The DOI matches its Crossref record; 213 of the 213 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 30 of the 313 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention
Open accessAbstract
People have a basic need to maintain the integrity of the self, a global sense of personal adequacy. Events that threaten self-integrity arouse stress and self-protective defenses that can hamper performance and growth. However, an intervention known as self-affirmation can curb these negative outcomes. Self-affirmation interventions typically have people write about core personal values. The interventions bring about a more expansive view of the self and its resources, weakening the implications of a threat for personal integrity. Timely affirmations have been shown to improve education, health, and relationship outcomes, with benefits that sometimes persist for months and years. Like other interventions and experiences, self-affirmations can have lasting benefits when they touch off a cycle of adaptive potential, a positive feedback loop between the self-system and the social system that propagates adaptive outcomes over time. The present review highlights both connections with other disciplines and lessons for a social psychological understanding of intervention and change.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
140 Own interpretation · 121 No full text of the sources · 34 Sources not found · 32 Not checked yet · 19 No basis given · 12 Partly supported · 9 Supported · 7 Supported so far · 1 Own method · accuracy not yet measured
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“People have a basic need to maintain the integrity of the self, a global sense of personal adequacy.”
- Also stated in: § Self-Affirmation Theory · plain
“The postulate that people are motivated to maintain self-integrity rests at the center of selfaffirmation theory (Steele 1988; see also Sherman & Cohen 2006).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Steele 1988 source
- Supportedcites Sherman & Cohen 2006 source
The Overview of Self-Affirmation Theory states that people are motivated to maintain self-integrity and defines it as a sense of being, on the whole, a good and appropriate person. The “Worth of the Self” section likewise describes the motivation to protect the self’s perceived integrity and worth. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Self-Affirmation Theory · plain
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Threats to this image evoke psychological threat (see Steele 1988, Sherman & Cohen 2006).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Self-Affirmation Theory
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Steele 1988 source
- Supportedcites Sherman & Cohen 2006 source
The “Worth of the Self” section says events that challenge a person’s self-conception are threatening because they bear on overall self-integrity. “Self-Affirmation and Threats to the Individual Self” likewise describes threats to a valued self-image. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.91)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“The postulate that people are motivated to maintain self-integrity rests at the center of selfaffirmation theory (Steele 1988; see also Sherman & Cohen 2006).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Self-Affirmation Theory
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Steele 1988 source
- Supportedcites Sherman & Cohen 2006 source
In the Overview of Self-Affirmation Theory, Sherman and Cohen state that the theory begins with the premise that people are motivated to maintain the integrity of the self. The “Worth of the Self” section also calls protecting the self’s perceived integrity and worth its most basic tenet. (LLM, conf=0.95)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Reducing defensiveness.Self-affirmations also reduce defensive responses, adaptations to protect the self from threat (for a review, see Sherman & Cohen 2006).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Buffering against threat.
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Sherman & Cohen 2006 source
Section IV, “Moderator Variables and Qualifying Conditions” (page not provided), states that self-affirmations reduce the likelihood of defensive adaptations to threat. The paper also describes those responses as adaptations that protect self-integrity. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Less encumbered by psychological threat, self-affirmed people can better marshal their cognitive resources to meet the demands of the task at hand, for example, solving more creative problems under pressure (Creswell et al. 2013) or exerting self-control in a depleting situation (Schmeichel & Vohs 2009).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Buffering against threat.
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Creswell et al. 2013 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion reports that self-affirmation improved performance on a creativity-related problem-solving task under pressure, specifically among underperforming, chronically stressed participants. It proposes greater working-memory availability as a possible explanation to be tested in future research; it does not establish that participants marshaled cognitive resources better because they were less threatened. (LLM, conf=0.83)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Schmeichel & Vohs 2009 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“But when self-affirmed, people can see the many ordinary stressors of daily life in the context of the big picture (Schmeichel & Vohs 2009, Wakslak & Trope 2009).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Understanding the Effects of Self-Affirmation
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Schmeichel & Vohs 2009 source
- Partly supportedcites Wakslak & Trope 2009 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The General discussion reports that self-affirmation promotes a “big picture approach” and proposes that it might reduce defensiveness by helping people distinguish immediate concerns from longer-term goals. The paper does not establish that people view the many ordinary stressors of daily life in that way specifically. (LLM, conf=0.82)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“A randomized field experiment that disentangled the effect of student social class from the effect of student race found that it could (Harackiewicz et al. 2014).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Educational interventions.
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Harackiewicz et al. 2014 source
The Method (The Intervention; page not provided) describes random assignment to values-affirmation or control exercises. The Results (Supplementary Analysis; page not provided) report improved performance for first-generation students and analyze generational status separately from underrepresented-minority status, supporting the claim that the intervention could help narrow the social-class achievement gap. (LLM, conf=0.93)
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Remarkably, first-generation students also proved more likely to enroll in the second course in the biology sequence if they had been in the affirmation condition (86% did so) rather than in the control condition (66% did so).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Educational interventions.
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Harackiewicz et al. 2014 source
The Results section, under “Continuation in second semester,” reports that 85.7% of first-generation students in the values-affirmation condition enrolled in the second biology course, compared with 66.2% in the control condition. The citing sentence rounds these figures to 86% and 66%. No page number is provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.95)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“It cut the achievement gap between them and their more financially advantaged peers in the course by 50%.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Educational interventions.
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Harackiewicz et al. 2014 source
The Results (Primary Analyses, ‘Biology course grade’; page not provided) report that the values-affirmation intervention reduced the course-grade gap between first-generation and continuing-generation students by 50%. The paper describes continuing-generation students as more likely to come from middle- or upper-class backgrounds, supporting the comparison with more financially advantaged peers. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“For these students, two in-class values affirmations improved their grades in an introductory biology course.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Educational interventions.
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Harackiewicz et al. 2014 source
The Method (The Intervention; page unavailable) says first-generation students in the affirmation condition were assigned two values-affirmation writing exercises, administered in laboratory sections in weeks 3 and 8. The Abstract (page unavailable) reports that values affirmation significantly improved their final grades in the introductory biology course. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
- It may state two separate claims as one. 103
- Probably not a substantial claim. 52
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“But the self-integrity motive is so strong that mundane events can threaten the self as well and instigate defensive responses to protect it (Sherman & Cohen 2006).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Sherman & Cohen 2006 source
In “IV. Moderator Variables and Qualifying Conditions” (page not available), the paper lists everyday events, including a team’s defeat and failure at an intellectual or athletic task, as threats to self-integrity. It says people may respond to such threats with defensive adaptations. Section 2 likewise describes defensive responses as a way to diminish threats and restore perceived self-integrity. (LLM, conf=0.90)
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Even small inputs into the self-system can have large effects, because a healthy self-system is motivated to maintain integrity and generate affirming meanings (Steele 1988; see also Sherman & Cohen 2006).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > What Are Self-Affirmations?
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Steele 1988 source
- Supportedcites Sherman & Cohen 2006 source
In “The Self-System is Flexible” (page not available), the paper says the self-system seeks to maintain integrity and can respond to a threat by affirming another domain. In “Are People Aware of Self-Affirmation Processes?” (page not available), it reports that a subtle priming task had an effect on interest in math careers equal in magnitude to the effect of participants’ sex. Together, these support the claim that small inputs can have substantial effects through self-affirmation. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In one series of studies, much of the effect of affirmation on second-year grades was mediated by its effect on first-year grades, suggesting that early strong performance begot later strong performance (Cohen et al. 2009, Harackiewicz et al. 2014).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Educational interventions.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Cohen et al. 2009 source
- Partly supportedcites Harackiewicz et al. 2014 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (Mediation analysis; page unavailable) report that first-course grades partially mediated affirmation’s effect on enrollment in the next course, not its effect on second-year grades. The Discussion (page unavailable) describes longer-term GPA effects and the possibility that early performance carries forward, but does not report the claimed first-year-to-second-year grade mediation. (LLM, conf=0.87)
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“For example, effects on academic grades and health outcomes have endured months and years after the commencement of the intervention”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Social psychological processes such as self-affirmation can propagate over time.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Cohen et al. 2009 source
- Partly supportedcites Harackiewicz et al. 2014 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Theoretical Framework reports that effects on academic grades persisted for two or three years in earlier values-affirmation studies, and the Discussion reports effects on grades in the same semester of this study. The Theoretical Framework also describes reduced physiological stress, but it does not say that health-related effects endured for months or years. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Logel & Cohen 2012 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“To the extent that financial distress can imprint on children a view of the world as threatening and requiring vigilance, interventions later in life may need to assure them that their school or work environment is a safe place where they belong and good things eventually happen”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Timing matters.
