Cited by 128Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Reputational Priors Magnify Striatal Responses to Violations of Trust

Open access
Fouragnan, Elsa, Chierchia, Gabriele, Greiner, Susanne, Neveu, Remi, Avesani, Paolo, Coricelli, Giorgio·2013·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Humans learn to trust each other by evaluating the outcomes of repeated interpersonal interactions. However, available prior information on the reputation of traders may alter the way outcomes affect learning. Our functional magnetic resonance imaging study is the first to allow the direct comparison of interaction-based and prior-based learning. Twenty participants played repeated trust games with anonymous counterparts. We manipulated two experimental conditions: whether or not reputational priors were provided, and whether counterparts were generally trustworthy or untrustworthy. When no prior information is available our results are consistent with previous studies in showing that striatal activation patterns correlate with behaviorally estimated reinforcement learning measures. However, our study additionally shows that this correlation is disrupted when reputational priors on counterparts are provided. Indeed participants continue to rely on priors even when experience sheds doubt on their accuracy. Notably, violations of trust from a cooperative counterpart elicited stronger caudate deactivations when priors were available than when they were not. However, tolerance to such violations appeared to be mediated by prior-enhanced connectivity between the caudate nucleus and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, which anticorrelated with retaliation rates. Moreover, on top of affecting learning mechanisms, priors also clearly oriented initial decisions to trust, reflected in medial prefrontal cortex activity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.3086-12.2013

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Decisions to cooperate with another person are influenced by information learned about the person thus far.

    “Decisions to cooperate with another person are colored by the information we have learnt about the person thus far.”
  • Prior reputation of a partner alters striatum responses to reciprocated or non-reciprocated cooperation.

    “Further research utilizing cooperative economic games has shown that the prior reputation of a partner alters striatum responses to reciprocated or non-reciprocated cooperation and influences decisions to cooperate or not 75–79.”
  • Prior reputation of a partner influences decisions to cooperate or not.

    “Further research utilizing cooperative economic games has shown that the prior reputation of a partner alters striatum responses to reciprocated or non-reciprocated cooperation and influences decisions to cooperate or not 75–79.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fouragnan, E., Chierchia, G., Greiner, S., Neveu, R., Avesani, P., & Coricelli, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Trento (IT)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2013-02-20
Volume
33
Issue
8
Pages
3602-3611
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1981686173
Cited by
128
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
trust, breach of trust, striatum, caudate nucleus, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, reinforcement learning, trust game, retaliation, medial prefrontal cortex, prior information, social learning
MeSH terms
Adult, Corpus Striatum, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Trust, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review