Cited by 485Gastrointestinal motility and disordersNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchRegulation of Appetite and Obesity

Neuroepithelial circuit formed by innervation of sensory enteroendocrine cells

Open access
Bohórquez, Diego V., Shahid, Rafiq A., Erdmann, Alan, Kreger, Alex M., Wang, Yu, Calakos, Nicole, Wang, Fan, Liddle, Rodger A.·2015·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Satiety and other core physiological functions are modulated by sensory signals arising from the surface of the gut. Luminal nutrients and bacteria stimulate epithelial biosensors called enteroendocrine cells. Despite being electrically excitable, enteroendocrine cells are generally thought to communicate indirectly with nerves through hormone secretion and not through direct cell-nerve contact. However, we recently uncovered in intestinal enteroendocrine cells a cytoplasmic process that we named neuropod. Here, we determined that neuropods provide a direct connection between enteroendocrine cells and neurons innervating the small intestine and colon. Using cell-specific transgenic mice to study neural circuits, we found that enteroendocrine cells have the necessary elements for neurotransmission, including expression of genes that encode pre-, post-, and transsynaptic proteins. This neuroepithelial circuit was reconstituted in vitro by coculturing single enteroendocrine cells with sensory neurons. We used a monosynaptic rabies virus to define the circuit's functional connectivity in vivo and determined that delivery of this neurotropic virus into the colon lumen resulted in the infection of mucosal nerves through enteroendocrine cells. This neuroepithelial circuit can serve as both a sensory conduit for food and gut microbes to interact with the nervous system and a portal for viruses to enter the enteric and central nervous systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci78361

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A basolateral cytoplasmic process of L cells, the neuropod, establishes a functional synaptic contact with enteric glia and vagal afferents.

    “A basolateral cytoplasmic process of the L cells -the neuropod -was shown to establish a functional synaptic contact with the enteric glia and vagal afferents.”

    From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Bohorquez et al., 2015

    The Introduction identifies the neuropod as an enteroendocrine-cell process escorted by enteric glia, and the Results and Discussion report direct contact with nerve fibers and evidence of synaptic connectivity. But the paper does not show a functional synapse with glia, and it says whether the connected neurons are intrinsic or extrinsic remains to be characterized; it therefore does not establish that they are vagal afferents. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Enteroendocrine and enterochromaffin cells form close synaptic connections with certain vagal afferent fibers through neuropods.

    “Enteroendocrine and enterochromaffin cells (ECCs) form close synaptic connections with certain vagal afferent fibers through cell extensions called neuropods [25, 26].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bohórquez, D. V., Shahid, R. A., Erdmann, A., Kreger, A. M., Wang, Y., Calakos, N., Wang, F., & Liddle, R. A.
Affiliations
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • Durham VA Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2015-01-02
Volume
125
Issue
2
Pages
782-786
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119429325
Cited by
484
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 17
FWCI
38.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DukeSpace (Duke University) (submittedVersion)
  • DukeSpace (Duke University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01 BX002230)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (F32DK094704, R01DK098796, R01DK091946, K01DK103832)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
Keywords
enteroendocrine cells, sensory neurons, enteric nervous system, neurotransmission, gut-brain signaling, satiety, rabies virus, small intestine
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Communication, Cells, Cultured, Colon, Intestine, Small, Coculture Techniques, Enteroendocrine Cells, Neuroepithelial Cells, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review