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Chen & Miller 2012 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
- Partly supportedcites Harackiewicz et al. 2014 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“This can help them retain the support of family, friends, and coworkers through the lifespan (Caspi & Moffitt 1995, Lyubomirsky & Della Porta 2010) and attract the interest of a role model (Chen & Miller 2012).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Connections With Other Research Areas
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Caspi & Moffitt 1995
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Lyubomirsky & Della Porta 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Partly supportedcites Chen & Miller 2012 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Benefits of Role Models section (page unavailable) reports that resilient children had close bonds with supportive adults, including teachers. It does not say that being good-natured attracted those adults’ interest. The family-and-friends portion of the sentence is attached to other citations, not Chen and Miller. (LLM, conf=0.78)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“For example, the finding that children's performance on laboratory self-control tasks can be boosted by situational intervention (e.g., Karniol et al. 2011) seems to clash with the finding that childhood variation on such self-control measures predicts health, wealth, employment, and crime decades later (Moffitt et al. 2011).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > CONCLUSION
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Moffitt et al. 2011 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results report that childhood self-control predicted health, wealth, and criminal convictions at age 32, including when measured by staff observation at ages 3–5. But the paper distinguishes its observational ratings and reports from laboratory self-control tasks, and the cited passages do not establish employment as a measured adult outcome. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Beyond unblinding instructors to students' condition assignment, the evaluative and public nature of the activity may have compromised its ability to be affirming.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > FUTURE ISSUES
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Woolf et al. 2009 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Methods (Procedures and Interventions; page unavailable) say tutors marked the reflective exercises and selected a few submissions for discussion in tutorials, supporting the description of the activity as evaluative and potentially public. The paper does not say that these features may have compromised the activity’s ability to be affirming; that is the citing authors’ interpretation. (LLM, conf=0.83)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“First, it was unclear whether identity threat contributed to the performance of the ethnic minority sample, a heterogeneous group consisting primarily of Asian Indian, Pakistani, and Bangladeshi participants.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > FUTURE ISSUES
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Woolf et al. 2009 source
In the Discussion and conclusion (page not supplied), the authors say most ethnic minority participants were Asian Indian, Pakistani or Bangladeshi and explicitly question whether stereotype threat applied to them. They also state that the degree of threat they experienced was not known. This supports the citing sentence’s uncertainty about identity threat in that sample. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Another affirmation intervention with an ethnically heterogeneous sample of medical students in England found mixed effects, improving the performance of all students on their clinical evaluations and undermining the performance of white students on a written examination(Woolf et al. 2009).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > FUTURE ISSUES
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Woolf et al. 2009 source
Split into 2 atoms — 2 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“But they did lead to positive and in some cases lasting changes in academic performance, health, and the quality of interpersonal and intergroup relations.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Cycles of Adaptive Potential: How Social Psychological Processes Such as Self-Affirmation Propagate Through Time
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The interventions did not eliminate the problems under study and, of course, were not expected to do so.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Cycles of Adaptive Potential: How Social Psychological Processes Such as Self-Affirmation Propagate Through Time
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The affirmation did not boost GPA but rather slowed its decline.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Educational interventions.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Timely affirmations have been shown to improve education, health, and relationship outcomes, with benefits that sometimes persist for months and years.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Abstract
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The self has a powerful need to see itself as having integrity, but it must do so within the constraints of reality (Adler 2012, Kunda 1990, Pennebaker & Chung 2011, Wilson 2011).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although psychological threat can sometimes trigger positive change (Rokeach 1973, Stone et al. 1994), it can also impede adaptive coping.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Rokeach 1973
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Stone et al. 1994 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The interventions bring about a more expansive view of the self and its resources, weakening the implications of a threat for personal integrity.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The goal is not to appraise every threat in a self-flattering way but rather to maintain an overarching narrative of the self 's adequacy.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > INTRODUCTION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Times of high need can be identified, making possible well-timed self-affirmation interventions.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > What Are Self-Affirmations?
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Rather, it is a psychological time-out (Lyubomirsky & Della Porta 2010): a moment to pull back and regain perspective on what really matters.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > What Are Self-Affirmations?
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Lyubomirsky & Della Porta 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although these defenses protect self-integrity in the short term, they can undermine growth and prove self-defeating in the long term.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Buffering against threat.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For a wide range of challenges, this is what self-affirmation interventions enable people to do.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > For a wide range of challenges, this is what self-affirmation interventions enable people to do.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Self-affirmations given at these times can help people navigate difficulties and set them on a better path.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > What Are Self-Affirmations?
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“An implication for intervention is that rewards and praise are secondary to opportunities for people to manifest their integrity through meaningful acts, thoughts, and feelings.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Self-Affirmation Theory
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Self-affirmations bring about a more expansive view of the self and its resources.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > What Are Self-Affirmations?
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Neither social support nor values affirmation eliminated the stressor.Rather they placed it in a larger context of”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Buffering against threat.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the flexibility of the self-system can be adaptive, it can also prove costly when people cannot find constructive avenues to achieve self-integrity.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Self-Affirmation Theory
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Self-affirmations can reassure people that they have integrity and that life, on balance, is okay in spite of an adversity before them.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Buffering against threat.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Against this broadened conception of the self in the world, a particular threat that confronts a person feels less dire.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > What Are Self-Affirmations?
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“But there are times when sources of self-affirmation may be few, or threats to the self may run especially high.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > What Are Self-Affirmations?
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Time does not necessarily weaken the influence of the past, but can, it seems, preserve and strengthen it.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Cycles of Adaptive Potential: How Social Psychological Processes Such as Self-Affirmation Propagate Through Time
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, if self-affirmed students perform better, they may find themselves held to higher expectations by their teachers or placed in a higher track, which could raise their performance further and open new opportunities.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Cycles of Adaptive Potential: How Social Psychological Processes Such as Self-Affirmation Propagate Through Time
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They thus buffer individuals against threat and reduce defensive responses to it.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Buffering against threat.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The effect is catalytic.Forces that would otherwise be suppressed by psychological threat-such as cognitive aptitude or persuasive evidence-are unleashed.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Buffering against threat.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“First, affirmations remind people of psychosocial resources beyond a particular threat and thus broaden their perspective beyond it (Sherman & Hartson 2011).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Understanding the Effects of Self-Affirmation
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Sherman & Hartson 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A positive feedback loop between these two powerful systems can drive adaptive outcomes over time.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Cycles of Adaptive Potential: How Social Psychological Processes Such as Self-Affirmation Propagate Through Time
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Affirmations lift psychological barriers to change through two routes: the buffering or lessening of psychological threat and the curtailing of defensive adaptations to it.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Understanding the Effects of Self-Affirmation
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The self may then seek out alternative domains in which to invest itself.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Self-Affirmation Theory
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many events in a given day are seen as relevant to the self in some way and this enables people to continually refresh their sense of adequacy.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > What Are Self-Affirmations?
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Recursion, interaction, and subjective construal can channel people into a cycle of adaptive potential.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Educational interventions.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Indeed, fewer minority students were placed in their school's remedial track or retained in grade in the affirmation condition (3%) than in the control condition (9%); affirmed minorities also took more advanced math courses (Cohen et al. 2009).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Educational interventions.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Cohen et al. 2009 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“The closure corresponded to roughly 30% for Latino and African American students at two school sites (Cohen et al. 2009;Sherman et al. 2013, study 2) and 22% for economically disadvantaged Latino American students at another (see Figure 2) (Sherman et al. 2013, study 1).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Educational interventions.
