The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 14 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms
Open accessAbstract
Despite a long tradition of effectiveness in laboratory tests, normative messages have had mixed success in changing behavior in field contexts, with some studies showing boomerang effects. To test a theoretical account of this inconsistency, we conducted a field experiment in which normative messages were used to promote household energy conservation. As predicted, a descriptive normative message detailing average neighborhood usage produced either desirable energy savings or the undesirable boomerang effect, depending on whether households were already consuming at a low or high rate. Also as predicted, adding an injunctive message (conveying social approval or disapproval) eliminated the boomerang effect. The results offer an explanation for the mixed success of persuasive appeals based on social norms and suggest how such appeals should be properly crafted.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
14 Own interpretation · 10 Own result · 6 No full text of the sources · 4 Own method · 2 Not checked yet · 1 No basis given
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, for households consuming above the average, the combined descriptive-plusinjunctive message served to decrease energy consumption (M = 18.91,SE = 0.73 vs. baseline M = 20.63,SE = 0.64; n = 63), t(62) = 2.49, p rep = .96,d = 0.63.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > Short-Term Change in Electricity Usage
plaindirectn = 63 ·- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The valence of the emoticon (happy face or sad face) communicates an injunctive message of approval or disapproval for the amount of energy being consumed.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, for households that were below the mean on baseline energy consumption, the descriptivenorm-only message produced an increase in energy consumption from baseline (M = 11.27,SE = 0.46 vs. baseline M = 10.38,SE = 0.33; n = 79), t(78) = 2.28, p rep = .94,d = 5 0.52.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > Short-Term Change in Electricity Usage
plaindirectn = 79 ·- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Residents perceive descriptive normative information about the average household's energy consumption as a descriptive norm.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, in the short term, the reduction in energy usage for high-consuming households was 1.72 kWh/day in the descriptive-plus-injunctive condition, compared with 1.22 kWh/day in the descriptive-only condition.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > DISCUSSION
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the combined injunctive-plus-descriptive message produced no change from baseline for low-consuming households (longer-term M = 10.14, SE = 0.37 vs. baseline M = 10.04,SE = 0.35; n = 70), t(69) = 0.64, n.s.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > Longer-Term Changes in Energy Consumption
plainn = 70- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The valence of the emoticon (happy face or sad face) communicates an injunctive message of approval or disapproval for the amount of energy being consumed.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For those households initially low in energy consumption, the descriptive-norm-only condition produced a significant increase in electricity usage (longer-term M = 11.13,SE =0.44 vs. baseline M = 10.15,SE = 0.34; n = 68), t(67) = 2.42, p rep = .95,d = 0.59.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > Longer-Term Changes in Energy Consumption
plaindirectn = 68 ·- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Residents perceive descriptive normative information about the average household's energy consumption as a descriptive norm.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For households that consumed more than the average during the baseline period, the descriptivenorm-only feedback produced a significant decrease in energy consumption relative to the baseline (M = 20.25,SE = 1.03 vs. baseline M = 21.47,SE = 0.89; n =64), t(63) = 2.17, p rep = .93,d = 0.55.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > Short-Term Change in Electricity Usage
plaindirectn = 64 ·- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Residents perceive descriptive normative information about the average household's energy consumption as a descriptive norm.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When the injunctive message was added to the descriptive normative feedback, households that were consuming less energy than average continued to consume at the desirable low rate (M = 10.58,SE = 0.38 vs. baseline M = 10.34,SE = 0.33; n =81), t(80) = 1.04, n.s.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > Short-Term Change in Electricity Usage
plainn = 81- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The valence of the emoticon (happy face or sad face) communicates an injunctive message of approval or disapproval for the amount of energy being consumed.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“The majority of individuals overestimate the prevalence of many undesirable behaviors, such as alcohol use among peers (e.g., Borsari & Carey, 2003;Prentice & Miller, 1993)”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > Abstract
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, despite concerns that normative interventions have an effect for only a short time, the longer-term results indicate that the effects of the normative messages continued to be strong even 4 weeks after the initial intervention.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > DISCUSSION
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, the results for both the short-term measure and the longer-term measure were consistent with predictions.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > Longer-Term Changes in Energy Consumption
plainn = 56 ·- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 11
- Probably not a substantial claim. 4
