The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ATR disruption leads to chromosomal fragmentation and early embryonic lethality
Open accessAbstract
Although a small decrease in survival and increase in tumor incidence was observed in ATR +/− mice, ATR −/− embryos die early in development, subsequent to the blastocyst stage and prior to 7.5 days p.c. In culture, ATR −/− blastocysts cells continue to cycle into mitosis for 2 days but subsequently fail to expand and die of caspase-dependent apoptosis. Importantly, caspase-independent chromosome breaks are observed in ATR −/− cells prior to widespread apoptosis, implying that apoptosis is caused by a loss of genomic integrity. These data show that ATR is essential for early embryonic development and must function in processes other than regulation of p53.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“ATR is an essential gene for the initiation and regulation of NER and for genome maintenance 17, 36, 37.”
From Xeroderma Pigmentosa Group A (XPA), Nucleotide Excision Repair and Regulation by ATR in Response to Ultraviolet Irradiation (2017) · cites this paper as [36]
In the citing paper
“ATR was originally cloned as a member of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase–related kinase (PIKK) family and is essential for early embryonic development [32, 80, 81].”
From Functional interplay between ATM/ATR-mediated DNA damage response and DNA repair pathways in oxidative stress (2014) · cites this paper as [81]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A mammalian protein targeted by G1-arresting rapamycin–receptor complex
Brown, E. J., Albers, M. W., Bum Shin, T., ichikawa, K., Keith, C. T., Lane, W. S., & Schreiber, S. L. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/369756a0 · Cited by 2,053
Self-citationTumor spectrum analysis in p53-mutant mice
Jacks, T., Remington, L., Williams, B. O., Schmitt, E. M., Halachmi, S., Bronson, R. T., & Weinberg, R. A. (1994) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00002-6 · Cited by 2,051
Activation of the ATM Kinase by Ionizing Radiation and Phosphorylation of p53
Canman, C. E., Lim, D.-S., Cimprich, K. A., Taya, Y., Tamai, K., Sakaguchi, K., Appella, E., Kastan, M. B., & Siliciano, J. D. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.281.5383.1677 · Cited by 2,042
Linkage of ATM to Cell Cycle Regulation by the Chk2 Protein Kinase
Matsuoka, S. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.282.5395.1893 · Cited by 1,322
Embryonic lethality and radiation hypersensitivity mediated by Rad51 in mice lacking Brca2
Sharan, S. K., Morimatsu, M., Albrecht, U., Lim, D., Regel, E., Dinh, C. Q., Sands, A., Gregor Eichele, C., Hasty, P., & Bradley, A. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/386804a0 · Cited by 1,087
A role for ATR in the DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of p53
Tibbetts, R. S., Brumbaugh, K. M., Williams, J. M., Sarkaria, J. N., Cliby, W. A., Shieh, S.-Y., Taya, Y., Prives, C., & Abraham, R. T. (1999) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.13.2.152 · Cited by 1,046
(1999) · PubMed · Cited by 1,030
Cortez, D., Wang, Y., Qin, J., & Elledge, S. J. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5442.1162 · Cited by 1,020
Dynamic changes of BRCA1 subnuclear location and phosphorylation state are initiated by DNA damage
Scully, R., Chen, J., Ochs, R. L., Keegan, K., Hoekstra, M., Feunteun, J., & Livingston, D. M. (1997) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80503-6 · Cited by 900
14-3-3σ is required to prevent mitotic catastrophe after DNA damage
Chan, T. A., Hermeking, H., Lengauer, C., Kinzler, K. W., & Vogelstein, B. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/44188 · Cited by 895
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 945
The ATR barrier to replication-born DNA damage