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Indeed, many social environments abound with change processes (G.L. Cohen & J. Garcia, manuscript in preparation).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Cycles of Adaptive Potential: How Social Psychological Processes Such as Self-Affirmation Propagate Through Time
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites G.L. Cohen & J. Garcia, manuscript in preparation
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because the intervention benefited ethnic minority students but not white students, it closed the achievement gap.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Educational interventions.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Women who had been randomly assigned to complete values affirmation exercises in their class performed better on their course exams and earned higher grades than did those who completed control exercises.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Educational interventions.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Miyake et al. 2010 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In summary, psychological threat contributes not only to underperformance but also to bullying and aggression, important problems that have proved difficult to change.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Educational interventions.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Academic institutions teem with processes that recognize, reinforce, and provide resources for student success.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Educational interventions.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“As hundreds of studies have shown, social identity threat-awareness that one could be devalued on the basis of one's group-can be stressful and undermine learning and performance (Inzlicht & Schmader 2011, Steele 2010, Steele et al. 2002).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > AFFIRMATION INTERVENTIONS Education
What the sources say
boostedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Self-affirmation processes bear not only on underperformance but also on bullying and aggression.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Educational interventions.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Indeed, the three domains where affirmation has had lasting benefit-education, health, and relationships-are ones where problems emerge from a slow-moving accumulation of costs.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Cycles of Adaptive Potential: How Social Psychological Processes Such as Self-Affirmation Propagate Through Time
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Self-affirmation interventions will not cure serious illness, but they can catalyze the impact of other positive health-related forces, such as health information, postoperative care regimens, and a person's goal to live a healthful life.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Health
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Because affirmations help people postpone shortterm gratifications for the sake of long-term goals (Schmeichel & Vohs 2009), and reduce stress that people might otherwise manage by drinking and smoking (Steele et al. 1981), it may be important to time affirmations to moments of greatest vulnerability (O.Fotuhi, S. Spencer, G.T. Fong, & M.P. Zanna, manuscript in preparation).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Overcoming barriers to long-term behavior change.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Schmeichel & Vohs 2009 source
- Not matchedcites Steele et al. 1981
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Illness, frailty, and the prospect of death represent some of the most powerful challenges to adaptive adequacy (see Greenberg et al. 1997).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Health
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Greenberg et al. 1997 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Relative to participants in a control condition, participants who first completed a self-affirmation-listing their desirable qualities-saw the advertisements as more distressing, expressed greater confidence in their ability to stop smoking, and had a stronger motivation to quit.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Health
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Harris et al. 2007 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“However, providing them with the opportunity to reflect on important values before reviewing the information decreased their denigration of the health message and increased their likelihood of agreeing to take a screening test (see also Howell & Shepperd 2012).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Health
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Beyond recursion and interaction, subjective construal can fuel a cycle of adaptive potential.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Educational interventions.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Self-affirmed minority students also displayed lower cognitive accessibility of the racial stereotype, suggesting that they were less likely to filter classroom experience through the lens of race (Cohen et al. 2006).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Educational interventions.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Cohen et al. 2006 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Between the two time points, the percentage of participants drinking within healthful government-recommended levels jumped by an average of 32 percentage points in the affirmation conditions, more than double the change observed in the control condition.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Overcoming barriers to long-term behavior change.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Armitage et al. 2011 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Indeed, over two years, minority students saw their sense of belonging in school fall, as if successive adversities reinforced the narrative that they did not belong (Cook et al. 2012).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Educational interventions.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Cook et al. 2012 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Among nonaffirmed minority students, a poor grade or a stressful day predicted a lower sense of belonging in school and a higher sense of racial threat (see Cook et al. 2012, Sherman et al. 2013).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Educational interventions.
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although three null findings have been published (Dillard et al. 2005, Fry & Prentice-Dunn 2005, Zhao et al. 2012)foot_4 , on the whole the research paints a picture of the affirmed mind as an open mind (Correll et al. 2004).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Health
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Dillard et al. 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Fry & Prentice-Dunn 2005 source
- Not matchedcites Zhao et al. 2012
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, affirmation does not produce change by itself but enables change to occur if evidence warrants it.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Health
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In summary, affirmation interventions can trigger a series of reciprocally reinforcing interactions between the self-system and the social system that foster students' adaptive potential over time.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Educational interventions.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Interventions that used these tactics to increase the adhesiveness of a single affirmation yielded long-term improvements in smoking cessation (O.Fotuhi, S. Spencer, G.T. Fong, & M.P. Zanna, manuscript in preparation) and GPA (G.M. Walton, C. Logel, J.M. Peach, S.J. Spencer, M.P. Zanna, manuscript under review).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Overcoming barriers to long-term behavior change.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites O.Fotuhi, S. Spencer, G.T. Fong, & M.P. Zanna, manuscript in preparation
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites G.M. Walton, C. Logel, J.M. Peach, S.J. Spencer, M.P. Zanna, manuscript under review
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A second strategy to promote long-term behavior change reinstates affirmation at the choice point, when the risk behavior occurs.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Overcoming barriers to long-term behavior change.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Affirmation produced these effects, the authors speculated, because it buffered women against weight-related stress and thus helped them to tap into psychological resources to meet their weight-related goals”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Overcoming barriers to long-term behavior change.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Schmeichel & Vohs 2009 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In a negotiation over abortion rights, participants whose commitment to their political views had been made salient proved responsive to affirmation.When affirmed, they made more compromises in a negotiation over abortion legislation, and they left the negotiation with stronger trust of the advocate on the other side of the issue”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Conflict.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Cohen et al. 2007 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In arguments, unhappy couples often sink into a mire of reciprocal retaliation.Each person's defensiveness evokes a response in kind from the other, a downward spiral of tit-for-tat that is not only mathematically predictable, consistent with a recursive cycle, but also predictive of early divorce.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Conflict.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gottman 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If success occurs at a timely moment, it can set in motion a cycle of adaptive potential that benefits long-term health.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Field experiments on patients with chronic health conditions.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“By contrast, happy couples seem to escape these recursive cycles by parrying with a surprising moment of affirmation-a disarming compliment, an assurance of regard, a bit of shared humor.Indeed, this pattern of disarming affirmation proved among the strongest predictors of marital stability and happiness”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Conflict.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gottman 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Among people in Israel and Bosnia, historically conflict-ridden areas, self-affirmed participants were more likely to acknowledge wrongdoings inflicted by their group on the other side and to support reparations to those harmed”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Conflict.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Čehajić-Clancy et al. 2011 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As in other domains, affirmation acts as a catalyst in the health domain.It allows people to take advantage of the opportunities for improvement available in a medical regimen or persuasive information, and to deal more adaptively with stress.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Field experiments on patients with chronic health conditions.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Affirmed patients gave and requested more information about their medical condition.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Field experiments on patients with chronic health conditions.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Havranek et al. 2012 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In a third study on young asthma patients, affirmation had a null effect on physical activity, although a positive effect emerged among young patients who had had a serious medical episode that required hospitalization or intensive care and who thus presumably faced the greatest psychological threat”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Field experiments on patients with chronic health conditions.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Mancuso et al. 2012
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many of the health-based affirmations also seem to encourage a habit of self-affirming in challenging circumstances, which may help explain the longevity of their effects.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Field experiments on patients with chronic health conditions.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Relative to a writing control group, self-affirmed students reported less stress and better health, as assessed by a composite measure of illness, physical symptoms, and health center visits.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Overcoming barriers to long-term behavior change.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Keough & Markus 1998 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Stress can undermine self-control, which can increase the likelihood that one will fail to meet health-related goals, which can increase stress further, in a repeating cycle.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Overcoming barriers to long-term behavior change.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Logel & Cohen 2012 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In these studies, the intervention also contained a positive mood component (e.g., patients received happiness-inducing gifts in the mail), so it is unclear whether affirmation or positive mood drove the effects.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Field experiments on patients with chronic health conditions.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Indeed, affirmations have been shown to lessen defensive behavior in interpersonal and intergroup encounters and to promote trust, compromise, and closeness”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Intergroup Conflict and Interpersonal Relationships
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Crocker et al. 2008 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“After viewing presidential debates on the eve of the 2008 election, affirmed Democrats and Republicans were less partisan in their evaluations of Barack Obama's debate performance, and 10 days after the election, previously affirmed Republicans thought that President Obama would govern in a more balanced and objective fashion”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Conflict.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Binning et al. 2010 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“They also had lower body mass index (BMI) and a smaller waist circumference, a health factor independent of BMI.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Overcoming barriers to long-term behavior change.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Logel & Cohen 2012 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Consistent with the effects of stress on self-control, preoccupation with one's weight predicts distress, poor eating, lack of exercise, and-ironically-weight gain”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Overcoming barriers to long-term behavior change.
