The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 14 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms
Open accessAbstract
Despite a long tradition of effectiveness in laboratory tests, normative messages have had mixed success in changing behavior in field contexts, with some studies showing boomerang effects. To test a theoretical account of this inconsistency, we conducted a field experiment in which normative messages were used to promote household energy conservation. As predicted, a descriptive normative message detailing average neighborhood usage produced either desirable energy savings or the undesirable boomerang effect, depending on whether households were already consuming at a low or high rate. Also as predicted, adding an injunctive message (conveying social approval or disapproval) eliminated the boomerang effect. The results offer an explanation for the mixed success of persuasive appeals based on social norms and suggest how such appeals should be properly crafted.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
14 Own interpretation · 10 Own result · 6 No full text of the sources · 4 Own method · 2 Not checked yet · 1 No basis given
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, for households consuming above the average, the combined descriptive-plusinjunctive message served to decrease energy consumption (M = 18.91,SE = 0.73 vs. baseline M = 20.63,SE = 0.64; n = 63), t(62) = 2.49, p rep = .96,d = 0.63.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > Short-Term Change in Electricity Usage
plaindirectn = 63 ·- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The valence of the emoticon (happy face or sad face) communicates an injunctive message of approval or disapproval for the amount of energy being consumed.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, for households that were below the mean on baseline energy consumption, the descriptivenorm-only message produced an increase in energy consumption from baseline (M = 11.27,SE = 0.46 vs. baseline M = 10.38,SE = 0.33; n = 79), t(78) = 2.28, p rep = .94,d = 5 0.52.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > Short-Term Change in Electricity Usage
plaindirectn = 79 ·- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Residents perceive descriptive normative information about the average household's energy consumption as a descriptive norm.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, in the short term, the reduction in energy usage for high-consuming households was 1.72 kWh/day in the descriptive-plus-injunctive condition, compared with 1.22 kWh/day in the descriptive-only condition.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > DISCUSSION
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the combined injunctive-plus-descriptive message produced no change from baseline for low-consuming households (longer-term M = 10.14, SE = 0.37 vs. baseline M = 10.04,SE = 0.35; n = 70), t(69) = 0.64, n.s.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > Longer-Term Changes in Energy Consumption
plainn = 70- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The valence of the emoticon (happy face or sad face) communicates an injunctive message of approval or disapproval for the amount of energy being consumed.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For those households initially low in energy consumption, the descriptive-norm-only condition produced a significant increase in electricity usage (longer-term M = 11.13,SE =0.44 vs. baseline M = 10.15,SE = 0.34; n = 68), t(67) = 2.42, p rep = .95,d = 0.59.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > Longer-Term Changes in Energy Consumption
plaindirectn = 68 ·- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Residents perceive descriptive normative information about the average household's energy consumption as a descriptive norm.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For households that consumed more than the average during the baseline period, the descriptivenorm-only feedback produced a significant decrease in energy consumption relative to the baseline (M = 20.25,SE = 1.03 vs. baseline M = 21.47,SE = 0.89; n =64), t(63) = 2.17, p rep = .93,d = 0.55.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > Short-Term Change in Electricity Usage
plaindirectn = 64 ·- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Residents perceive descriptive normative information about the average household's energy consumption as a descriptive norm.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When the injunctive message was added to the descriptive normative feedback, households that were consuming less energy than average continued to consume at the desirable low rate (M = 10.58,SE = 0.38 vs. baseline M = 10.34,SE = 0.33; n =81), t(80) = 1.04, n.s.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > Short-Term Change in Electricity Usage
plainn = 81- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The valence of the emoticon (happy face or sad face) communicates an injunctive message of approval or disapproval for the amount of energy being consumed.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“The majority of individuals overestimate the prevalence of many undesirable behaviors, such as alcohol use among peers (e.g., Borsari & Carey, 2003;Prentice & Miller, 1993)”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > Abstract
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, despite concerns that normative interventions have an effect for only a short time, the longer-term results indicate that the effects of the normative messages continued to be strong even 4 weeks after the initial intervention.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > DISCUSSION
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, the results for both the short-term measure and the longer-term measure were consistent with predictions.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > Longer-Term Changes in Energy Consumption
plainn = 56 ·- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 11
- Probably not a substantial claim. 4