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For those households that were high in energy consumption at baseline, the descriptive-norm-only message continued to produce the (constructive) decrease in energy consumption, although the difference was not conventionally significant (baseline M = 22.32, SE = 1.05 vs. longer-term M = 21.29,SE = 0.92; n = 52), t(51) = 1.45, n.s.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > Longer-Term Changes in Energy Consumption
plaindirectn = 52- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Residents perceive descriptive normative information about the average household's energy consumption as a descriptive norm.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our results show this overall pattern, although the differences were not statistically significant.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > DISCUSSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At each measurement period, daily household energy consumption was positively skewed (M = 15.03,SD 5 7.10, skew = 1.39, range = 1.63-35.88),resulting in more households below the mean than above.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The mean is a more meaningful number than other measures of central tendency when reported to residents.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of the 287 households in the study, 41 were inconsistently above or below the average across the 2 weeks of normative feedback and were therefore excluded from the analyses of longer-term change.There were no significant differences in inconsistency rate across the four experimental conditions.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > Longer-Term Changes in Energy Consumption
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our results demonstrate the potential for such messages to boomerang, but the results also show that an injunctive element of approval is reconstructive in its ability to ameliorate these unwanted effects.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > DISCUSSION
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The valence of the emoticon (happy face or sad face) communicates an injunctive message of approval or disapproval for the amount of energy being consumed.
In the paper
“Second, prior research has suggested that presenting aligned descriptive and injunctive norms can result in larger behavioral changes than presenting either type of norm in isolation (Cialdini, 2003).”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Cialdini, 2003 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Households were matched on this baseline measure and randomly assigned to either the descriptive-norm-only condition or the descriptive-plusinjunctive-information condition.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > Participants and Design
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Three households called to withdraw from the study following the initial normative-feedback distribution, resulting in a final sample of 287.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On 157 occasions, two research assistants were assigned to read the same meter.These independent readings correlated at r 5 .999.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“The correlation between this measure and our readings was .96and .99 on 2 separate months.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > Results
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, the overall impact of a normative education campaign will depend on the distribution of the behavior in the population; a campaign could produce an increase, decrease, or no change in the behavior (the latter being most likely).”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > DISCUSSION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our results suggest that for those individuals who tend to engage in destructive behaviors, a descriptive normative message can be a guide to engaging in more constructive behavior; in contrast, for those individuals who already engage in the constructive behavior, a descriptive normative message can be a spur to engaging in more destructive behavior.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > DISCUSSION
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The results offer an explanation for the mixed success of persuasive appeals based on social norms and suggest how such appeals should be properly crafted.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the research has clearly established that social norms not only spur but also guide action in direct and meaningful ways (Aarts & Dijksterhuis, 2003;Cialdini, Kallgren, & Reno, 1991;Darley & Latane´, 1970;Goldstein, Cialdini, & Griskevicius, 2006;Kerr, 1995;Terry & Hogg, 2001).”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > Abstract
What the sources say
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
The valence of the emoticon (happy face or sad face) communicates an injunctive message of approval or disapproval for the amount of energy being consumed.
“The valence of the emoticon was used to communicate an injunctive message of approval or disapproval for the amount of energy being con-sumed.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The mean is a more meaningful number than other measures of central tendency when reported to residents.
“we used the mean as the dividing point for consumption because we believed it would provide a more meaningful number than other measures of central tendency when reported to residents.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Energy conservation has a direct personal benefit (saving money), is private, is recurring rather than a one-time action, and has widespread social approval.
“The target behavior in this study (energy conservation) has a direct personal benefit (saving money), is private, is reoccurring (rather than a onetime action), and has widespread social approval.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Residents perceive descriptive normative information about the average household's energy consumption as a descriptive norm.
“descriptive normative information about the actual energy consumption of the average household in their neighborhood during that same period (in kilowatt-hours per day)”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Research has shown that placing a greater emphasis on the injunctive norm can help to overcome the problem of a negative descriptive norm (Schultz et al., 2007; Smith and Louis, 2008).”
