Cited by 492Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingPersonality Traits and Psychology

Theory of mind and emotion regulation difficulties in adolescents with borderline traits

Open access
Sharp, Carla, Pane, Heather, Ha, Carolyn, Venta, Amanda, Patel, Amee B., Sturek, Jennifer, Fonagy, Peter·2011·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective Dysfunctions in both emotion regulation and social cognition (understanding behavior in mental state terms, theory of mind or mentalizing) have been proposed as explanations for disturbances of interpersonal behavior in borderline personality disorder (BPD). This study aimed to examine mentalizing in adolescents with emerging BPD from a dimensional and categorical point of view, controlling for gender, age, Axis I and Axis II symptoms, and to explore the mediating role of emotion regulation in the relation between theory of mind and borderline traits.Method The newly developed Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition (MASC) was administered alongside self-report measures of emotion regulation and psychopathology to 111 adolescent inpatients between the ages of 12 to 17 (mean age = 15.5 years; SD = 1.44 years). For categorical analyses borderline diagnosis was determined through semi-structured clinical interview, which showed that 23% of the sample met criteria for BPD.Results Findings suggest a relationship between borderline traits and "hypermentalizing" (excessive, inaccurate mentalizing) independent of age, gender, externalizing, internalizing and psychopathy symptoms. The relation between hypermentalizing and BPD traits was partially mediated by difficulties in emotion regulation, accounting for 43.5% of the hypermentalizing to BPD path.Conclusions Results suggest that in adolescents with borderline personality features the loss of mentalization is more apparent in the emergence of unusual alternative strategies (hypermentalizing) than in the loss of the capacity per se (no mentalizing or undermentalizing). Moreover, for the first time, empirical evidence is provided to support the notion that mentalizing exerts its influence on borderline traits through the mediating role of emotion dysregulation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaac.2011.01.017

Cites

112 of 112 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Allen JG. Mentalizing. Bull Menninger Clin. 2003;67:91- 112.
  2. Crick NR, Murray-Close D, Woods K. Borderline personality features in childhood: a short-term longitudinal study. Dev Psychopathol. 2005;17:1051-1070.
  3. Allen J. Traumatic Attachments. New York: Wiley; 2002.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sharp, C., Pane, H., Ha, C., Venta, A., Patel, A. B., Sturek, J., & Fonagy, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Houston (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Sharp, Carla
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-06
Volume
50
Issue
6
Pages
563-573.e1
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2133290727
Cited by
492
References
112
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 15
FWCI
28.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Menninger Clinic
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0510-10228)
  • British Psychological Society
  • University College London
  • Curry School of Education and Human Development, University of Virginia
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
theory of mind, mentalization, emotion regulation, borderline personality disorder, borderline personality traits, adolescents, social cognition, mediation, psychopathy, interpersonal behavior
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Borderline Personality Disorder, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Interview, Psychological, Life Change Events, Male, Personality Assessment, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Residential Treatment, Comorbidity, Substance-Related Disorders, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Theory of Mind, Emotional Intelligence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review