Lopez-Contreras, A. J., & Fernández-Capetillo, Ó. (2010) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.09.012 · Cited by 148
Bukhari, A. B., Lewis, C. W., Pearce, J. J., Luong, D., Chan, G. K. T., & Gamper, A. M. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci122622 · Cited by 141
Two Distinct Modes of ATR Activation Orchestrated by Rad17 and Nbs1
Shiotani, B., Nguyen, H. D., Håkansson, P., Maréchal, A., Tse, A., Tahara, H., & Zou, L. (2013) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2013.04.018 · Cited by 142
DNA damage and repair in atherosclerosis
Mahmoudi, M., MERCER, J., & Bennett, M. R. (2006) · Cardiovascular Research · doi:10.1016/j.cardiores.2006.03.002 · Cited by 137
Genome-wide CRISPR screens reveal synthetic lethality of RNASEH2 deficiency and ATR inhibition
Wang, C., Wang, G., Feng, X., Shepherd, P. D. A., Zhang, J., Tang, M., Chen, Z., Srivastava, M., McLaughlin, M. E., Navone, N. M., et al. (2018) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/s41388-018-0606-4 · Cited by 137
Depletion of Chk1 Leads to Premature Activation of Cdc2-cyclin B and Mitotic Catastrophe
Niida, H., Tsuge, S., Katsuno, Y., Konishi, A., Takeda, N., & Nakanishi, M. (2005) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m505009200 · Cited by 139
Gemcitabine-Induced Activation of Checkpoint Signaling Pathways That Affect Tumor Cell Survival
Karnitz, L. M., Flatten, K. S., Wagner, J. M., Loegering, D. A., Hackbarth, J. S., Arlander, S. J. H., Vroman, B. T., Thomas, M. B., Baek, Y.-U., Hopkins, K. M., et al. (2005) · Molecular Pharmacology · doi:10.1124/mol.105.012716 · Cited by 137
Insights into cancer therapeutic design based on p53 and TRAIL receptor signaling
El‐Deiry, W. S. (2001) · Cell Death and Differentiation · doi:10.1038/sj.cdd.4400943 · Cited by 136
Mammalian TIMELESS and Tipin are Evolutionarily Conserved Replication Fork-associated Factors
Gotter, A. L., Suppa, C., & Emanuel, B. S. (2006) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2006.10.097 · Cited by 142
Mcm2 Is a Direct Substrate of ATM and ATR during DNA Damage and DNA Replication Checkpoint Responses
Yoo, H. Y., Shevchenko, A., Shevchenko, A., & Dunphy, W. G. (2004) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m408026200 · Cited by 133
Replication stress and cancer: It takes two to tango
Lecona, E., & Fernández-Capetillo, Ó. (2014) · Experimental Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.09.019 · Cited by 134
ATR and H2AX cooperate in maintaining genome stability under replication stress
Chanoux, R. A., Yin, B., Urtishak, K. A., Asare, A., Bassing, C. H., & Brown, E. J. (2009) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m806739200 · Cited by 130
Self-citationWang, H., Wang, H., Powell, S. N., Iliakis, G., & Wang, Y. (2004) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-1289 · Cited by 130
Essential role of S‐adenosylmethionine decarboxylase in mouse embryonic development
Nishimura, K., Nakatsu, F., Kashiwagi, K., Ohno, H., Saito, T., & Igarashi, K. (2002) · Genes to Cells · doi:10.1046/j.1356-9597.2001.00494.x · Cited by 130
Progress towards a clinically-successful ATR inhibitor for cancer therapy
Barnieh, F. M., Loadman, P. M., & Falconer, R. A. (2021) · Current Research in Pharmacology and Drug Discovery · doi:10.1016/j.crphar.2021.100017 · Cited by 134
Caretaker tumour suppressor genes that defend genome integrity
Levitt, N. C., & Hickson, I. D. (2002) · Trends in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1016/s1471-4914(02)02298-0 · Cited by 138
Inhibition of ATR protein kinase activity by schisandrin B in DNA damage response
Nishida, H., Tatewaki, N., Nakajima, Y., Magara, T., Ko, K. M., Hamamori, Y., & Konishi, T. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp593 · Cited by 133
Inactivation of mouse Hus1 results in genomic instability and impaired responses to genotoxic stressPreprint
