The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 25 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game
Open accessAbstract
Compassion has been suggested to be a strong motivator for prosocial behavior. While research has demonstrated that compassion training has positive effects on mood and health, we do not know whether it also leads to increases in prosocial behavior. We addressed this question in two experiments. In Experiment 1, we introduce a new prosocial game, the Zurich Prosocial Game (ZPG), which allows for repeated, ecologically valid assessment of prosocial behavior and is sensitive to the influence of reciprocity, helping cost, and distress cues on helping behavior. Experiment 2 shows that helping behavior in the ZPG increased in participants who had received short-term compassion training, but not in participants who had received short-term memory training. Interindividual differences in practice duration were specifically related to changes in the amount of helping under no-reciprocity conditions. Our results provide first evidence for the positive impact of short-term compassion training on prosocial behavior towards strangers in a training-unrelated task.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Short-term compassion training increased prosocial helping toward strangers in a newly developed Zurich Prosocial Game (ZPG), whereas memory training did not. The ZPG also showed sensitivity to reciprocity, helping cost, and distress cues, and compassion training effects were observed two to five days after training.
Key findings
- In Experiment 1 (N = 68), helping in the ZPG was higher in reciprocity trials, low-cost trials, and distress-cue trials: main effects were reciprocity, F(67) = 73.22, p < .001, partial η² = .52; cost, F(67) = 73.78, p < .001, partial η² = .52; distress, F(67) = 7.02, p = .01, partial η² = .10.
- ZPG helping correlated with dictator-game giving, ρ(65) = .35, p = .004, but not with memory-task performance, ρ(64) = .06, p > .05, supporting convergent and divergent validity.
- In Experiment 2, compassion training significantly increased helping from pre- to post-training, t(26) = 1.85, p = .04, one-sided, while memory training did not, t(31) = −1.20, p = .24; the time × training interaction was F(1,57) = 4.09, p = .05, partial η² = .07.
- Reported compassion practice hours correlated with increased helping in no-reciprocity trials, ρ(17) = .39, p = .05, one-sided, but not with total helping, ρ(17) = .27, p = .13. Dictator-game giving did not change after training, F(1,56) = .02, p = .89.
Methods
- Two experiments with healthy female volunteers: Experiment 1 validated the ZPG in 68 participants; Experiment 2 tested compassion versus memory training in 69 participants, with 27 compassion and 32 memory participants in the reported samples.
- The ZPG used a 2 × 2 × 2 within-subjects design: reciprocity (no reciprocity, reciprocity), cost (low, high), and distress (no distress cues, distress cues); participants navigated a maze, could help an ostensible co-player by donating keys, and could collect stars to control for attention.
- Experiment 2 compared a one-day, six-hour compassion meditation workshop with a one-day method-of-loci memory workshop; pre-test occurred one to two weeks before training and post-test two to five days after training. Analyses used repeated-measures ANOVAs, t-tests, and correlations.
Limitations
- The paper states that future research with longer training and bigger sample sizes is needed to determine how long-lasting the effects are and who benefits; it also notes that the study was not designed to test the distinction between compassion-based and norm-based prosocial behavior.
- The paper states that self-reported practice data were available only from a subset of participants (n = 19 compassion, n = 22 memory), and that mechanisms such as relaxation or perceived self-other overlap were not isolated.
- Evident from the text: both experiments included only healthy female volunteers aged 18–35 from the University of Zurich and surrounding community, limiting generalizability; the compassion-training effect was tested one-sided based on directional hypotheses.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 25 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As in Experiment 1, these main effects were qualified by a significant interaction between the two factors”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Results > Experiment 2
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“which allows for repeated, ecologically valid assessment of prosocial behavior and is sensitive to the influence of reciprocity, helping cost, and distress cues on helping behavior.”
- Also stated in: § Experiment 1 · hedged
“Thus, the ZPG indeed seems to be sensitive to the three operationalizations of the influencing factors”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § Experiment 1 · hedged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While there was no reliable change in helping from pre- to post-training for the memory training group, t(31) = −1.20, p = .24”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Results > Experiment 2
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“participants helped significantly more in reciprocity trials, in trials with a low cost of helping, and in trials in which the co-player's virtual character expressed distress”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Results > Experiment 1
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Increasing the cost of helping resulted in a larger decrease in prosocial behavior in the no-reciprocity compared to the reciprocity trials”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Results > Experiment 1
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As both correlations were non-significant, we can preclude that interindividual differences in risk preferences, ρ(66) = .10, p>.05 (risk questionnaire) and ρ(66) = .02, p>.05 (lottery index), accounted for the difference in prosocial behavior between low and high cost trials.”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Results > Experiment 1
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the number of remembered words did not correlate with helping in the ZPG, ρ(66) = −.04, p>.05”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Results > Experiment 2
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For negative mood, a significant time x training interaction was revealed, F(1,68) = 6.11, p = .016, partial η2 = .08.”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Results > Experiment 2
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The analysis did however yield a reciprocity x distress interaction: Distress cues increased helping in the no-reciprocity but not in the reciprocity trials”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Results > Experiment 2
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These interactions were qualified by a significant three-way interaction between time x cost x training, F(1,57) = 4.55, p = .04, partial η2 = .07.”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Results > Experiment 2
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 27
- Probably not a substantial claim. 34
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A significant main effect of time, F(1,54) = 5.84, p = .02, partial η2 = .10, was revealed for compassionate feelings that was qualified by a marginally significant interaction between time and training, F(1,54) = 3.61, p = .06, partial η2 = .06.”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Results > Experiment 2
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The analysis again revealed main effects of reciprocity, and cost (see Table 1). Participants helped significantly more in reciprocity trials and in trials with a low cost of helping.”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Results > Experiment 2
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Participants in experiment 2 also reported to be very engaged in the game (range: 1–5; mean: 4.04, SD = 1.07). There was no differences between participants in the compassion and memory training group in the engagement with the game, t(52) = 1.78, p>.05”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Results > Experiment 2
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“at pre-training, helping in the low-cost, t(57) = 1.21, p = .23, and high-cost trials, t(57) = .55, p = .58, did not differ between the compassion and the memory group”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Results > Experiment 2
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While negative mood decreased in the compassion-training group, t(23) = −1.94, p = .03, one-sided, it marginally significantly increased in the memory-training group, t(23) = 2.02, p = .05.”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Results > Experiment 2
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“on average participants indicated that they were very engaged in the game (range: 2–5; mean: 4.15, SD: 0.74)”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Results > Experiment 1
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Furthermore, the game is very engaging (on average participants rate their involvement in the game with 4 on a 1-to-5-scale and report later that they find the game very enjoyable)”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Discussion
