Cited by 1,260Phytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesNutritional Studies and DietPomegranate: compositions and health benefits

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 121 of the 121 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

I NHIBITION OF C ARCINOGENESIS BY D IETARY P OLYPHENOLIC C OMPOUNDS

Abstract

Plants consumed by humans contain thousands of phenolic compounds. The effects of dietary polyphenols are of great current interest due to their antioxidative and possible anticarcinogenic activities. A popular belief is that dietary polyphenols are anticarcinogens because they are antioxidants, but direct evidence for this supposition is lacking. This chapter reviews the inhibition of tumorigenesis by phenolic acids and derivatives, tea and catechins, isoflavones and soy preparations, quercetin and other flavonoids, resveratrol, and lignans as well as the mechanisms involved based on studies in vivo and in vitro. Polyphenols may inhibit carcinogenesis by affecting the molecular events in the initiation, promotion, and progression stages. Isoflavones and lignans may influence tumor formation by affecting estrogen-related activities. The bioavailability of the dietary polyphenols is discussed extensively, because the tissue levels of the effective compounds determine the biological activity. Understanding the bioavailability and blood and tissue levels of polyphenols is also important in extrapolating results from studies in cell lines to animal models and humans. Epidemiological studies concerning polyphenol consumption and human cancer risk suggest the protective effects of certain food items and polyphenols, but more studies are needed for clear-cut conclusions. Perspectives on the application of dietary polyphenols for the prevention of human cancer and possible concerns on the consumption of excessive amounts of polyphenols are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.nutr.21.1.381

Cites

121 of 121 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 120 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Chung F-L, 1998, Cancer Res., 58, 4096
  2. Constantinou AI, 1996, Anticancer Res., 16, 3293
  3. Dorai T, 2000, Mol. Urol., 4, 1
  4. Ferry DR, 1996, Clin. Cancer Res., 2, 659
  5. Hsieh TC, 2000, Anticancer Res., 20, 225
  6. Huang M-T, 1994, Cancer Res., 54, 5841
  7. Huang M-T, 1988, Cancer Res., 48, 5941
  8. Huang M-T, 1997, Cancer Res., 57, 2623
  9. Jang M, 1999, Drugs Exp. Clin. Res., 25, 65
  10. Katiyar SK, 1996, Int. J. Oncol., 8, 221
  11. Kawamori T, 1999, Cancer Res., 59, 597
  12. Leth T, Justesen U. 1998. Analysis of flavonoids in fruits, vegetables and beverages by HPLC-UV and LC-MS and estimation of the total daily flavonoid intake in Denmark. InPolyphenols in Food, ed. R Amado, H Andersson, S Bardocz, F Serra, pp. 39–40. Luxembourg: Off. Off. Publ. Eur. Commun.
  13. Lu LJ, 2000, Cancer Res., 60, 4112
  14. Lu LJ, 2000, Cancer Res., 60, 1299
  15. Makita H, 1996, Cancer Res., 56, 4904
  16. Mitchell SH, 1999, Cancer Res., 59, 5892
  17. Rao CV, 1997, Cancer Res., 57, 3717
  18. Su LJ, 2000, Proc. Ann. Meet. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res.,
  19. Su S-J, 2000, Clin. Cancer Res., 6, 230
  20. Verma AK, 1988, Cancer Res., 48, 5754
  21. Wolffram S, 1995, J. Nutr., 125, 1300
  22. Xu Y, 1992, Cancer Res., 52, 3875
  23. Yamane T, 1995, Cancer Res., 55, 2081
  24. Yang CS, 1998, Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev., 7, 351
  25. Yang G-Y, 1997, Cancer Res., 57, 1889
  26. Zhou JR, 1998, Cancer Res., 58, 5231

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 1,000

Metadata

Authors
Yang, C. S., Landau, J. M., Huang, M.-T., & Newmark, H. L.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Nutrition
Published
2001-07
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
381-406
ISSN
  • 0199-9885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4312
OpenAlex
W2158944838
Cited by
1,260
References
120
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 69
FWCI
4.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA056673, CA56673)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry (medical) › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Pomegranate: compositions and health benefits
Keywords
dietary polyphenols, anticarcinogenic activity, carcinogenesis inhibition, antioxidants, phenolic acids, tea catechins, isoflavones, soybean, quercetin, flavonoids, resveratrol, lignans, bioavailability, cancer prevention, cancer risk
MeSH terms
Absorption, Antioxidants, Biological Availability, Biotransformation, Catechin, Diet, Flavonoids, Humans, Isoflavones, Phenols, Polymers, Tea, Anticarcinogenic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review