Weiss, R. S., Enoch, T., & Leder, P. (2000) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.14.15.1886 · Cited by 130
Regulation and Role of Arabidopsis CUL4-DDB1A-DDB2 in Maintaining Genome Integrity upon UV Stress
Molinier, J., Lechner, E., Dumbliauskas, E., & Genschik, P. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000093 · Cited by 135
DNA replication as a target of the DNA damage checkpoint
Zegerman, P., & Diffley, J. F. X. (2009) · DNA Repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.04.023 · Cited by 128
Genome instability, cancer and aging
Maslov, A. Y., & Vijg, J. (2009) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects · doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2009.03.020 · Cited by 134
ATM and ATR: Sensing DNA damage
Yang, J. J., Xu, Z., Huang, Y., Hamrick, H. E., Duerksen-Hughes, P. J., & Yu, Y. (2004) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v10.i2.155 · Cited by 129
Nam, E. A., Zhao, R., Glick, G. G., Bansbach, C. E., Friedman, D. B., & Cortez, D. (2011) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m111.248914 · Cited by 129
Shimuta, K., Nakajo, N., Uto, K., Hayano, Y., Okazaki, K., & Sagata, N. (2002) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/cdf357 · Cited by 126
Recruitment of the Cell Cycle Checkpoint Kinase ATR to Chromatin during S-phase
Dart, D. A., Adams, K. E., Akerman, I., & Lakin, N. D. (2004) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m314212200 · Cited by 124
Hein, J., Boichuk, S., Wu, J., Cheng, Y., Freire, R., Jat, P., Roberts, T. M., & Gjoerup, O. V. (2008) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.01515-08 · Cited by 125
Apoptosis Associated with Deregulated E2F Activity Is Dependent on E2F1 and Atm/Nbs1/Chk2
Rogoff, H. A., Pickering, M., Frame, F. M., Debatis, M. E., Sánchez, Y., Jones, S. N., & Kowalik, T. F. (2004) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.24.7.2968-2977.2004 · Cited by 123
ATM, ATR, CHK1, CHK2 and WEE1 inhibitors in cancer and cancer stem cells
Ronco, C., Martin, A. R., Demange, L., & Benhida, R. (2016) · MedChemComm · doi:10.1039/c6md00439c · Cited by 131
Cyclin K goes with Cdk12 and Cdk13
Kohoutek, J., & Blažek, D. (2012) · Cell Division · doi:10.1186/1747-1028-7-12 · Cited by 129
Min, W., Bruhn, C., Grigaravičius, P., Zhou, Z., Li, F., Krüger, A., Siddeek, B., Greulich, K., Popp, O., Meisezahl, C., et al. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms3993 · Cited by 129
Mutations in DONSON disrupt replication fork stability and cause microcephalic dwarfism
Reynolds, J. J., Bicknell, L. S., Carroll, P., Higgs, M. R., Shaheen, R., Murray, J., Papadopoulos, D. K., Leitch, A., Murina, O., Tarnauskaitė, Ž., et al. (2017) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3790 · Cited by 123
Spontaneous DNA Damage, Genome Instability, and Cancer—When DNA Replication Escapes Control
Schär, P. (2001) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00220-3 · Cited by 122
Phosphoproteomics Reveals Distinct Modes of Mec1/ATR Signaling during DNA Replication
de Oliveira, F. M. B., Kim, D.-S., Cussiol, J. R. R., Das, J., Jeong, M. C., Doerfler, L., Schmidt, K. H., Yu, H., & Smolka, M. B. (2015) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2015.01.043 · Cited by 121
Mechanisms of Dealing with DNA Damage-Induced Replication Problems
Budzowska, M., & Kanaar, R. (2008) · Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics · doi:10.1007/s12013-008-9039-y · Cited by 122
Proximal tubule ATR regulates DNA repair to prevent maladaptive renal injury responses
Kishi, S., Brooks, C. R., Taguchi, K., Ichimura, T., Mori, Y., Akinfolarin, A., Gupta, N., Galichon, P., Elias, B. C., Suzuki, T., et al. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci122313 · Cited by 117
BCR/ABL translocates to the nucleus and disrupts an ATR-dependent intra-S phase checkpoint
