xgen.2023.100304 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009285 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41587-019-0032-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.037 · DOI · Paper page
- Anders, S. & Huber, W . Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 11, R106 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
- Love, M. I. , Huber, W. & Anders, S . Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/s12859-016-1015-8 · DOI
- Hutton, E. R. , Vakoc, C. R. & Siepel, A . ACE: a probabilistic model for characterizing gene-level essentiality in CRISPR screens. Genome Biol. 22, 278 (2021). · DOI
- Imkeller, K. , Ambrosi, G. , Boutros, M. & Huber, W. gscreend: modelling asymmetric count ratios in CRISPR screens to decrease experiment size and improve phenotype detection. Genome Biol. 21, 53 (12/2020). · DOI
- Li, W. et al. MAGeCK enables robust identification of essential genes from genome-scale CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screens. Genome Biol. 15, 554 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
- Li, W. et al. Quality control, modeling, and visualization of CRISPR screens with MAGeCK-VISPR. Genome Biol. 16, 281 (2015). · DOI
- 10.1101/gr.245571.118 · DOI
- Daley, T. P. et al. CRISPhieRmix: a hierarchical mixture model for CRISPR pooled screens. Genome Biol. 19, 159 (2018). · DOI
- Huang, C. , Li, G. , Wu, J. , Liang, J. & Wang, X . Identification of pathogenic variants in cancer genes using base editing screens with editing efficiency correction. Genome Biol. 22, 80 (2021). · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gks596 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth.1923 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.25080/majora-92bf1922-011 · DOI
- 2021, Motif-Raptor: a cell type-specific and transcription factor centric approach for post-GWAS prioritization of causal regulators, Bioinformatics, 37, 2103, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab072 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.009 · DOI
- 10.1093/NAR/GKAA913 · DOI · Paper page
- Wheeler, T. J. , Clements, J. & Finn, R. D . Skylign: a tool for creating informative, interactive logos representing sequence alignments and profile hidden Markov models. BMC Bioinformatics 15, 7 (2014). · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkt376 · DOI
- Sievers, F. et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 539 (2011). · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkq313 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001779 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-022-04558-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Danecek, P. et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience 10, (2021). · DOI
- 10.1038/s41587-019-0054-x · DOI · Paper page
- McLaren, W. et al. The ensembl variant effect predictor. Genome Biol. 17, (2016). · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/gr.3715005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/2023.01.06.23284280 · DOI
- Chen, T. & Guestrin, C . XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. arXiv [cs.LG] (2016). · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cpc.2010.04.018 · DOI
- Schrödinger, LLC . The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.8. Preprint at (2015).
- 10.1126/science.4023714 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/NAR/GKAB1061 · DOI · Paper page
- Webb, B. & Sali, A . Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER. Curr. Protoc. Protein Sci. 86, 2.9.1–2.9.37 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
- 2023, DDMut: predicting effects of mutations on protein stability using deep learning, Nucleic Acids Res, 51, W122, 10.1093/nar/gkad472 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Ryu, J., Barkal, S., Yu, T., Jankowiak, M., Zhou, Y., Francoeur, M., Phan, Q. V., Li, Z., Tognon, M., Brown, L., Love, M. I., Lettre, G., Ascher, D. B., Cassa, C. A., Sherwood, R. I., & Pinello, L.
- Affiliations
- Broad Institute (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute (AU)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Montreal Heart Institute (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Cassa, Christopher A.
- Sherwood, Richard I.
- Pinello, Luca
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Genetics
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2023-09-10
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 925-937
- ISSN
- 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11669423
- OpenAlex
- W4395074959
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 4.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
- medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1R35HG010717-01, 1R01HL164409, UM1HG012010, R01-HG010372, 1R01GM143249)
- American Cancer Society
- American Heart Association
- National Organization for Rare Disorders
- State Government of Victoria
- Medical Research Council
- National Health and Medical Research Council (1174405)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL164409)
- National Human Genome Research Institute (R56HG012681, R35HG010717, R01HG010372, UM1HG012010)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM143249)
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P30ES010126)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Keywords
- variant effect prediction, Bayesian networks, beans, chromatin accessibility, LDL uptake, LDL receptor, disease-associated variants, regulatory variants
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review