From A Social Identity Analysis of Climate Change and Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors: Insights and Opportunities (2016) · cites this paper as Schultz et al., 2007
In the citing paper
“Notice that many of the experiments just mentioned were field studies, that is, they were conducted in naturalistic contexts ensuring high ecological validity (see Schultz et al. [2007]; Goldstein et al. [2008]; Gerber and Rogers [2009]; Hallsworth et al. [2017]; Sparkman and Walton [2017]).”
From Science Communication and the Problematic Impact of Descriptive Norms (2023) · cites this paper as Schultz et al. [2007]
In the citing paper
“in one study, (Californian) households informed that they used more electricity than all the other households in their neighbourhood subsequently reduced their energy consumption, whereas households informed that they used less than all others increased it (Schultz et al. [2007]).”
From Science Communication and the Problematic Impact of Descriptive Norms (2023) · cites this paper as Schultz et al. [2007]
In the citing paper
“many of the experiments on descriptive norms discussed earlier can in fact be viewed as involving actual instances of PST on their own: they involve public (descriptive-norms conveying) claims by scientific or otherwise authoritative sources about negative features”
From Science Communication and the Problematic Impact of Descriptive Norms (2023) · cites this paper as Schultz et al. [2007]
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- Consistentt(80) = 1.04reported n.s. · recomputed p = .301
“t(80) = 1.04, n.s.”
- Consistentt(51) = 1.45reported n.s. · recomputed p = .153
“t(51) = 1.45, n.s.”
- Consistentt(69) = 0.64reported n.s. · recomputed p = .524
“t(69) = 0.64, n.s.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.
Citations
Cites
Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity
Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015 · Cited by 6,077
Self-citationCialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60330-5 · Cited by 3,143
Self-citationCrafting Normative Messages to Protect the Environment
Cialdini, R. B. (2003) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-8721.01242 · Cited by 1,553
Self-citationDescriptive and injunctive norms in college drinking: a meta-analytic integration.
Borsari, B., & Carey, K. B. (2003) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol · doi:10.15288/jsa.2003.64.331 · Cited by 1,224
Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm.
Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.243 · Cited by 1,075
Perkins, H. W., & Berkowitz, A. D. (1986) · International Journal of the Addictions · doi:10.3109/10826088609077249 · Cited by 1,017
The transsituational influence of social norms.
Reno, R. R., Cialdini, R. B., & Kallgren, C. A. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.1.104 · Cited by 976
Self-citationCrano, W. D., & Prišlin, R. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190034 · Cited by 846
Biases in the perception of drinking norms among college students.
Baer, J. S., Stacy, A., & Larimer, M. (1991) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol · doi:10.15288/jsa.1991.52.580 · Cited by 688
Changing Behavior With Normative Feedback Interventions: A Field Experiment on Curbside Recycling
Schultz, P. W. (1999) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2101_3 · Cited by 684
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- 2004, Changing the culture of college drinking, 193
- 2000, Journal of College Student Development, 41, 19
- 1970, Altruism and helping behavior, 83
- 1995, Social dilemmas: Perspectives on individuals and groups, 31
- 2000, Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 45, 39
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 3,687
Confente, I., & Scarpi, D. (2020) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/0047287520938875 · Cited by 220
Hsueh, M., Yogeeswaran, K., & Malinen, S. K. (2015) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/hcre.12059 · Cited by 228
Ramaswami, A., Weible, C. M., Main, D. S., Heikkila, T., Siddiki, S., Duvall, A., Pattison, A., & Bernard, M. (2012) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00566.x · Cited by 192
Reid, A. E., & Carey, K. B. (2015) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2015.06.006 · Cited by 185
Affect and the adoption of pro-environmental behaviour: A structural model
Coelho, F., Pereira, M. C., Cruz, L., Simões, P., & Barata, E. (2017) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.10.008 · Cited by 214
Reducing student absences at scale by targeting parents’ misbeliefs
Rogers, T., & Feller, A. (2018) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0328-1 · Cited by 210
“Who Doesn’t?”—The Impact of Descriptive Norms on Corruption
