Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 590

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Meta-Analysis of Different Forms of Shared Leadership–Team Performance Relations

D’Innocenzo, Lauren, Mathieu, John E., Kukenberger, Michael R.·2016·Journal of Management
DOI 10.1177/0149206314525205
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Using 50 effect sizes from both published and unpublished studies (team n = 3,198), we provide meta-analytic support for the positive relationship between shared leadership and team performance. Employing a random effects model, we found that the theoretical foundation and associated measurement techniques used to index shared leadership significantly moderated effect size estimates. Specifically, as compared to studies that conceptualized and employed assessments of overall shared leadership from members (i.e., an aggregation approach), network conceptions and measures of shared leadership evidenced higher effect sizes. Both network density and (de)centralization approaches to the study of shared leadership–performance relations exhibited significant and higher effect sizes than did the aggregation-based studies. Analyses also revealed lower average effect sizes when the sample studied was in the classroom/lab as compared to the field. Task complexity significantly moderated the shared leadership, with lower effect sizes observed with more complex tasks. No significant influence of team task interdependence was observed. We highlight the relative value of employing social network theories and measures as compared to aggregate theories and measures of shared leadership. Directions for future research and application are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0149206314525205

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 101

  1. 10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.435 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/1048-9843(95)90035-7 · DOI · Paper page
  3. *Avolio B. J., Jung D., Murry W., Sivasubramaniam N. 1996. Building highly developed teams: Focusing on shared leadership process, efficacy, trust, and performance. In Beyerlein D. A. J. D. A., Beyerlein S. T. (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams: 173-209. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  4. 10.4135/9781452229539.n7 · DOI
  5. Bass B. M. 1985. Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, NY: Free Press.
  6. Bass B. M., Bass R. 2009. The Bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. New York, NY: Free Press.
  7. 10.1037/h0058076 · DOI
  8. 10.1108/02683940610663105 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1027/1866-5888/a000021 · DOI
  10. 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00306.x · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/S0149-2063_03_00087-4 · doi:10.1016/s0149-2063_03_00087-4
  12. 10.2307/2391247 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Card N. A. 2012. Applied meta-analysis for social science research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  14. Carley K. M., Pfeffer J., Reminga J., Storrick J., Columbus D. 2012. ORA user’s guide 2012. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
  15. *Carson J. B., Tesluk P. E. 2007. Leadership from within: A look at leadership roles in teams. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Philadelphia, PA.
  16. 10.2307/20159921 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1007/s10726-006-9045-7 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2012.01470.x · doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2012.01470.x
  19. *Cashman D. M. 2008. The effects of vertical leadership team demographics and group potency upon shared leadership emergence within technical organizations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation Capella University.
  20. 10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.234 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.234 · Paper page
  21. 10.1504/IJMED.2007.011792 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.10.010 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.5465/amr.2006.21318925 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.4135/9781452229539.n3 · DOI
  25. 10.5465/amr.2011.0206 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.001 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/j.riob.2011.09.007 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.5465/AMR.2010.53503267 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1177/001872089203400303 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.002 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01801.x · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00135.x · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.2307/2094779 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Follett M. P. 1924. Creative experience. New York: Peter Smith.
  35. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.09.008 · DOI · Paper page
  36. *Gerstner C. R. 1998. Leadership relationships and work group effectiveness: A multi-level empirical examination. Unpublished doctoral dissertation Pennsylvania State University University Park.
  37. Gibb C. A. 1954. Leadership. In Lindzey G. (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology, Vol. 2: 877-917. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  38. 10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5 · DOI · Paper page
  39. *Greer L. L. de Hoogh A. H. B. Patel P. C. Thatcher S. M. B. De Dreu C. K. W. 2013. Does shared leadership benefit team performance via voice or harm team performance via power struggles? The importance of team power-base diversity. Unpublished manuscript Stanford Graduate School of Business Stanford CA. · doi:10.5465/ambpp.2013.12875abstract
  40. 10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.819 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.819 · Paper page
  41. *Gupta V. K., Huang R., Yayla A. A. 2011. Social capital, collective transformational leadership, and performance: A resource-based view of self-managed teams. Journal of Managerial Issues, 23: 31-45.
  42. 10.1016/B978-0-08-057065-5.50010-5 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Highhouse S., Gillespie J. Z. 2008. Do samples really matter that much? In Lance C. E., Vandenberg R. J. (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity, and fable in the organizational and social sciences: 249-267. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  44. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.04.004 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1177/0149206311415419 · DOI · Paper page
  46. *Hoch J. E. 2012. Shared leadership and innovation: The role of vertical leadership and employee integrity. Journal of Business and Psychology. Advance online publication. · DOI · Paper page