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For those households that were high in energy consumption at baseline, the descriptive-norm-only message continued to produce the (constructive) decrease in energy consumption, although the difference was not conventionally significant (baseline M = 22.32, SE = 1.05 vs. longer-term M = 21.29,SE = 0.92; n = 52), t(51) = 1.45, n.s.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > Longer-Term Changes in Energy Consumption
plaindirectn = 52- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Residents perceive descriptive normative information about the average household's energy consumption as a descriptive norm.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our results show this overall pattern, although the differences were not statistically significant.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > DISCUSSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At each measurement period, daily household energy consumption was positively skewed (M = 15.03,SD 5 7.10, skew = 1.39, range = 1.63-35.88),resulting in more households below the mean than above.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The mean is a more meaningful number than other measures of central tendency when reported to residents.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of the 287 households in the study, 41 were inconsistently above or below the average across the 2 weeks of normative feedback and were therefore excluded from the analyses of longer-term change.There were no significant differences in inconsistency rate across the four experimental conditions.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > Longer-Term Changes in Energy Consumption
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our results demonstrate the potential for such messages to boomerang, but the results also show that an injunctive element of approval is reconstructive in its ability to ameliorate these unwanted effects.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > DISCUSSION
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The valence of the emoticon (happy face or sad face) communicates an injunctive message of approval or disapproval for the amount of energy being consumed.
In the paper
“Second, prior research has suggested that presenting aligned descriptive and injunctive norms can result in larger behavioral changes than presenting either type of norm in isolation (Cialdini, 2003).”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Cialdini, 2003 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Households were matched on this baseline measure and randomly assigned to either the descriptive-norm-only condition or the descriptive-plusinjunctive-information condition.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > Participants and Design
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Three households called to withdraw from the study following the initial normative-feedback distribution, resulting in a final sample of 287.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On 157 occasions, two research assistants were assigned to read the same meter.These independent readings correlated at r 5 .999.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“The correlation between this measure and our readings was .96and .99 on 2 separate months.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > Results
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, the overall impact of a normative education campaign will depend on the distribution of the behavior in the population; a campaign could produce an increase, decrease, or no change in the behavior (the latter being most likely).”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > DISCUSSION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our results suggest that for those individuals who tend to engage in destructive behaviors, a descriptive normative message can be a guide to engaging in more constructive behavior; in contrast, for those individuals who already engage in the constructive behavior, a descriptive normative message can be a spur to engaging in more destructive behavior.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > DISCUSSION
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The results offer an explanation for the mixed success of persuasive appeals based on social norms and suggest how such appeals should be properly crafted.”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the research has clearly established that social norms not only spur but also guide action in direct and meaningful ways (Aarts & Dijksterhuis, 2003;Cialdini, Kallgren, & Reno, 1991;Darley & Latane´, 1970;Goldstein, Cialdini, & Griskevicius, 2006;Kerr, 1995;Terry & Hogg, 2001).”
§ The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms > Abstract
What the sources say
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
The valence of the emoticon (happy face or sad face) communicates an injunctive message of approval or disapproval for the amount of energy being consumed.
“The valence of the emoticon was used to communicate an injunctive message of approval or disapproval for the amount of energy being con-sumed.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The mean is a more meaningful number than other measures of central tendency when reported to residents.
“we used the mean as the dividing point for consumption because we believed it would provide a more meaningful number than other measures of central tendency when reported to residents.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Energy conservation has a direct personal benefit (saving money), is private, is recurring rather than a one-time action, and has widespread social approval.
“The target behavior in this study (energy conservation) has a direct personal benefit (saving money), is private, is reoccurring (rather than a onetime action), and has widespread social approval.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Residents perceive descriptive normative information about the average household's energy consumption as a descriptive norm.
“descriptive normative information about the actual energy consumption of the average household in their neighborhood during that same period (in kilowatt-hours per day)”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Research has shown that placing a greater emphasis on the injunctive norm can help to overcome the problem of a negative descriptive norm (Schultz et al., 2007; Smith and Louis, 2008).”
