The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Power and Perspectives Not Taken
Abstract
Four experiments and a correlational study explored the relationship between power and perspective taking. In Experiment 1, participants primed with high power were more likely than those primed with low power to draw an E on their forehead in a self-oriented direction, demonstrating less of an inclination to spontaneously adopt another person's visual perspective. In Experiments 2a and 2b, high-power participants were less likely than low-power participants to take into account that other people did not possess their privileged knowledge, a result suggesting that power leads individuals to anchor too heavily on their own vantage point, insufficiently adjusting to others' perspectives. In Experiment 3, high-power participants were less accurate than control participants in determining other people's emotion expressions; these results suggest a power-induced impediment to experiencing empathy. An additional study found a negative relationship between individual difference measures of power and perspective taking. Across these studies, power was associated with a reduced tendency to comprehend how other people see, think, and feel.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach.
Davis, M. H. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113 · Cited by 10,272
Power, approach, and inhibition.
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.110.2.265 · Cited by 3,427
Self-citationGalinsky, A. D., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.708 · Cited by 1,725
Self-citation2. Is it lonely at the top?: The independence and interdependence of power holders
Lee, F., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2001) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0191-3085(01)23003-2 · Cited by 174
Cited by
Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2015) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2247 · Cited by 2,056
8 Social Hierarchy: The Self‐Reinforcing Nature of Power and Status
Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520802211628 · Cited by 2,385
Self-citationMulticultural experience enhances creativity: The when and how.
Leung, A. K.-Y., Maddux, W. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Chiu, C.-Y. (2008) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.63.3.169 · Cited by 975
Self-citationThe Neurodiversity Approach(es): What Are They and What Do They Mean for Researchers?
Dwyer, P. (2022) · Human Development · doi:10.1159/000523723 · Cited by 672
The social distance theory of power
Magee, J. C., & Smith, P. K. (2013) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868312472732 · Cited by 620
Self-citationReversing the extraverted leadership advantage: The role of employee proactivity
Grant, A. M., Gino, F., & Hofmann, D. A. (2011) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.61968043 · Cited by 530
Misplaced Confidences: Privacy and the Control Paradox
Brandimarte, L., Acquisti, A., & Loewenstein, G. (2013) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550612455931 · Cited by 522
Dutton, J. E., Workman, K. M., & Hardin, A. E. (2014) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091221 · Cited by 513
Power, Distress, and Compassion: Turning a Blind Eye to the Suffering of Others
van Kleef, G. A., Oveis, C., van der Löwe, I., LuoKogan, A., Goetz, J., & Keltner, D. (2008) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02241.x · Cited by 482
Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication
Ebersole, C. R., Atherton, O. E., Belanger, A. L., Skulborstad, H. M., Allen, J. M., Banks, J. B., Baranski, E., Bernstein, M. J., Bonfiglio, D. B. V., Boucher, L., et al. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.012 · Cited by 468
Power and consumer behavior: How power shapes who and what consumers value
Rucker, D. D., Galinsky, A. D., & Dubois, D. (2012) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2011.06.001 · Cited by 452
Self-citationThe functions and dysfunctions of hierarchy
Anderson, C., & Brown, C. E. (2010) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2010.08.002 · Cited by 395
Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.01.005 · Cited by 389
Self-citationMeta-Analysis of Theory of Mind and Peer Popularity in the Preschool and Early School Years
Slaughter, V., Imuta, K., Peterson, C. C., & Henry, J. D. (2015) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12372 · Cited by 324
Illusory Control: A Generative Force Behind Power's Far-Reaching Effects
Fast, N. J., Gruenfeld, D. H., Sivanathan, N., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02311.x · Cited by 321
Self-citationComparing meta-analyses and preregistered multiple-laboratory replication projects
Kvarven, A., Strømland, E., & Johannesson, M. (2019) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0787-z · Cited by 271
Social status modulates neural activity in the mentalizing network
Muscatell, K. A., Morelli, S. A., Falk, E. B., Way, B. M., Pfeifer, J. H., Galinsky, A. D., Lieberman, M. D., Dapretto, M., & Eisenberger, N. I. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.080 · Cited by 213
Power changes how the brain responds to others.
Hogeveen, J., Inzlicht, M., & Obhi, S. S. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0033477 · Cited by 135
Culture and the Home-Field Disadvantage
Medin, D., Bennis, W., & Chandler, M. (2010) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610388772 · Cited by 122
Social status as a cue for tacit coordination
Kwaadsteniet, E. W. D., & Dijk, E. V. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.01.005 · Cited by 113
The influence of sex and empathy on putting oneself in the shoes of others
Mohr, C., Rowe, A. C., & Blanke, O. (2010) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1348/000712609x457450 · Cited by 97
The Uncertainty Paradox: Perceived Threat Moderates the Effect of Uncertainty on Political Tolerance
Haas, I. J., & Cunningham, W. A. (2014) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12035 · Cited by 96
Savani, K., Stephens, N. M., & Markus, H. R. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611407928 · Cited by 89
Beyond perspective-taking: Mind-reading motivation
Carpenter, J. M., Green, M. C., & Vacharkulksemsuk, T. (2016) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-016-9544-z · Cited by 45
Improving interoceptive ability through the practice of power posing: A pilot study
Weineck, F., Messner, M., Hauke, G., & Pollatos, O. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0211453 · Cited by 36
Hoogervorst, N., De Cremer, D., & van Dijke, M. (2013) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726713482150 · Cited by 33
Welsh, D. T., Mai, K. M., Ellis, A. P. J., & Christian, M. S. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.01.007 · Cited by 26
Xie, G.-X., Chang, H., & Rank-Christman, T. (2022) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-020-04582-6 · Cited by 21
Experiencing Physical Pain Leads to More Sympathetic Moral Judgments
Xiao, Q., Zhu, Y., & Luo, W.-B. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0140580 · Cited by 13
Powerlessness Also Corrupts: Lower Power Increases Self-Promotional Lying
Li, H. (., Chen, Y.-R., & Hildreth, J. A. D. (2023) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2022.1630 · Cited by 12
Körner, R., Schütz, A., & Petersen, L.-E. (2024) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0297850
Metadata
- Authors
- Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Inesi, M. E., & Gruenfeld, D. H.
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1068-1074
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2153322464
- Cited by
- 1,278
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 66.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