Köbis, N., van Prooijen, J., Righetti, F., & Lange, P. A. M. V. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0131830 · Cited by 185
Social Identity and Economic Policy
Shayo, M. (2020) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-082019-110313 · Cited by 180
Ruggeri, K., Tutuska, O. S., Ladini, G. A. R., Al-Zahli, N., Alexander, N., Andersen, M., Bibilouri, K., Chen, J., Doubravová, B., Dugue, T. M., et al. (2022) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4046264 · Cited by 512
A Reduced-Form Approach to Behavioral Public Finance
Mullainathan, S., Schwartzstein, J., & Congdon, W. J. (2012) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-111809-125033 · Cited by 176
Increasing healthy food choices through nudges: A systematic review
Vecchio, R., & Cavallo, C. (2019) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.05.014 · Cited by 186
A systematic review of occupant behavior in building energy policy
Hu, S., Yan, D., Azar, E., & Guo, F. (2020) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106807 · Cited by 184
Promoting cooperation in the field
Kraft-Todd, G., Yoeli, E., Bhanot, S., & Rand, D. (2015) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.02.006 · Cited by 178
Bertoldi, P. (2022) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112075 · Cited by 205
Public Health Messaging during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond: Lessons from Communication Science
Nan, X., Iles, I. A., Yang, B. K., & Ma, Z. (2021) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2021.1994910 · Cited by 201
Direct and mediated impacts of social norms on pro-environmental behavior
Helferich, M., Thøgersen, J., & Bergquist, M. (2023) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102680 · Cited by 191
Behavioral Environmental Economics: Promises and Challenges
Croson, R. T. A., & Treich, N. (2014) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-014-9783-y · Cited by 197
Feedback on household electricity consumption: learning and social influence processes
Grønhøj, A., & Thøgersen, J. B. (2011) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00967.x · Cited by 177
Risk Perception and Protective Behaviors During the Rise of the COVID-19 Outbreak in Italy
Savadori, L., & Lauriola, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.577331 · Cited by 185
The Motivational Roots of Norms for Environmentally Responsible Behavior
Thøgersen, J. B. (2009) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973530903317144 · Cited by 193
Consumer demand for time of use electricity tariffs: A systematized review of the empirical evidence
Nicolson, M., Fell, M. J., & Huebner, G. M. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.08.040 · Cited by 177
Riemer, H., Shavitt, S., Koo, M., & Markus, H. R. (2014) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0037666 · Cited by 174
Diversity Thresholds: How Social Norms, Visibility, and Scrutiny Relate to Group Composition
Chang, E. H., Milkman, K. L., Chugh, D., & Akinola, M. (2018) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2017.0440 · Cited by 169
Five lessons to guide more effective biodiversity conservation message framing
Kusmanoff, A. M., Fidler, F. M., Gordon, A., Garrard, G. E., & Bekessy, S. A. (2020) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.13482 · Cited by 186
Assessing eco-feedback interface usage and design to drive energy efficiency in buildings
Jain, R. K., Taylor, J. E., & Peschiera, G. (2012) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.12.033 · Cited by 172
Understanding and managing compliance in the nature conservation context
Arias, A. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.02.013 · Cited by 186
Ferraro, P. J., & Miranda, J. J. (2013) · Resource and Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2013.04.001 · Cited by 171
Eco-Premium or Eco-Penalty? Eco-Labels and Quality in the Organic Wine Market
Delmas, M. A., & Lessem, N. (2015) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650315576119 · Cited by 172
Perception of pro-environmental behavior
Truelove, H. B., & Gillis, A. J. (2018) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.02.009 · Cited by 185
Schmidt, K. (2016) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.04.006 · Cited by 168
HONESTY ON THE STREETS: A FIELD STUDY ON NEWSPAPER PURCHASING
Pruckner, G. J., & Sausgruber, R. (2013) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1111/jeea.12016 · Cited by 169
The Effectiveness of Energy Feedback for Conservation and Peak Demand: A Literature Review
Vine, D., Buys, L. R., & Morris, P. (2013) · Open Journal of Energy Efficiency · doi:10.4236/ojee.2013.21002 · Cited by 168
Social Influence, Consumer Behavior, and Low-Carbon Energy Transitions
Axsen, J., & Kurani, K. S. (2012) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-062111-145049 · Cited by 170