  47. *Hoch J. E., Pearce C. L., Dulebohn J. H. 2010. Developing a shared and vertical leadership short scale: Validating Pearce and Sims (2002) questionnaire using in three samples of German work teams. Paper presented at the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, GA.
  48. 10.1027/1866-5888/a000020 · DOI
  49. 10.5465/amr.2010.0181 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1007/s10490-012-9282-z · DOI
  51. Katz D., Kahn R. L. 1978. The social psychology of organizations. New York, NY: Wiley.
  52. 10.1016/0030-5073(78)90023-5 · DOI · Paper page
  53. *Kim H. R. 1988. Group behavior: Performance sick leave and job satisfaction as a function of within-group homogeneity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation Iowa State University Ames.
  54. 10.2189/asqu.51.4.590 · DOI · Paper page
  55. *Kukenberger M. 2012. A shared leadership classification and multi-level exploration of compositional antecedents and team and individuals outcomes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation University of Connecticut Storrs.
  56. *Kukenberger M., Mathieu J., D’Innocenzo L., Reilly G. 2011. Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of the impact of team composition and performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, San Antonio, TX.
  57. *Künzle B., Zala-Mezö E., Wacker J., Kolbe M., Spahn D. R., Grote G. 2010. Leadership in anaesthesia teams: The most effective leadership is shared. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 19: 1-6.
  58. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00114.x · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1177/016327870102400302 · DOI
  60. Martell R. F. Leavitt K. N. 2002. Reducing the performance-cue bias in work behavior ratings: Can groups help? Journal of Applied Psychology 87: 1032-1041. · DOI
  61. 10.1177/0149206308316061 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1177/0149206310364663 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.273 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.273 · Paper page
  64. 10.4135/9781452229539.n9 · DOI
  65. 10.1177/1368430211422923 · DOI
  66. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.003 · DOI · Paper page
  67. *Mendez M. J. 2009. A closer look into collective leadership: Is leadership shared or distributed? Unpublished doctoral dissertation New Mexico State University Las Cruces.
  68. 10.12927/hcq.2012.22765 · DOI
  69. 10.1177/0149206309347376 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1002/hrm.21488 · DOI
  71. Murase T. Doty D. Wax A. DeChurch L. A. Contractor N. S. 2012. Teams are changing: Time to “think networks.” Industrial and Organizational Psychology 5: 41-44. · doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01402.x
  72. 10.1177/104649649903000507 · DOI
  73. 10.5465/AME.2004.12690298 · DOI · Paper page
  74. 10.4135/9781452229539 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2005.03.003 · DOI · Paper page
  76. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.03.007 · DOI
  77. 10.1016/S1572-0977(00)07008-4 · DOI · Paper page
  78. 10.1037/1089-2699.6.2.172 · doi:10.1037/1089-2699.6.2.172 · Paper page
  79. *Pearce C. L., Yoo Y., Alavi M. 2004. Leadership, social work, and virtual teams: The relative influence of vertical versus shared leadership in the nonprofit sector. Riggio R. E., Smith-Orr S. (Eds.). Improving leadership in nonprofit organizations: 180-203. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  80. Perry M. L., Pearce C. L., Sims H. P. 1999. Empowered selling teams: How shared leadership can contribute to selling team outcomes. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 19: 35-51.
  81. *Resick C. J., DeChurch L. A., Randall K., Murase T. M., Jimenez M. J. 2009. Elaboration of information and team decision-making effectiveness in uncertain environments. Paper presented at the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New Orleans, LA.
  82. Ripley R. M., Snijders T. A., Preciado P. 2011. Manual for RSIENA. Oxford, UK: University of Oxford, Department of Statistics, Nuffield College.
  83. 10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.61 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.61 · Paper page
  84. 10.1037/0021-9010.71.2.302 · DOI
  85. *Sanders T. O. 2006. Collectivity and influence: The nature of shared leadership and its relationship with team learning orientation vertical leadership and team effectiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation George Washington University Washington DC.
  86. Seers A. 1996. Better leadership through chemistry: Toward a model of emergent shared team leadership. In Johnson M. M. B. D. A. (Ed.), Advances in the interdisciplinary study of work teams: Team leadership, Vol. 3: 145-172. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  87. 10.4135/9781452229539.n4 · doi:10.4135/9781452229539.n4
  88. 10.1287/orsc.1090.0506 · DOI
  89. 10.1177/1059601102027001005 · DOI · Paper page
  90. 10.1027/1866-5888/a000017 · DOI
  91. 10.2307/3069458 · DOI · Paper page
  92. 10.1037/a0015659 · DOI · Paper page
  93. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00184.x · DOI · Paper page
  94. Tesluk P., Mathieu J. E., Zaccaro S. J., Marks M. A. 1997. Task and aggregation issues in analysis and assessment of team performance. In Brannick M. T., Salas E., Prince C. (Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications: 197-226. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  95. Thompson J. D. 1967. Organizations in action. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  96. Yammarino F. J. 1994. Indirect leadership: Transformational leadership at a distance. In Bass B.M., Avolio B.J. (Eds.), Improving organizational effectiveness: 26-47. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  97. 10.1177/014920638901500207 · DOI · Paper page
  98. *Ziegert J. C. 2005. Does more than one cook spoil the broth? An examination of shared team leadership. Unpublished doctoral dissertation University of Maryland College Park.
  99. *Ziegert J. C., Mayer D. M., Piccolo R. F. 2008. Sharing leadership: Examining vertical and shared charisma in organizations. Paper presented at the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Francisco, CA.
  100. *Ziegert J. C., Mayer D. M., Piccolo R. F. 2009. Context matters: Examining contextual influences on shared leadership. Paper presented at the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New Orleans, LA.
  101. *Zhou W. 2012. Moderating and mediating effects of shared leadership on the relationship between entrepreneurial team diversity and performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation City University of New York NY.

Cited by

See all 590

Metadata

Authors
D’Innocenzo, L., Mathieu, J. E., & Kukenberger, M. R.
Venue
Journal of Management
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2016-07-10
Volume
42
Issue
7
Pages
1964-1991
ISSN
  • 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1211
DOI
10.1177/0149206314525205
OpenAlex
W2133062259
Cited by
590
References
16
FWCI
5.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.