Cited by 194Microplastics and Plastic PollutionEnvironmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyTurtle Biology and Conservation

Assessing plastic debris in aquatic food webs: What we know and don't know about uptake and trophic transfer

Open access
Provencher, J.F., Ammendolia, J., Rochman, C.M., Mallory, M.L.·2019·Environmental Reviews

Abstract

Plastic pollution is now recognized as a global environmental issue that can affect the health of biota and ecosystems. Now that a growing number of species and taxa are known to ingest a diverse range of sizes and types of plastics and retain the plastics in their guts, there are increasing questions relating to the movement of plastics through food webs, and how biota may directly and indirectly ingest plastics. Here, we synthesize what is known from the published, peer-reviewed literature about plastic ingestion by animals and identify critical gaps in our knowledge. We systematically reviewed and examined the literature for studies that reported ingested plastics in marine and freshwater biota at a global scale. Our objective was to inform discussions and future studies regarding what we know about plastic ingestion and fate in food webs. We assessed what regions, ecosystems, and food webs have been studied to date and whether potential information may already be available to assess if trophic transfer of plastics may be occurring. We found 160 relevant publications through 2016. Most studies were concentrated in specific regions and in specific ecosystem types, with freshwater studies being the most limited. Moreover, most studies examined one species at a time with only a handful of regions with multiple taxa examined across multiple studies. Twenty-one percent of the regions have no published data on plastic ingestion to date. Although some studies have measured ingestion in multiple species across trophic levels, few have tested the hypothesis that plastics are transferred across trophic levels. Moreover, none have addressed questions related to biomagnification. While our review suggests that numerous papers have recorded the ingestion of plastics by biota across many trophic levels, habitats, and geographic regions, many questions regarding how or whether biota retain, bioaccumulate, biomagnify, and trophically transfer plastics still need to be addressed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/er-2018-0079

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Janinhoff, N., Verdaat, H., and van Franeker, J.A. 2010. Rosse Franjepoot Phalaropus fulicaria fourageert in plastic soep. Grey phalarope foraging in plastic soup. Sula 23(1): 41-45.
  2. Nordberg, M., Templeton, D.M., Andersen, O., and Duffus, J.H. 2009. Glossary of erms used in Ecotoxicology. Pure Appl. Chem. 81(5): 829-970.
  3. Poon, F., Provencher, J.F., Mallory, M.L., Braune, B.M., and Smith, P.A. 2017. Plastic accumulation in four Arctic seabird species. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 116(1-2): 517-520.
  4. Provencher, J.F., Bond, A.L., Avery-Gomm, S., Borrelle, S.B., Bravo Rebolledo, E.L., Hammer, S., Kühn, S., Lavers, J.L., Mallory, M.L., Trevail, A., and Van Franeker, J.A. 2017. Quantifying ingested debris in marine megafauna: A review and recommendations for standardization. Anal. Methods 9(9): 1454-1469. doi:10.1039/c6ay02419. · DOI
  5. Tahir, A., and Rochman, C.M. 2014. Plastic Particles in Silverside (Stolephorusheterolobus) Collected at Paotere Fish Market, Makassar. Int. J. Agric. Syst. 2(2): 163-168. Available from http://pasca.unhas.ac.id/ijas/pdf/7) IJAS Vol. 2 Issue 2 December 2014.pdf.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Provencher, J. F., Ammendolia, J., Rochman, C. M., & Mallory, M. L.
Affiliations
  • Environment and Climate Change Canada (CA)
  • Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Acadia University (CA)
Venue
Environmental Reviews
Published
2019-09
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
304-317
ISSN
  • 1181-8700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1208-6053
OpenAlex
W2899730238
Cited by
194
References
110
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 7
FWCI
6.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Association of Canadian Universities for Northern Studies
  • Liber Ero Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Turtle Biology and Conservation
Keywords
plastic pollution, plastic ingestion, trophic transfer, food webs, biomagnification, bioaccumulation, marine organisms, freshwater organisms, trophic levels

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review