Cited by 172Marine Invertebrate Physiology and EcologyDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationPlanarian Biology and Electrostimulation

Evolution of striated muscle: Jellyfish and the origin of triploblasty

Open access
Seipel, Katja, Schmid, Volker·2005·Developmental Biology

Abstract

The larval and polyp stages of extant Cnidaria are bi-layered with an absence of mesoderm and its differentiation products. This anatomy originally prompted the diploblast classification of the cnidarian phylum. The medusa stage, or jellyfish, however, has a more complex anatomy characterized by a swimming bell with a well-developed striated muscle layer. Based on developmental histology of the hydrozoan medusa this muscle derives from the entocodon, a mesoderm-like third cell layer established at the onset of medusa formation. According to recent molecular studies cnidarian homologs to bilaterian mesoderm and myogenic regulators are expressed in the larval and polyp stages as well as in the entocodon and derived striated muscle. Moreover striated and smooth muscle cells may have evolved directly and independently from non-muscle cells as indicated by phylogenetic analysis of myosin heavy chain genes (MHC class II). To accommodate all evidences we propose that striated muscle-based locomotion coevolved with the nervous and digestive systems in a basic metazoan Bauplan from which the ancestors of the Ctenophora (comb jellyfish), Cnidaria (jellyfish and polyps), as well as the Bilateria are derived. We argue for a motile tri-layered cnidarian ancestor and a monophyletic descent of striated muscle in Cnidaria and Bilateria. As a consequence, diploblasty evolved secondarily in cnidarian larvae and polyps.

Verified 2026-10-06 · 18 references not checked yet

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.03.032

Cites

119 of 137 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 38 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingcitation

    Mitochondrial DNA structure does not strictly correlate with phylogeny.

    “There is, however, no strict correlation of mtDNA structure with phylogeny.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Nosek et al., 1998 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Interpretationreasoning

    All the basic anatomical elements probably co-evolved as integrated functional units in the basic Bauplan.

    “All the basic anatomical elements probably co-evolved as integrated functional units in the basic Bauplan.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Premisecitation

    In Leptomedusa and a few Anthomedusa, striated muscle is completely covered by flagellated smooth muscle epithelia.

    “In the Leptomedusa(Chapman, 1968) and few Anthomedusa(Hyman, 1940) the striated muscle (red) is completely covered (A, A1) by flagellated smooth muscle epithelia (green)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Chapman, 1968 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Hyman, 1940

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Interpretationreasoning

    The available data suggest that striated muscle originated very early.

    “Together these data suggest a very early origin of the striated muscle.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Premisecitation

    All striated and smooth muscles and RFamide-positive nerve cells of the subumbrella come from the outer layer of the entocodon.

    “All of the striated and smooth muscles and the RFamidepositive nerve cells of the subumbrella derive from the outer layer of the entocodon”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Seipel et al., 2004a

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Tardent, 1978

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims. 7
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 4
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A triploblast jellyfish ancestor is supported by entocodon-derived striated muscle and by similarity of jellyfish myogenic regulators to bilaterian mesoderm and myogenic factors.

    “Two observations corroborate the existence of a triploblast jellyfish ancestor: (1) jellyfish striated muscle develops from a mesoderm-like layer (entocodon), and (2) jellyfish myogenesis is controlled by regulators similar to bilaterian mesoderm and myogenic factors.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Assuming evolutionary principles have not changed since the first animals, replacing ciliary motility with muscle-driven locomotion must have been an important selective advantage for prey capture and escape.

    “Under the assumption that the principles of evolution have not changed since the first animals appeared, the replacement of ciliary motility by muscle-driven locomotion must have represented an important selective advantage in preying and escape.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The principles of evolution have not changed since the first animals appeared.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The linearization of mitochondrial DNA in Medusozoa likely had little selective value and happened early, after the split from Anthozoa and/or Bilateria.

    “Thus the linearization of the mtDNA in the Medusozoa was likely of little selective value and occurred early, after the separation from the Anthozoa and/or Bilateria.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The cnidarian ancestor was motile and tri-layered, and striated muscle descended monophyletically in Cnidaria and Bilateria.