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This vigilance can create a self-fulfilling prophecy wherein the expectation of threat readies people to perceive it, thereby reinforcing the expectation of threat in a recursive loop that imposes an increasingly heavy toll on health (Miller et al. 2009).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Overcoming barriers to long-term behavior change.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Miller et al. 2009 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“When people are affirmed in valued domains unrelated to a dispute, they are more open to otherwise identity-threatening political information and less intransigent in negotiations”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Conflict.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Cohen 2012 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The most effective way to do so is to change the social environment-classrooms, work, home, society-so that it better provides everyday opportunities to manifest adequacy, such as through meaningful work and civic engagement (Sterling 2004).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Overcoming barriers to long-term behavior change.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Sterling 2004 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“Such race discordances predict poorer patient-physician communication, a cause of racial disparities in compliance and health care”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Field experiments on patients with chronic health conditions.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Havranek et al. 2012 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By helping patients to see themselves as people with adaptive adequacy in spite of their illness, or even because of their ability to cope with it, the writing exercise seemed to lessen the stress of chronic illness and thus improved long-term health.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Overcoming barriers to long-term behavior change.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Chronic stressors at sensitive periods can keep the stress system on alert for threat even years later, a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (see Miller et al. 2009).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Overcoming barriers to long-term behavior change.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Miller et al. 2009 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Once people begin to achieve important health goals, they may feel more affirmed and receive more affirming feedback from others, each of which could reinforce the change and carry it forward through time.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Overcoming barriers to long-term behavior change.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“But short of this, timely interventions that assuage threat at sensitive periods can help.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Overcoming barriers to long-term behavior change.
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Patients who affirmed important values, such as relationships or religion, or who reflected on valued personal qualities benefited most.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Overcoming barriers to long-term behavior change.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Creswell et al. 2007 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Their interactions evinced greater attentiveness, warmth, and respect, and less depression and distress.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Field experiments on patients with chronic health conditions.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Havranek et al. 2012 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Poor communication between patients and their physicians contributes to patient nonadherence to prescribed care, a major health problem”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Field experiments on patients with chronic health conditions.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Zolnierek & DiMatteo 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Third, because a process interacts with the system in which it occurs, field studies provide a necessary supplement to lab studies.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Social psychological processes such as self-affirmation can propagate over time.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Affirmed students may be placed in more demanding courses (see Cohen et al. 2009) and come to befriend peers who set a norm for higher achievement”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Social psychological processes such as self-affirmation can propagate over time.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Cohen et al. 2009 source
- Not matchedcites Alwin et al. 1991
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“At the end of two weeks, affirmed participants reported that their partners had acted more supportively and less critically toward them”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Conflict.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Marigold et al. 2007 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Other examples of disappointing interventions include the Cambridge-Somerville youth program (McCord 1978;see Ross & Nisbett 2011), which provided substantial material and social resources to at-risk juveniles.Such resources may be necessary for change to occur, but not sufficient.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Social psychological processes such as self-affirmation can propagate over time.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites McCord 1978
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Ross & Nisbett 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Self-affirmed individuals narrate adversity in a manner that better maintains the adequacy of the self and helps them to adaptively engage with threats; this narrative can build on itself over time”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Social psychological processes such as self-affirmation can propagate over time.
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This negative spiral can be interrupted, and a positive trajectory fostered, through values affirmation.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Conflict.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Self-affirmed children took more advanced courses in math, which suggests that they put themselves on a positive trajectory”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Social psychological processes such as self-affirmation can propagate over time.
What the sources say
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“After a standard relationship threat induction-thinking about personal traits they wanted to keep secret from their partner-affirmed low-self-esteem participants proved less prone to derogate their partner and to contemplate relationship-sabotaging behaviors such as starting arguments.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Conflict.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Jaremka et al. 2011 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Relative to various control conditions, including one that asked participants only to recall the compliment, the intervention led low-self-esteem participants to feel more secure both in their relationship and about themselves.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Conflict.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Marigold et al. 2007 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For example, Schulz & Hanusa (1978) found strong initial health benefits of an intervention that increased elderly nursing home residents' sense of control over their lives.But after the intervention ended, its benefits vanished and treated residents' health worsened.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Social psychological processes such as self-affirmation can propagate over time.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Schulz & Hanusa 1978
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“For instance, months after the intervention had commenced, affirmed minority students had a more robust identity as a person who belongs in school and were resilient to ongoing threats”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Social psychological processes such as self-affirmation can propagate over time.
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Self-affirmed individuals may achieve better outcomes, which in turn can reaffirm them and promote better outcomes, in a cycle that sustains itself.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Social psychological processes such as self-affirmation can propagate over time.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Values affirmations can improve grades for students in a lasting way, open people up to threatening health information, reduce sympathetic nervous system activation during stressors, lead overweight people to lose weight, increase patients' compliance with treatment regimens, and improve intergroup and interpersonal relations.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > IMPLICATIONS, QUALIFICATIONS, AND QUESTIONS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“When affirmed, relationally insecure participants not only felt more confident in the regard of their family and romantic partners, but also behaved with greater ease and positivity in an interaction with a stranger several weeks later”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Conflict.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Stinson et al. 2011 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because of subjective construal, recursion, and interaction, the benefits of an intervention can carry forward through time and can accumulate.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Social psychological processes such as self-affirmation can propagate over time.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Observational studies thus suggest that reducing threat can lessen defensiveness and help couples resolve disagreements constructively”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Conflict.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Murray et al. 2006 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Together, structural reforms and psychological interventions can synergize each other's effects and reduce the gap between where people are and what they can achieve in a variety of domains (Garcia & Cohen 2012, Yeager & Walton 2011).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Timing matters.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Garcia & Cohen 2012
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Yeager & Walton 2011 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“High-self-esteem people seem to do this more readily in romantic relationships and thus benefit less from affirmation (Marigold et al. 2007).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Moderators and Boundary Conditions
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Marigold et al. 2007 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Adolescence, the ascension to college, and entry into gateway courses represent sensitive periods that are often threatening, unpredictable, and stressful-an opportune circumstance for an affirmation.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Timing matters.
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Transitions thus represent both points of vulnerability and windows of opportunity”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Timing matters.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Anderson 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is easier to control a process in its germinal stages.But once a process has accumulated its full consequences, it may have a momentum that is hard to halt.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Timing matters.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“People with low self-esteem and those who feel insecure in their relationships seem at particular risk.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Moderators and Boundary Conditions
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Affirmations reduced defensiveness when they occurred either before the presentation of threatening information or soon after.But once participants had engaged in defensive rationalization, the affirmation could not undo it”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Timing matters.
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These resources may either reside latent in the person (e.g., cognitive ability inhibited by stress) or be scaffolded by the environment (e.g., information about health risk behavior).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Moderators and Boundary Conditions
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“When African Americans performed poorly early in the school year, they suffered a drop in their sense of academic belonging and did not recoup it even if their grades later improved”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Timing matters.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Cook et al. 2012 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Health campaigns may yield disappointing results if they arouse defensiveness.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Timing matters.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A sound peace proposal could meet with rejection if adversaries stake their identity on prevailing over the other side.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Timing matters.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“When social psychological interventions raise the performance of minority undergraduates, this suggests that the collegiate programs that promoted their recruitment and retention were successful, as the performance of students begins to reflect their acquired aptitude (Steele 2010, Walton & Spencer 2009).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Timing matters.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Steele 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Walton & Spencer 2009 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By cognitively transforming into Superman, children could envision themselves as a competent agent, able to manage a difficult situation, and they could thus perform in a way that better achieved their goal.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Links to other interventions.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With time, these adaptive tendencies may give rise to interpersonal assets, as suggested by research on the resilient.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Connections With Other Research Areas
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These principles seem harnessed in a variety of success stories.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Links to other interventions.
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Indeed, many affirmation essays focus on unconditional sources of integrity, often from social relationships (Crocker et al. 2008, Shnabel et al. 2013).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Types of values and affirmations.
