The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Origins of Technology-Skill Complementarity
Open accessAbstract
Current concern with the impact of new technologies on the wage structure motivates this study. We offer evidence that technology-skill and capital-skill (relative) complementarities existed in manufacturing early in this century and were related to the adoption of electric motors and particular production methods. Industries, from 1909 to 1929, with more capital per worker and a greater proportion of motive energy coming from purchased electricity employed relatively more educated blue-collar workers in 1940 and paid their production workers substantially more. We also find a strong positive association between changes in capital intensity and the nonproduction worker wage bill from 1909–1919 implying capital-skill complementarity as large as in recent years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Changes in Relative Wages, 1963-1987: Supply and Demand Factors
Katz, L. F., & Murphy, K. M. (1992) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118323 · Cited by 4,793
Self-citationBerman, E., Bound, J., & Griliches, Z. (1994) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118467 · Cited by 1,870 · cited 4×
“(5) as the non-production worker share of total labor costs. well as a modification that drops the relative wage variable, 44See Berman, Bound, and Griliches (1994) and Brown and Christensen (1981).”
Influential
Cited by
The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019 · Cited by 8,727
The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration
Autor, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355303322552801 · Cited by 6,205
Galor, O., & Weil, D. N. (2000) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.90.4.806 · Cited by 2,319
Capital-skill Complementarity and Inequality: A Macroeconomic Analysis
(2000) · doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00150 · Cited by 2,106
Computing inequality: have computers changed the labor market?
Autor, D. H., Katz, L. F., & Krueger, A. B. (1998) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355398555874 · Cited by 1,830
Self-citationTechnical change, inequality, and the labor market
Acemoglu, D. (2002) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.40.1.7 · Cited by 1,767
Dell’Acqua, F., McFowland, E., Mollick, E., Lifshitz, H., Kellogg, K. C., Rajendran, S., Krayer, L., Candelon, F., & Lakhani, K. R. (2026) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2025.21838 · Cited by 1,189
Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D., & Raymond, L. (2025) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjae044 · Cited by 1,083
Dell'Acqua, F., McFowland III, E., Mollick, E. R., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., Kellogg, K., Rajendran, S., Krayer, L., Candelon, F., & Lakhani, K. R. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4573321 · Cited by 794
The History of Technological Anxiety and the Future of Economic Growth: Is This Time Different?
Mokyr, J., Vickers, C., & Ziebarth, N. L. (2015) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.29.3.31 · Cited by 698
Economics of Artificial Intelligence: Implications for the Future of Work
Ernst, E., Merola, R., & Samaan, D. (2019) · IZA Journal of Labor Policy · doi:10.2478/izajolp-2019-0004 · Cited by 405
Human capital and industrialization: Evidence from the age of enlightenment
Squicciarini, M. P., & Voigtländer, N. (2015) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjv025 · Cited by 384
The ‘Task Approach’ to Labor Markets – An Overview
Autor, D. H. (2013) · Journal for Labour Market Research · doi:10.1007/s12651-013-0128-z · Cited by 382
Violante, G. L. (2008) · The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics · doi:10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2388-1 · Cited by 238
The Future of Critical Management Studies: A Paleo-Marxist Critique of Labour Process Theory
Adler, P. S. (2007) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840607080743 · Cited by 212
Katz, L., & Margo, R. (2013) · doi:10.3386/w18752 · Cited by 202
Self-citationCorporate digital transformation and labor structure upgrading
Dou, B., Guo, S., Chang, X., & Wang, Y. (2023) · International Review of Financial Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102904 · Cited by 193
Changes in China’s wage structure
Ge, S., & Yang, D. T. (2014) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1111/jeea.12072 · Cited by 177
Applying AI to Rebuild Middle Class Jobs
Autor, D. (2024) · doi:10.3386/w32140 · Cited by 157
When does AI pay off? AI-adoption intensity, complementary investments, and R&D strategy
Lee, Y. S., Kim, T., Choi, S., & Kim, W. (2022) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102590 · Cited by 141
“Why Is Labor Receiving a Smaller Share of Global Income? Theory and Empirical Evidence”
Dao, M., Das, M., Koczan, Z., & Lian, W. (2017) · IMF Working Papers · doi:10.5089/9781484311042.001 · Cited by 144
de Pleijt, A., Nuvolari, A., & Weisdorf, J. (2020) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1093/jeea/jvz006 · Cited by 81
The diffusion of new technologies
Kalyani, A., Bloom, N., Carvalho, M., Hassan, T., Lerner, J., & Tahoun, A. (2025) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjaf002 · Cited by 60
How Does AI Improve Human Decision-Making? Evidence from the AI-Powered Go Program
Choi, S., Kim, N., Kim, J., & Kang, H. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3893835 · Cited by 30
Distinguished Lecture on Economics in Government: Lessons from Past Productivity Booms
Ferguson, R. W., & Wascher, W. L. (2004) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/0895330041371286 · Cited by 30
Dell'Acqua, F., Kogut, B., & Perkowski, P. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3746564 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldin, C., & Katz, L. F.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Journal of Economics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-08-01
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 693-732
- ISSN
- 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-4650
- OpenAlex
- W2103419131
- Cited by
- 1,061
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 96.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.