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“helping in no-reciprocity trials, but not helping in reciprocity trials, was related to interindividual differences in reported training hours in the compassion group.”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Participants' self-reported time spent practicing outside of training accurately reflects their actual practice duration.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is further supported by our finding that giving in the dictator game did not change from pre- to post-training in either group and that the modal giving at pre-training was 50%.”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Discussion
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the ZPG is more ecologically valid than, for example, monetary exchange games, as it minimizes the influence of strategic considerations, minimizes effects of task-affordances due to explicit instructions and maximizes the influence of emotion-driven, fast decisions”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This compassion meditation technique (called “Metta” in Pali) aims to foster an attitude of loving kindness, emotional positivity, benevolence, and friendliness towards oneself and others [20], [58].”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Materials and Methods > Procedure
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [20] JW Carson, 2005, Loving-kindness meditation for chronic low back pain: Results from a pilot trial., J Holist Nurs source
- Not checked yetcites [58] S Salzberg, 1995, Loving-kindness: The revolutionary art of happiness.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Here we show for the first time that compassion training had longer-lasting effects on prosocial behavior as the post-test was completed two to five days after training.”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast to a momentary induction of empathic concern through instruction to feel for a specific person in distress in a specific situation, compassion training aims at permanently changing one's motivation and attitude towards others in general.”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Materials and Methods > Procedure
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The more time participants had actually spent training, the stronger the reduction in interleukin-6 release, suggesting a dose-dependent effect of compassion training.”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [23] TWW Pace, 2009, Effect of compassion meditation on neuroendocrine, innate immune and behavioral responses to psychosocial stress., Psychoneuroendocrinology source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A novel game, the Zurich Prosocial Game (ZPG), was developed that allows for repeated assessment of prosocial behavior and for parsing the influence of reciprocity, cost, and distress on prosocial behavior.”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Materials and Methods > Measures
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“To assess the convergent validity of the ZPG, participants played the dictator game [31].”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Materials and Methods > Measures
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [31] E Hoffman, 1994, Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games., Games Econ Behav source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“35 participants entered the compassion-training group and 34 participants entered the memory-training group. 28 participants from the compassion group and 32 participants from the memory group completed the study. One participant of the compassion group was eliminated from the analysis as data on the ZPG was missing.”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Materials and Methods > Participants
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 32Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The present results support the notion that similar to situation-specific induction of empathic concern for a specific person in need [8], [49], the training of compassionate motivation leads to increases in prosocial behavior.”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [8] CD Batson, 1991, The altruism question: Towards a social-psychological answer.
- Not checked yetcites [49] N Eisenberg, 1987, The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors., Psychol Bull source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On the phone, participants were given information about the timing but, importantly, in case of Experiment 2, not about the specific content of the study and underwent a structured psychological interview”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Materials and Methods > Participants
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Ultimately, this should lead to an attitude of emotional positivity, benevolence, and friendliness towards oneself and others [58].”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Materials and Methods > Procedure
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [58] S Salzberg, 1995, Loving-kindness: The revolutionary art of happiness.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Importantly, possible participants of Experiment 2 were additionally not allowed to have prior experience with mental compassion training or the method of loci.”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Materials and Methods > Participants
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The memory control group underwent a one-day training workshop in the method of loci, a technique used to memorize items in an ordered sequence [59], [60].”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Materials and Methods > Procedure
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [59] GH Bower, 1970, Analysis of a mnemonic device., Am Sci
- Not checked yetcites [60] P Verhaeghen, 1996, On the mechanisms of plasticity in young and older adults after instruction in the method of loci: Evidence for an amplification model., Psychol Aging source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Participants were asked after playing the game to indicate on a five-point scale how engaged they were when playing the game. A high engagement of the participants would indicate that they were emerged in the game and diminish the probability that demand effects and strategic decision-making influenced prosocial behavior in the ZPG.”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Materials and Methods > Measures
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Importantly, the two players do not share the same paths in the maze and do not compete for the same treasure. Thus, in principle, the game can be played while completely ignoring the other player.”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Materials and Methods > Measures
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As interindividual differences in the behavior in the high cost trials could be brought on by differences in risk preferences, i.e., participants differ in their perception of the risk of not reaching the treasure in the high cost trials, we assessed risk preferences.”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Materials and Methods > Measures
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Six to seven weeks of meditation-based compassion training result in increases in positive mood and life satisfaction [21]”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [21] BL Fredrickson, 2008, Open hearts build lives: Positive emotions, induced through loving-kindness meditation, build consequential personal resources., J Pers Soc Psychol source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Furthermore, the game is very engaging (on average participants rate their involvement in the game with 4 on a 1-to-5-scale and report later that they find the game very enjoyable) and fast, thus making strategic considerations difficult.”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Thus, as in compassion-focused therapy [7], compassion here is trained as a skill.”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Materials and Methods > Procedure
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [7] P Gilbert, 2010, Compassion-focused therapy. source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Giving in the dictator game is likely driven by fairness norms and not by kindness [35].”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [35] GE Bolton, 1998, Dictator game giving: Rules of fairness versus acts of kindness., Int J Game Theory source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The advertisements for Experiment 2 asked for people interested in mental training but never mentioned the word compassion.”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Materials and Methods > Participants
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Importantly, to reduce demand effects, participants are never told that the purpose of the game is to help the co-player. Instead, the instructed aim of this computer game is to reach a goal, the treasure, in a short amount of time to optimize monetary winnings.”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Materials and Methods > Measures