From A Social Identity Analysis of Climate Change and Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors: Insights and Opportunities (2016) · cites this paper as Schultz et al., 2007
In the citing paper
“Notice that many of the experiments just mentioned were field studies, that is, they were conducted in naturalistic contexts ensuring high ecological validity (see Schultz et al. [2007]; Goldstein et al. [2008]; Gerber and Rogers [2009]; Hallsworth et al. [2017]; Sparkman and Walton [2017]).”
From Science Communication and the Problematic Impact of Descriptive Norms (2023) · cites this paper as Schultz et al. [2007]
In the citing paper
“in one study, (Californian) households informed that they used more electricity than all the other households in their neighbourhood subsequently reduced their energy consumption, whereas households informed that they used less than all others increased it (Schultz et al. [2007]).”
From Science Communication and the Problematic Impact of Descriptive Norms (2023) · cites this paper as Schultz et al. [2007]
In the citing paper
“many of the experiments on descriptive norms discussed earlier can in fact be viewed as involving actual instances of PST on their own: they involve public (descriptive-norms conveying) claims by scientific or otherwise authoritative sources about negative features”
From Science Communication and the Problematic Impact of Descriptive Norms (2023) · cites this paper as Schultz et al. [2007]
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- Consistentt(80) = 1.04reported n.s. · recomputed p = .301
“t(80) = 1.04, n.s.”
- Consistentt(51) = 1.45reported n.s. · recomputed p = .153
“t(51) = 1.45, n.s.”
- Consistentt(69) = 0.64reported n.s. · recomputed p = .524
“t(69) = 0.64, n.s.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.
Citations
Cites
Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity
Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015 · Cited by 6,077
Self-citationCialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60330-5 · Cited by 3,143
Self-citationCrafting Normative Messages to Protect the Environment
Cialdini, R. B. (2003) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-8721.01242 · Cited by 1,553
Self-citationDescriptive and injunctive norms in college drinking: a meta-analytic integration.
Borsari, B., & Carey, K. B. (2003) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol · doi:10.15288/jsa.2003.64.331 · Cited by 1,224
Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm.
Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.243 · Cited by 1,075
Perkins, H. W., & Berkowitz, A. D. (1986) · International Journal of the Addictions · doi:10.3109/10826088609077249 · Cited by 1,017
The transsituational influence of social norms.
Reno, R. R., Cialdini, R. B., & Kallgren, C. A. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.1.104 · Cited by 976
Self-citationCrano, W. D., & Prišlin, R. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190034 · Cited by 846
Biases in the perception of drinking norms among college students.
Baer, J. S., Stacy, A., & Larimer, M. (1991) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol · doi:10.15288/jsa.1991.52.580 · Cited by 688
Changing Behavior With Normative Feedback Interventions: A Field Experiment on Curbside Recycling
Schultz, P. W. (1999) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2101_3 · Cited by 684
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- 2004, Changing the culture of college drinking, 193
- 2000, Journal of College Student Development, 41, 19
- 1970, Altruism and helping behavior, 83
- 1995, Social dilemmas: Perspectives on individuals and groups, 31
- 2000, Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 45, 39
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 3,687
Learning from Behavioural Changes That Fail
Osman, M., McLachlan, S., Fenton, N., Neil, M., Löfstedt, R. E., & Meder, B. (2020) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2020.09.009 · Cited by 99
Gaver, W. W., Bowers, J., Boehner, K., Boucher, A., Cameron, D. W. T., Hauenstein, M., Jarvis, N., & Pennington, S. (2013) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2470654.2466474 · Cited by 99
Bouman, T., Steg, L., & Perlaviciute, G. (2021) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.04.010 · Cited by 100
Information provision and consumer behavior: A natural experiment in billing frequency
Wichman, C. J. (2017) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2017.05.004 · Cited by 96
Behavioral Economics and Environmental Policy
Carlsson, F., & Johansson‐Stenman, O. (2012) · Annual Review of Resource Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-resource-110811-114547 · Cited by 106
King, R. B. (2016) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.10.006 · Cited by 122
When nudges aren’t enough: Norms, incentives and habit formation in public transport usage
Gravert, C. A., & Collentine, L. O. (2021) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2021.07.012 · Cited by 100
Reducing household water consumption: a social marketing approach
Lowe, B., Lynch, D., & Lowe, J. F. (2014) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2014.971044 · Cited by 99
Burger, P., Bezençon, V., Bornemann, B., Brosch, T., Carabias-Hütter, V., Farsi, M., Hille, S. L., Moser, C., Ramseier, C., Samuel, R., et al. (2015) · Frontiers in Energy Research · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2015.00029 · Cited by 100
Discouraged by Peer Excellence
Rogers, T., & Feller, A. (2016) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797615623770 · Cited by 97
Dolan, P., & Metcalfe, R. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2589269 · Cited by 104
All about size? – The potential of downsizing in reducing energy demand
Huebner, G. M., & Shipworth, D. (2016) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.066 · Cited by 97
Using a descriptive social norm to increase vegetable selection in workplace restaurant settings.
