Cited by 63

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Energy deficiency impairs resistance training gains in lean mass but not strength: a meta-analysis and meta-regression

Murphy, Chaise, Koehler, Karsten·2022·Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports

Abstract

Short‐term energy deficits impair anabolic hormones and muscle protein synthesis. However, the effects of prolonged energy deficits on resistance training (RT) outcomes remain unexplored. Thus, we conducted a systematic review of PubMed and SportDiscus for randomized controlled trials performing RT in an energy deficit (RT+ED) for ≥3 weeks. We first divided the literature into studies with a parallel control group without an energy deficit (RT+CON; Analysis A) and studies without RT+CON (Analysis B). Analysis A consisted of a meta‐analysis comparing gains in lean mass (LM) and strength between RT+ED and RT+CON. Studies in Analysis B were matched with separate RT+CON studies for participant and intervention characteristics, and we qualitatively compared the gains in LM and strength between RT+ED and RT+CON. Finally, Analyses A and B were pooled into a meta‐regression examining the relationship between the magnitude of the energy deficit and LM. Analysis A showed LM gains were impaired in RT+ED vs RT+CON (effect size (ES) = −0.57, p = 0.02), but strength gains were comparable between conditions (ES = −0.31, p = 0.28). Analysis B supports the impairment of LM in RT+ED (ES: −0.11, p = 0.03) vs RT+CON (ES: 0.20, p < 0.001) but not strength (RT+ED ES: 0.84; RT+CON ES: 0.81). Finally, our meta‐regression demonstrated that an energy deficit of ~500 kcal · day−1 prevented gains in LM. Individuals performing RT to build LM should avoid prolonged energy deficiency, and individuals performing RT to preserve LM during weight loss should avoid energy deficits >500 kcal day−1.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/sms.14075

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis by Murphy and Koehler found that energy deficits at or beyond 500 kcal/day can impair lean mass gains in subjects undergoing resistance training.

    “Corroborating this point, a systematic review and meta-analysis by Murphy and Koehler [87] examined RCTs with a minimum 3-week duration; and found that energy deficits at or beyond 500 kcal/day can impair lean mass gains in subjects undergoing resistance training.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 77

  1. 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099193 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093218 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1007/s00421-020-04516-0 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1097/01.CSMR.0000306070.67390.cb · DOI
  5. 10.1001/archinte.166.22.2502 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/j.ecl.2012.04.017 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/s00421-020-04354-0 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1210/er.2008-0027 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/ajcn/nqy193 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.2165/00007256-200737020-00004 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1002/jrsm.1240 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1007/s40279-017-0788-x · DOI
  13. Normandin E, 2015, Effects of Caloric Restriction with or without Resistance Training in Dynapenic‐Overweight and Obese Menopausal Women: A MONET Study, J Frailty Aging, 4, 155
  14. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00935.2007 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/s00198-009-1139-z · DOI
  16. 10.1093/gerona/gls258 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1152/jappl.1994.77.2.614 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/s12603-016-0748-4 · DOI
  19. Mahon AK, 2007, Measurement of body composition changes with weight loss in postmenopausal women: comparison of methods, J Nutr Health Aging, 11, 203
  20. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001074 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.2165/11588540-000000000-00000 · DOI
  22. Hedges LV, 1985, Statistical methods for meta‐analysis
  23. 2009, Handbook of research synthesis and meta‐analysis
  24. 10.18637/jss.v036.i03 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Wright G, 2010, Impact of compliance on weight loss and health profile in a very low energy diet program, Aust Fam Physician, 39, 49
  26. 10.3389/fnut.2019.00131 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1093/ajcn/6.5.542 · DOI
  28. 10.1152/ajpcell.00209.2019 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06482.x · DOI
  30. 10.3390/nu10081070 · DOI
  31. 10.1186/1475-2891-9-59 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1093/ajh/hps050 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1093/ajcn/47.1.19 · DOI
  34. 10.1097/gme.0b013e31817dacf7 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1186/1743-7075-7-17 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1056/NEJMoa1616338 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1093/gerona/gls241 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000622 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1519/00124278-200405000-00005 · DOI
  40. 10.1002/oby.21977 · DOI
  41. 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50267.x · DOI
  42. 10.2337/diacare.25.10.1729 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1371/journal.pone.0000991 · DOI
  44. Rogers ME, 2006, Effects of creatine, ginseng, and astragalus supplementation on strength, body composition, mood, and blood lipids during strength‐training in older adults, J Sports Sci Med, 5, 60
  45. 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001935 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.12.015 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1002/oby.22274 · DOI
  48. Hudson JL, 2017, Within‐day protein distribution does not influence body composition responses during weight loss in resistance‐training adults who are overweight, Am J Clin Nutr, 106, 1190, 10.3945/ajcn.117.158246 · DOI
  49. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00152.2014 · DOI
  50. 10.1007/s12603-015-0442-y · DOI
  51. 10.1159/000012817 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.14740/jocmr3817 · DOI
  53. 10.1089/jmf.2012.0062 · DOI
  54. 10.1186/1758-5996-5-11 · DOI
  55. 10.1093/ajcn/58.4.561 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1007/s00421-008-0956-7 · DOI
  57. 10.2147/CIA.S156174 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/S0026-0495(97)90070-6 · DOI
  59. 10.1001/archinte.1993.00410010119011 · DOI
  60. 10.1123/ijsn.6.3.285 · DOI
  61. 10.1007/s00421-018-3852-9 · DOI
  62. 10.1007/s00774-007-0805-5 · DOI
  63. 10.1016/j.jbspin.2008.07.016 · DOI
  64. 10.1089/met.2011.0104 · DOI · Paper page
  65. 10.1093/jn/nxy169 · DOI
  66. 10.1080/07315724.1992.12098237 · DOI
  67. 10.1136/bjsm.2008.052126 · DOI
  68. 10.3810/psm.2011.05.1893 · DOI
  69. 10.1139/H09-136 · DOI
  70. 10.1123/ijsnem.21.3.181 · DOI
  71. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802198 · DOI
  72. 10.1016/j.scispo.2016.12.002 · DOI
  73. 10.1007/s00421-005-0127-z · DOI · Paper page
  74. 10.3390/nu13051640 · DOI
  75. 10.1080/10641963.2020.1833024 · DOI
  76. 10.1111/acel.12342 · DOI
  77. 10.1210/jc.2002-020369 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Murphy, C., & Koehler, K.
Affiliations
Department of Sport and Health Sciences Technical University of Munich Munich Germany
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-10-13
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
125-137
ISSN
  • 0905-7188
  • 1600-0838
Cited by
63
References
15
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review