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“if the costs of helping are low [41]”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [41] JF Dovidio, 1991, The arousal-cost-reward model and the process of intervention: A review of the evidence.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“only recently a differentiation between norm-based and compassion-based prosocial behavior has been suggested [2].”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [2] T Singer, 2009, Differential roles of fairness- and compassion-based motivations for cooperation, defection, and punishment., Ann NY Acad Sci source
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, the correlation between helping in the ZPG and giving in the dictator was modest suggesting that the two measures tap into different aspects of prosocial behavior.”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Trial types appeared in random order with the restriction that the first reciprocity trial could appear at the earliest as the third trial. This restriction was introduced to reduce the likelihood of an anchoring effect (helping agreed upon behavior) being introduced by experiencing a helpful co-player right away.”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Materials and Methods > Measures
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The present study adds to these findings by showing that even a short-term compassion training may not only have benefits for the practitioner's health and subjective well-being but also for other people and society in general as it increases the propensity to act prosocially even towards people one has never met.”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They were told that they would play interactive computer games via the internet with other participants in different research institutes across Europe in order to investigate cross-cultural differences in interpersonal behaviors. In reality, there were no co-players; the ostensible co-players' behavior was pre-programmed.”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Materials and Methods > Experiment 1
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To offset individual differences in speed and proficiency with computer games, the individual time limit for all trials of a given game was set at the average time the individual required to reach the treasure in the four practice trials plus 5 s.”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Materials and Methods > Measures
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It has been shown that people help more often if they have been helped before [39], [40]”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Introduction
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“as well as a reduction of interleukin-6 release in response to a psychosocial stressor [23].”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [23] TWW Pace, 2009, Effect of compassion meditation on neuroendocrine, innate immune and behavioral responses to psychosocial stress., Psychoneuroendocrinology source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“it has been demonstrated [10] that momentarily inducing feelings of empathic concern for a person in need by having participants focus on the person's feelings increases their prosocial behavior towards that person.”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [10] CD Batson, 2007, An additional antecedent of empathic concern: Valuing the welfare of the person in need., J Pers Soc Psychol source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To assess the divergent validity of the ZPG, we used a memory task that was later used as an outcome measure for the memory training group in the intervention experiment.”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Materials and Methods > Measures
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“if they are confronted with signs of distress [42], [43].”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [42] CD Batson, 1981, Empathy: A source of altruistic motivation for helping?
- Not checked yetcites [43] G Carlo, 1991, The altruistic personality: When is it apparent?, J Pers Soc Psychol source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Hutcherson et al. [25] report that a very brief (7-min) compassion meditation exercise results in a more positive attitude towards the target of the exercise.”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [25] CA Hutcherson, 2008, Loving-kindness meditation increases social connectedness., Emotion source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Importantly, as the game is framed as a treasure hunt with monetary gains, demand effects induced by the content of the training should be less strong than in other prosocial tasks.”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The majority of the dropout in the compassion group (5/7) occurred before the training.”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Materials and Methods > Participants
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 7Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Participants then answered five questions testing their comprehension of the game. The experimenter then checked the answers to ensure that participants fully understood the rules of the game.”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Materials and Methods > Experiment 1
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The compassion group and the memory group did not differ in age, t(57) = 1.98, p>.05, years of education, t(57) = .64, p>.05, prosocialness, t(54) = 1.91, p>.05, empathic concern, t(54) = .1, p>.05, alexithymic symptoms, t(57) = .89, p>.05, or depressive symptoms, t(57) = .87, p>.05. There was also no difference in the distribution of type of education between the samples (χ2 = 3.06, p>.05).”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Materials and Methods > Participants
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Only female participants were included in Experiments 1 and 2 because of better performance in emotional tasks [53] and higher self-reported empathy in women [54].”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Materials and Methods > Participants
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [53] AM Kring, 1998, Sex differences in emotion: Expression, experience, and physiology., J Pers Soc Psychol source
- Not checked yetcites [54] S Baron-Cohen, 2004, The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences., J Autism Dev Disord source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, the newly developed Zurich Prosocial Game was assessed in the context of several other non-helping tasks, which further helped to reduce possible demand effects of the compassion training.”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Materials and Methods > Procedure
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This particular mnemonic technique was chosen for the control group as it contains most elements also needed in the compassion training workshops: People need to actively engage in inner mental processing and to create active mental images and specific associations between items. The difference is that the memory group focuses purely on improving cognitive rather than affective skills.”
§ Short-Term Compassion Training Increases Prosocial Behavior in a Newly Developed Prosocial Game > Materials and Methods > Procedure
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The authors state this as an assumption.
Compassion training has effects on compassion-based prosocial behavior (and not on norm-based prosocial behavior).
“Based on the suggested distinction between compassion-based and norm-based prosocial behavior, and on the assumption that the compassion training has effects on the former this correlation could possibly only arise for non-reciprocity trials.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Participants' self-reported time spent practicing outside of training accurately reflects their actual practice duration.
“we calculated the correlation between participants' self-reported time spent praticing outside of the training and the change in helping from pre- to post-training (self-report data could only be obtained from a subset of the samples: n compassion = 19, n memory = 22).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Participants believed the cover story that they were playing with real co-players in other research institutes.
“They were told that they would play interactive computer games via the internet with other participants in different research institutes across Europe in order to investigate cross-cultural differences in interpersonal behaviors. In reality, there were no co-players; the ostensible co-players' behavior was pre-programmed.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The compassion and memory training workshops were equivalent in all aspects other than the trained skill, including teacher characteristics and participant expectations.
“This particular mnemonic technique was chosen for the control group as it contains most elements also needed in the compassion training workshops: People need to actively engage in inner mental processing and to create active mental images and specific associations between items. The difference is that the memory group focuses purely on improving cognitive rather than affective skills.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“LKM is a useful tool during the COVID-19 pandemic because it promotes social interactions and builds resilience by cultivating positive emotions and social connection, increasing motivation to access and provide social support, and engendering prosocial behaviors (Leiberg, Klimecki & Singer, 2011).”