Dierov, J., Dierova, R., & Carroll, M. (2004) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/s1535-6108(04)00056-x · Cited by 117
p53 and p21 Form an Inducible Barrier that Protects Cells against Cyclin E-cdk2 Deregulation
Minella, A. C., Swanger, J., Bryant, E. M., Welcker, M., Hwang, H. C., & Clurman, B. E. (2002) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(02)01225-3 · Cited by 119
Genes encoding longevity: from model organisms to humans
Kuningas, M., Mooijaart, S. P., van Heemst, D., Zwaan, B. J., Slagboom, P. E., & Westendorp, R. G. J. (2008) · Aging Cell · doi:10.1111/j.1474-9726.2008.00366.x · Cited by 115
An extra allele of Chk1 limits oncogene-induced replicative stress and promotes transformation
Lopez-Contreras, A. J., Gutierrez‐Martinez, P., Specks, J., Rodrigo-Perez, S., & Fernández-Capetillo, Ó. (2012) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20112147 · Cited by 121
Telomere Replication Stress Induced by POT1 Inactivation Accelerates Tumorigenesis
Pinzaru, A. M., Hom, R. A., Beal, A., Phillips, A. F., Ni, E., Cardozo, T. J., Nair, N., Choi, J., Wuttke, D. S., Sfeir, A. J., et al. (2016) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.05.008 · Cited by 114
Targeting ATR in patients with cancer
Ngoi, N. Y. L., Pilie, P. G., McGrail, D. J., Zimmermann, M., Schlacher, K., & Yap, T. A. (2024) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-024-00863-5 · Cited by 119
Li, L., & Zou, L. (2004) · Journal of Cellular Biochemistry · doi:10.1002/jcb.20355 · Cited by 117
Regulation of Genome Stability by TEL1 and MEC1, Yeast Homologs of the Mammalian ATM and ATR Genes
Craven, R. J., Greenwell, P. W., Dominska, M., & Petes, T. D. (2002) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/161.2.493 · Cited by 115
You, Z., Kong, L., & Newport, J. W. (2002) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m204120200 · Cited by 114
ATR functions as a gene dosage‐dependent tumor suppressor on a mismatch repair‐deficient background
Fang, Y., Tsao, C., Goodman, B. K., Furumai, R., Tirado, C. A., Abraham, R. T., & Wang, X.-F. (2004) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600315 · Cited by 115
Hopkins, K. M., Auerbach, W., Wang, X. Y., Hande, M. P., Hang, H., Wolgemuth, D. J., Joyner, A. L., & Lieberman, H. B. (2004) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.24.16.7235-7248.2004 · Cited by 114
RNF4 and PLK1 are required for replication fork collapse in ATR-deficient cellsPreprint
Ragland, R. L., Patel, S., Rivard, R. S., Smith, K. D., Peters, A. A., Bielinsky, A., & Brown, E. J. (2013) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.223180.113 · Cited by 120
Self-citationEykelenboom, J. K., Harte, E. C., Canavan, L. E., Pastor-Peidro, A., Calvo‐Asensio, I., Llorens-Agost, M., & Lowndes, N. F. (2013) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2013.10.027 · Cited by 118
The Intra-S Checkpoint Responses to DNA Damage
Iyer, D., & Rhind, N. (2017) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes8020074 · Cited by 131
DNA stress checkpoint control and plant development
Cools, T., & Veylder, L. D. (2008) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2008.09.012 · Cited by 112
HCLK2 is essential for the mammalian S-phase checkpoint and impacts on Chk1 stability
Collis, S. J., Barber, L. J., Clark, A. J., Martin, J. S., Ward, J. D., & Boulton, S. J. (2007) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1555 · Cited by 112
Centrosomal localization of DNA damage checkpoint proteins
Zhang, S., Hemmerich, P. H., & Große, F. (2006) · Journal of Cellular Biochemistry · doi:10.1002/jcb.21195 · Cited by 112
MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 Complex Dictates DNA Repair Independent of H2AX
Yuan, J., & Chen, J. (2009) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m109.078436 · Cited by 117
Reverse genetic studies of the DNA damage response in the chicken B lymphocyte line DT40.
