PreprintCited by 179Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDigital Mental Health InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

New Evidence in the Booming Field of Online Mindfulness: An Updated Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (Preprint)

Open access
Sommers-Spijkerman, Marion, Austin, Judith, Bohlmeijer, Ernst, Pots, Wendy·2021·JMIR Mental Health

Preprint — published as 10.2196/28168 · Paper page

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a need to regularly update the evidence base on the effectiveness of online mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs), especially considering how fast this field is growing and developing. OBJECTIVE: This study presents an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials assessing the effects of online MBIs on mental health and the potential moderators of these effects. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search in PsycINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science up to December 4, 2020, and included 97 trials, totaling 125 comparisons. Pre-to-post and pre-to-follow-up between-group effect sizes (Hedges g) were calculated for depression, anxiety, stress, well-being, and mindfulness using a random effects model. RESULTS: The findings revealed statistically significant moderate pre-to-post effects on depression (g=0.34, 95% CI 0.18-0.50; P<.001), stress (g=0.44, 95% CI 0.32-0.55; P<.001), and mindfulness (g=0.40, 95% CI 0.30-0.50; P<.001) and small effects on anxiety (g=0.26, 95% CI 0.18-0.33; P<.001). For well-being, a significant small effect was found only when omitting outliers (g=0.22, 95% CI 0.15-0.29; P<.001) or low-quality studies (g=0.26, 95% CI 0.12-0.41; P<.001). Significant but small follow-up effects were found for depression (g=0.25, 95% CI 0.12-0.38) and anxiety (g=0.23, 95% CI 0.13-0.32). Subgroup analyses revealed that online MBIs resulted in higher effect sizes for stress when offered with guidance. In terms of stress and mindfulness, studies that used inactive control conditions yielded larger effects. For anxiety, populations with psychological symptoms had higher effect sizes. Adherence rates for the interventions ranged from 35% to 92%, but most studies lacked clear definitions or cut-offs. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings not only demonstrate that online MBIs are booming but also corroborate previous findings that online MBIs are beneficial for improving mental health outcomes in a broad range of populations. To advance the field of online MBIs, future trials should pay specific attention to methodological quality, adherence, and long-term follow-up measurements.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/preprints.28168

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. 10.1159/000365764 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1080/15228830802094429 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001454 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1007/s12529-016-9556-9 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1093/clipsy/bph077 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.2196/jmir.6200 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1080/16506073.2017.1401115 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1186/s12888-018-1739-2 · DOI
  9. 10.1037/cap0000096 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1002/da.22641 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e11 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.134 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.09.009 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1007/s10865-014-9610-5 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.10.011 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.01.006 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.486 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1007/s12160-016-9844-2 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/0163-8343(82)90026-3 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.04.006 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.2307/3090197 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1037/0022-006X.73.3.539 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.2105/ajph.2010.192245 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.0076 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1002/jclp.20741 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1080/17439760.2015.1015156 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.01.008 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1037/0003-066x.48.12.1181 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.2196/mental.8597 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1080/13642537.2012.713186 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1016/j.beth.2017.07.007 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1037/str0000165 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.2196/jmir.1713 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1176/appi.ps.56.9.1165 · DOI
  36. 10.2196/10278 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.2196/jmir.8578 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.03.009 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.08.008 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1016/j.beth.2020.07.002 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1080/16506073.2015.1098724 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1007/s12671-020-01373-y · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1007/s12671-013-0264-0 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.091496 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1016/j.jad.2009.06.032 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1002/pon.3171 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1097/md.0000000000000897 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1097/md.0000000000020493 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1007/s12671-013-0260-4 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Sommers-Spijkerman, M., Austin, J., Bohlmeijer, E., & Pots, W.
Affiliations
University of Twente (NL)
Venue
JMIR Mental Health
Published
2021-02-23
Volume
8
Issue
7
Pages
e28168-e28168
ISSN
2368-7959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3160486984
Cited by
179
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Mental Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
online intervention, depression, anxiety, stress, well-being, mindfulness, mental health, intervention adherence, treatment moderators, psychological symptoms, follow-up outcomes, digital mental health, effect size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review