From Stress and coping in the time of COVID-19: Pathways to resilience and recovery (2020) · cites this paper as Leiberg, Klimecki & Singer, 2011
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Short-term contemplative training in compassion increases helping, even when it is costly [51].”
From On the interaction of social affect and cognition: empathy, compassion and theory of mind (2018) · cites this paper as [51]
In the citing paper
“Behavioral research has shown that short-term training of loving-kindness and compassion is associated with increases in daily positive affect (Kok et al., 2013), prosocial behavior (Leiberg et al., 2011;Weng et al., 2013), resilience (Fredrickson et al., 2008) and empathy (Mascaro et al., 2013).”
From Compassion-based emotion regulation up-regulates experienced positive affect and associated neural networks (2015) · cites this paper as Leiberg et al., 2011
In the citing paper
“prosocial behavior (Leiberg et al., 2011)”
From Differential pattern of functional brain plasticity after compassion and empathy training (2014) · cites this paper as Leiberg et al., 2011
In the citing paper
“Accordingly, it has recently been shown that the frequency of helping behavior can indeed be increased with a similar short-term compassion training (Leiberg et al., 2011).”
From Differential pattern of functional brain plasticity after compassion and empathy training (2014) · cites this paper as Leiberg et al., 2011
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- ConsistentF(1, 67) = 17.73reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“F(1,67) = 17.73, p < .001”
- ConsistentF(1, 68) = 1.89reported p > .05 · recomputed p = .174
“F(1,68) = 1.89, p > .05”
- Consistentt(52) = 1.78reported p > .05 · recomputed p = .081
“t(52) = 1.78, p > .05”
- ConsistentF(1, 54) = 23.47reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“F(1,54) = 23.47, p < .001”
- ConsistentF(1, 54) = 5.84reported p = .02 · recomputed p = .019
“F(1,54) = 5.84, p = .02”
- ConsistentF(1, 54) = 3.61reported p = .06 · recomputed p = .063
“F(1,54) = 3.61, p = .06”
- Consistentt(23) = 2.66reported p = .01 · recomputed p = .014
“t(23) = 2.66, p = .01”
- ConsistentF(1, 68) = 6.11reported p = .016 · recomputed p = .016
“F(1,68) = 6.11, p = .016”
- Consistentt(23) = -1.94reported p = .03 · recomputed p = .065
“t(23) = −1.94, p = .03”
The paper states a one-tailed test
- Consistentt(23) = 2.02reported p = .05 · recomputed p = .055
“t(23) = 2.02, p = .05”
- ConsistentF(1, 57) = 4.09reported p = .05 · recomputed p = .048
“F(1,57) = 4.09, p = .05”
- Consistentt(31) = -1.2reported p = .24 · recomputed p = .239
“t(31) = −1.20, p = .24”
- Consistentt(26) = 1.85reported p = .04 · recomputed p = .076
“t(26) = 1.85, p = .04”
The paper states a one-tailed test
- ConsistentF(1, 57) = 6.76reported p = .01 · recomputed p = .012
“F(1,57) = 6.76, p = .01”
- ConsistentF(1, 57) = 4.55reported p = .04 · recomputed p = .037
“F(1,57) = 4.55, p = .04”
- Consistentt(57) = 1.21reported p = .23 · recomputed p = .231
“t(57) = 1.21, p = .23”
- Consistentt(57) = 0.55reported p = .58 · recomputed p = .584
“t(57) = .55, p = .58”
- Consistentt(57) = 3.07reported p = .003 · recomputed p = .003
“t(57) = 3.07, p = .003”
- Consistentt(57) = 2.27reported p = .03 · recomputed p = .027
“t(57) = 2.27, p = .03”
- ConsistentF(1, 56) = 0.02reported p = .89 · recomputed p = .888
“F(1,56) = .02, p = .89”
- ConsistentF(1, 56) = 1.63reported p = .21 · recomputed p = .207
“F(1,56) = 1.63, p = .21”
- Consistentt(32) = 0.57reported p > .05 · recomputed p = .573
“t(32) = .57, p > .05”
- Consistentt(32) = 1.75reported p > .05 · recomputed p = .090
“t(32) = 1.75, p > .05”
- Consistentt(32) = -0.81reported p > .05 · recomputed p = .424
“t(32) = −.81, p > .05”
- Consistentt(32) = 1.7reported p > .05 · recomputed p = .099
“t(32) = 1.70, p > .05”
- Consistentt(32) = -0.75reported p > .05 · recomputed p = .459
“t(32) = −.75, p > .05”
- Consistentt(32) = -0.79reported p > .05 · recomputed p = .435
“t(32) = −.79, p > .05”
- Consistentt(32) = -0.99reported p > .05 · recomputed p = .330
“t(32) = −.99, p > .05”
- Consistentt(32) = 1.42reported p > .05 · recomputed p = .165
“t(32) = 1.42, p > .05”
- Consistentt(32) = -0.06reported p > .05 · recomputed p = .953
“t(32) = −.06, p > .05”
- Consistentt(57) = 1.98reported p > .05 · recomputed p = .053
“t(57) = 1.98, p > .05”
- Consistentt(57) = 0.64reported p > .05 · recomputed p = .525
“t(57) = .64, p > .05”
- Consistentt(54) = 1.91reported p > .05 · recomputed p = .061
“t(54) = 1.91, p > .05”
- Consistentt(54) = 0.1reported p > .05 · recomputed p = .921
“t(54) = .1, p > .05”
- Consistentt(57) = 0.89reported p > .05 · recomputed p = .377
“t(57) = .89, p > .05”
- Consistentt(57) = 0.87reported p > .05 · recomputed p = .388
“t(57) = .87, p > .05”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Incorrect percentage for memory-group education
MinorThe table lists one apprenticeship participant in a memory-training sample of 32. One out of 32 is 3.125%, not 6.3%.
Reported 6.3 · recomputed 3.125
“Memory training sample (N = 32)”
Negative-mood ANOVA degrees of freedom exceed the sample size
MinorFor a two-group repeated-measures ANOVA, a denominator degree of freedom of 68 requires at least 70 participants. Experiment 2 enrolled only 69, even before any incomplete data are excluded.
