Cited by 234Probiotics and Fermented FoodsExercise and Physiological ResponsesSports Performance and Training

Oral administration of the probiotic Lactobacillus fermentum VRI-003 and mucosal immunity in endurance athletes

Open access
Cox, A J, Pyne, D B, Saunders, P U, Fricker, P A·2010·British Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the ability of a probiotic Lactobacillus fermentum VRI-003 (PCC) to enhance the mucosal immune system of elite athletes. Design and setting: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial was conducted over a 4-month period of winter training. Participants: 20 healthy elite male distance runners. Interventions: PCC was given at a daily dose of 1.26×10 10 as a freeze-dried powder in gelatin capsules. Placebo capsules contained an inert excipient. Main outcome measures: Treadmill performance (monthly), mucosal and systemic immunity (monthly), training (daily) and illness (daily) were assessed. Serum cytokine levels, salivary IgA levels and incidence, duration and severity of respiratory tract infections were measured. Results: Subjects reported less than half the number of days of respiratory symptoms during PCC treatment (30 days) compared with placebo (72 days, p<0.001). Illness severity was also lower for episodes occurring during the PCC treatment (p = 0.06). There were no significant differences in the mean change in salivary IgA and IgA1 levels, or in interleukin (IL)4 and IL12 levels, between treatments. However, PCC treatment elicited a twofold (p = 0.07) greater change in whole-blood culture interferon gamma (IFNγ) compared with placebo. No substantial changes in running performance measures were seen over the study period. Conclusions: Prophylactic administration of PCC was associated with a substantial reduction in the number of days and severity of respiratory illness in a cohort of highly trained distance runners. Maintenance of IFNγ levels may be one mechanism underpinning the positive clinical outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjsm.2007.044628

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The single strain interventions used in five studies did not produce an aerobic performance benefit.

    “The single strain interventions used in these five studies did not produce an aerobic performance benefit.”
  • In an athletic population, specific probiotic strains can reduce the number of episodes, severity and duration of upper respiratory tract infections.

    “In an athletic population, specific probiotic strains can reduce the number of episodes, severity and duration of upper respiratory tract infections.”
  • In a 16-week study of 20 elite male distance runners, supplementation with Lactobacillus fermentum VRI-003 did not significantly change measures of performance (training duration, intensity, and VO2 max).

    “in a 16-week study investigating the effect of Lactobacillus fermentum VRI-003 on the immunity in 20 elite male distance runners, measures of performance (which included training duration, intensity, and VO2 max) did not change significantly [57].”
  • In 20 elite male distance runners, L. fermentum VRI-003 (PCC) over 16 weeks of winter training significantly reduced URTI incidence and severity compared to placebo.

    “Probiotic supplementation significantly reduced URTI incidence and severity compared to placebo.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Batterham AM, Hopkins WG. A decision tree for controlled trials. Sportscience 2005;9:33-9.
  2. Gluck G, Gebbers JO. Ingested probiotics reduce nasal colonization with pathogenic bacteria. Am J Clin Nutr 2003;77:517-20.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cox, A. J., Pyne, D. B., Saunders, P. U., & Fricker, P. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
  • Australian National University (AU)
Corresponding author
Pyne, D B
Venue
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2008-02-13
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
222-226
ISSN
  • 0306-3674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0480
OpenAlex
W2116436375
Cited by
234
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 11
FWCI
11.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
probiotics, mucosal immunity, endurance athletes, long-distance runners, respiratory infections, salivary IgA, interferon-gamma, cytokines, disease prevention, winter training
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adult, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Male, Physical Endurance, Running, Cytokines, Cross-Over Studies, Immunity, Mucosal, Probiotics, Limosilactobacillus fermentum, Medication Adherence, Athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review