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Affirmation interventions are not only subtle but also indirect.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Awareness of self-affirmation processes.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The tutors tune in to students' emotional state, and they provide subtle but well-timed gestures of encouragement that interrupt downward spirals of demoralization and establish a psychological safety zone that helps children confront challenges (Lepper & Woolverton 2001).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Links to other interventions.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Lepper & Woolverton 2001
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Likewise, many effective doctors see their patients as whole people with goals and lives, not bodies with disease (Verghese et al. 2011).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Links to other interventions.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Verghese et al. 2011 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Imaginary acts of self-transformation can bolster a sense of adequacy and thus help people to cope with challenging circumstances.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Links to other interventions.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Likewise, expressive writing interventions (Pennebaker & Chung 2011) and narratives of personal agency (Adler 2012) can help people salvage from hardship a sense of purpose and global adequacy.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Links to other interventions.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Pennebaker & Chung 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Adler 2012 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Psychological assets beget social assets.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Connections With Other Research Areas
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More generally, affirmation is not simply a paper-and-pencil manipulation but rather an act that manifests one's adequacy.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Links to other interventions.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“By meeting adversity, these individuals became better prepared for new challenges, in a cycle of adaptive potential (Elder 1974).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Connections With Other Research Areas
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Elder 1974
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In two of these null reports, the authors raise questions about whether their manipulations successfully instantiated affirmation because of either a novel affirmation method(Dillard et al. 2005) or failed manipulation checks for the majority of participants(Fry & Prentice-Dunn 2005).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > FUTURE ISSUES
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Dillard et al. 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Fry & Prentice-Dunn 2005 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“In two of the reports(Dillard et al. 2005, Zhao et al. 2012), the null result may be due to low statistical power, as the key comparisons, though not statistically significant, were in the predicted direction such that affirmation led to more openness to threatening health messages among those for whom the message was most relevant.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > FUTURE ISSUES
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Dillard et al. 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Zhao et al. 2012
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“For example, inGriffin & Harris (2011), affirmation effects were moderated by trait defensiveness.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > FUTURE ISSUES
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Griffin & Harris 2011 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Social psychology can help locate the right place and the right time for a small, good thing to happen.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > CONCLUSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Performance across the school year as a function of ethnicity and affirmation condition, with means and error terms adjusted for baseline covariates and grade level.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > FUTURE ISSUES
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Sherman et al. 2013 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It has spurred a more general account of the change process: how and when people adapt adequately to threatening circumstances, how interventions can foster this adaptation, and when these new adaptations stick.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > CONCLUSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is also possible that the effects of affirmation depend on hidden moderators not assessed in these studies.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > FUTURE ISSUES
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A little help with a financial aid form for college, some health advice from a friend, a word of encouragement from a mentor, a conversation with a stranger, and other seemingly random events can change a life and even the course of history.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > CONCLUSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By chance alone, periodic null effects would occur in a large set of studies.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > FUTURE ISSUES
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“But from the perspective of people under threat, a self-affirming act can be a timely sign of their adequacy in the wider world.”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Links to other interventions.
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
Barriers and catalysts to change can be identified and social psychological interventions can bring about long-term improvement.
“The commonality is the notion that barriers and catalysts to change can be identified and that social psychological interventions can bring about long-term improvement.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Students want to think positively of themselves.
“Students want to think positively of themselves.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The daily stressors of school can threaten students' sense of personal adequacy.
“But the daily stressors of school-tests, grades, peer relations-can threaten their sense of personal adequacy.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Most people want to think of themselves as healthy.
“Most people want to think of themselves as healthy, so it can be threatening to confront evidence that challenges that assessment.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Academic institutions teem with processes that recognize, reinforce, and provide resources for student success.
“Academic institutions teem with processes that recognize, reinforce, and provide resources for student success.”
The paper relies on this without support.
For many diseases, simple preventive steps, such as smoking cessation or diet change, would save a profound number of lives if practiced on a large scale.
“For many diseases, simple preventive steps, such as smoking cessation or diet change, would save a profound number of lives if practiced on a large scale.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Psychological threat can impede people's ability to learn, grow, be healthy, and have rewarding relationships.
“People want to learn, grow, be healthy, and have rewarding relationships, but psychological threat can impede their ability to do so.”
The paper relies on this without support.
People want to have rewarding relationships and most want to resolve disagreements equitably.
“People want to have rewarding relationships, and most want to resolve disagreements equitably.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Social systems such as schools are designed to reinforce positive change.
“In the context of a powerful social system such as school, designed to reinforce positive change, an affirmation can nudge a motivated but underperforming student away from failure in a lasting way.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This virtuous cycle is further strengthened as teachers and peers alter their perceptions of the students' ability, thereby raising expectations and generating support for higher levels of academic challenge (Cohen & Sherman, 2014;Rosenthal & Jacobson, 1966;Timmermans, van der Werf, & Rubie-Davies, 2019).”
From Tackling Educational Inequalities with Social Psychology: Identities, Contexts, and Interventions (2021) · cites this paper as Cohen & Sherman, 2014
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Values affirmation (a type of self-affirmation-for a review, see Cohen & Sherman, 2014), when used in educational settings, is primarily aimed at reducing attainment gaps by reducing the inimical consequences of stereotype threat.”
From Tackling Educational Inequalities with Social Psychology: Identities, Contexts, and Interventions (2021) · cites this paper as Cohen & Sherman, 2014
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“but in order for this new perspective to bring about lasting and meaningful change, the context needs to react to, support, and sustain such a change: the seed that the intervention plants needs fertile soil in which to grow”
From Tackling Educational Inequalities with Social Psychology: Identities, Contexts, and Interventions (2021) · cites this paper as Cohen & Sherman, 2014
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“the SA component of the intervention has been proposed to contribute to activating positive elements of the self-concept (Cohen & Sherman, 2014).”
From Effects of a Brief Preventive Intervention in Cyberbullying and Grooming in Adolescents (2021) · cites this paper as Cohen & Sherman, 2014
In the citing paper
“More generally, a growing body of research indicates that values affirmation interventions that enhance stigmatized racial group members’ sense of self-worth are associated with improved academic performance, health and health behaviors [127].”
From Reducing Racial Inequities in Health: Using What We Already Know to Take Action (2019) · cites this paper as [127]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > Educational interventions.
“In another study with low-income middle school students, the standard affirmation did not affect students' initial grades, but it did prevent a drop in grades over the course of the year (Bowen et al. 2012).”
§ The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention > References
“Bowen NK, Wegmann KM, Webber KC. 2013. Enhancing a brief writing intervention to combat stereotype threat among middle-school students.”
Citations
Cites
Toward an experimental ecology of human development.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.32.7.513 · Cited by 10,853
(1973) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 10,144
The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022
Adherence to Long-Term Therapies: Evidence for Action
Geest, S. D., & Sabate, E. J. (2003) · European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing · doi:10.1016/s1474-5151(03)00091-4 · Cited by 6,310
A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety
Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., Houts, R., Poulton, R., Roberts, B. W., Ross, S., et al. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1010076108 · Cited by 4,885
The Psychology of Self-Affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self
Steele, C. M. (1988) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60229-4 · Cited by 3,697
The Theory of Moral Sentiments
Smith, A. (1759) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oseo/instance.00042831 · Cited by 3,629
The life course as developmental theory
Elder, G. H. (1998) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06128.x · Cited by 3,513
Implementation intentions and goal achievement: a meta-analysis of effects and processes
Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(06)38002-1 · Cited by 3,236 · cited 1×
“One encourages people to form realistic, concrete plans for how to implement their new health-related goals in specific situations (Gollwitzer & Sheeran 2006).”
BackgroundAdherence to Long‐Term Therapies: Evidence for Action
Burkhart, P. V., & Sabaté, E. (2003) · Journal of Nursing Scholarship · doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2003.tb00001.x · Cited by 2,526
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Addona V, 2010, J. Quant. Anal. Sports, 6, 1
- Carver R, 1989, Where I'm Calling From
- Caspi A, 1995, Developmental Psychopathology Vol. 2: Risk, Disorder, and Adaptation. Wiley Series on Personality Processes, 472
- Cohen GL, 2012, Stereotype Threat: Theory, Process, and Application, 280
- Garcia J, 2012, Behavioral Foundations of Policy, 329
- Heckman JJ, 1998, Am. Econ. Rev., 88, 381
- Lyubomirsky S, 2010, Handbook of Adult Resilience: Concepts, Methods, and Applications, 450
- Norris S, 2008, Coping with Illness
- Obradović J, 2010, J. Clin. Child Adolesc. Psychol., 39, 109
- Reardon SF, 2011, Whither Opportunity? Rising Inequality and the Uncertain Life Chances of Low-Income Children, 91
- Reed MB, 1998, Motiv. Emot., 22, 99
- Sapolsky RM, 2004, Why Zebras Don't Get Ulcers: The Acclaimed Guide to Stress, Stress-Related Diseases, and Coping—Now Revised and Updated
- Shapiro JR, 2012, J. Personal. Soc. Psychol., 104, 277
- Silverman A, 2012, J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 49, 93
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,187
Wang, S., Luo, X., Zang, X., Ma, Y., & Yang, J. (2024) · International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.ijchp.2024.100499 · Cited by 9
“Value affirmation is the process of reflecting on important personal values (Cohen & Sherman, 2014) and belongs to the agency dimension, such as praise, approval, etc. Emotional support is emotionally cared for by others (Reblin & Uchino, 2008) and belongs to the communion dimension, such as…”
BackgroundSeckin, M., Petrie, M. C., Stewart, S., & Johnston, B. M. (2024) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088335 · Cited by 6
“This approach may help to understand individuals’ unique symptoms profile and responses to their needs.”
