Cited by 646Gut microbiota and healthOral microbiology and periodontitis researchGenetic factors in colorectal cancer

The oral microbiota in colorectal cancer is distinctive and predictive

Open access
Flemer, Burkhardt, Warren, Ryan D, Barrett, Maurice P, Cisek, Katryna, Das, Anubhav, Jeffery, Ian B, Hurley, Eimear, O‘Riordain, Micheal +2 more·2018·Gut

Abstract

Background and aims: Microbiota alterations are linked with colorectal cancer (CRC) and notably higher abundance of putative oral bacteria on colonic tumours. However, it is not known if colonic mucosa-associated taxa are indeed orally derived, if such cases are a distinct subset of patients or if the oral microbiome is generally suitable for screening for CRC. Methods: We profiled the microbiota in oral swabs, colonic mucosae and stool from individuals with CRC (99 subjects), colorectal polyps (32) or controls (103). Results: Several oral taxa were differentially abundant in CRC compared with controls, for example, Streptococcus and Prevotella s pp. A classification model of oral swab microbiota distinguished individuals with CRC or polyps from controls (sensitivity: 53% (CRC)/67% (polyps); specificity: 96%). Combining the data from faecal microbiota and oral swab microbiota increased the sensitivity of this model to 76% (CRC)/88% (polyps). We detected similar bacterial networks in colonic microbiota and oral microbiota datasets comprising putative oral biofilm forming bacteria. While these taxa were more abundant in CRC, core networks between pathogenic, CRC-associated oral bacteria such as Peptostreptococcus , Parvimonas and Fusobacterium were also detected in healthy controls. High abundance of Lachnospiraceae was negatively associated with the colonisation of colonic tissue with oral-like bacterial networks suggesting a protective role for certain microbiota types against CRC, possibly by conferring colonisation resistance to CRC-associated oral taxa and possibly mediated through habitual diet. Conclusion: The heterogeneity of CRC may relate to microbiota types that either predispose or provide resistance to the disease, and profiling the oral microbiome may offer an alternative screen for detecting CRC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314814

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Enrichment of bacterial species from oral cavity is characteristic of CRC GOMS, along with enrichment in invasive polymicrobial bacterial biofilms in patients with right-sided tumours.

    “The enrichment of bacterial species from the oral cavity is characteristic of the CRC GOMS50,76–79, along with an enrichment in invasive polymicrobial bacterial biofilms in patients with right-sided tumours76,80,81.”
  • Similar networks of oral bacteria were found in oral and colonic mucosal samples from individuals with colonic neoplasia and controls.

    “Interestingly, similar networks of oral bacteria were found samples from oral and colonic mucosal surfaces of individuals with colonic neoplasia and controls.55”
  • Alterations to the oral and intestinal microbiomes might each contribute to colorectal carcinogenesis through microbe dissemination and induction of inflammation.

    “So, alterations to the oral and intestinal microbiomes might each contribute to colorectal carcinogenesis, via microbe dissemination and induction of inflammation.54, 55, 59,60.”
  • Oral microbiome profiling identified several oral biofilm members with different abundances in colorectal cancer patients compared with controls, including Haemophilus, Parvimonas, Prevotella, Alloprevotella, Lachnoanaerobaculum, Neisseria, and Streptococcus.

    “oral microbiome profiling studies identified several members of the oral biofilms with different abundances in patients with CRC compared with controls, including Haemophilus, Parvimonas, Prevotella, Alloprevotella, Lachnoanaerobaculum, Neisseria, and Streptococcus.54, 55”
  • Except for Prevotella, several common oral genera (Haemophilus, Neisseria, and Streptococcus) decreased in individuals with colitis-associated cancer.

    “Veillonella, Streptococcus, Rothia and Aggregatibacter were dramatically increased in non-small cell lung cancer patients (Zhang W. et al., 2019) and, except for Prevotella, several common oral genera (i.e., Haemophilus, Neisseria and Streptococcus) decreased in individuals with colitis-associated cancer (Flemer et al., 2018).”

    From Oral Microbiome and SARS-CoV-2: Beware of Lung Co-infection (2020) · cites this paper as Flemer et al., 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flemer, B., Warren, R. D., Barrett, M. P., Cisek, K., Das, A., Jeffery, I. B., Hurley, E., O‘Riordain, M., Shanahan, F., & O‘Toole, P. W.
Affiliations
  • National University of Ireland (IE)
  • 4D Pharma Cork Ltd, Cork, Ireland
  • APC Microbiome Institue, University College Cork, National University of Ireland, Cork, Ireland
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2017-10-07
Volume
67
Issue
8
Pages
1454-1463
ISSN
  • 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3288
OpenAlex
W2762906919
Cited by
646
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 97 · 2023: 92 · 2022: 88 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 81 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 3
FWCI
17.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Gut (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (acceptedVersion)
  • Cork Open Research Archive (University College Cork, Ireland) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
Science Foundation Ireland
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Keywords
colorectal cancer, oral microbiota, colonic mucosa, colorectal polyps, cancer screening, Streptococcus, Prevotella, Peptostreptococcus, Parvimonas, Fusobacterium, Lachnospiraceae, bacterial networks, colonization resistance, diet
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Colonic Polyps, Feces, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mouth, Sensitivity and Specificity, Colorectal Neoplasms, Case-Control Studies, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review