Cited by 117Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsRetinal Imaging and AnalysisDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Risk factor analysis for atrophic and exudative age‐related macular degeneration: An epidemiological study of 1000 aged individuals

Vinding, T., Appleyard, M., Nyboe, J., Jensen, G.·1992·Acta Ophthalmologica

Abstract

The relationship between age-related macular degeneration and cardiovascular risk factors and certain life-style factors, collected in the Copenhagen City Heart Study (1981-83), was studied by multiple logistic regression analysis. The ophthalmological study sample comprised 1000 randomly selected persons aged 60 to 80 years. Separate analyses were made for the atrophic and the exudative forms of age-related macular degeneration. Among all the possible risk factors analysed, only three factors were significantly associated with macular degeneration. Age was associated with both atrophic and exudative macular degeneration (P less than 0.01). Among smokers who inhaled, the risk of atrophic maculopathy was 2.5 times higher than among non-smokers (P less than 0.01), whereas the use of hypnotics increased the risk of exudative maculopathy by 3.4 times (P less than 0.01).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1992.tb02093.x

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cigarette smoking is a risk factor for age-related macular degeneration, confirmed by case-control, population-based, and prospective studies.

    “Results from a number of case-control studies,28–33 population-based studies,34–36 and prospective studies of both physicians37 and nurses38 strongly confirm cigarette smoking as a risk factor for age-related macular degeneration.”

    From Age-related macular degeneration (2008) · cites this paper as [31]

  • The neovascular form of age-related macular degeneration was highest in Chinese individuals, compared with white people.

    “The neovascular form of age-related macular degeneration was highest in Chinese individuals, compared with white people.31”

    From Age-related macular degeneration (2008) · cites this paper as [31]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vinding, T., Appleyard, M., Nyboe, J., & Jensen, G.
Affiliations
Rigshospitalet (DK)
Corresponding author
Vinding, T.
Venue
Acta Ophthalmologica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-02
Volume
70
Issue
1
Pages
66-72
ISSN
  • 0001-639X (ISSN-L)
  • 1755-375X
  • 1755-3768
OpenAlex
W2002558743
Cited by
117
References
24
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Ophthalmologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Sundhed og Sygdom, Det Frie Forskningsråd
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
age-related macular degeneration, atrophic macular degeneration, neovascular age-related macular degeneration, risk factors, cardiovascular risk factors, lifestyle factors, smoking, hypnotic use, older adults, Copenhagen City Heart Study
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Atrophy, Denmark, Exudates and Transudates, Female, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Macula Lutea, Macular Degeneration, Male, Middle Aged, Random Allocation, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Smoking, Odds Ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review