RETRACTED: Global impacts of pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic: Focus on socio-economic consequences
Mishra, N. T. P., Das, S. S., Yadav, S., Khan, W., Afzal, M. F., AlArifi, A. S., Kenawy, E.-R., Ansari, M. T., Hasnain, M. S., & Nayak, A. K. (2020) · Sensors International · doi:10.1016/j.sintl.2020.100042 · Cited by 191
RetractedBouman, T., Steg, L., & Zawadzki, S. J. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101470 · Cited by 143
Health Insurance Coverage and Take‐Up: Lessons from Behavioral Economics
D, K. B. A., Congdon, W. J., & Mullainathan, S. (2012) · Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00656.x · Cited by 167
Using Behavioral Economics to Design More Effective Food Policies to Address Obesity
Liu, P. J., Wisdom, J., Roberto, C. A., Liu, L. J., & Ubel, P. A. (2013) · Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy · doi:10.1093/aepp/ppt027 · Cited by 161
From mechanism to virtue: Evaluating Nudge theory
Kosters, M., & van der Heijden, J. (2015) · Evaluation · doi:10.1177/1356389015590218 · Cited by 167
Nudges, Social Norms, and Permanence in Agri-environmental Schemes
Kühfuss, L., Préget, R., Thoyer, S., Hanley, N. D., Coënt, P. L., & Désolé, M. (2016) · Land Economics · doi:10.3368/le.92.4.641 · Cited by 188
Soll, J. B., Milkman, K. L., & Payne, J. W. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118468333.ch33 · Cited by 209
Brent, D. A., Cook, J., & Olsen, S. (2015) · Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists · doi:10.1086/683427 · Cited by 162
How Do Values Affect Behavior? Let Me Count the Ways
Sagiv, L., & Roccas, S. (2021) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/10888683211015975 · Cited by 160
How social norms are often a barrier to addressing climate change but can be part of the solution
Sparkman, G., Howe, L. C., & Walton, G. (2020) · Behavioural Public Policy · doi:10.1017/bpp.2020.42 · Cited by 169
The role of a “common is moral” heuristic in the stability and change of moral norms.
Lindström, B., Jangard, S., Selbing, I., & Olsson, A. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000365 · Cited by 162
Yamin, P., Fei, M., Lahlou, S., & Levy, S. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11205847 · Cited by 172
Conditional Cooperation and Climate Change
Tingley, D. H., & Tomz, M. R. (2013) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414013509571 · Cited by 159
Kowalska-Pyzalska, A. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.103 · Cited by 158
Nudging with Care: The Risks and Benefits of Social InformationPreprint
Bicchieri, C., & Dimant, E. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3319088 · Cited by 152
Social influences on eating: implications for nutritional interventions
Robinson, E., Blissett, J. M., & Higgs, S. (2013) · Nutrition Research Reviews · doi:10.1017/s0954422413000127 · Cited by 170
Charitable Intent: A Moral or Social Construct? A Revised Theory of Planned Behavior Model
van der Linden, S. (2011) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-011-9122-1 · Cited by 185
Promoting Pro-Environmental Behavior
Schultz, P. W., & Kaiser, F. G. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199733026.013.0029 · Cited by 182
Self-citationSalonen, A. O., & Haavisto, N. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11030588 · Cited by 156
The Effectiveness of Social Norms in Fighting Fake News on Social Media
Gimpel, H., Heger, S., Olenberger, C., & Utz, L. (2021) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2021.1870389 · Cited by 167
Environmental Attitudes and Environmental Behavior—Which Is the Horse and Which Is the Cart?
Eilam, E., & Trop, T. (2012) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su4092210 · Cited by 173
The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms: Reprise
Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2018) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691617693325 · Cited by 153
Self-citationStallen, M., Dreu, C. K. W. D., Shalvi, S., Smidts, A., & Sanfey, A. G. (2012) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797612446026 · Cited by 160
The role of information for energy efficiency in the residential sector
Ramos, A., Rodríguez, A. G., Labandeira, X., & Linares, P. (2015) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2015.08.022 · Cited by 163
The Dynamics of Behavior Change: Evidence from Energy Conservation
Asensio, O. I., & Delmas, M. A. (2015) · Academy of Management Proceedings · doi:10.5465/ambpp.2015.17915abstract · Cited by 170
Culture and the natural environment
Milfont, T. L., & Schultz, P. W. (2015) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.009 · Cited by 155
Self-citationWhat's in a norm? Sources and processes of norm change.