Yamazoe, M., Sonoda, E., Hochegger, H., & Takeda, S. (2004) · DNA Repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.03.039 · Cited by 116
Exploiting synthetic lethal interactions for targeted cancer therapy
Reinhardt, H. C., Jiang, H., Hemann, M. T., & Yaffe, M. B. (2009) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.4161/cc.8.19.9626 · Cited by 110
Targeting the Checkpoint to Kill Cancer Cells
Benada, J., & Macůrek, L. (2015) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom5031912 · Cited by 115
Amiard, S., Charbonnel, C., Allain, E., Depeiges, A., White, C. I., & Gallego, M. E. (2010) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.110.078527 · Cited by 115
MCPH1 Functions in an H2AX-dependent but MDC1-independent Pathway in Response to DNA Damage
Wood, J. L., Singh, N., Mer, G., & Chen, J. (2007) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m705245200 · Cited by 110
Cell-cycle responses to DNA damage in G2
Cuddihy, A. R., & O'Connell, M. J. (2003) · International Review of Cytology · doi:10.1016/s0074-7696(02)22013-6 · Cited by 89
Following the Path of the Virus: The Exploitation of Host DNA Repair Mechanisms by Retroviruses
Smith, J. A., & Daniel, R. (2006) · ACS Chemical Biology · doi:10.1021/cb600131q · Cited by 113
Cryo-EM structure of human ATR-ATRIP complex
Rao, Q., Liu, M., Tian, Y., Wu, Z., Hao, Y., Song, L., Qin, Z., Ding, C., Wang, H., Wang, J., et al. (2017) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/cr.2017.158 · Cited by 106
Ruzankina, Y., Schoppy, D. W., Asare, A., Clark, C. E., Vonderheide, R. H., & Brown, E. J. (2009) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.441 · Cited by 97
Self-citationSIRT2 directs the replication stress response through CDK9 deacetylation
Zhang, H., Park, S., Pantazides, B. G., Karpiuk, O., Warren, M. D., Hardy, C. W., Duong, D. M., Park, S., Kim, H. S., Vassilopoulos, A., et al. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1301463110 · Cited by 105
Dillon, M. T., Good, J., & Harrington, K. J. (2014) · Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.clon.2014.01.009 · Cited by 104
Cdk12 is essential for embryonic development and the maintenance of genomic stability
Juan, H. U., Lin, Y.-J., Chen, H.-R., & Fann, M.-J. (2015) · Cell Death and Differentiation · doi:10.1038/cdd.2015.157 · Cited by 102
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Vpr Induces DNA Replication Stress InVitro and In Vivo
Zimmerman, E. S., Sherman, M. P., Blackett, J. L., Neidleman, J. A., Kreis, C., Mundt, P., Williams, S. A., Warmerdam, M. T., Kahn, J. O., Hecht, F. M., et al. (2006) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.01212-06 · Cited by 105
ATM-Mediated Transcriptional and Developmental Responses to γ-rays in Arabidopsis
Ricaud, L., Proux, C., Renou, J., Pichon, O., Fochesato, S., Ortet, P., & Montané, M. (2007) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000430 · Cited by 107
Leman, A. R., & Noguchi, E. (2013) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes4010001 · Cited by 102
Chang, D. J., Lupardus, P. J., & Cimprich, K. A. (2006) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m606799200 · Cited by 101
The S‐phase checkpoint: targeting the replication fork
Segurado, M., & Tercero, J. A. (2009) · Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1042/bc20090053 · Cited by 115
Interaction between human MCM7 and Rad17 proteins is required for replication checkpoint signaling
Tsao, C., Geisen, C., & Abraham, R. T. (2004) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600463 · Cited by 103
