Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,316

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social Preferences, Beliefs, and the Dynamics of Free Riding in Public Goods Experiments

Fischbacher, Urs, Gächter, Simon·2010·American Economic Review
DOI 10.1257/aer.100.1.541
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

One lingering puzzle is why voluntary contributions to public goods decline over time in experimental and real-world settings. We show that the decline of cooperation is driven by individual preferences for imperfect conditional cooperation. Many people's desire to contribute less than others, rather than changing beliefs of what others will contribute over time or people's heterogeneity in preferences makes voluntary cooperation fragile. Universal free riding thus eventually emerges, despite the fact that most people are not selfish. (D12, D 83, H41, Z13)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/aer.100.1.541

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. 10.1016/0047-2727(88)90043-6 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Andreoni James, 1995, American Economic Review, 85, 891
  3. 10.2307/2234532 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.2307/2297968 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1007/s11238-006-9013-3 · DOI
  6. Bayer C, 2009, University of Nottingham Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics Discussion Paper, 2009
  7. 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.04.005 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00120-6 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1111/1468-0475.00080 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1007/s10683-005-0436-4 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/S0047-2727(96)01609-X · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.geb.2006.08.011 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1023/A:1009994008166 · DOI
  14. 10.1006/game.1996.0013 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/S0165-1765(97)82136-2 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2006.00006.x · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/j.econlet.2004.10.007 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/s10683-007-9191-z · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/j.geb.2008.07.003 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1098/rspb.2007.1558 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Ferraro Paul J, 2005, Georgia State University Andrew Young School of Policy Studies Working Paper, 2005
  22. 10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Fischbacher Urs, 2009, University of Nottingham Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics Discussion Paper, 2009
  24. 10.1257/0002828043052187 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Gächter Simon, 2007, Psychology and Economics: A Promising New cross-Disciplinary Field, ed. Bruno S. Frey and Alois Stutzer, 19, 10.7551/mitpress/2604.003.0006 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/S0167-2681(99)00045-1 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00160-2 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/0167-2681(86)90004-1 · DOI
  29. 10.1007/s10683-008-9197-1 · DOI
  30. 10.1257/00028280260344605 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1111/j.1465-7295.1988.tb01519.x · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1007/BF00140829 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1037/h0029849 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1111/1467-9442.00182 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/j.econlet.2008.07.015 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1073/pnas.0408759102 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1016/0167-2681(94)00073-N · DOI
  38. 10.1257/000282803321455359 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.jebo.2007.09.001 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.joep.2008.04.005 · DOI
  41. 10.1007/s10683-007-9171-3 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00072-3 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.2307/1964229 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Palfrey Thomas R, 1997, American Economic Review, 87, 829
  45. 10.1016/S0167-2681(00)00128-1 · DOI
  46. 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2007.00051.x · DOI · Paper page
  47. Selten Reinhard, 1967, Beiträge Zur Experimentellen Wirtschaftsforschung, ed. Heinz Sauermann, 136
  48. 10.1016/0167-2681(86)90021-1 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1016/S0165-1765(98)00203-1 · DOI
  50. 10.2307/2232294 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1016/S0899-8256(03)00002-2 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/0047-2727(94)90059-0 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Fischbacher, U., & Gächter, S.
Venue
American Economic Review
Publisher
American Economic Association
Published
2010-03-01
Volume
100
Issue
1
Pages
541-556
ISSN
0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1257/aer.100.1.541
OpenAlex
W3123807625
Cited by
1,316
References
8
FWCI
226.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.