Paluck, E. L. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0014688 · Cited by 147
Behavior Change Interventions to Reduce Illegal Fishing
Battista, W., Romero‐Canyas, R., Smith, S. L., Fraire-Cervantes, J. A., Effron, M., Larson-Konar, D. M., & Fujita, R. M. (2018) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2018.00403 · Cited by 160
Internal and External Barriers to Energy Efficiency: Made-to-Measure Policy Interventions
Cattaneo, C. (2018) · Energy Efficiency · doi:10.1007/s12053-019-09775-1 · Cited by 166
Ayres, I., Raseman, S., & Shih, A. (2009) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1434950 · Cited by 146
Nutritious or Delicious? The Effect of Descriptive Norm Information on Food Choice
Burger, J. M., Bell, H. L., Harvey, K. N., Johnson, J., Stewart, C., Dorian, K., & Swedroe, M. (2010) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.2010.29.2.228 · Cited by 151
Petkov, P., Köbler, F., Foth, M., & Krcmar, H. (2011) · International Conference on Communities and Technologies (C&T) · doi:10.1145/2103354.2103358 · Cited by 150
Onwezen, M. C., Bartels, J., & Antonides, G. (2013) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.1991 · Cited by 156
Impact factors of household energy-saving behavior: An empirical study of Shandong Province in China
Zhang, C.-Y., Yu, B., Wang, J., & Wei, Y. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.303 · Cited by 148
Cognitive bias and how to improve sustainable decision making
Korteling, J. E. (., Paradies, G. L., & Sassen-van Meer, J. P. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1129835 · Cited by 143
Naturally Green: Harnessing Stone Age Psychological Biases to Foster Environmental Behavior
van Vugt, M., Griskevicius, V., & Schultz, P. W. (2014) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12000 · Cited by 152
Self-citationvon Borgstede, C., Andersson, M., & Johnsson, F. (2013) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.051 · Cited by 142
Normative prompts reduce consumer food waste in restaurants
Stöckli, S., Dorn, M., & Liechti, S. (2018) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.047 · Cited by 142
The interaction of descriptive and injunctive social norms in promoting energy conservation
Bonan, J., Cattaneo, C., D’Adda, G., & Tavoni, M. (2020) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-020-00719-z · Cited by 142
Making the user more efficient: design for sustainable behaviour
Lockton, D., Harrison, D., & Stanton, N. (2008) · International Journal of Sustainable Engineering · doi:10.1080/19397030802131068 · Cited by 139
Group Norms and the Attitude–Behaviour Relationship
Smith, J. R., & Louis, W. R. (2009) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00161.x · Cited by 138
Intrinsic Motivation, Norms and Environmental Behaviour: The Dynamics of Overarching Goals
Steg, L., Lindenberg, S. M., & Keizer, K. (2016) · International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1561/101.00000077 · Cited by 157
Know Your Neighbors, Save the Planet
Macias, T., & Williams, K. (2014) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916514540458 · Cited by 150
Guilty and helpful: An emotion-based reparatory model of voluntary work behavior.
