The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New Evidence in the Booming Field of Online Mindfulness: An Updated Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (Preprint)
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.2196/28168 · Paper page
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is a need to regularly update the evidence base on the effectiveness of online mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs), especially considering how fast this field is growing and developing. OBJECTIVE: This study presents an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials assessing the effects of online MBIs on mental health and the potential moderators of these effects. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search in PsycINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science up to December 4, 2020, and included 97 trials, totaling 125 comparisons. Pre-to-post and pre-to-follow-up between-group effect sizes (Hedges g) were calculated for depression, anxiety, stress, well-being, and mindfulness using a random effects model. RESULTS: The findings revealed statistically significant moderate pre-to-post effects on depression (g=0.34, 95% CI 0.18-0.50; P<.001), stress (g=0.44, 95% CI 0.32-0.55; P<.001), and mindfulness (g=0.40, 95% CI 0.30-0.50; P<.001) and small effects on anxiety (g=0.26, 95% CI 0.18-0.33; P<.001). For well-being, a significant small effect was found only when omitting outliers (g=0.22, 95% CI 0.15-0.29; P<.001) or low-quality studies (g=0.26, 95% CI 0.12-0.41; P<.001). Significant but small follow-up effects were found for depression (g=0.25, 95% CI 0.12-0.38) and anxiety (g=0.23, 95% CI 0.13-0.32). Subgroup analyses revealed that online MBIs resulted in higher effect sizes for stress when offered with guidance. In terms of stress and mindfulness, studies that used inactive control conditions yielded larger effects. For anxiety, populations with psychological symptoms had higher effect sizes. Adherence rates for the interventions ranged from 35% to 92%, but most studies lacked clear definitions or cut-offs. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings not only demonstrate that online MBIs are booming but also corroborate previous findings that online MBIs are beneficial for improving mental health outcomes in a broad range of populations. To advance the field of online MBIs, future trials should pay specific attention to methodological quality, adherence, and long-term follow-up measurements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Parsons, C. E., Crane, C., Parsons, L. J., Fjorback, L. O., & Kuyken, W. (2017) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2017.05.004 · Cited by 550
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 49
- 10.1159/000365764 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/15228830802094429 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001454 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s12529-016-9556-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/clipsy/bph077 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2196/jmir.6200 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/16506073.2017.1401115 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/s12888-018-1739-2 · DOI
- 10.1037/cap0000096 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/da.22641 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e11 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.134 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.09.009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10865-014-9610-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.10.011 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.01.006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.486 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s12160-016-9844-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0163-8343(82)90026-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.04.006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/3090197 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-006X.73.3.539 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2105/ajph.2010.192245 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.0076 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/jclp.20741 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/17439760.2015.1015156 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.01.008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0003-066x.48.12.1181 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2196/mental.8597 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/13642537.2012.713186 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.beth.2017.07.007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/str0000165 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2196/jmir.1713 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1176/appi.ps.56.9.1165 · DOI
- 10.2196/10278 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2196/jmir.8578 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.03.009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.08.008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.beth.2020.07.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/16506073.2015.1098724 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s12671-020-01373-y · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s12671-013-0264-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.091496 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jad.2009.06.032 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/pon.3171 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/md.0000000000000897 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/md.0000000000020493 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s12671-013-0260-4 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Sommers-Spijkerman, M., Austin, J., Bohlmeijer, E., & Pots, W.
- Affiliations
- University of Twente (NL)
- Venue
- JMIR Mental Health
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2021-02-23
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e28168-e28168
- ISSN
- 2368-7959 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8329762
- OpenAlex
- W3160486984
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 37 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 3.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- JMIR Mental Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Keywords
- online intervention, depression, anxiety, stress, well-being, mindfulness, mental health, intervention adherence, treatment moderators, psychological symptoms, follow-up outcomes, digital mental health, effect size
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review