Cited by 516Sports Performance and TrainingSports Dynamics and BiomechanicsPhysical Education and Training Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 97 of the 97 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Maximum Strength-Power-Performance Relationships in Collegiate Throwers

Abstract

Presently the degree to which peak force influences power production or explosive performance such as strength training movements or throwing (shot-put and weight-throw) is unclear. This study describes the relationships between a measure of maximum strength, isometric peak force (IPF), dynamic peak force (PF), peak power (PP), the 1-repetition movement power snatch (SN), and throwing ability over an 8-week training period. Five male and 6 female (n = 11) well-trained collegiate throwers participated. PF was measured using an AMTI force plate; PP was measured using an infrared-ultrasonic tracking device (V-Scope, Lipman Electronics). Clean pulls from the midthigh position were assessed isometrically and dynamically at a constant load, 30% and 60% of IPF. Specific explosive strength was evaluated using an SN and using the shot-put (SP) and weight-throw (WGT) measured under meet conditions. Variables (PF, PP, SN) were assessed 3 times at 0 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks. Each measurement period preceded a field meet by 3 days. Peak force, peak rate of force development, and PP increased over the 8 weeks. Correlation coefficients (r) indicate that IPF is strongly related to dynamic PF and PP 30%, 60% of the IPF. Furthermore, strong correlations were found for the SN and the distance for the SP and WGT, and these relationships tended to increase over time. Results suggest that maximum strength (i.e., IPF) is strongly associated with dynamic PF. In addition, maximum strength is stron…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1519/00124278-200311000-00019

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
STONE, M. H., SANBORN, K., OʼBRYANT, H. S., HARTMAN, M., STONE, M. E., PROULX, C., WARD, B., & HRUBY, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
  • Mount Washington College (US)
  • Southern Cross University (AU)
  • Appalachian State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2003-11
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
739-745
ISSN
1064-8011 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2078996423
Cited by
254
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 15
FWCI
5.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Training Studies
Keywords
isometric peak force, peak power, rate of force development, shot put, throwing performance, resistance training, explosive strength
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Physical Education and Training, Physical Endurance, Track and Field, Linear Models, Muscle, Skeletal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review