Cited by 227Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHealth disparities and outcomesAging and Gerontology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 52 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Social isolation, cognitive reserve, and cognition in healthy older people

Open access
Evans, Isobel E. M., Llewellyn, David J., Matthews, Fiona E., Woods, Robert T., Brayne, Carol, Clare, Linda, on behalf of the CFAS-Wales research team·2018·PLOS ONE

Abstract

There is evidence to suggest that social isolation is associated with poor cognitive health, although findings are contradictory. One reason for inconsistency in reported findings may be a lack of consideration of underlying mechanisms that could influence this relationship. Cognitive reserve is a theoretical concept that may account for the role of social isolation and its association with cognitive outcomes in later life. Therefore, we aimed to examine the relationship between social isolation and cognition in later life, and to consider the role of cognitive reserve in this relationship. Baseline and two year follow-up data from the Cognitive Function and Ageing Study-Wales (CFAS-Wales) were analysed. Social isolation was assessed using the Lubben Social Network Scale-6 (LSNS-6), cognitive function was assessed using the Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG), and cognitive reserve was assessed using a proxy measure of education, occupational complexity, and cognitive activity. Linear regression modelling was used to assess the relationship between social isolation and cognition. To assess the role of cognitive reserve in this relationship, moderation analysis was used to test for interaction effects. After controlling for age, gender, education, and physically limiting health conditions, social isolation was associated with cognitive function at baseline and two year follow-up. Cognitive reserve moderated this association longitudinally. Findings suggest that maintaining a socially active lifestyle in later life may enhance cognitive reserve and benefit cognitive function. This has important implications for interventions that may target social isolation to improve cognitive function.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In CFAS-Wales, social isolation was associated with poorer cognitive function at baseline and with cognitive change over two years, and cognitive reserve moderated the longitudinal association. Occupational complexity drove the moderation, with isolation linked to cognitive change only among those with low occupational complexity.

Key findings

  • Social isolation was associated with cognition at baseline after full adjustment (B = .04, 95% CI .02–.07, p < .001; adjusted R² = .17) and with two-year cognitive change (B = .05, 95% CI .01–.10, p = .03; adjusted R² = .05), suggesting less isolated people had better CAMCOG scores and less decline.
  • At baseline, 601 of 2,224 participants (27.02%) were classified as socially isolated by LSNS-6 ≤12; isolated participants were older, more likely to be men, had poorer CAMCOG scores, fewer years of education, less cognitive activity, and lower cognitive reserve scores.
  • Cognitive reserve did not moderate the cross-sectional association (.01; 95% CI −.01–.04), but it did moderate the longitudinal association (.05; 95% CI .10–0). Post-hoc analyses showed occupational complexity significantly moderated the association (−.05; 95% CI −.10–−.01), while education (−.04; 95% CI −.08–.01) and cognitive activity (−.01; 95% CI −.06–.03) did not.
  • Social isolation was associated with cognitive change in the low occupational complexity group (.08; 95% CI 0–.15) but not the high occupational complexity group (.03; 95% CI −.02–.09). Baseline gender interaction was significant (p = .04), with the association significant for women but not men; longitudinal gender interaction was not significant (p = .13).

Methods

  • Longitudinal analysis of the Cognitive Function and Ageing Study–Wales (CFAS-Wales), a population-based cohort aged 65+ sampled from general practice lists in rural and urban Wales, with baseline interviews in 2011–2013 and two-year follow-up in 2013–2015. Final samples were 2,224 for cross-sectional and 1,524 for longitudinal analyses after exclusions.
  • Social isolation was measured with the Lubben Social Network Scale-6 (LSNS-6; ≤12 indicating isolation), cognition with the Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG), and cognitive reserve with a weighted composite of education, occupational complexity, and cognitive activity.
  • Linear regression assessed baseline cognition and standardized two-year cognitive change; moderation analyses tested interactions between social isolation and cognitive reserve, adjusting for age, gender, education (except in reserve models), sensory limitations, and help with daily activities, using Stata 15.0.