    “We argue for a motile tri-layered cnidarian ancestor and a monophyletic descent of striated muscle in Cnidaria and Bilateria.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Under the polyp-first hypothesis, a simpler polyp form would give rise to a more complex medusa while the polyp continued to exist alongside it in the life cycle.

    “according to Hyman (1940) the polyp first hypothesis would present ''the curious spectacle of a lower type (polyp) evolving into a higher type (medusa) and continuing to exist simultaneously as part of its life cycle''.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hyman (1940)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    There were placement constraints on the basic anatomical elements within the body and relative to each other.

    “Additionally there were placement constraints for the basic anatomical elements within the body and with respect to each other.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The term diploblast is questionable for an animal phylum and applies only to the anatomy of the cnidarian larva and polyp.

    “Indeed, the term diploblast becomes questionable with respect to an animal phylum (Ball et al., 2004;Hyman, 1940;Willmer, 1990), as it is appropriate only for the anatomy of the cnidarian larva and polyp.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Ball et al., 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Hyman, 1940

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Willmer, 1990

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Various unrelated groups-plants, fungi, slime molds, yeast, and ciliates-carry linear mitochondrial DNA, with the trait appearing in scattered positions across phylogenies.

    “Linear mtDNA is known to occur in plants, fungi, slime molds, yeast, or ciliates, often randomly scattered in the phylogenies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Nosek et al., 1998

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Linear mitochondrial DNA in Medusozoa is more derived than the circular mitochondrial DNA of Anthozoa and Bilateria.

    “Compared to the circular mtDNA of the anthozoans and bilaterians, linear mtDNA appears to be more derived.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Larval and polyp stages of living Cnidaria consist of two cell layers and lack mesoderm and its differentiated products.

    “The larval and polyp stages of extant Cnidaria are bi-layered with an absence of mesoderm and its differentiation products.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bouillon, 1993

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Hyman, 1940

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Tardent, 1978

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The medusa stage has a complex anatomy with a swimming bell and a well-developed striated muscle layer.

    “The medusa stage, or jellyfish, however, has a more complex anatomy characterized by a swimming bell with a well-developed striated muscle layer.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bölsterli, 1977

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Gröger et al., 1999 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Schuchert et al., 1993

      Not checked in the free run.

11 of 11
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Ancestral genomes are sufficiently conserved in living cnidarians to study developmental regulators and their differentiation products for evolutionary research.

    “Since cnidarian anatomy appears to have little changed since Precambrian times it can be assumed that the ancestral genomes are suitably well conserved in the extant cnidarian species to investigate developmental regulators and their differentiation products for evolutionary studies.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The principles of evolution have not changed since the first animals appeared.

    “Under the assumption that the principles of evolution have not changed since the first animals appeared”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The model is based on a parenchymula- or phagocytella-like ancestor.

    “Its cellular organization is highly speculative but according to the presented data we have based the model on a parenchymula or phagocytellalike ancestor (Grell et al., 1980).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Motile-to-sessile transitions have happened many times among aquatic invertebrates, and in some filter feeders this change came with reduced neuromuscular complexity.

    “Furthermore the transition from a motile to a sessile life style is not exclusive to cnidarians but evidently has occurred repeatedly in various aquatic invertebrates, sometimes accompanied by reduction in neuromuscular complexity, as observed in the filter feeders.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Ctenophora have no permanent sessile stages.

    “There are no permanent sessile stages in this phylum”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Ctenophora possess mesodermate-like development and histology.

    “they have a mesodermate-like development and histology”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pan-eumetazoan conservation of striated and smooth muscle includes conserved cellular morphology, function, regulatory state (myogenic bHLH factors and MEF2), and downstream effector genes (e.g., myosin heavy chain).

    “Here the distinctive cellular morphology, the function, and underlying these, the regulatory state consisting of myogenic bHLH factors and MEF2, plus downstream effector genes exemplified by the myosin heavy chain contractile protein are all conserved (Seipel and Schmid, 2005).”