Thomas, J. M., Ursell, A., Robinson, E., Aveyard, P. N., Jebb, S. A., Herman, C. P., & Higgs, S. (2017) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/hea0000478 · Cited by 95
A Review and Framework for Thinking about the Drivers of Prosocial Consumer Behavior
White, K., Habib, R., & Dahl, D. W. (2019) · Journal of the Association for Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/706782 · Cited by 112
Leveraging Social Science to Generate Lasting Engagement with Climate Change Solutions
Goldberg, M. H., Gustafson, A., & van der Linden, S. (2020) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2020.08.011 · Cited by 108
Dynamics of social influence on consumption choices: A social network representation
Shah, S. S., & Asghar, Z. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17146 · Cited by 97
Applying behavioral theories to invasive animal management: Towards an integrated framework
McLeod, L. J., Hine, D. W., Please, P. M., & Driver, A. B. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.06.048 · Cited by 98
Vasiljevic, M., Pechey, R., & Marteau, T. M. (2015) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2015.03.034 · Cited by 107
Wynes, S., Nicholas, K. A., Zhao, J., & Donner, S. D. (2018) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aae5d7 · Cited by 98
Is There Backlash to Social Pressure? A Large-scale Field Experiment on Voter Mobilization
Mann, C. B. (2010) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9124-y · Cited by 95
History of Social Psychology: Insights, Challenges, and Contributions to Theory and Application
Ross, L. D., Lepper, M. R., & Ward, A. C. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy001001 · Cited by 97
Salas‐Wright, C. P., Vaughn, M. G., Maynard, B. R., Clark, T. T., & Snyder, S. (2014) · Youth & Society · doi:10.1177/0044118x14531603 · Cited by 97
Coupling social norms and commitments: Testing the underdetected nature of social influence
Jaeger, C. M., & Schultz, P. W. (2017) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.03.015 · Cited by 106
Self-citationTurning green: Agent-based modeling of the adoption of dynamic electricity tariffs
Kowalska-Pyzalska, A., Maciejowska, K., Suszczyński, K., Sznajd-Weron, K., & Weron, R. (2014) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.04.021 · Cited by 95
Changing everyday health behaviors through descriptive norm manipulations
Burger, J. M., & Shelton, M. (2011) · Social Influence · doi:10.1080/15534510.2010.542305 · Cited by 95
Stuck in the 70s: The role of social norms in distracted driving
Atchley, P., Hadlock, C., & Lane, S. M. (2012) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2012.01.026 · Cited by 93
The Perils of Explaining Climate Inaction in Terms of Psychological Barriers
Schmitt, M. T., Neufeld, S. D., Mackay, C. M. L., & Dys‐Steenbergen, O. (2019) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12360 · Cited by 93
Bolsen, T., Leeper, T. J., & Shapiro, M. A. (2013) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x13484173 · Cited by 90
Energizing and De-Motivating Effects of Norm-Conflict
McDonald, R. I., Fielding, K. S., & Louis, W. R. (2012) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167212464234 · Cited by 99
Boudet, H. S., Ardoin, N. M., Flora, J. A., Armel, K. C., Desai, M., & Robinson, T. N. (2016) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/nenergy.2016.91 · Cited by 92
Using mobile phones to support sustainability
Kjeldskov, J., Skov, M. B., Paay, J., & Pathmanathan, R. (2012) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2207676.2208395 · Cited by 97
Evans, J. R., Meissner, C. A., Brandon, S. E., Russano, M. B., & Kleinman, S. M. (2010) · The Journal of Psychiatry & Law · doi:10.1177/009318531003800110 · Cited by 100
Frey, E., & Rogers, T. (2014) · Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1177/2372732214550405 · Cited by 95
Cislaghi, B., & Heise, L. (2018) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/hea0000618 · Cited by 100
