Cited by 142Service and Product InnovationHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilityDigital Marketing and Social Media

Patient value co-creation in online health communities: Social identity effects on customer knowledge contributions and membership continuance intentions in online health communities

Zhao, Jing, Wang, Tao, Fan, Xiucheng·2015·Journal of Service Management

Abstract

Purpose: – Patient value co-creation represents a key research priority and an essential determinant of health care service outcomes. Yet few studies empirically examine the factors that motivate patients to participate actively in value co-creation. The purpose of this paper is to seek to identify the motivators of such activities in online health communities (OHC) and examine their specific and unique effects. Design/methodology/approach: – A netnographic study helps identify the motivators that drive patients’ value co-creation activities in OHCs. The combination of these results with social identity theories suggest the hypotheses; mediation analyses test the hypothesized model with data collected from eight OHCs that address both life-threatening and non-life-threatening illnesses. Findings: – The netnographic results show that social identity drives patients’ value co-creation activities. Interactions among OHC members and the cognitive resources of the OHC both contribute to the development of its social identity. Furthermore, benevolence trust, shared vision, and shared language determine how likely an OHC member is to identify with a particular OHC, which further influences his or her value co-creation activities in that OHC. Originality/value: – Although value co-creation is critical to the health care sector, few studies examine antecedents of patient value co-creation empirically. This study represents an initial attempt to do so by combining innovative netnographic analyses with mediation analyses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/josm-12-2013-0344

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, J., Wang, T., & Fan, X.
Affiliations
  • Wuhan University (CN)
  • Fudan University (CN)
Venue
Journal of Service Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2015-03-16
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
72-96
ISSN
1757-5818 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1921824671
Cited by
142
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5
FWCI
24.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of service management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
Keywords
online health communities, social identity, patient participation, shared vision, shared language, cognitive resources, online community interaction, life-threatening illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review