Cited by 138Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringConducting polymers and applicationsElectrochemical Analysis and Applications

Sputtered iridium oxide films (SIROFs) for low-impedance neural stimulation and recording electrodes

Open access
Cogan, S.F., Plante, T.D., Ehrlich, J.·2005·The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society

Abstract

Iridium oxide films formed by electrochemical activation of iridium metal (AIROF) or by electrochemical deposition (EIROF) are being evaluated as low-impedance charge-injection coatings for neural stimulation and recording. Iridium oxide may also be deposited by reactive sputtering from iridium metal in an oxidizing plasma. The characterization of sputtered iridium oxide films (SIROFs) as coatings for nerve electrodes is reported. SIROFs were characterized by cyclic voltammetry, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, and potential transient measurements during charge-injection. The surface morphology of the SIROF transitions from smooth to highly nodular with increasing film thickness from 80 nm to 4600 nm. Charge-injection capacities exceed 0.75 mC/cm(2) with 0.75 ms current pulses in thicker films. The SIROF was deposited on both planar and non-planar substrates and photolithographically patterned by lift-off.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iembs.2004.1404158

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cogan, S. F., Plante, T. D., & Ehrlich, J.
Affiliations
EIC Laboratories (US)
Venue
The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2005-04-06
Volume
4
Pages
4153-4156
ISSN
2375-7477 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W111354489
Cited by
138
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
17.43
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R44HL071395)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Conducting polymers and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Electrochemistry › Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
Keywords
iridium oxide films, reactive sputtering, neural stimulation electrodes, neural recording electrodes, electrode impedance, electrochemical activation, electrodeposition, film thickness effects, surface morphology, lift-off patterning, photolithography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review