“For negative mood, a significant time x training interaction was revealed, F(1,68) = 6.11, p = .016, partial η2 = .08.”
“In Experiment 2, that aimed to assess the effect of a short-term compassion training workshop on prosocial behavior as measured using the newly developed ZPG, we investigated 69 healthy female volunteers (age: 18–34 years; mean: 23.69).”
Citations
Cites
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
Trivers, R. L. (1971) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/406755 · Cited by 11,010
Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach.
Davis, M. H. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113 · Cited by 10,272
A Handbook of Child Psychology
(1932) · Nature · doi:10.1038/130331a0 · Cited by 10,133
Comparison of Beck Depression Inventories -IA and -II in psychiatric outpatients
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., Ball, R., & Ranieri, W. F. (1996) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6703_13 · Cited by 5,965
Bagby, R. M., Parker, J. D. A., & Taylor, G. J. (1994) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(94)90005-1 · Cited by 5,293
Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1023/b:jadd.0000022607.19833.00 · Cited by 4,093
Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction
Camerer, C. F. (2003) · Cited by 3,722
Evolution of indirect reciprocity
Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04131 · Cited by 2,762
The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors
Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. A. (1987) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.91 · Cited by 2,672
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- H Rockliff, 2008, Heart rate variability and salivary cortisol responses to compassion-focused imagery., J Clin Neuropsychiatry, 5, 132
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 442
Influence of meditation on estate planning decisions: evidence from Indian survey data
Gill, A. S., Mand, H. S., Obradovich, J. D., & Mathur, N. (2017) · Financial Innovation · doi:10.1186/s40854-017-0078-5 · Cited by 5
Virtue as Emergence From Contemplative Practices
Lin, J., Culham, T. E., & Scott, C. F. (2020) · Journal of Character Education · doi:10.1108/jced-06-2020-0005 · Cited by 4
Ma, G., Chen, Z., Zou, W., & Zhang, X. (2023) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-023-04371-0 · Cited by 4
Ludvik, M. B. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57783-8_11 · Cited by 5
Balderas, J. C., Bistricky, S. L., Gimenez-Zapiola, M., Pascuzzi, B., Millmann, M., & Short, M. B. (2023) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/00332941231164071 · Cited by 4
“…and accessibility (pending internet access) also strengthen its external validity (Aronson et al., 2013) as a potential public health-style intervention, especially compared to existing in-person or lengthy prosocial interventions (Fredrickson et al., 2008; Leiberg et al., 2011; Weng et al., 2013).”
InfluentialCalming Meditation Increases Altruism, Decreases ParochialismPreprint
Frost, K. (2016) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/060616 · Cited by 5
Pichon, S., Antico, L., Chanal, J. P., Singer, T., & Bavelier, D. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/te83n · Cited by 5
Self-citationPantaleno, A. P., & Sisti, M. (2017) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119375395.ch8 · Cited by 3
Thompson, A. H. (2021) · FIU - Digital Commons (Florida International University) · doi:10.25148/etd.fidc009550 · Cited by 4
On the relation between boredom and social behavior: A registered report
Müller-Boysen, T., Pirla, S., & Pfattheicher, S. (2025) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104804 · Cited by 3
Towards a Relational Anthropology Fostering an Economics of Human Flourishing
Nullens, P., & van Nes, J. (2022) · Ethical economy · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-84690-9_2 · Cited by 3
Nebot-Gresa, L., Llorens, S., Salanova, M., Coo, C., & García‐Campayo, J. (2021) · Terapia psicológica · doi:10.4067/s0718-48082021000300427 · Cited by 3
Merhamet Eğitimi ve Eğitimde Merhamet
Eşref, N. A. S., & KARDAŞ, F. (2022) · İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi · doi:10.15869/itobiad.894028 · Cited by 4
Disentangling the road to a compassionate response to suffering: A multistudy investigation
Garrido‐Macías, M., Navarro‐Carrillo, G., Soler‐Martínez, F. M., & Valor‐Segura, I. (2022) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2022.112030 · Cited by 3
Intergroup trust as a mediator between compassion and positive attitudes toward sexual minorities
Kuglerová, N., Popper, M., & Poslon, X. D. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015595 · Cited by 4
“, 2017) and improving emotional intelligence (Barnard and Curry, 2011), but also in its wider impact on society through the associated humanity, prosocial behavior (Leiberg et al., 2011), and altruism (Neff and Pommier, 2013).”
BackgroundRay, C. D., Wang, N. O., Duede, L. A., Garza, B., & Burns, J. (2024) · Interpersona An International Journal on Personal Relationships · doi:10.5964/ijpr.11807 · Cited by 3
Byrne, S. J., Nixon, E., & Swords, L. (2025) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-024-02970-4 · Cited by 3
“…is effective in increasing helping and prosocial behaviour among children, adolescents, and adults (Georgi et al., 2014; Gibbs et al., 1996; Greenberg et al., 2009; Jazaieri et al., 2012; Klimecki et al., 2013; Klimecki et al., 2014; Leiberg et al., 2011; Mascaro et al., 2013; Weng et al., 2013).”
Introducing brief mindfulness practices to mitigate faculty burnout in the post-COVID era
Bitting, K. S., & Sweet, M. S. (2025) · The International Journal for Academic Development · doi:10.1080/1360144x.2025.2451318 · Cited by 4
“…when confronted with another in distress (Klimecki et al., 2014), increasing their compassion satisfaction and decreasing their compassion fatigue (Watts et al., 2021), and increasing their likelihood of engaging in helping behavior (Condon et al., 2013; Leiberg et al., 2011; Weng et al., 2013).”