Reveling in Mayhem: The Need for Chaos in Pandemic Psychology
Alam, R., & Vitriol, J. A. (2025) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12661 · Cited by 7
The Lived-Experiences of African Migrant Professionals in Diverse Workplaces in Australia
Bolaji, S., & Kuteyi-Imonitie, O. (2025) · Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies · doi:10.29333/ejecs/2362 · Cited by 6
“…self-affirmation from the analyzed data referred to the psychological process by which individuals maintain their self-integrity by affirming core personal values, particularly when faced with information or experiences that threaten their self-concept (Cohen & Sherman, 2014; Sherman et al., 2020).”
Consequences of ostracism and potential interventions to mitigate its negative outcomes
Chen, Z., Tian, Y., Feng, Q., & Poon, K. (2025) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2025.2572653 · Cited by 6
“…that self-affirmation, an effective intervention focusing on core-value affirmation to reduce threat reactivity and improve recover from ostracism (Cohen & Sherman, 2014; Hales et al., 2016), can weaken the effects of ostracism on self-continuity and suicidal thoughts, highlighting the potential…”
A multi-wave test of self-affirmation versus emotionally expressive writing
Lannin, D. G., Vogel, D. L., Kahn, J. H., Brenner, R. E., Heath, P. J., & Guyll, M. (2018) · Counselling Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1080/09515070.2018.1553144 · Cited by 6
“…encourage greater utilization of self-affirmation) to bolster CONTACT Daniel G. Lannin dglann1@ilstu.edu © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group mental health over time (Cohen & Sherman, 2014; Howell, 2017); however, multi-wave examinations could strengthen this literature.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialBrooke, L. E., Lin, A. P., Ntoumanis, N., & Gucciardi, D. F. (2020) · Mental health and physical activity · doi:10.1016/j.mhpa.2020.100330 · Cited by 6
THE CULTURAL ECOLOGY OF GUN VIOLENCE
Whaley, A. L. (2021) · Du Bois Review Social Science Research on Race · doi:10.1017/s1742058x21000205 · Cited by 6
“Self-integrity is the view of oneself as morally and adaptively adequate (Cohen and Sherman, 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialLi, S., Xia, Y., Zhao, W., Miao, X., & Xu, Q. (2022) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-022-00292-8 · Cited by 6
“…information would show a higher acceptance of persuasive messages than those who do not engage in selfaffirmation; the latter may resist or have a processing bias toward the persuasive messages because fully accepting persuasive information may threaten their self-integrity (Cohen & Sherman, 2014).”
BackgroundŁakuta, P. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.795055 · Cited by 9
Zhou, L., Cai, E., Chankoson, T., Sukpasjaroen, K., Wu, Y., & Liu, G. (2022) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/00332941221127625 · Cited by 6
“According to Harman ’ s single-factor test (Aguirre-Urreta & Hu, 2019), the items of C-MSPSS, C-RPWBS, C-ISKS, and C-SIS were tested by Exploratory factor analysis.”
BackgroundChopova, T., & Ellemers, N. (2022) · Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility · doi:10.1111/beer.12472 · Cited by 6
Authentic leader(ship) development and leaders' psychological well-being: an outcome-wide analysis
Yemiscigil, A., Born, D. H., Snook, S. A., & Pate, E. (2022) · Leadership & Organization Development Journal · doi:10.1108/lodj-11-2021-0525 · Cited by 11
Carey, K. B., DiBello, A. M., Magill, M., & Mastroleo, N. R. (2024) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037/adb0000989 · Cited by 6
Self-Affirmation: Protecting the Self and Protecting Subjective Well-Being
Schüz, N., & Schüz, B. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-58763-9_16 · Cited by 6
Conceptualizing similarities and differences between purpose in life and self‐affirmation
Burd, K. A., & Burrow, A. L. (2017) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12366 · Cited by 7
Whiteman, R. C., & Mangels, J. A. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02094 · Cited by 7
“AOIs with these kinds of parameters have been used elsewhere in other studies investigating visual fixations of word stimuli (Dampuré et al., 2014).”
MethodNoble, A. J., Nevitt, S. J., Holmes, E. A. F., Ridsdale, L., Morgan, M., Smith, C. T., Hughes, D. A., Goodacre, S. W., Marson, A. G., & Snape, D. (2020) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr08390 · Cited by 7
Pandey, R., Tiwari, G. K., & Rai, P. (2021) · Current Issues in Personality Psychology · doi:10.5114/cipp.2021.105260 · Cited by 7
Bolstering biculturals: Self-affirmation reduces contrastive responses to identity primes
Liu, Z., Brockner, J., & Morris, M. W. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104150 · Cited by 6
Dağlı, H., & Dağlıoğlu, H. E. (2021) · Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education · doi:10.30703/cije.799698 · Cited by 6
ACT for Children and Adolescents
Petersen, J. M., Hayes, L., Gillard, D., & Ciarrochi, J. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197550076.013.27 · Cited by 8
Ciarrochi, J., Hayes, L., Quinlen, G., Sahdra, B. K., Ferrari, M., & Yap, K. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-06932-1_17 · Cited by 8
Zhu, X., & Yzer, M. C. (2017) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1080/15213269.2017.1282875 · Cited by 6
“Self-affirmation affects construal level Despite well-documented self-affirmation effects on message acceptance and other outcome variables, the exact mechanisms through which self-affirmation influences different outcome variables remain unclear (Cohen & Sherman, 2014; Sherman & Cohen, 2006).”
BackgroundAffirmation prevents long-term weight gain
Logel, C. R., Kathmandu, A., & Cohen, G. L. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.07.005 · Cited by 6
Self-citationDangerous Expectations: Breaking Rules to Resolve Cognitive DissonancePreprint
Moore, C., Wakeman, S. W., & Gino, F. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2486576 · Cited by 6
“However, Cohen and Sherman (2014) suggest the process of affirming the self is only effective if the domain of the affirmation accesses more global understanding of the self beyond the threat.”
The emotive nature of conflict monitoring in the medial prefrontal cortexPreprint
Saunders, B., Lin, H., Milyavskaya, M., & Inzlicht, M. (2017) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/5mts5 · Cited by 8
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Laryngeal Cancer Care
Cox, S. R., & Daniel, C. (2021) · Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities · doi:10.1007/s40615-021-01018-3 · Cited by 14
Suh, Y. J., & Kim, H. S. (2024) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/00936502241263941 · Cited by 7
“Consequently, this self-affirmation process increases the likelihood of message acceptance (Cohen & Sherman, 2014).”
InfluentialWilliams, M. J., Esianor, B. I., Hendrick, S., Farlow, J. L., Farrell, A., Kupfer, R. A., Meyer, T. K., Vinson, K. N., Wandell, G. M., & Chen, A. Y. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2415826122 · Cited by 7
Why I declare a conflict of interest and you should not
Acem, E., Aczél, B., Albayrak‐Aydemir, N., Brown, N. J. L., Dudda, L. A., Elsherif, M. M., Gjoneska, B., Kowal, M., Krishna, A., Miłkoś, S., et al. (2025) · Theory and Society · doi:10.1007/s11186-025-09641-3 · Cited by 5
“Simple self-affirmation exercises — brief reflections on one’s core personal values — may reduce defensiveness when ethical lapses come to light and thus increase receptivity to COI discussions (Cohen & Sherman, 2014).”
Zhang, X., Yang, Y., He, L., & Wang, Z. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1663695 · Cited by 5
“A deterioration in physical health can undermine individuals ’ sense of self-integrity and self-worth, thereby increasing their vulnerability to negative emotions, particularly depression (29, 30).”
Self‐affirmation reduces uncertainty aversion for potential gains
Weller, J. A., Vineyard, J., & Klein, W. M. P. (2022) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12856 · Cited by 5
The affirmed (White) teacher in a cross-race context
Brady, S. T., Griffiths, C. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2023) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-023-09812-z · Cited by 5
“Encouragingly, however, they are consistent with other findings from the broader affirmation literature (Cohen & Sherman, 2014).”
