Cited by 96Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Experiential reward learning outweighs instruction prior to adulthood

Open access
Decker, Johannes H., Lourenco, Frederico S., Doll, Bradley B., Hartley, Catherine A.·2015·Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

Throughout our lives, we face the important task of distinguishing rewarding actions from those that are best avoided. Importantly, there are multiple means by which we acquire this information. Through trial and error, we use experiential feedback to evaluate our actions. We also learn which actions are advantageous through explicit instruction from others. Here, we examined whether the influence of these two forms of learning on choice changes across development by placing instruction and experience in competition in a probabilistic-learning task. Whereas inaccurate instruction markedly biased adults' estimations of a stimulus's value, children and adolescents were better able to objectively estimate stimulus values through experience. Instructional control of learning is thought to recruit prefrontal-striatal brain circuitry, which continues to mature into adulthood. Our behavioral data suggest that this protracted neurocognitive maturation may cause the motivated actions of children and adolescents to be less influenced by explicit instruction than are those of adults. This absence of a confirmation bias in children and adolescents represents a paradoxical developmental advantage of youth over adults in the unbiased evaluation of actions through positive and negative experience.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/s13415-014-0332-5

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Children (age 6-12) and adolescents (age 13-17) excel at learning rules through experience, whereas adults were biased to learn more from explicit instruction.

    “A recent behavioral study showed that children (age 6–12) and adolescents (age 13–17) excel at learning rules through experience, whereas adults were biased to learn more from explicit instruction”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Decker, J. H., Lourenco, F. S., Doll, B. B., & Hartley, C. A.
Affiliations
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Hartley, Catherine A.
Venue
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2015-01-13
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
310-320
ISSN
  • 1530-7026 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-135X
OpenAlex
W2062013810
Cited by
96
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P50MH079513)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007739)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
reward learning, experiential learning, explicit instruction, developmental differences, children, adolescents, adults, probabilistic learning, confirmation bias, choice behavior
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Child, Choice Behavior, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Probability Learning, Reward, Feedback, Psychological, Young Adult, Psychology, Developmental

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review