Lalot, F., Quiamzade, A., Falomir‐Pichastor, J. M., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.01.002 · Cited by 99
Advancing Environmental Education Practice
Krasny, M. E. (2020) · Cornell University Press eBooks · doi:10.7591/9781501747083 · Cited by 109
Tell Me Something I Don’t Already Know: Informedness and the Impact of Information Programs
Byrne, D., Nauze, A. L., & Martin, L. (2017) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00695 · Cited by 93
Linder, N., Lindahl, T., & Borgström, S. T. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00352 · Cited by 113
Making the smart meter social promotes long-term energy conservation
Dominicis, S. D., Sokoloski, R., Jaeger, C. M., & Schultz, P. W. (2019) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-019-0254-5 · Cited by 97
Self-citationDo Social Norms Influence Young People’s Willingness to Take the COVID-19 Vaccine?
Sinclair, S., & Agerström, J. (2021) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2021.1937832 · Cited by 95
Inducing Peer Pressure to Promote Cooperation
Mani, A., Rahwan, I., & Pentland, A. (2013) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep01735 · Cited by 91
Affective Influences on Energy-Related Decisions and Behaviors
Brosch, T., Patel, M. K., & Sander, D. (2014) · Frontiers in Energy Research · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2014.00011 · Cited by 96
I saw the sign: Promoting energy conservation via normative prompts
Bergquist, M., & Nilsson, A. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.03.005 · Cited by 92
Evaluating science arguments: Evidence, uncertainty, and argument strength.
Corner, A., & Hahn, U. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/a0016533 · Cited by 89
Children are sensitive to norms of giving
McAuliffe, K., Raihani, N., & Dunham, Y. C. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.006 · Cited by 99
When Employees Retaliate Against Self-Serving Leaders: The Influence of the Ethical Climate
Decoster, S., Stouten, J., & Tripp, T. M. (2019) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04218-4 · Cited by 97
Kleef, G. A. V., Gelfand, M. J., & Jetten, J. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.05.002 · Cited by 109
Redman, E., & Redman, A. (2013) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.016 · Cited by 91
The acquisition of perceived descriptive norms as social category learning in social networks
Kashima, Y., Wilson, S. G., Lusher, D., Pearson, L. J., & Pearson, C. J. (2013) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2013.06.002 · Cited by 98
Melnyk, V., van Herpen, E., Fischer, A. R. H., & van Trijp, J. C. M. (2011) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20408 · Cited by 100
Blanton, H., Köblitz, A. R., & McCaul, K. D. (2008) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00107.x · Cited by 93
Senbel, M., Ngo, V. D., & Blair, E. (2014) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.001 · Cited by 94
Davies, G., Whelan, S., Foley, A., et al. (2009) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00271.x · Cited by 88
Nachreiner, M., Mack, B., Matthies, E., & Tampe-Mai, K. (2015) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.016 · Cited by 88
Barclay, P., & Barker, J. L. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101441 · Cited by 100
Rinscheid, A., Pianta, S., & Weber, E. U. (2020) · Behavioural Public Policy · doi:10.1017/bpp.2020.43 · Cited by 89
Mummah, S. A., King, A. C., Gardner, C. D., & Sutton, S. (2016) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-016-0400-z · Cited by 77
Gulbinas, R., & Taylor, J. E. (2014) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.08.017 · Cited by 88
Wan, C., Shen, Q., & Choi, S. (2017) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2017.11.022 · Cited by 89
The Effect of Descriptive Norms and Construal Level on Consumers' Sustainable Behaviors