Inhibition of ATR Leads to Increased Sensitivity to Hypoxia/Reoxygenation
Hammond, E. M., Dorie, M. J., & Giaccia, A. J. (2004) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-1520 · Cited by 104
Elledge, S. J., & Amon, A. (2002) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/s1535-6108(02)00041-7 · Cited by 100
Evidence that the retroviral DNA integration process triggers an ATR-dependent DNA damage response
Daniel, R., Kao, G. D., Taganov, K. D., Greger, J., Favorova, O. O., Merkel, G. W., Yen, T. J., Katz, R. A., & Skalka, A. M. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0730887100 · Cited by 104
Questioning the Role of Checkpoint Kinase 2 in the p53 DNA Damage Response
Ahn, J., Urist, M., & Prives, C. (2003) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m213185200 · Cited by 99
A germline chromothripsis event stably segregating in 11 individuals through three generations
Bertelsen, B., Nazaryan‐Petersen, L., Sun, W., Mehrjouy, M. M., Xie, G., Chen, W., Hjermind, L. E., Taschner, P. E. M., & Tümer, Z. (2015) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1038/gim.2015.112 · Cited by 102
Moiseeva, T. N., Hood, B. L., Schamus, S., O’Connor, M. J., Conrads, T. P., & Bakkenist, C. J. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01401-x · Cited by 107
Clinical Candidates Targeting the ATR–CHK1–WEE1 Axis in Cancer
Górecki, L., Andrš, M., & Korábečný, J. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers13040795 · Cited by 107
Shi, Y., Dodson, G. E., Shaikh, S., Rundell, K., & Tibbetts, R. S. (2005) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.c500400200 · Cited by 100
Mitotic Cell Death by Chromosome Fragmentation
Stevens, J. B., Liu, G., Bremer, S. W., Ye, K. J., Xu, W. V., Xu, J., Sun, Y., Wu, G. S., Savaşan, S., Krawetz, S. A., et al. (2007) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-0472 · Cited by 99
Colnaghi, R., Carpenter, G., Volker, M., & O’Driscoll, M. (2011) · Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2011.07.010 · Cited by 101
A potent Chk1 inhibitor is selectively cytotoxic in melanomas with high levels of replicative stress
Brooks, K. M., Oakes, V., Edwards, B., Ranall, M. V., Leo, P., Pavey, S. J., Pinder, A., Beamish, H., Mukhopadhyay, P., Lambie, D., et al. (2012) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2012.72 · Cited by 100
ATR Is Not Required for p53 Activation but Synergizes with p53 in the Replication Checkpoint
Nghiem, P., Park, P. K., Kim, Y.-S., Desai, B. N., & Schreiber, S. L. (2002) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m106113200 · Cited by 99
Kerzendorfer, C., & O’Driscoll, M. (2009) · DNA Repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.04.018 · Cited by 97
DNA Damage Signalling and Repair Inhibitors: The Long-Sought-After Achilles’ Heel of Cancer
Velic, D., Couturier, A. M., Ferreira, M., Rodrigue, A., Poirier, G. G., Fleury, F., & Masson, J. (2015) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom5043204 · Cited by 106
Song, Y., Mirey, G., Betson, M., Haber, D. A., & Settleman, J. E. (2004) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.06.064 · Cited by 98
Self-inflicted DNA double-strand breaks sustain tumorigenicity and stemness of cancer cells
Liu, X., Li, F., Huang, Q., Zhang, Z., Zhou, L., Deng, Y., Zhou, M., Fleenor, D. E., He, W., Kastan, M. B., et al. (2017) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/cr.2017.41 · Cited by 99
ATR Plays a Direct Antiapoptotic Role at Mitochondria, which Is Regulated by Prolyl Isomerase Pin1
