Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 431

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Time Will Tell? Temporality and the Analysis of Causal Mechanisms and Processes

Grzymala-Busse, Anna·2011·Comparative Political Studies
DOI 10.1177/0010414010390653
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Causal inference and the logic of historical explanation are grounded in temporality. Yet the relationship between causal analysis and aspects of temporality, such as duration, tempo, acceleration, and timing, is often less clear. Using examples from analyses of institutional change and postcommunist regime transitions, the author argues that aspects of temporality allow us to predict which causal mechanisms can unfold and to differentiate causal sequences. Explicitly specifying the role of temporality can thus improve scholars’ understanding of political mechanisms, sequences, and the processes they constitute.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0010414010390653

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Abbott Andrew, 2001, Time matters
  2. de Swaan Abram, 1988, In care of the state
  3. Dahl Robert, 1971, Polyarchy
  4. Ekiert Grzegorz, 2003, Capitalism and democracy in Central and Eastern Europe
  5. 10.1017/CBO9780511628351 · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511628351
  6. Gallup John, 1998, Paper prepared for the World Bank Conference on Development Economics
  7. 10.1080/1351034042000238185 · doi:10.1080/1351034042000238185
  8. Hanson Stephen, 1997, Time and revolution: Marxism and the design of Soviet institutions
  9. Jowitt Ken, 1991, The new world disorder: The Leninist extinction
  10. 10.1057/palgrave.polity.2300030 · doi:10.1057/palgrave.polity.2300030
  11. Kitschelt Herbert, 2003, Capitalism and democracy in Central and Eastern Europe, 49
  12. Kuran Timur, 1992, Liberalization and democratization, 7
  13. 10.1057/palgrave.polity.2300025 · doi:10.1057/palgrave.polity.2300025
  14. Orren Karen, 1994, The dynamics of American politics, 311
  15. Pop-Eleches Grigore, 2009, From economic crisis to reform: IMF programs in Latin America and Eastern Europe
  16. Rustow Dankwart, 1967, A world of nations
  17. 10.3998/mpub.15030 · doi:10.3998/mpub.15030
  18. Scott James, 1998, Seeing like a state
  19. Stark David, 1997, Postsocialist pathways

Cited by

See all 431

Metadata

Authors
Grzymala-Busse, A.
Venue
Comparative Political Studies
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2010-12-16
Volume
44
Issue
9
Pages
1267-1297
ISSN
  • 0010-4140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3829
DOI
10.1177/0010414010390653
OpenAlex
W2113571993
Cited by
431
References
67
FWCI
25.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.