The Earthrise Community: Transforming Planetary Consciousness for a Flourishing Future
Prescott, S. L., Nusrat, A. Z., Scott, R., Nelson, D., Rogers, H. H., El‐Sherbini, M. S., Bisram, K., Vizina, Y. N., Warber, S. L., & Webb, D. A. (2025) · Challenges · doi:10.3390/challe16020024 · Cited by 3
Klein, T., Liang, B., Sepulveda, J., & White, A. E. (2019) · Journal of Character Education · doi:10.1108/jced-10-2019-0009 · Cited by 13
Seeing Agents When we Need to, Attributing Experience When we Feel Like it
Hallgren, I. (2012) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-012-0109-0 · Cited by 3
True stories: Storytelling and empathy in None in Three’s digital game narratives
Powell, A. (2020) · Book 2 0 · doi:10.1386/btwo_00022_1 · Cited by 3
Kim, M. J., Heo, J. M., & Gim, W. S. (2017) · Korean Journal of Stress Research · doi:10.17547/kjsr.2017.25.2.145 · Cited by 3
“선행 연구에서 자 비명상의 단기간 훈련만으로도 사회적 유대감과 친사회적 행동이 증진되고(Hutcherson et al., 2008; Germer, 2009; Leiberg et al., 2011), 특히 사회적 기능에 중요한 공감과 연관된 뇌 부위인 변연계의 뇌섬엽이 활성화되는 것이 밝혀 졌다(Lutz et al., 2008).”
Goodman, R. J., Plonski, P. E., & Savery, L. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-809837-0.00009-x · Cited by 4
Mahdavi, A., Yaghoobi, A., Rashid, K., & Kordnoghabi, R. (2020) · Iranian Evolutionary Educational Psychology Journal · doi:10.29252/ieepj.2.1.33 · Cited by 4
Guomin, J. I. N., & Li, D. (2020) · Advances in Psychological Science · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1042.2020.00978 · Cited by 4
Merhamet Korkusu Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi
Eşref, N. A. S., & Sak, R. (2021) · Buca eğitim fakültesi dergisi (Online)/Buca Eğitim Fakültesi dergisi · doi:10.53444/deubefd.930883 · Cited by 3
Gordon, W. V. (2017) · Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) · Cited by 3
McCall, C., Steinbeis, N., Ricard, M., & Singer, T. (2017) · MindRxiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31231/osf.io/6wuh5 · Cited by 3
Self-citationYour coping and resilience strategies might need to shift as the COVID-19 crisis continues
Polizzi, C. P., & Lynn, S. J. (2020) · doi:10.64628/aai.r55vdpw3c · Cited by 3
Tran, A., Cheema, F. S., & Perry, J. L. (2025) · Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1080/23276665.2025.2587025 · Cited by 4
“Leiberg et al. (2011) found that compassion training (vs. a control) significantly increased prosocial helping behaviour in an economic game, even when it was costly to the participant.”
Focus on the breath: brain decoding reveals internal states of attention during meditation
Weng, H. Y., Lewis-Peacock, J. A., Hecht, F. M., Uncapher, M. R., Ziegler, D. A., Farb, N. A. S., Goldman, V., Skinner, S., Duncan, L. G., Chao, M. T., et al. (2018) · doi:10.1101/461590 · Cited by 8
Aesthetic Motivation Impacts Judgments of Others’ Prosociality and Mental Life
Agrawal, T., & Schachner, A. (2023) · Open Mind · doi:10.1162/opmi_a_00113 · Cited by 3
“Compassionate behavior involves acting prosocially towards others by treating them with warmth, care, and concern, and is lacking in those who exhibit antisocial behaviors like bullying (Gini et al., 2011; Leiberg et al., 2011; Preckel et al., 2018; Singer & Klimecki, 2014).”
BackgroundMatthaeus, H., & Singer, T. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009342919.031 · Cited by 2
Self-citationDualism and beyond: A unified framework for self- and other-oriented compassion
Quaglia, J. T., Leigh, D., Berry, D. R., & Simmer‐Brown, J. (2025) · Theory & Psychology · doi:10.1177/09593543251365556 · Cited by 3
“…across diverse fields such as behavioral economics, evolutionary psychology, neuroscience, and social psychology (e.g., Ashar et al., 2016; Condon & DeSteno, 2017; Gilbert, 2019; Klimecki et al., 2014; Leiberg et al., 2011), this investigation has yielded numerous theoretical and applied insights.”
ORTAOKUL SON SINIF ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN MERHAMET DÜZEYLERİ İLE YAŞAM DOYUMLARININ İNCELENMESİ
Eşref, N. A. S., Şahin-Sak, İ. T., & Sak, R. (2022) · Beykoz Akademi Dergisi · doi:10.14514/beykozad.843335 · Cited by 2
Bayle‐Cordier, J., Berger, L., Elatmani, R., & Tavoni, M. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su151310491 · Cited by 3
Micheli, L. R., Breil, C., & Böckler, A. (2023) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000437 · Cited by 2
The Story of Compassion: From Ancient Texts to Modern Practice
Maurya, R. K., & DeDiego, A. C. (2024) · Journal of Humanistic Psychology · doi:10.1177/00221678241233786 · Cited by 4
“At behavioral level, compassion training is found to significantly increase the helping behaviors (Condon et al., 2013; Leiberg et al., 2011; Weng et al., 2013).”
Concerned Creativity to Counteract Concerning Creativity
Chowkase, A. A., Datar, K., & Dedhe, A. M. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-51590-3_6 · Cited by 2
Stoewen, D. L. (2024) · PubMed Central · Cited by 2
An Open Mind or a Big Heart: Possible Routes to Reducing In-Group Bias
Arceneaux, K., & Wielen, R. J. V. (2025) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.1080/10584609.2025.2493705 · Cited by 2
“Recent research in neuroscience holds out the possibility that people can train themselves to be more compassionate toward others and, in the process, become more prosocial (e.g., Klimecki et al., 2012, 2014; Leiberg et al., 2011; Weng et al., 2013b).”
