Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 484

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The neurobehavioural rating scale: assessment of the behavioural sequelae of head injury by the clinician.

Open access
Levin, H S, High, W M, Goethe, K E, Sisson, R A, Overall, J E, Rhoades, H M, Eisenberg, H M, Kalisky, Z, Gary, H E·1987·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
DOI 10.1136/jnnp.50.2.183
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

To investigate the inter-rater reliability and validity of the Neurobehavioural Rating Scale at various stages of recovery after hospitalisation for closed head injury, we studied 101 head trauma patients who had no antecedent neuropsychiatric disorder. The results demonstrated satisfactory inter-rater reliability and showed that the Neurobehavioural Rating Scale reflects both the severity and chronicity of closed head injury. A principal components analysis revealed four factors which were differentially related to severity of head injury and the presence of a frontal lobe mass lesion. Although our findings provide support for utilising clinical ratings of behaviour to investigate sequelae of head injury, extension of this technique to other settings is necessary to evaluate the distinctiveness of the neurobehavioural profile of closed head injury as compared with other aetiologies of brain damage.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp.50.2.183

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Levin HS, Grossman RG. Behavioral sequelae of closed head injury. A quantitative study. Arch Neurol 1978;35:720-7. · DOI
  2. Lishman WA. The psychiatric sequelae of head injury: a review. Psychol Med 1973;3:304-18. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Ruesch J. Intellectual impairment in head injuries. Am J Psychiatry 1944;100:480-96. · doi:10.1176/ajp.100.4.480
  4. Ruesch J, Bowman KM. Prolonged post-traumatic syndromes following head injury. Am J Psychiatry 1945;102: 145-63. · DOI
  5. Schilder P. Psychic disturbances after head injuries. Am J Psychiatry 1934;91: 155-88. · doi:10.1176/ajp.91.1.155
  6. Schnaper N. The psychological implications of severe trauma: emotional sequelae to unconsciousness. A preliminary study. J Trauma 1975;15:94-8. · doi:10.1097/00005373-197502000-00002
  7. Stem JM. Cranio-cerebral injured patients. A psychiatric clinical description. Scand J Rehab Med 1978;10:7-10.
  8. Jennett B, Snoek J, Bond MR, Brooks N. Disability after severe head injury: observations on the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1981;44:285-93. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Brooks DN, McKinlay W. Personality and behavioural change after severe blunt head injury-a relative's view. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1983;46:336 44.
  10. Fordyce DJ, Roueche JR, Prigatano GP. Enhanced emotional reactions in chronic head trauma patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1983;46:620-4. · DOI
  11. 1 Livingston MG, Brooks DN, Bond MR. Three months after severe head injury: psychiatric and social impact on relatives. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1985;48:870-5. · DOI
  12. Livingston MG, Brooks DN, Bond MR. Patient outcome in the year following severe head injury and relatives' psychiatric and social functioning. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1985;48:876-81. · DOI
  13. McKinlay WW, Brooks DN, Bond MR, Martinage DP, Marshall MM. The short-term outcome of severe blunt head injury as reported by relatives of the injured persons. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1981;44:727-33.
  14. Oddy M, Coughlan T, Tyerman A, Jenkins D. Social adjustment after closed head injury: a further followup seven years after injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1985;48:564-8. · DOI · Paper page
  15. van Zomeren AH, Van Den Burg W. Residual complaints of patients two years after severe head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1985;48:21-8. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Weddell R, Oddy M, Jenkins D. Social adjustment after rehabilitation: a two year follow-up of patients with severe head injury. Psychol Med 1980;10:257-63. · DOI
  17. Cassileth BR, Lusk EJ, Strouse TB, Miller DS, Brown LL, Cross PA, Tenaglia AN. Psychosocial status in chronic illness. A comparative analysis of six diagnostic groups. N Engl J Med 1984;311:506-10. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Gronwall D, Wrightson P. Delayed recovery of intellectual function after minor head injury. Lancet 1974;ii:605-9. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Levin HS, Mattis S, Ruff RM, et al. Neurobehavioral outcome of minor head injury: a three center study. J Neurology (in press).
  20. Rutherford WH, Merrett JD, McDonald JR. Sequelae of concussion caused by minor head injuries. Lancet 1977;i: 1-4. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Walker AE. Long term evaluation of the social and family adjustment to head injuries. Scand J Rehab Med 1972;4:5-8.
  22. Dahlstrom WG, Welsh GS, Dahlstrom LE. An MMPI handbook. Vol. 1. Clinical Interpretation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1972.
  23. Dikmen S, Reitan RM. Emotional sequelae of head injury. Ann Neurol 1977a;2:492-4.
  24. Dikmen S, Reitan RM. MMPI correlates of adaptive ability deficits in patients with brain lesions. J Nerv Ment Dis 1977b;165:247-54. · doi:10.1097/00005053-197710000-00004
  25. Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet 1975;1:480-7. · DOI · Paper page
  26. Levin HS, Grossman RG, Rose JE, Teasdale G. Longterm neuropsychological outcome of closed head injury. J Neurosurg 1979;50:412-22. · DOI · Paper page
  27. Levin HS, O'Donnell VM, Grossman RG. The Galveston orientation and amnesia test: A practical scale to assess cognition after head injury. J Nerv Ment Dis 1979;167:675-84. · DOI · Paper page
  28. Nauta WJH. The problem of the frontal lobe. A reinterpretation. J Psychiat Res 1971;8: 167-87. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Jounadet M, Gazzaniga MS. The frontal lobes. In: Gazzaniga MS, ed. Handbook ofBehavioral Neurobiology. New York: Plenum Press, 1979:25-59.
  30. Gandy SE, Snow RB, Zimmerman RD, Deck MDF. Cranial nuclear magnetic resonance imaging in head trauma. Ann Neurol 1984;16:254-7. · DOI
  31. Adams JH, Graham DI, Murray LS, Scott G. Diffuse axonal injury due to nonmissile head injury to humans: an analysis of 45 cases. Ann Neurol 1982;12:557-63. · DOI · Paper page
  32. Strich SJ. Diffuse degeneration of the cerebral white matter in severe dementia following head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1956;19:163-85. · DOI · Paper page
  33. Marshall LF, Becker DP, Bowers SA, Cayard C, Eisenberg HM, et al. The national coma data bank. Part 1: Design, purpose, goals and results. J Neurosurg 1983;59:276-84. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Levin, H. S., High, W. M., Goethe, K. E., Sisson, R. A., Overall, J. E., Rhoades, H. M., Eisenberg, H. M., Kalisky, Z., & Gary, H. E.
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1987-02-01
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
183-193
ISSN
0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1136/jnnp.50.2.183
OpenAlex
W2072514883
Cited by
484
References
3
FWCI
3.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.