Limitations

  • Stated: social isolation may be prodromal to poor cognitive function, though participants with baseline cognitive impairment or dementia were excluded to reduce reverse causation.
  • Stated: very little cognitive change occurred over two years, and some participants improved on CAMCOG, limiting the validity of longitudinal analyses; the two-year follow-up may be insufficient to observe cognitive change.
  • Stated/evident: the cognitive reserve composite may not adequately reflect individual differences in how much each component contributes, and education was measured only as years of education, a relatively crude index. Also evident: many participants were excluded for missing follow-up data, and those excluded were older and had poorer baseline cognition, education, cognitive activity, occupational complexity, and higher isolation.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0201008

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 52 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 47 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 25
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 43
57 of 57
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The association between social connections and cognition is less well understood than other lifestyle factors that may build cognitive reserve.

    “Compared to other lifestyle factors that may build cognitive reserve, the association between social connections and cognition is less well understood.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    There is no consistent definition of social isolation used within the literature, and this inconsistency is reflected in the measures selected to assess social isolation.

    “There is no consistent definition used within the literature and this inconsistency is reflected in the measures selected to assess social isolation.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Previous work suggests that cognitive reserve may be important in the association between social isolation and cognitive function, but this has not been explored.

    “Although previous work suggests that cognitive reserve may be important in this association, to our knowledge, this has not been explored.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The experience of social isolation differs between community and residential settings.

    “as it is considered that the experience of social isolation will differ between community and residential settings.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Depression is associated with cognitive impairment.

    “Given that depression is also associated with cognitive impairment”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Some aspects of early- and mid-life reserve, such as education or occupational complexity, cannot be modified in later life.

    “Although some aspects of early- and mid- life reserve cannot be modified in later life, such as education or occupational complexity, there are other aspects of reserve that can be modified, such as social activity, to contribute to building reserve and reducing poor cognitive function in later life.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Other aspects of reserve, such as social activity, can be modified in later life and can contribute to building reserve and reducing poor cognitive function.

    “Although some aspects of early- and mid- life reserve cannot be modified in later life, such as education or occupational complexity, there are other aspects of reserve that can be modified, such as social activity, to contribute to building reserve and reducing poor cognitive function in later life.”
7 of 7

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Not confirmedF(6, 1090) = 35.85reported p = .1 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(6, 1090) = 35.85, p = .10”

  • Not confirmedF(8, 2215) = 57.23reported p = .04 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(8, 2215) = 57.23, p = .04”

  • Not confirmedF(6, 759) = 11.57reported p = .02 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(6, 759) = 11.57, p = .02”

  • Not confirmedF(6, 751) = 4.65reported p = .39 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(6, 751) = 4.65, p = .39”

  • Not confirmedF(8, 1515) = 10.75reported p = .13 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(8, 1515) = 10.75, p = .13”

  • ConsistentF(1, 2222) = 35.99reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(1, 2222) = 35.99, p < .001”

  • ConsistentF(7, 2216) = 64.67reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(7, 2216) = 64.67, p < .001”

  • ConsistentF(6, 1120) = 38.41reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(6, 1120) = 38.41, p < .001”

  • ConsistentF(1, 1522) = 8.92reported p = .003 · recomputed p = .003

    “F(1, 1522) = 8.92, p = .003”

  • ConsistentF(7, 1516) = 11.95reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(7, 1516) = 11.95, p < .001”

10 of 10

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 47 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–227 of 227

Metadata

Authors
Evans, I. E. M., Llewellyn, D. J., Matthews, F. E., Woods, R. T., Brayne, C., Clare, L., & on behalf of the CFAS-Wales research team
Affiliations
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Australian National University (AU)
Corresponding author
Evans, Isobel E. M.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2018-08-17
Volume
13
Issue
8
Pages
e0201008
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2885562630
Cited by
227
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 1
FWCI
14.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Bangor University Research Portal (Bangor University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by)
Funders
Alzheimer's Society (AS-DTC-2014-027)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
social isolation, cognitive reserve, cognitive function, older adults, cognitive aging, Lubben Social Network Scale, occupational complexity, educational attainment, cognitive activity, social networks
MeSH terms
Cognitive Aging, Healthy Aging, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cognition, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Social Isolation, Wales, Linear Models, Cognitive Reserve

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review