Hilton, B. A., Li, Z., Musich, P. R., Wang, H., Cartwright, B. M., Serrano, M., Zhou, X. Z., Lu, K. P., & Zou, Y. (2015) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2015.08.008 · Cited by 95
Hitting cancers’ weak spots: vulnerabilities imposed by p53 mutation
Gurpinar, E., & Vousden, K. H. (2015) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2015.04.001 · Cited by 98
Functional role of Mdm2 phosphorylation by ATR in attenuation of p53 nuclear export
Shinozaki, T., Nota, A., Taya, Y., & Okamoto, K. (2003) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1207176 · Cited by 93
SOG1: a master regulator of the DNA damage response in plants
Yoshiyama, K. (2015) · Genes & Genetic Systems · doi:10.1266/ggs.15-00011 · Cited by 96
Mdm2 in the Response to Radiation
Perry, M. E. (2004) · Molecular Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1541-7786.9.2.1 · Cited by 96
Wang, J., He, J., Su, F., Ding, N., Hu, W., Yao, B. W., Wang, W., & Zhou, G. (2013) · Cell Death and Disease · doi:10.1038/cddis.2013.227 · Cited by 93
Zheng, P., Schramm, R. D., & Latham, K. E. (2005) · Biology of Reproduction · doi:10.1095/biolreprod.104.039073 · Cited by 92
Smith, K. D., Fu, M. A., & Brown, E. J. (2009) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200905006 · Cited by 94
Self-citationCK2 Inhibits Apoptosis and Changes Its Cellular Localization Following Ionizing Radiation
Yamane, K., & Kinsella, T. J. (2005) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-3941 · Cited by 92
Hus1 Acts Upstream of Chk1 in a Mammalian DNA Damage Response Pathway
Weiss, R. S., Matsuoka, S., Elledge, S. J., & Leder, P. (2002) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00626-1 · Cited by 93
Sivasubramaniam, S., Sun, X., Pan, Y.-R., Wang, S., & Lee, E. Y.-H. P. (2008) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1627708 · Cited by 97
Comparison of hypoxia-induced replication arrest with hydroxyurea and aphidicolin-induced arrest
Hammond, E. M., Green, S., & Giaccia, A. J. (2003) · Mutation research. Fundamental and molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2003.08.017 · Cited by 90
Genetic instability in cancer cells by impaired cell cycle checkpoints
Nakanishi, M., Shimada, M., & Niida, H. (2006) · Cancer Science · doi:10.1111/j.1349-7006.2006.00289.x · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, E. J., & Baltimore, D.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- Genes & Development
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2000-02-15
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 397-402
- ISSN
- 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5477
- PMC
- PMC316378
- OpenAlex
- W2167196101
- Cited by
- 951
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 34
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Genes & Development (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Cancer Research Institute
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
- Keywords
- ATR kinase, early embryonic lethality, chromosomal fragmentation, caspase-dependent apoptosis, blastocyst, genome stability, p53-independent function, mitotic cycle
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Blastocyst, Cell Transformation, Neoplastic, Chromosome Aberrations, DNA Repair, Fetal Death, Genotype, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mitosis, Neoplasm Proteins, Neoplasms, Experimental, Transcription Factors, Apoptosis, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Mice, Knockout, Gene Targeting, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Cell Cycle Proteins, BRCA1 Protein, Caspases, BRCA2 Protein, Mice, Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review