Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 244

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Innovations—Doomed to Fail? Investigating Strategies to Overcome Passive Innovation Resistance

Heidenreich, Sven, Kraemer, Tobias·2016·Journal of Product Innovation Management

Abstract

The constant and successful market introduction of new products is of major concern to companies throughout all industries. However, empirical research points to high failure rates of innovations, indicating that most new products fail as they are rejected by consumers due to their resistance to innovation. Several studies have confirmed the importance of passive innovation resistance as a dominant barrier, which has to be overcome before new product adoption can start. However, empirical evidence on how to overcome passive innovation resistance is still lacking. This study intends to address this gap by evaluating the effectiveness of marketing instruments (i.e., mental simulation and benefit comparison) to reduce negative effects of passive innovation resistance on new product adoption. The results of a scenario‐based experiment (n = 679) confirm high effectiveness for both instruments. However, the effectiveness varied with the type of passive innovation resistance present. More specifically, mental simulation was found to be the most effective instrument in the case of cognitive passive resistance, whereas benefit comparison was found to be most effective in the case of situational passive resistance. Thereby, the effect of both marketing instruments was stronger the more radical the new product was perceived. Hence, companies should assess the type of passive innovation resistance that is predominant in their target market, and align their choice of marketing instruments that accompany a new product launch to most effectively overcome passive innovation resistance. Employing such new product launch tactics should decrease initial market resistance and thus help companies in reducing innovation failure rates.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jpim.12273

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 88

  1. Anderson R. C., 1997, Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge
  2. 10.1108/03090561011079846 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Arbuckle J. L., 2009, AMOS 18.0 user's guide
  4. 10.1016/S1441-3582(06)70058-1 · DOI
  5. Bagozzi R. P., 1999, Consumer resistance to, and acceptance of, innovations, Advances in Consumer Research, 26, 218
  6. 10.1109/17.618169 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00331.x · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1287/mnsc.49.2.197.12741 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.2307/3151623 · DOI
  10. Berry L. L., 2006, Creating new markets through service innovation, MIT Sloan Management Review, 47, 56
  11. 10.1509/jmkr.45.3.320 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.01009.x · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_29 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1145/217278.217285 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Chin W. W., 1999, Statistical strategies for small sample research, 307
  16. Claudy M.2011.An empirical investigation of consumer resistance to green product innovation. Doctoral thesis Dublin Institute of Technology Dublin.
  17. 10.1509/jmkr.39.4.488.19121 · DOI
  18. 10.2307/3151912 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1111/j.0737-6782.2004.00077.x · DOI
  20. 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Debevec K., 1985, The effects of knowledge and imagery on advertising responses to an innovation, Advances in Consumer Research, 12, 273
  22. El Houssi A., 2005, Effectively communicating new product benefits to consumers: The use of analogy versus literal similarity, Advances in Consumer Research, 32, 1
  23. 10.1007/BF02726504 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00324.x · DOI
  25. 10.1177/002224378101800104 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Garcia R., 2007, Overcoming consumer resistance to innovation, MIT Sloan Management Review, 48, 82
  27. Gatignon H., 1991, Handbook of consumer behavior, 316
  28. 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00995.x · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00995.x
  29. Gourville J. T., 2006, Eager sellers and stony buyers: Understanding the psychology of new‐product adoption, Harvard Business Review, 84, 98
  30. 10.1207/S15327663JCP1304_09 · DOI
  31. 10.1086/209388 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1111/jpim.12161 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1142/S1363919613500217 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.2307/3152213 · doi:10.2307/3152213
  35. 10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_31 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Hess S.2009.Managing consumer's adoption barriers. Dissertation University of Mannheim.
  37. 10.1086/208816 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1108/07363760610674310 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1509/jmkr.40.4.406.19394 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1002/1520-6793(200101)18:1<43::AID-MAR3>3.0.CO;2-I · doi:10.1002/1520-6793(200101)18:1<43::aid-mar3>3.0.co;2-i
  41. Huber F., 2007, Kausalmodellierung mit partial least squares: Eine anwendungsorientierte einführung
  42. Ilieva J., 2002, Online surveys in marketing research: Pros and cons, International Journal of Market Research, 44, 361
  43. 10.1177/0092070302238602 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1086/376806 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00174.x · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1016/j.joep.2009.02.004 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.2307/20650325 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1002/mar.20196 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1108/02652320810902451 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1108/07363760710834834 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2008.05.008 · DOI
  52. 10.1509/jmkg.69.2.61.60759 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Midgley D. F., 1977, Innovation and new product marketing
  54. 10.1016/S0167-8116(02)00046-0 · DOI
  55. 10.1509/jmkr.38.1.14.18836 · doi:10.1509/jmkr.38.1.14.18836
  56. Nabih M. I., 1997, Conceptual issues in the study of innovation adoption behavior, Advances in Consumer Research, 24, 190
  57. 10.1287/mksc.20.1.1.10197 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1002/asi.20800 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.680 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.935 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Orth U. R., 2005, Optimum stimulation level theory and the differential impact of olfactory stimuli on consumer exploratory tendencies, Advances in Consumer Research, 32, 613
  62. 10.1086/208587 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1086/209273 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1108/08876041311330771 · DOI
  65. 10.1086/209476 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1509/jmkg.71.2.169 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Ram S., 1987, A model of innovation resistance, Advances in Consumer Research, 14, 208
  68. 10.1108/EUM0000000002542 · DOI · Paper page
  69. Reinders M. J.2010.Managing consumer resistance to innovations. Doctoral thesis VU University Amsterdam.
  70. 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00775.x · DOI
  71. 10.1007/s11747-007-0040-6 · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00311-9 · DOI · Paper page
  73. Rogers E. M., 2003, Diffusion of innovations
  74. 10.1177/002224379803500107 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.1509/jmkg.66.3.98.18510 · DOI · Paper page
  76. 10.1108/07363761011052341 · DOI
  77. 10.1016/S0166-4972(98)00030-3 · DOI · Paper page
  78. 10.1111/jpim.12130 · DOI · Paper page
  79. 10.1111/jpim.12017 · DOI
  80. 10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005 · DOI · Paper page
  81. 10.1086/599325 · DOI
  82. 10.1016/j.jretai.2006.10.005 · DOI · Paper page
  83. 10.1111/1540-5885.1520136 · doi:10.1111/1540-5885.1520136 · Paper page
  84. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.06.023 · DOI
  85. 10.1509/jmkr.48.5.827 · DOI
  86. 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00951.x · DOI
  87. 10.1509/jmkg.67.2.49.18606 · DOI
  88. 10.1111/1540-5885.1950365 · doi:10.1111/1540-5885.1950365

Cited by

See all 244

Metadata

Authors
Heidenreich, S., & Kraemer, T.
Venue
Journal of Product Innovation Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-07-14
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
277-297
ISSN
  • 0737-6782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-5885
OpenAlex
W2109734372
Cited by
244
References
5
FWCI
12.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Innovations—Doomed to Fail? Investigating Strategies to Overcome Passive Innovation Resistance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jpim.12273
The paper
Heidenreich, S., & Kraemer, T. (2016). Innovations—Doomed to Fail? Investigating Strategies to Overcome Passive Innovation Resistance. Journal of Product Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12273

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.