InfluentialSelf-citationZadworna, M., & Ardelt, M. (2025) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2025.2452943 · Cited by 8
Tiwari, G. K., Choudhary, A., Singh, A., Shukla, A., Macorya, A. K., Pandey, A., & Singh, A. K. (2025) · Counselling and Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1002/capr.12892 · Cited by 5
The role of feature-based discrimination in driving health disparities among Black Americans
Dent, R. B., Hagiwara, N., Stepanova, E. V., & Green, T. (2017) · Ethnicity and Health · doi:10.1080/13557858.2017.1398314 · Cited by 5
Dwibedi, C. K., Abrahamsson, B., & Rosengren, A. H. (2022) · Diabetes Therapy · doi:10.1007/s13300-022-01214-2 · Cited by 7
Ingroup Bias, Partisanship, and Gendered Voting
West, E. A. (2022) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12807 · Cited by 5
Łakuta, P., Krankowska, D. C., Marcinkiewicz, P., Bociąga‐Jasik, M., & Komorska‐Błażewicz, A. (2022) · Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being · doi:10.1111/aphw.12357 · Cited by 6
See something, say something? exploring the gap between real and imagined moral courage
Kemper, N. S., Campbell, D. S., & Reiman, A. (2022) · Ethics & Behavior · doi:10.1080/10508422.2022.2104282 · Cited by 9
“…selfaffirmation has been argued to bolster people’s sense of self-integrity and self-competence while also reducing stress in the face of threat (Cohen & Sherman, 2014), it is plausible that self-affirmation would also attenuate some of the uncertainties and self-doubts that may inhibit moral…”
BackgroundStructured reflection increases intentions to reduce other people’s health risks during COVID-19
Ramos, J., Grant, M. D., Dickert, S., Eom, K., Flores, A., Jiga‐Boy, G. M., Kogut, T., Mayorga, M. W., Pedersen, E. J., Pereira, B. D. C. S., et al. (2022) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac218 · Cited by 5
“Reflection entails serious thought and consideration of those criteria, similar to the self-reflection on cognitive processes (23, 24), past experiences (25), and personal values (26) that can influence judgments and decisions.”
BackgroundSelf-citationSeidman, A. J., Vogel, D. L., & Lannin, D. G. (2023) · Psychotherapy · doi:10.1037/pst0000482 · Cited by 6
Brown, S. D., Garcia, B. L., Ritchie, J. L., Tsai, A., Millman, A. K., Greenberg, M., Quesenberry, C. P., & Ferrara, A. M. (2024) · PEC Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100256 · Cited by 5
“Self-affirmation theory posits that people are naturally inclined to avoid or dismiss health information that threatens a self-perception of adequacy [32].”
BackgroundOjute, F. M., Gonzales, P. A., Ghadimi, T. R., Edwards, A., van der Schaaf, M. F., & Lebares, C. C. (2024) · Journal of surgical education · doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.12.015 · Cited by 5
Tiwari, G. K., Shukla, A., Macorya, A. K., Singh, A., & Choudhary, A. (2024) · Journal of Psychological Perspective · doi:10.47679/jopp.616762024 · Cited by 5
“It has been suggested that self-affirmation acts as a buffer against stress by changing the psychological and physiological processes (Cohen & Sherman, 2014; Creswell et al., 2013).”
BackgroundRotschild, T. (2024) · Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs · doi:10.1111/1471-3802.12709 · Cited by 13
Monheim, C. L., & Himmelstein, M. S. (2024) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.70017 · Cited by 5
Liu, C., Huang, P., Chang, J., Lin, C., & Huang, C.-C. (2015) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.11.023 · Cited by 5
“When the selfimage is threatened by information or events such as failure, negative feedback, threatening stereotypes or even healthy concerns, it would arouse stress and self-protective defenses that can hamper performance and growth (Cohen & Sherman, 2014; Vohs, Park, & Schmeichel, 2013).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialUnderstanding and Addressing Parent-Adolescent Conflict in Asian American Families
Zhou, X., Wu, C. S., Juan, M. J. D., & Lee, R. M. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-63136-3_7 · Cited by 5
Goal conflict when making decisions for others
Ferrer, R. A., Orehek, E., & Padgett, L. S. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.008 · Cited by 6
When training backfires and what can be done about it
Steele, L. M., & Vandello, J. A. (2019) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1017/iop.2019.3 · Cited by 5
“This enables trainees to come into the training more open to new points of view (Cohen et al., 2007), and their focus is not just on defending oneself on the issue at hand (Cohen & Sherman, 2014; Sherman & Hartson, 2011).”
BackgroundImmediate and short term effects of values-based interventions on paranoia
Evans, N., Ellett, L., Carpenter, R., & Kingston, J. L. (2019) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2019.101500 · Cited by 5
“Although it as not been tested, affirmations are thought to achieve lasting benefits when they prompt an increase in affirming behaviours (Brady et al., 2016; Cohen & Sherman, 2014; Hayes, Strosahl, & Wilson, 1999).”
BackgroundWang, X. (2020) · Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2020.1726858 · Cited by 4
“Self-affirmation theory states that alternatively, individuals may affirm their overall self-worth by reflecting upon one’s values, self-identity, and previous actions (Cohen & Sherman, 2014).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialExploring the impact of dimensional comparisons in health contexts
Edmonds, K. A., & Rose, J. P. (2022) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12669 · Cited by 4
Music therapy promotes self-determination in young people with autism spectrum disorder
Gadberry, A. L., & Harrison, A. (2016) · International Journal of School & Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/21683603.2016.1130580 · Cited by 5
“…children with autism spectrum disorder also have complex difficulties in using language, or in some instances a reluctance to do so, there are real inhibitions to making good, strong relationships that validate the child’s sense of self and imbue the child with confidence (Cohen & Sherman, 2014).”
BackgroundFolk, J. B., Disabato, D. J., Goodman, F. R., Carter, S. P., DiMauro, J., & Riskind, J. H. (2016) · Journal of Psychotherapy Integration · doi:10.1037/int0000038 · Cited by 6
“For example, engaging in self-affirmations (i.e., an act that demonstrates a person’s adequacy; Cohen & Sherman, 2014) promotes a view of the self as capable and adaptive and diminishes the need to rationalize away threatening information (Sherman & Cohen, 2006; Steele, 1988).”
BackgroundUnhealthy food preferences: A psychological consequence of poverty?
Thomas, D. (2021) · Journal of Consumer Affairs · doi:10.1111/joca.12422 · Cited by 5
Sunding, L., & Ekholm, A. (2014) · Construction Economics and Building · doi:10.5130/ajceb.v14i2.3925 · Cited by 5
The Importance of Families and Home Environments in the Lives of Young Children
Bradley, R. H. (2019) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119148104.ch6 · Cited by 6
Roles of socioeconomic status, ethnicity, and teacher beliefs in academic gradingPreprint
Doyle, L., Easterbrook, M. J., & Harris, P. R. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/u4z6n · Cited by 5
Yeo, H., & Hwang, H. (2025) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.3538 · Cited by 4
Sreejesh, S., & Singha, S. D. (2025) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104660 · Cited by 5
How to improve group affirmation manipulations: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Smith, H., & Grant, D. R. (2024) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302241276070 · Cited by 5
“…to features of the self-integrity threat and affirmation manipulation, we explore if group affirmations are more effective before versus after participants experience the threat, a factor explored within individual self-affirmation research (G. L. Cohen & Sherman, 2014; Critcher et al., 2010).”
InfluentialTake a step back to see your own value: on the role of metacognition in self-esteem regulation
Rader, L., Forster, S. D., Gauggel, S., Drueke, B., & Mainz, V. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1530008 · Cited by 5
“It has also been shown that self-affirmation can buffer the negative effects of stereotype threats (e.g., Cohen and Sherman, 2014).”
InfluentialEgotism, Elitism, and the Ethics of Musical Humility
Coppola, W. J. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780197692974.001.0001 · Cited by 5
Effect of Self-Affirmation on Smartphone Use Reduction Among Heavy Users
Shimoda, S., Shimoda, M., & Higuchi, O. (2022) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/00332941211069514 · Cited by 4
“This theory postulates that individuals are motivated to maintain global self-integrity, which is defined as “a sense of global efficacy, an image of oneself as being in control of important adaptive and moral outcomes in one’s life” (Cohen & Sherman, 2014, p. 336).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Flipped Classroom: A Guide to Making Evidence-Based Decisions About Implementation
Lee, M. W., & Butler, A. C. (2022) · Methods in physiology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-95633-2_6 · Cited by 5
Wu, N., Fu, A., Liu, Y., Yue, T., Li, J., Wang, X., & Huang, X. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1174614 · Cited by 5
“Second, it can reduce the negative impact of stereotype threat on self-integrity by enabling people to view themselves and their resources in a more holistic way (Cohen and Sherman, 2014).”