    From Evolution of Gene Regulatory Networks Controlling Body Plan Development (2011) · cites this paper as Seipel and Schmid, 2005

    The sections “The evolution of striated and smooth muscle” and “Mesoderm and myogenic regulatory genes” describe similar vertebrate and medusa striated-muscle ultrastructure, related myosin heavy chains, and myogenic regulatory genes. Table 1 also lists bHLH factors and MEF2 across eumetazoan groups. These passages do not establish that the full combination of morphology, function, regulatory state, and effector genes is conserved in both striated and smooth muscle throughout Eumetazoa. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The eumetazoan genes of ancient eukaryotic ancestry descended from approximately 5,148 eukaryotic progenitors by nearly one thousand gene duplications along the eumetazoan stem, after early radiation of eukaryotes about 1100-1500 Mya but prior to divergence of cnidarians and bilaterians.

    “The eumetazoan genes of ancient eukaryotic ancestry are themselves descended from approximately ~5,148 eukaryotic progenitors by nearly one thousand gene duplications along the eumetazoan stem, that is, after the early radiation of eukaryotes ~1100-1500 Mya (60) but prior to the divergence of cnidarians and bilaterians (32).”
  • Complex muscle-based locomotory circuits may have evolved independently in cnidarians and bilaterians.

    “Given the very different mechanics of muscle-based locomotion in cnidarians (polyp and medusa forms) and in bilaterians (worm-like body), complex muscle-based locomotory circuits may have evolved independently in the two groups (for a detailed discussion of the ancestral form of locomotion in cnidarians and the origin of striated muscles, see [9]).”
  • Muscle-based motor systems are very ancient and trace back to the stem eumetazoan.

    “Muscle-based motor systems are also very ancient and trace back to the stem eumetazoan [9].”
  • Muscle-based motor systems evolved very early and were probably already present in the stem eumetazoan lineage.

    “Muscle-based motor systems also evolved very early, and were probably already present in the stem eumetazoan lineage [9].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Cambrian age conflicts with a cited fossil report

    Minor

    The text cites Hagadorn et al. (2002) for fossils from mid-Cambrian strata, but the paper's reference list identifies that report as describing a late Cambrian shoreline.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 138 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Boero, 1992, On the origins of evolution of hydromedusan life cycles (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa), vol. 6, 59
  2. Brien, 1969, Principes de Phylogenèse animal appliqués à l'interprétation des Métazoaires diploblastiques et à leur evolution en Métazoaires triploblastique, Mém. Acad. R. Belg., 38, 9
  3. Brooks, 1886, Origin of medusae and significance of metagenesis, Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., 3
  4. Chen, 1997, Biology of the Chengjang Fauna, Bull. Natl. Mus. Nat. Sci. (Taipei), 10, 11
  5. Jägersten, 1955, On the early phylogeny of the Metazoa: the bilatero-gastrea theory, Zool. Bidr. Uppsala, 30, 321
  6. Kühn, 1910, Die Entwicklunsgeschichte der Geschlechtsindividuen der Hydromedusen, Zool. Jahrb. Abt. Syst. Okol. Geogr. Tiere, 30, 145
  7. Scholtz, 2004, Coelenterata versus Acrosomata—On the position of comb jellyfish (Ctenophora) in metazoan phylogeny, Sitz.ber. Ges. Nat.forsch. Freunde Berl., 43, 15

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seipel, K., & Schmid, V.
Affiliations
University of Basel (CH)
Corresponding author
Schmid, Volker
Venue
Developmental Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-06
Volume
282
Issue
1
Pages
14-26
ISSN
0012-1606 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009856397
Cited by
172
References
138
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
15.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Yale University
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Planarian Biology and Electrostimulation
Keywords
Cnidaria, jellyfish, Medusa, mesoderm, Ctenophora, bilaterian origin, locomotion, nervous system evolution, digestive system evolution
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Differentiation, Cnidaria, Biological Evolution, Genes, Regulator, Germ Layers, Larva, Life Cycle Stages, Mesoderm, Models, Biological, Muscle, Skeletal, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Myosin Heavy Chains

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review