Ryoo, Y., Hyun, N. K., & Sung, Y. (2017) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2017.1396514 · Cited by 88
Promoting energy efficiency at household level: a literature review
Solà, M. D. M., de Ayala, A., Galarraga, I., & Escapa, M. (2020) · Energy Efficiency · doi:10.1007/s12053-020-09918-9 · Cited by 90
Public attitudes towards photovoltaic developments: Case study from Greece
Τsantopoulos, G., Arabatzis, G., & Tampakis, S. A. (2014) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.03.025 · Cited by 86
License to Cheat: Voluntary Regulation and Ethical Behavior
Gino, F., Krupka, E. L., & Weber, R. A. (2013) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1120.1699 · Cited by 84
Unlocking the potential of smart grid technologies with behavioral science
Sintov, N. D., & Schultz, P. W. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00410 · Cited by 85
Self-citationThe Climate Change Challenge and Barriers to the Exercise of Foresight Intelligence
Ross, L. D., Arrow, K. J., Cialdini, R. B., Diamond‐Smith, N., Diamond, J., Dunne, J. A., Feldman, M. W., Horn, R. E., Kennedy, D., Murphy, C., et al. (2016) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biw025 · Cited by 84
Self-citationSystematic Literature Review on Behavioral Barriers of Climate Change Mitigation in Households
Stankūnienė, G., Štreimikienė, D., & Kyriakopoulos, G. L. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12187369 · Cited by 84
Exploring panic buying behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic: a developing country perspective
Singh, G., Aiyub, A. S., Greig, T., Naidu, S., Sewak, A., & Sharma, S. (2021) · International Journal of Emerging Markets · doi:10.1108/ijoem-03-2021-0308 · Cited by 96
Do social norms affect intended food choice?
Croker, H. A., Whitaker, K. L., Cooke, L. J., & Wardle, J. (2009) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.07.006 · Cited by 84
Influencing Financial Behavior: From Changing Minds to Changing Contexts
Dolan, P., Elliott, A., Metcalfe, R., & Vlaev, I. (2012) · Journal of Behavioral Finance · doi:10.1080/15427560.2012.680995 · Cited by 94
Reducing high calorie snack food in young adults: a role for social norms and health based messages
Robinson, E., Harris, E., Thomas, J. M., Aveyard, P. N., & Higgs, S. (2013) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/1479-5868-10-73 · Cited by 86
Personal carbon allowances revisited
Fuso Nerini, F., Fawcett, T., Parag, Y., & Ekins, P. (2021) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-021-00756-w · Cited by 83
Yang, M., Chen, H., Long, R., & Yang, J. (2022) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2022.05.007 · Cited by 84
Lo, S. H., Peters, G.-J., & Kok, G. (2011) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2011.00464.x · Cited by 83
Byrka, K., Jędrzejewski, A., Sznajd-Weron, K., & Weron, R. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.063 · Cited by 83
Paul, L. A., & Gray, M. J. (2010) · Trauma Violence & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838010390710 · Cited by 81
An Empirical Analysis of Green Electricity Adoption Among Residential Consumers in Poland
Kowalska-Pyzalska, A. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10072281 · Cited by 82
Bhanot, S. P. (2018) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.11.002 · Cited by 92
Rafsanjani, H. N., Ahn, C. R., & Alahmad, M. A. (2015) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en81010996 · Cited by 82
Using Social and Behavioural Science to Support COVID-19 Pandemic ResponsePreprint
Bavel, J. J. V., D, K. B. A., Boggio, P. S., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A. K., Cikara, M., Crockett, M. J., Crum, A. J., Douglas, K. M., Druckman, J. N., et al. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4178356 · Cited by 89
Nudging Away False News: Evidence from a Social Norms Experiment
Andı, S., & Akesson, J. (2020) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2020.1847674 · Cited by 87
How smart do smart meters need to be?
