CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,683Personality Traits and PsychologyEmotions and Moral BehaviorSocial and Intergroup Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 126 of the 136 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

TARGET ARTICLE: Toward a Conceptualization of Optimal Self-Esteem

Kernis, Michael H.·2003·Psychological Inquiry
DOI 10.1207/s15327965pli1401_01
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this article, I present a theoretical perspective on the nature of "optimal" self-esteem. One of my major goals is to show that optimal and high self-esteem are different from each other. High self-esteem can be fragile or secure depending upon the extent to which it is defensive or genuine, contingent or true, unstable or stable, and discrepant or congruent with implicit (nonconscious) feelings of self-worth. Optimal self-esteem is characterized by qualities associated with genuine, true, stable, and congruent (with implicit self-esteem) high self-esteem. A second major goal is to present a conceptualization of the construct of authenticity. I propose that authenticity as an individual difference construct may be particularly important in delineating the adaptive features of optimal self-esteem. Authenticity can be characterized as the unobstructed operation of one's true, or core, self in one's daily enterprise. I argue that authenticity has 4 components: awareness, unbiased processing, action, and relational. Initial data pertaining to these components are highly encouraging. Finally, I discuss some implications of the fragile versus secure high self-esteem distinction for narcissism, defensive processing models, and cross-cultural self-esteem perspectives.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327965pli1401_01

Cites

126 of 126 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

10 of the 136 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 10.1037//0033-2909.84.5.888 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1037//0022-3514.64.1.141 · DOI
  3. 10.1037//0033-295X.103.1.5 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1037//0022-3514.79.4.631 · DOI
  5. 10.1037//0022-3514.55.3.445 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1037//0022-3514.70.1.141 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Carver, C. S. & Scheier, M. F. (1983). Two sides of the self: One for you and one for me. In J. Suls & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 2, pp. 123-158). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  8. 10.1037//0033-2909.116.1.28 · DOI
  9. Colvin C. R., 1995, Journal of Personality and Social Personality, 68, 152, 10.1037/0022-3514.68.6.1152 · DOI
  10. Crocker, J. & Park, L. E. (2002). Seeking self-esteem: Construction, maintenance, and protection of self-worth. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity. New York: Guilford.
  11. 10.1037//0033-295X.108.3.593 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1995). Human agency: The basis for true self-esteem. In M. H. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 31-50 ). New York: Plenum.
  13. 10.1037//0022-3514.75.2.545 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1037//0022-3514.69.1.58 · DOI
  15. 10.1037//0022-3514.73.1.139 · DOI
  16. Epstein, S. (1983). The unconscious, the preconscious and the self-concept. In J. Suls & A. Greenwald (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 2, pp. 219-247). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  17. 10.1037//0022-3514.73.1.31 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Freud, S. (1957). The unconscious. In J. Strachey (Ed. and Tran.), The standard edition of the complete works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 14, pp. 159-215). London: Hogarth. (Original work published 1915)
  19. 10.1037//0033-295X.106.4.766 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1037//0022-3514.65.6.1190 · DOI
  21. Kernis, M. H. & Goldman, B. M. (2002). Stability and malleability in self-concept and self-esteem. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity. New York: Guilford.
  22. Kernis, M. H. & Paradise, A. W. (2002). Distinguishing between fragile and secure forms of high self-esteem. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Self-determination: Theoretical issues and practical applications. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
  23. Lewin, K. (1951). Problems of research in social psychology. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Field theory in social science (pp. 155-169). New York: Harper & Row.
  24. 10.1037//0022-3514.74.2.494 · DOI
  25. 10.1037//0022-3514.75.3.681 · DOI
  26. 10.1037//0022-3514.75.6.1459 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1037//0022-3514.74.5.1197 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1037//0022-3514.55.1.88 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Rogers, C. R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality, and interpersonal relationships, as developed in the client-centered framework. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of science (Vol. 3, pp. 184-256). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  30. 10.1037//0022-3514.57.6.1069 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1037//0022-3514.70.4.780 · DOI
  32. 10.1037//0033-2909.103.2.193 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Tesser, A., Martin, L. L. & Cornell, D. P. (1996). On the substitutability of self-protective mechanisms. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action (pp. 48-68). New York: Guilford.
  34. 10.1037//0022-3514.60.5.711 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,683

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kernis, M. H.
Affiliations
University of Georgia (US)
Corresponding author
Kernis, Michael H.
Venue
Psychological Inquiry
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2003-01
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
1-26
ISSN
  • 1047-840X (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7965
DOI
10.1207/s15327965pli1401_01
OpenAlex
W1981141777
Cited by
1,683
References
136
Citations by year
2026: 62 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 96 · 2020: 121 · 2019: 97 · 2018: 109 · 2017: 87 · 2016: 111 · 2015: 94 · 2014: 97 · 2013: 92 · 2012: 84
FWCI
28.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Inquiry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
high self-esteem, authenticity, implicit self-esteem, defensive processing, narcissism, individual differences, self-awareness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review