BackgroundEvidence that Mental Contrasting Reduces Health Information Avoidance
Yang, M. Z., King, W. C., Oettingen, G., & Sheeran, P. (2023) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/abm/kaad031 · Cited by 4
Effects of a self-affirmation intervention on responses to bowel cancer screening information
Travis, E., Ashley, L., & O'Connor, D. B. (2024) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870446.2024.2332265 · Cited by 5
“Several authors have argued that self-affirming in a domain related to the threat (e.g. health) is less effective, due to a potential increase in defensive processing and enhanced dissonance (Cohen & Sherman, 2014; Sivanathan et al., 2008).”
Moral vs Agentic Self-Superiority and Self-Esteem: The Role of Trait Properties
Liang, Y., Dondeyne, A., Hodges, S. D., & Hoorens, V. (2024) · Swiss Psychology Open · doi:10.5334/spo.72 · Cited by 4
Wolfe, J. L. (2024) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.58680/ccc2024754759 · Cited by 6
A Case Study of Self-Affirmations in Teacher Education
Robinson, S. (2022) · Journal of Invitational Theory and Practice · doi:10.26522/jitp.v20i.3734 · Cited by 4
Boosting Performance on an Evaluative Math Test
Wieland, A. M., & Burnham, T. A. (2016) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/0033294115625576 · Cited by 4
Does Facebook, Twitter, Instagram influence well‑being and self‑esteem among early adolescents?
Mierzwa, J., & Jurjewicz, H. (2016) · Studia Socialia Cracoviensia · doi:10.15633/ssc.1880 · Cited by 4
Predictors of receptivity to an alcohol intervention among mandated students
Carey, K. B., DiBello, A. M., Orazio, E. E., Hatch, M. R., & Mastroleo, N. R. (2020) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106605 · Cited by 4
Nan, X., Iles, I. A., & Ma, Z. (2021) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2021.1885773 · Cited by 4
Reducing prejudice by enhancing the other rather than the self
Legault, L., Coleman, D., Jurchak, K., & Scaltsas, N. (2021) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298868.2021.1965016 · Cited by 4
“The purpose of self-affirmation is to preserve self-integrity by grounding the self in its core identity (Cohen & Sherman, 2014).”
BackgroundComparing self-affirmation manipulations to reduce alcohol consumption in university students
Vogt, K. S., Stephenson, J. R., & Norman, P. E. (2021) · Journal of American College Health · doi:10.1080/07448481.2021.1968409 · Cited by 4
“32 So therefore, a person’s defensive processing must be reduced prior to being presented with this health-risk information, to prevent dismissal.”
BackgroundParker, A., & Kingston, J. L. (2021) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-021-10278-6 · Cited by 6
“…on highly valued domains can help to engage a broader and more positive view of the self under threat (Sherman, 2013), increase one’s willingness to consider threatening information (Cohen & Sherman, 2014) and de-couple the threat from meaningful aspects of the self (Wakslak & Thrope, 2009).”
BackgroundChalmers, H. (2022) · Philosophia · doi:10.1007/s11406-021-00445-0 · Cited by 4
“Such methods include expressive journaling (Pennebaker, 1997); self-affirmation (Cohen & Sherman, 2014); deep breathing (Zaccaro et al., 2018); muscle relaxation (Rausch, Gramling, & Auerbach, 2006); mindfulnessbased meditation (Farb et al., 2015); cognitive reappraisal (e.g., no longer thinking…”
MethodCaza, B. B., Heaphy, E. D., Roberts, L. M., & Spreitzer, G. M. (2023) · Academy of Management Discoveries · doi:10.5465/amd.2021.0021 · Cited by 4
The Third Culture People's Impact
de Príncipe, J. V. (2023) · Advances in human resources management and organizational development book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-7212-5.ch009 · Cited by 4
The value of scholar-practitioner cultural intuition in transforming educational systems
Rocha, J., Coronella, T., Reyes, M., & Romasanta, L. (2023) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education · doi:10.1080/09518398.2023.2218828 · Cited by 4
“Constant and repetitive threats (or even perceptions of threats) compel individuals to develop adaptations to remain within the context (Cohen & Sherman, 2014).”
BackgroundLv, J., Shen, Y., Huang, Z., Zhang, C., Meijiu, J., & Zhang, H. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1292232 · Cited by 4
Hagerman, C. J., Stock, M. L., Molloy-Paolillo, B. K., Beekman, J. B., Klein, W. M. P., & Butler, N. (2019) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-019-00104-6 · Cited by 4
Identity Safety and Its Importance for Academic Success
Lowe, A. N. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-14625-2_128 · Cited by 6
Morality or competence? The importance of affirming the appropriate dimension of self‐integrity
Jessop, D. C., SPARKS, P. B., Jessop, L., Dodds, L., & Lynch, S. B. (2016) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjhp.12209 · Cited by 6
The Reciprocal Path from Possible Self to Core Self-Revision
Carroll, P. J. (2018) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/gpr0000139 · Cited by 4
“Each new possible-self success will further affirm the integrity of the core self and, by extension, the potential of that core self to provide a source of global-self integrity (see Cohen & Sherman, 2014 discussion of propagating adaptive potential over time).”
BackgroundInfluentialWebb, T. L., Benn, Y., Chang, B. P. I., Reynolds, J. P., Sirois, F. M., Assinnari, A., & Harris, P. R. (2020) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2020.104020 · Cited by 5
Developing and evaluating the multiple mini interview in student midwife selection
Callwood, A. (2015) · Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) · Cited by 4
Leader development: an identity-based perspective
Miščenko, D. (2017) · UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) · doi:10.4225/23/5935057e0cf05 · Cited by 4
“Finally, people are motivated to maintain self-integrity—“a sense of global efficacy, an image of oneself as able to control important adaptive and moral outcomes in one’s life” (Cohen & Sherman, 2014, p. 336).”
BackgroundInfluentialEconomic Evaluation of an Online Single-Session Intervention for Depression in Kenyan AdolescentsPreprint
Wasil, A. R., Kacmarek, C. N., Osborn, T. L., et al. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/qrafg · Cited by 4
Filippo, A. D., Bellatin, P., Tietz, N., Whitefield, A., Nkopane, P., Grant, E., Crawford, K., Devereux, C., Vermeulen, B., & Hatcher, A. M. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/n6rdj · Cited by 4
Shnabel, N., Ullrich, J., & Nadler, A. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/cv8my · Cited by 4
Reilly, D., & Hurem, A. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-818630-5.13013-1 · Cited by 4
How future orientations predict healthy outcomes: Information avoidance as a potential mechanism
Capps-Cohen, K., & Updegraff, J. A. (2023) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/13591053231214516 · Cited by 3
“Self-affirmation involves acts that focus on aspects of a person’s identity and ideals, which helps one to overcome threats such as learning unpleasant information about one’s health (Cohen and Sherman, 2014).”
Li, J.-W., Chen, Y., Tang, M., & Wang, S. (2024) · Behavioral Science · doi:10.3390/bs14070538 · Cited by 4
“Yet, the impact of self-affirmations on health behavioral change could vary on the domains they choose because the values they are most focused on can be related or unrelated to health [41,42].”
BackgroundZhao, Y., Bolter, J. D., Chen, K., Wang, X. Y., Jiang, X., & Ni, Z. (2025) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3715668.3736380 · Cited by 4
“While effective in some ways [38], research indicates that over-reliance on these quantitative methods can overwhelm users [22], foster negative attitudes toward exercise [11] [28] [27], and ultimately hinder engagement, long-term motivation and adherence to fitness goals [31] [4] [9].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Cohen, G. L., & Sherman, D. K.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sherman, David K.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Psychology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2014-01-03
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 333-371
- ISSN
- 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2085
- OpenAlex
- W2168420763
- Cited by
- 1,302
- References
- 205
- Citations by year
- 2026: 94 · 2025: 151 · 2024: 108 · 2023: 101 · 2022: 149 · 2021: 142 · 2020: 119 · 2019: 98 · 2018: 98 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 85 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 23
- FWCI
- 9.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1109548)
- National Institutes of Health
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD055342)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Keywords
- self-affirmation, self-integrity, self-affirmation intervention, self-system, social-psychological intervention, stress, personal values, adaptive potential
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Mental Health, Psychology, Social, Self Concept, Social Values, Self Efficacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review