Mogles, N. M., Walker, I. O., Ramallo-González, A. P., Lee, J. H., Natarajan, S., Padget, J. A., Gabe‐Thomas, E., Lovett, T., Ren, G., Hyniewska, S., et al. (2017) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.09.008 · Cited by 80
Shen, M., Lu, Y., Wei, K. H., & Cui, Q. (2020) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.109839 · Cited by 80
The logic of universalization guides moral judgment
Levine, S., Kleiman-Weiner, M., Schulz, L., Tenenbaum, J., & Cushman, F. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2014505117 · Cited by 88
Social Norms and the Dynamics of Online Incivility
Shmargad, Y., Coe, K., Kenski, K. M., et al. (2021) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439320985527 · Cited by 81
Behavioral interventions to reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing: a randomized pilot trial
Persell, S. D., Doctor, J. N., Friedberg, M. W., Meeker, D., Friesema, E. M., Cooper, A., Haryani, A., Gregory, D. L., Fox, C. R., Goldstein, N. J., et al. (2016) · BMC Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1186/s12879-016-1715-8 · Cited by 79
Self-citationFrederiks, E. R., Stenner, K., Hobman, E. V., & Fischle, M. (2016) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.020 · Cited by 90
Moral learning: Psychological and philosophical perspectives
Cushman, F. A., Kumar, V., & Railton, P. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.008 · Cited by 79
Cook, B. R., & Overpeck, J. T. (2018) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.570 · Cited by 86
Reports of social circles’ and own vaccination behavior: A national longitudinal survey.
de Bruin, W. B., Parker, A. M., Galešić, M., & Vardavas, R. (2019) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/hea0000771 · Cited by 76
When Online Harassment Is Perceived as Justified
Blackwell, L., Chen, T., Schoenebeck, S. Y., & Lampe, C. A. C. (2018) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v12i1.15036 · Cited by 80
Lo, S. H., van Breukelen, G., Peters, G.-J., & Kok, G. (2015) · Travel Behaviour and Society · doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2015.11.002 · Cited by 92
Bayesian Evidence Synthesis Can Reconcile Seemingly Inconsistent Results
Scheibehenne, B., Jamil, T., & Wagenmakers, E. (2016) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797616644081 · Cited by 82
Han, R., & Cheng, Y. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17197164 · Cited by 82
Nudging Public Employees Through Descriptive Social Norms in Healthcare Organizations
Bellè, N., & Cantarelli, P. (2021) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13353 · Cited by 77
The role of perceived norms in the stigmatization of mental illness
Norman, R. M. G., Sorrentino, R. M., Windell, D., & Manchanda, R. (2008) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-008-0375-4 · Cited by 81
Sevenant, M., & Antrop, M. (2009) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.05.005 · Cited by 79
Ethical Infrastructure and Successful Handling of Workplace Bullying
Einarsen, K., Mykletun, R. J., Einarsen, S. V., Skogstad, A., & Salin, D. (2017) · Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies · doi:10.18291/njwls.v7i1.81398 · Cited by 81
Individual Adaptation to Climate Change: The Role of Information and Perceived RiskPreprint
Osberghaus, D., Finkel, E., & Pohl, M. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1674840 · Cited by 79
Towards a culture of low-carbon research for the 21st Century
Quéré, C. L., Capstick, S., Corner, A., Cutting, D., Johnson, M., Minns, A., Schroeder, H., Walker-Springett, K., Whitmarsh, L. E., & Wood, F. R. (2015) · Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) · Cited by 80
Kalnikaitė, V., Rogers, Y., Bird, J., Villar, N., Bachour, K., Payne, S. J., Todd, P. M., Schöning, J., Krüger, A., & Kreitmayer, S. (2011) · ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp) · doi:10.1145/2030112.2030115 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V.
- Affiliations
- California State University, San Marcos (US)
- 2 University of Arkansas
- Arizona State University (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 429-434
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2147478345
- Cited by
- 3,643
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 156 · 2025: 222 · 2024: 235 · 2023: 231 · 2022: 243 · 2021: 329 · 2020: 244 · 2019: 284 · 2018: 241 · 2017: 225 · 2016: 232 · 2015: 226 · 2014: 185 · 2013: 172 · 2012: 138
- FWCI
- 233.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- John Spoor Broome Library Institutional Repository (California State University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Pro-Environmental Behavior and Attitudes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Keywords
- social norms, normative messages, boomerang effect, descriptive norms, injunctive norms, residential energy conservation, persuasive appeals, field experiments, social approval, energy conservation
- MeSH terms
- Conservation of Energy Resources, Family Characteristics, Humans, Persuasive Communication, Residence Characteristics, Social Behavior, Social Values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