Ilieș, R., Peng, A. C., Savani, K., & Dimotakis, N. E. (2013) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0034162 · Cited by 137
Ayres, I., Raseman, S., & Shih, A. (2009) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w15386 · Cited by 138
Larson, K. L., Nelson, K. C., Samples, S., Hall, S. J., Bettez, N. D., Cavender-Bares, J. M., Groffman, P. M., Grove, J. M., Heffernan, J. B., Hobbie, S. E., et al. (2015) · Urban Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s11252-015-0477-1 · Cited by 139
Cherchi, E. (2017) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2017.04.009 · Cited by 142
Cooperation in the Climate Commons
Carattini, S., Levin, S., & Tavoni, A. (2019) · Review of Environmental Economics and Policy · doi:10.1093/reep/rez009 · Cited by 134
Using descriptive norm appeals effectively to promote green behavior
Elgaaïed‐Gambier, L., Monnot, É., & Reniou, F. (2017) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.09.032 · Cited by 157
Perceived Social Consensus Can Reduce Ideological Biases on Climate Change
Goldberg, M. H., van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. W. (2019) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916519853302 · Cited by 148
Social norms information enhances the efficacy of an appearance-based sun protection intervention
Mahler, H. I. M., Kulik, J. A., Butler, H. A., et al. (2008) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.037 · Cited by 135
Optimal Design of Social Comparison Effects: Setting Reference Groups and Reference Points
Roels, G., & Su, X. (2013) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2013.1760 · Cited by 118
Lo, S. H., Halloran, S. P., Snowball, J. M., Seaman, H. E., Wardle, J., & von Wagner, C. (2014) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306144 · Cited by 138
Turning off the Lights: Consumers' Environmental Efforts Depend on Visible Efforts of Firms
Wang, W., Krishna, A., & McFerran, B. (2016) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.14.0441 · Cited by 137
Demand, Services and Social Aspects of Mitigation
(IPCC), I. P. O. C. C. (2023) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009157926.007 · Cited by 244
Using Non-Pecuniary Strategies to Influence Behavior: Evidence from a Large Scale Field Experiment
Ferraro, P. J., & Price, M. (2011) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w17189 · Cited by 133
Quantified Traveler: Travel Feedback Meets the Cloud to Change Behavior
Jariyasunant, J., Abou-Zeid, M., Carrel, A. L., Ekambaram, V. N., Gaker, D., Sengupta, R., & Walker, J. L. (2013) · Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1080/15472450.2013.856714 · Cited by 131
de Groot, J. I. M., Abrahamse, W., & Jones, K. (2013) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su5051829 · Cited by 133
Encouraging Reading of Diverse Political Viewpoints with a Browser Widget
Munson, S. A., Lee, S., & Resnick, P. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v7i1.14429 · Cited by 136
Brownlee, M. T. J., Powell, R. B., & Hallo, J. C. (2012) · Environmental Education Research · doi:10.1080/13504622.2012.683389 · Cited by 142
Earth stewardship: a strategy for social–ecological transformation to reverse planetary degradation
Chapin, F. S., Pickett, S. T. A., Power, M. E., Jackson, R. B., Carter, D. M., & Duke, C. S. (2011) · Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s13412-011-0010-7 · Cited by 144
The Welfare Effects of Nudges: A Case Study of Energy Use Social Comparisons
Allcott, H., & Kessler, J. B. (2015) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w21671 · Cited by 120
Compliance with COVID-19 Mitigation Measures in the United StatesPreprint
van Rooij, B., de Bruijn, A. L., Folmer, C. R., Kooistra, E. B., Kuiper, M. E., Brownlee, M., Olthuis, E., & Fine, A. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.31234/osf.io/qymu3 · Cited by 189
Energy saving behaviours: Development of a practice-based model
Sweeney, J., Kresling, J., Webb, D. A., Soutar, G. N., & Mazzarol, T. W. (2013) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.121 · Cited by 131
Hobman, E. V., Frederiks, E. R., Stenner, K., & Meikle, S. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.144 · Cited by 136
The Effect of Recycling versus Trashing on Consumption: Theory and Experimental Evidence
Sun, M., & Trudel, R. (2016) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.15.0574 · Cited by 148
Moon, R. Y., Carlin, R. F., & Hand, I. L. (2022) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2022-057991 · Cited by 149
Metadata
- Authors
- Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V.
- Affiliations
- California State University, San Marcos (US)
- 2 University of Arkansas
- Arizona State University (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 429-434
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2147478345
- Cited by
- 3,643
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 156 · 2025: 222 · 2024: 235 · 2023: 231 · 2022: 243 · 2021: 329 · 2020: 244 · 2019: 284 · 2018: 241 · 2017: 225 · 2016: 232 · 2015: 226 · 2014: 185 · 2013: 172 · 2012: 138
- FWCI
- 233.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- John Spoor Broome Library Institutional Repository (California State University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Pro-Environmental Behavior and Attitudes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Keywords
- social norms, normative messages, boomerang effect, descriptive norms, injunctive norms, residential energy conservation, persuasive appeals, field experiments, social approval, energy conservation
- MeSH terms
- Conservation of Energy Resources, Family Characteristics, Humans, Persuasive Communication, Residence Characteristics, Social Behavior, Social Values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