Mekelburg, A., Maliske, L., Kirby, J. N., Kanske, P., & Förster, K. (2025) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2025.05.006 · Cited by 2
Malbois, E., & Clavien, C. (2019) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-019-09935-1 · Cited by 2
Lovingkindness Meditation in Psychology
Williams-Orlando, C. (2016) · Alternative and Complementary Therapies · doi:10.1089/act.2016.29056.cwo · Cited by 2
How Avatars in Care Context Should Show Affect
Fagel, S., Moussa, M. B., & Cereghetti, D. M. (2016) · International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare · doi:10.4108/eai.16-5-2016.2264514 · Cited by 2
Mindfulness, Compassion, and the Foundations of Global Health Ethics
Addiss, D. G. (2017) · Mindfulness in behavioral health · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64924-5_12 · Cited by 2
Goldberg, S. B., Hirshberg, M. J., Tello, L. Y., Weng, H. Y., Flook, L., & Davidson, R. J. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0221782 · Cited by 2
"Empathy on Trial: Is Empathy Inherently Biased?"
Polinska, W. (2020) · Buddhist-Christian Studies · doi:10.1353/bcs.2020.0022 · Cited by 1
“For example, Suzanne Leiberg and teammates created a computer game examining prosocial behavior of the virtual participants.(60) In this study, the researches defined “compassion” as “an emotional as well as a motivational state, characterized by feelings of warmth, love, and concern for the other as well as the desir…”
BackgroundRelational Anthropology for Contemporary Economics
van Nes, J., Nullens, P., & Heuvel, S. C. V. D. (2022) · Ethical economy · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-84690-9 · Cited by 2
Global Research Trends on Prosocial Behaviour: A Bibliometric Analysis
Yi, Z. N., & Mahmud, N. B. (2022) · Journal of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development · doi:10.33736/jcshd.3891.2022 · Cited by 2
Steigerung von Selbstfürsorge und Mitgefühl in der eigenen Beziehung: Ein Gruppentraining für Paare
Aguilar‐Raab, C. (2020) · Psychotherapie: Praxis · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-60318-5_9 · Cited by 2
Cheung, K. (2017) · TUScholarShare (Temple University) · Cited by 2
Under the Umbrella of Prosocial Behavior – A Critical Comparison of ParadigmsPreprint
Behrens, F., & Kret, M. E. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/9uebc · Cited by 3
Urbanska, K., McKeown, S., & Taylor, L. K. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/yh9dx · Cited by 2
Psychometric evaluation of the Santa Clara Brief Compassion Scale in the Czech environment (SCBCS)Preprint
Novák, L., Maliňáková, K., Mikoška, P., Fürstlova, J., Cann, R. F., & Tavel, P. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/zgtq9 · Cited by 2
Condon, P. (2014) · Digital Repository Service (Northeastern University) · doi:10.17760/d20005093 · Cited by 3
Focus on the breath: Brain decoding reveals internal states of attention during meditationPreprint
Weng, H. Y., Lewis‐Peacock, J. A., Hecht, F. M., Uncapher, M. R., Ziegler, D. A., Farb, N. A. S., Goldman, V. M., Skinner, S. N., Duncan, L. G., Chao, M. T., et al. (2018) · MindRxiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31231/osf.io/9jxqf · Cited by 2
Empathic emotion regulation in prosocial behavior and altruismPreprint
Brethel-Haurwitz, K. M., Stoianova, M., & Marsh, A. A. (2017) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ds3gc · Cited by 2
Chen, H., Liu, C., Hsu, S.-E., Wu, K., Liu, C.-Y., & Chiou, W. (2024) · European Journal of Psychology Open · doi:10.1024/2673-8627/a000057 · Cited by 1
Deng, Y., Du, T., Zeng, X., & Wang, W. (2025) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-025-02771-4 · Cited by 4
“Empirical research on the effects of LKCM has risen sharply in recent years [12, 20, 26, 28].”
Prévost, A., George, M., & Fourie, M. M. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1450549 · Cited by 1
A biopsychosocial safeness model: New directions for psychotherapy research and practice
Paucsik, M., & Sonia Pellissier, A. (2026) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106797 · Cited by 2
Weng, H. Y., Lewis‐Peacock, J. A., Stodola, D. E., & Richard, J. (2012) · Cited by 1
Toward an integrative view of human pain and suffering
Fabbro, F., & Crescentini, C. (2014) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2014.07.006 · Cited by 1
Meditation for Combat-related Mental Health Concerns
Khusid, M. A. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22985-0_10 · Cited by 1
Feher, A. (2016) · Scholarship@Western (Western University) · Cited by 1
Lee, S., Jae-Han, S., Han, J., Jang, S., & Shin, H.-S. (2017) · Korean Journal of Stress Research · doi:10.17547/kjsr.2017.25.1.8 · Cited by 1
“그러 나 최근 연구에 따르면 1주일의 짧은 명상을 통해서도 신경 세포 발화의 효율성과 연결성이 증가하고 주의집중력과 자 기조절 능력이 향상되며(Tang et al., 2007; Xue et al., 2014; Saraswat et al., 2016), 자신의 감정 인식과 긍정적 정서와 친사회적이고 이타적 행동이 증가한다(Leiberg et al., 2011)는 결과가 보고되고 있다.”
Lombas, A. S. (2019) · Revista de Investigación y Educación en Ciencias de la Salud (RIECS) · doi:10.37536/riecs.2019.4.s1.124 · Cited by 2
“In line with this, in a third experiment, Olga Klimecki and Tania Singer [34] have shown that compassion training, but not memory training, increased helping behavior through the use of a computer game, developed to measure prosocial behavior.”
ResultInfluentialGuided Visualizations for Integrating Education in Human Values into Curriculum Subjects
Taplin, M. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-0200-9_3 · Cited by 1
Paying Attention: An Examination of Attention and Empathy as They Relate to Buddhist Philosophy
Carmichael, J. S. (2022) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel13020108 · Cited by 1
“Before playing the game, some participants were given a brief training on meditating on compassion while others were given training on improving memory (Leiberg et al. 2011).”
