Cited by 398Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory Processes and Influences

Elements of a neurobiological theory of hippocampal function: the role of synaptic plasticity, synaptic tagging and schemas

Morris, R. G. M.·2006·European Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The 2004 EJN Lecture was an attempt to lay out further aspects of a developing neurobiological theory of hippocampal function [Morris, R.G.M., Moser, E.I., Riedel, G., Martin, S.J., Sandin, J., Day, M. & O'Carroll, C. (2003) Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. , 358 , 773–786.] These are that (i) activity‐dependent synaptic plasticity plays a key role in the automatic encoding and initial storage of attended experience; (ii) the persistence of hippocampal synaptic potentiation over time can be influenced by other independent neural events happening closely in time, an idea with behavioural implications for memory; and (iii) that systems‐level consolidation of memory traces within neocortex is guided both by hippocampal traces that have been subject to cellular consolidation and by the presence of organized schema in neocortex into which relevant newly encoded information might be stored. Hippocampal memory is associative and, to study it more effectively than with previous paradigms, a new learning task is described which is unusual in requiring the incidental encoding of flavour–place paired associates, with the readout of successful storage being successful recall of a place given the flavour with which it was paired. NMDA receptor‐dependent synaptic plasticity is shown to be critical for the encoding and intermediate storage of memory traces in this task, while AMPA receptor‐mediated fast synaptic transmission is necessary for memory retrieval. Typically, these rapidly encoded traces decay quite rapidly over time. Synaptic potentiation also decays rapidly, but can be rendered more persistent by a process of cellular consolidation in which synaptic tagging and capture play a key part in determining whether or not it will be persistent. Synaptic tags set at the time of an event, even many trivial events, can capture the products of the synthesis of plasticity proteins set in train by events before, during or even after an event to be remembered. Tag–protein interactions stabilize synaptic potentiation and, by implication, memory. The behavioural implications of tagging are explored. Finally, using a different protocol for flavour–place paired associate learning, it is shown that rats can develop a spatial schema which represents the relative locations of several different flavours of food hidden at places within a familiar space. This schema is learned gradually but, once acquired, enables new paired associates to be encoded and stored in one trial. Their incorporation into the schema prevents rapid forgetting and suggests that schema play a key and hitherto unappreciated role in systems‐level memory consolidation. The elements of what may eventually mature into a more formal neurobiological theory of hippocampal memory are laid out as specific propositions with detailed conceptual discussion and reference to recent data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04888.x

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The medial pallium or hippocampus of land vertebrates plays a central role in allocentric spatial navigation.

    “A considerable amount of evidence shows that the medial pallium or hippocampus of land vertebrates plays a central role in allocentric spatial navigation.”

    From Spatial Cognition in Teleost Fish: Strategies and Mechanisms (2021) · cites this paper as [149]

  • Hippocampal lesions in mammals, birds, and reptiles produce impairments on spatial tasks that require the use of map-like or relational spatial memory.

    “For example, in mammals [39,57,72,149], birds [97,98,99,150,151,152,153], and reptiles [112,154,155,156,157], the hippocampal lesions produce impairments on spatial tasks that require the use of map-like or relational spatial memory.”

    From Spatial Cognition in Teleost Fish: Strategies and Mechanisms (2021) · cites this paper as [149]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morris, R. G. M.
Affiliations
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Morris, R. G. M.
Venue
European Journal of Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-06
Volume
23
Issue
11
Pages
2829-2846
ISSN
  • 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-9568
OpenAlex
W2049038171
Cited by
398
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 27
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
hippocampal function, synaptic plasticity, synaptic tagging, memory consolidation, NMDA receptor, AMPA receptors, spatial schema, memory retrieval, forgetting, hippocampal-dependent memory, associative memory, neocortex, memory encoding, rats, mice
MeSH terms
Animals, Hippocampus, Humans, Memory, Models, Biological, Neurobiology, Neuronal Plasticity, Synapses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review