Cited by 142Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsIon Channels and Receptors

Central and peripheral sites of action for CB 2 receptor mediated analgesic activity in chronic inflammatory and neuropathic pain models in rats

Open access
Hsieh, Gin C, Pai, Madhavi, Chandran, Prasant, Hooker, Bradley A, Zhu, Chang Z, Salyers, Anita K, Wensink, Erica J, Zhan, CenChen +5 more·2011·British Journal of Pharmacology

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Cannabinoid CB 2 receptor activation by selective agonists has been shown to produce analgesic effects in preclinical models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain. However, mechanisms underlying CB 2 ‐mediated analgesic effects remain largely unknown. The present study was conducted to elucidate the CB 2 receptor expression in ‘pain relevant’ tissues and the potential sites of action of CB 2 agonism in rats. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH Expression of cannabinoid receptor mRNA was evaluated by quantitative RT‐PCR in dorsal root ganglia (DRGs), spinal cords, paws and several brain regions of sham, chronic inflammatory pain (CFA) and neuropathic pain (spinal nerve ligation, SNL) rats. The sites of CB 2 mediated antinociception were evaluated in vivo following intra‐DRG, intrathecal (i.t.) or intraplantar (i.paw) administration of potent CB 2 ‐selective agonists A‐836339 and AM1241. KEY RESULTS CB 2 receptor gene expression was significantly up‐regulated in DRGs (SNL and CFA), spinal cords (SNL) or paws (CFA) ipsilateral to injury under inflammatory and neuropathic pain conditions. Systemic A‐836339 and AM1241 produced dose‐dependent efficacy in both inflammatory and neuropathic pain models. Local administration of CB 2 agonists also produced significant analgesic effects in SNL (intra‐DRG and i.t.) and CFA (intra‐DRG) pain models. In contrast to A‐836339, i.paw administration of AM‐1241 dose‐relatedly reversed the CFA‐induced thermal hyperalgesia, suggesting that different mechanisms may be contributing to its in vivo properties. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS These results demonstrate that both DRG and spinal cord are important sites contributing to CB 2 receptor‐mediated analgesia and that the changes in CB 2 receptor expression play a crucial role for the sites of action in regulating pain perception.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.01046.x

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CFA administration into a ventral footpad leads to upregulation of CB2 receptors, but not CB2 receptor mRNA in dorsal root ganglia or ipsilateral paw tissue of rats.

    “CFA administration into a ventral footpad leads to upregulation of CB 2 receptors, but not CB 2 receptor mRNA in dorsal root ganglia or ipsilateral paw tissue of rats, suggesting that these receptors play an integral role in the endocannabinoid modulation of chronic inflammatory pain (Hsieh et al, 2011).”
  • Acute administration of CB2 receptor agonists reduces CFA-induced mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia.

    “Acute administration of CB 2 receptor agonists reduces CFA-induced mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia (Hsieh et al, 2011;Valenzano et al, 2005;Yao et al, 2008Yao et al, , 2009)).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hsieh, G. C., Pai, M., Chandran, P., Hooker, B. A., Zhu, C. Z., Salyers, A. K., Wensink, E. J., Zhan, C., Carroll, W. A., Dart, M. J., Yao, B. B., Honore, P., & Meyer, M. D.
Affiliations
Abbott (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Hsieh, Gin C
Venue
British Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-12-14
Volume
162
Issue
2
Pages
428-440
ISSN
  • 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5381
OpenAlex
W1594786713
Cited by
139
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 9
FWCI
10.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
Keywords
CB2 receptor, cannabinoid analgesia, neuropathic pain, inflammatory pain, dorsal root ganglia, spinal cord, AM1241, intrathecal administration, receptor gene expression, thermal hyperalgesia, spinal nerve ligation, complete Freund's adjuvant
MeSH terms
Analgesia, Analgesics, Animals, Brain, Cannabinoids, Disease Models, Animal, Ganglia, Spinal, Inflammation, Male, Neuralgia, Pain, RNA, Messenger, Spinal Cord, Thiazoles, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Opioid Peptides, Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2, Rats, Pain Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review