BackgroundAn App-Based Loving-Kindness Training to Facilitate Compassion, Team Cohesion, and Fairness
Stenzel, L., Konsemüller, M., Tan, S. L., Röcken, M., Borgmann, S., Thomsen, N., & Stoll, O. (2021) · Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie · doi:10.1026/1612-5010/a000345 · Cited by 1
Metachangemaking: An interdisciplinary synthesis of research on cultivating changemakers
Reynante, B. M., Wilcox, J. E., Stephenson, O. L., Lieder, F., & Lacopo, C. (2024) · Journal of Moral Education · doi:10.1080/03057240.2024.2342274 · Cited by 2
“…directs people to repeatedly think compassionate thoughts and gradually expand the scope of their compassion from their loved ones to all sentient beings—increases various aspects of prosocial behavior (Condon et al., 2013; Hutcherson et al., 2008; Leiberg et al., 2011; Weng et al., 2013).”
Altruism in management education: a closer look at yoga-based practices
Ghag, N., Sonar, H. C., & Chaudhary, G. (2024) · Cogent Social Sciences · doi:10.1080/23311886.2024.2367087 · Cited by 2
“…research suggests that contemplative practices foster compassion, which increases real-world altruism (lutz et al., 2008). according to research by leiberg et al. (2011) and rajni et al. (2022), meditation and compassion training be effective in promoting prosaically behaviour by increasing one’s…”
Yuan, R., Qi, F., Zhou, J., Zhu, Q., Liu, Q., Zhang, H., & Wang, Y. Q. (2025) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-025-03356-x · Cited by 3
“However, excessive affective empathy, particularly in the absence of appropriate emotional boundaries, may lead to empathy fatigue and vicarious trauma (Leiberg et al. 2011; Stevens and Taber 2021; Donald et al. 2019).”
Blaser, K., Zlabinger, M., & Hinterberger, T. (2014) · Complementary Medicine Research · doi:10.1159/000358176 · Cited by 1
Mitfühlend leben – „Mindfulness-Based Compassionate Living“
van den Brink, E., & Koster, F. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-48199-8_8 · Cited by 1
Neuroscience of Compassion: Challenges and Opportunities
Hangartner, D., & 漢迪歐 (2015) · Cited by 1
Genetic basis of affective and cognitive empathy
Jankowiak-Siuda, K., Krakowska, N., Gaździcka, K., Kundziołka, J., & Topczewski, J. (2019) · Neuropsychiatria i Neuropsychologia · doi:10.5114/nan.2019.89790 · Cited by 3
Loizzo, J. J. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-57733-9_8 · Cited by 1
Experiences of Meditation on Twin Hearts by Naive Practitioners
Kumar, M. R., Nityashree, L. K., & Jois, S. N. (2021) · Advances in psychology, mental health, and behavioral studies (APMHBS) book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-8682-2.ch018 · Cited by 1
Nguyen-Phuong-Mai, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.644145 · Cited by 2
Does native country turmoil predict immigrant workers’ honesty in markets?
Shohfi, T., & White, R. M. (2022) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2022.02.020 · Cited by 1
Shonin, E. (2015) · Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) · Cited by 1
Navigating Motivation: A Semantic and Subjective Atlas of 7 MotivesPreprint
Chierchia, G., Przyrembel, M., Lesemann, F. H. P., Bosworth, S., Snower, D. J., & Singer, T. (2018) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/wjhmq · Cited by 3
Self-citationPerrykkad, K., Sherwell, C. S., Kirby, J. N., & Hohwy, J. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/7twj4 · Cited by 1
Tait, V. R. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-17125-3_502-1 · Cited by 1
Tait, V. R. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-48129-1_502 · Cited by 1
Al‐Awabdeh, E. (2015) · Middle East Journal of Nursing · doi:10.5742/mejn.2015.92617
“Leiberg, Klimecki, and Singer (2011) conducted their study to examine the effect of compassion training on pro-social behavior (a pervasive aspect of human life which means cooperate with others and help them when they are in need).”
BackgroundA Dialogical-Self Narrative: Meanings of Inclusiveness between Disability, Design and Theology
Timofte, L. (2013) · OCAD University Open Research Repository (OCAD University)
M, J. M., Khatri, N., & Jamadar, P. (2015) · Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences · doi:10.14260/jemds/2015/1286
W poszukiwaniu istoty empatii. Wnioski z przeglądu badań neuronaukowych i ich praktyczne implikacje
Kucwaj, H. (2017) · Rocznik Kognitywistyczny · doi:10.4467/20843895rk.16.005.6411
Seeking Understanding on the Issue of Happiness: A Hermeneutic Literature Review
Petersen, M. (2017) · Tuwhera (Auckland University of Technology)
COMPASSION: CAN SERVICE LEARNING MAKE A DIFFERENCE, AND IF SO, HOW?
Goldberg, E. (2018) · Digital Commons - URI (University of Rhode Island) · doi:10.23860/diss-goldberg-edward-2018
“In that study Leiberg, Klimecki, and Singer (2011) found that compassionate behavior was stimulated by compassion training.”
BackgroundSocratic Seminar in the Basic English Community College Classroom
Aman, R. (2018) · doi:10.7916/d8rn4r92
“…to decreased aggression among school children; Seppala, Rossomando, and Doty (2013), who make the connection between social connection and empathy; Leiberg, Klimecki, and Singer (2011), whose study saw a connection between compassion and prosocial behavior; and Gilbert (2004), who focused upon…”
BackgroundPsychotherapy for Adolescents: Mindfulness and Compassion in Individual and Group Settings
Klauser, N., & Steinebach, P. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-25513-8_14
Author, U. (2019) · Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) · doi:10.24385/lincoln.24326158
Metadata
- Authors
- Leiberg, S., Klimecki, O., & Singer, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Zurich (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Leiberg, Susanne
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2011-03-09
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e17798
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3052380
- OpenAlex
- W1973616877
- Cited by
- 442
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 19.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (FP7/2007-2013)
- Mind and Life Institute
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (FP7/2007-2013)
- Universität Zürich
- FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (205557)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Keywords
- compassion training, prosocial behavior, helping behavior, reciprocity, memory training, individual differences, practice duration, helping strangers
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Empathy, Female, Games, Experimental, Helping Behavior, Humans, Memory, Social Behavior, Time Factors, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review