Cited by 669Neural dynamics and brain functionNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFree Will and Agency

Prelude to and resolution of an error: EEG phase synchrony reveals cognitive control dynamics during action monitoring

Open access
Cavanagh, James F., Cohen, Michael X, Allen, John J. B.·2009·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Error-related activity in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) is thought to work in conjunction with lateral prefrontal cortex (lPFC) as a part of an action-monitoring network, where errors signal the need for increased cognitive control. The neural mechanism by which this mPFC–lPFC interaction occurs remains unknown. We hypothesized that transient synchronous oscillations in the theta range reflect a mechanism by which these structures interact. To test this hypothesis, we extracted oscillatory phase and power from current–source–density-transformed electroencephalographic data recorded during a Flanker task. Theta power in the mPFC was diminished on the trial preceding an error and increased immediately after an error, consistent with predictions of an action-monitoring system. These power dynamics appeared to take place over a response-related background of oscillatory theta phase coherence. Theta phase synchronization between FCz (mPFC) and F5/6 (lPFC) sites was robustly increased during error trials. The degree of mPFC–lPFC oscillatory synchronization predicted the degree of mPFC power on error trials, and both of these dynamics predicted the degree of posterror reaction time slowing. Oscillatory dynamics in the theta band may in part underlie a mechanism of communication between networks involved in action monitoring and cognitive control.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.4137-08.2009

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cavanagh, J. F., Cohen, M. X., & Allen, J. J. B.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Cavanagh, James F.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2009-01-07
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
98-105
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2108456626
Cited by
669
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 22
FWCI
15.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH066902, F31MH082560)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
Keywords
action monitoring, cognitive control, medial prefrontal cortex, lateral prefrontal cortex, theta oscillations, phase synchronization, current source density, flanker task
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Analysis of Variance, Biological Clocks, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Male, Reaction Time, Theta Rhythm, Time Factors, Prefrontal Cortex, Nonlinear Dynamics, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review