Cited by 279Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 36 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

The Oxytocin Receptor (OXTR) Contributes to Prosocial Fund Allocations in the Dictator Game and the Social Value Orientations Task

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Economic games observe social decision making in the laboratory that involves real money payoffs. Previously we have shown that allocation of funds in the Dictator Game (DG), a paradigm that illustrates costly altruistic behavior, is partially determined by promoter-region repeat region variants in the arginine vasopressin 1a receptor gene (AVPR1a). In the current investigation, the gene encoding the related oxytocin receptor (OXTR) was tested for association with the DG and a related paradigm, the Social Values Orientation (SVO) task. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Association (101 male and 102 female students) using a robust-family based test between 15 single tagging SNPs (htSNPs) across the OXTR was demonstrated with both the DG and SVO. Three htSNPs across the gene region showed significant association with both of the two games. The most significant association was observed with rs1042778 (p = 0.001). Haplotype analysis also showed significant associations for both DG and SVO. Following permutation test adjustment, significance was observed for 2-5 locus haplotypes (p<0.05). A second sample of 98 female subjects was subsequently and independently recruited to play the dictator game and was genotyped for the three significant SNPs found in the first sample. The rs1042778 SNP was shown to be significant for the second sample as well (p = 0.004, Fisher's exact test). CONCLUSIONS: The demonstration that genetic polymorphisms for the OXTR are associated with human prosocial decision making converges with a large body of animal research showing that oxytocin is an important social hormone across vertebrates including Homo sapiens. Individual differences in prosocial behavior have been shown by twin studies to have a substantial genetic basis and the current investigation demonstrates that common variants in the oxytocin receptor gene, an important element of mammalian social circuitry, underlie such individual differences.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Common variants in the oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) were associated with prosocial fund allocations in both the Dictator Game and the Social Value Orientations task, with rs1042778 showing the most robust signal. The rs1042778 association with Dictator Game giving was replicated in an independent sample of 98 female subjects.

Key findings

  • In the first family-based sample (101 male and 102 female students), 8 of 15 analyzed OXTR htSNPs showed nominal association with one or both games; 6 of 8 were consistent across Dictator Game and SVO. The most significant SNP was rs1042778 for both Dictator Game (p = 0.001, corrected p = 0.016) and SVO (p = 0.002, corrected p = 0.031).
  • Three SNPs—rs1042778, rs2268490, and rs237887—were significant for both games. Haplotype analysis found significant associations for 2–5 locus haplotypes after permutation testing (p < 0.05); the 4-locus block rs9840864-rs237888-rs2268490-rs237887 was significant for Dictator Game (FBAT-GEE = 0.005), SVO (FBAT-GEE = 0.028), and jointly (p = 0.038).
  • Dictator Game and SVO allocations were correlated (Pearson Chi-Square = 28.18, DF = 1, p < 0.0001): 64.7% of SVO prosocial participants were high Dictator Game allocators versus 26.5% of proself participants.
  • In the second sample of 98 female subjects, rs1042778 was significant for high/low Dictator Game giving (p = 0.004, Fisher’s exact test); mean giving trended higher for GG+GT genotypes (25 shekels) than TT genotypes (18.3 shekels; F1,96 p = 0.07, effect size approximately 0.5 SD).

Methods

  • Candidate-gene family-based association study. First sample: 101 male and 102 female students, average age 26.00 (SD = 3.73), with parents genotyped for family-based analysis; second sample: 98 mothers, average age 34.47 (SD = 4.76), who played only the Dictator Game.
  • Sixteen tagging SNPs across OXTR were selected; rs2139184 was excluded for very low heterozygosity, leaving 15 htSNPs analyzed. Dictator Game allocations were dichotomized as low (<25 NIS) versus high (≥25 NIS); SVO responses were categorized as prosocial, proself, or undefined.
  • Main analyses used PBAT dominant model, UNPHASED haplotype analysis with 1000 permutations, and FBAT-GEE multivariate statistics; the second sample used Fisher’s exact test.

Limitations

  • The paper states that complex traits such as human altruism are shaped by environment and multiple genes and pose challenges from gene-gene and gene-environment interactions, genetic heterogeneity, low penetrance, and limited statistical power. It also notes that the second sample played only the Dictator Game because time constraints precluded the SVO, and that the pharmacological oxytocin study by Zak et al. did not find a Dictator Game effect, suggesting a future pharmacogenetic approach.
  • Evident from the text: the replication sample was all female mothers and tested only three SNPs, so replication is limited to Dictator Game giving and rs1042778 rather than the full OXTR region or SVO. The first sample also showed some sex-specific nominal associations, and many SNP results were nominal before correction.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0005535

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 36 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 14 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 21
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 38
48 of 48
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The PBAT association analysis assumes a dominant mode of inheritance.

    “results are given using PBAT's dominant model, which assumes a dominant mode of inheritance.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Under the null hypothesis, offspring genotypes follow Mendelian segregation.

    “which are assumed to follow Mendelian segregation under the null hypothesis.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Student sample sex counts are reversed

    Minor

    The abstract reports 101 male and 102 female students, while the Subjects section reports 102 men and 101 women for the same sample.

  • Primer table gives a different SNP identifier

    Minor

    The association results identify rs2268490 as one of the significant SNPs, but the corresponding identifier in the genotyping-primer table is rs2264890.

  • Table 1 supports seven, not eight, nominally significant SNPs

    Minor

    At p<0.05, Table 1 shows nominal significance for seven SNPs. The apparent eighth, rs13316193, has p = 0.0508, which is above that threshold.

3 of 3

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 68 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–279 of 279

Metadata

Authors
Israel, S., Lerer, E., Shalev, I., Uzefovsky, F., Riebold, M., Laiba, E., Bachner-Melman, R., Maril, A., Bornstein, G., Knafo, A., & Ebstein, R. P.
Affiliations
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
Ebstein, Richard P.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2009-05-20
Volume
4
Issue
5
Pages
e5535
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039329578
Cited by
278
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 30
FWCI
35.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem
  • Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities
  • Israel Science Foundation
  • Ministry of Industry, Trade and Labor
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
oxytocin receptor, dictator game, prosocial behavior, altruism, genetic association, single nucleotide polymorphisms, haplotypes, individual differences, social decision-making, oxytocin
MeSH terms
Adult, Cost Allocation, Female, Games, Experimental, Haplotypes, Humans, Male, Social Behavior, Social Values, Software, Task Performance and Analysis, Receptors, Oxytocin, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review