The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microcomputer Playfulness: Development of a Measure With Workplace Implications
Abstract
Microcomputer playfulness represents the degree of cognitive spontaneity in microcomputer interactions. Research on the general characteristic of playfulness has demonstrated relationships with measures such as creativity and exploration. Thus, with the widespread diffusion of computers in organizations, research in micro-computer playfulness can have significant practical implications for organizations. Five independent studies involving more than 400 participants provided initial evidence for the construct validity of a microcomputer playfulness measure with respect to its factor structure, internal consistency reliability, concurrent validity, discriminant validity, predictive validity, predictive efficacy, and test-retest reliability. As hypothesized, the measure related positively to computer attitudes, anxiety, competence, and efficacy, and did not relate to gender or age. In addition, the measure related positively to training outcomes of learning, mood, involvement, and satisfaction. Further, the evidence suggests the predictive efficacy of microcomputer playfulness as compared to other variables, such as computer anxiety and attitudes. Consequently, the findings indicate that researchers should focus more attention on positive influences on human-computer interaction, such as microcomputer playfulness, rather than on negative influences, such as computer anxiety.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
Construct validity in psychological tests.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0040957 · Cited by 11,195
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.192 · Cited by 9,150
Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888 · Cited by 7,611
Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix
Steiger, J. H. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.87.2.245 · Cited by 4,621
Health complaints, stress, and distress: Exploring the central role of negative affectivity.
Watson, D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.96.2.234 · Cited by 3,030
Computer anxiety: sex, race and age
Gilroy, F. D., & Desai, H. B. (1986) · International Journal of Man-Machine Studies · doi:10.1016/s0020-7373(86)80084-0 · Cited by 206
Cited by
Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x · Cited by 8,159
Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test
Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249688 · Cited by 6,553
Venkatesh, V. (2000) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872 · Cited by 6,664
Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace 1
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x · Cited by 6,231
Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology
McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81 · Cited by 5,550
Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250951 · Cited by 4,726
User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems1
van der Heijden, H. (2004) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148660 · Cited by 3,850
Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context
Moon, J.-W., & Kim, Y.-G. (2001) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(00)00061-6 · Cited by 3,802
Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.9.2.204 · Cited by 3,575
An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-Commerce Transactions
Dinev, T., & Hart, P. (2006) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1060.0080 · Cited by 2,640
Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1997) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01322.x · Cited by 1,669
Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250989 · Cited by 1,587
Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model
Roca, J. C., Chiu, C.-M., & Martínez, F. J. (2006) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.01.003 · Cited by 1,399
Individual Trust in Online Firms: Scale Development and Initial Test
(2002) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2002.11045715 · Cited by 1,347
A motivational model of microcomputer usage
Igbaria, M., Parasuraman, S., & Baroudi, J. J. (1996) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1996.11518115 · Cited by 915
Demographic differences in perceived benefits from gamification
Koivisto, J., & Hamari, J. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.007 · Cited by 841
Ahuja, M. K., & Bennett, J. (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148691 · Cited by 818
Roca, J. C., & Gagné, M. (2008) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.06.001 · Cited by 732
Information System Success: Individual and Organizational Determinants
Sabherwal, R., Jeyaraj, A., & Chowa, C. (2006) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0583 · Cited by 685
Salloum, S. A., Qasim Mohammad Alhamad, A., Al-Emran, M., Abdel Monem, A., & Shaalan, K. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2939467 · Cited by 651
Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research
Hiebl, M. R. W. (2023) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428120986851 · Cited by 635
Integrating Technology Addiction and Use: an Empirical Investigation of Online Auction Users1
Turel, O., Serenko, A., & Giles, P. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41409972 · Cited by 547
Exploring influencing variables for the acceptance of social robots
de Graaf, M. M. A., & Ben Allouch, S. (2013) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2013.07.007 · Cited by 499
“Working out for likes”: An empirical study on social influence in exercise gamification
Hamari, J., & Koivisto, J. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.018 · Cited by 473
Marketing AI recruitment: The next phase in job application and selection
van Esch, P., Black, J. S., & Ferolie, J. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.009 · Cited by 391
Why do people play games? A meta-analysis
Hamari, J., & Keronen, L. (2017) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.01.006 · Cited by 368
Zhang, P. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37.1.11 · Cited by 331
Approaches for Organizational Learning: A Literature Review
Basten, D., & Haamann, T. (2018) · Sage Open · doi:10.1177/2158244018794224 · Cited by 282
Wu, C. H.-J., & Liang, R.-D. (2011) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2010.03.001 · Cited by 241
Washington State University, Hess, T., Fuller, M., University of Massachusetts, A., Campbell, D., & Millsaps College (2009) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00216 · Cited by 233
Wang, C. (., & Jeong, M. (2018) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.04.006 · Cited by 197
Lalmas, M., O’Brien, H., & Yom-Tov, E. (2015) · Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-02289-0 · Cited by 192
Magni, M., Susan Taylor, M., & Venkatesh, V. (2010) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.03.004 · Cited by 173
From attachment to addiction: The mediating role of need satisfaction on social networking sites
Chen, A. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.034 · Cited by 169
The Playful Advantage: How Playfulness Enhances Coping with Stress
Magnuson, C. D., & Barnett, L. A. (2013) · Leisure Sciences · doi:10.1080/01490400.2013.761905 · Cited by 159
The influence of age in usability testing
Sonderegger, A., Schmutz, S., & Sauer, J. (2016) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2015.06.012 · Cited by 152
Self-efficacy as an antecedent of cognition and affect in technology acceptance
Kulviwat, S., C. Bruner II, G., & P. Neelankavil, J. (2014) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/jcm-10-2013-0727 · Cited by 144
Agogo, D., & Hess, T. J. (2018) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2018.1435230 · Cited by 121
Liao, Q. V., Mas-ud Hussain, M., Chandar, P., Davis, M., Khazaeni, Y., Crasso, M. P., Wang, D., Muller, M., Shami, N. S., & Geyer, W. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3173577 · Cited by 116
Management of Trust in the E-Marketplace: The Role of the Buyer's Experience in Building Trust
Kim, M.-S., & Ahn, J.-H. (2007) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000095 · Cited by 102
A model of user adoption of interface agents for email notification
Serenko, A. (2008) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2008.04.004 · Cited by 92
Nanyang Technological University, Chandra, S., Srivastava, S., HEC School of Management, P., Theng, Y.-L., & Nanyang Technological University (2012) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00310 · Cited by 90
Hong, J.-C., Hwang, M.-Y., Hsu, H.-F., Wong, W.-T., & Chen, M.-Y. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.011 · Cited by 85
Job candidates’ reactions to AI-enabled job application processes
van Esch, P., Black, J. S., & Arli, D. (2021) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-020-00025-0 · Cited by 72
Mohd Amir, R. I., Mohd, I. H., Saad, S., Abu Seman, S. A., & Tuan Besar, T. B. H. (2020) · Charting a Sustainable Future of ASEAN in Business and Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-3859-9_34 · Cited by 47
(2015) · International Conference on Information Systems · Cited by 25
Hasebrook, J. P., Michalak, L., Kohnen, D., Metelmann, B., Metelmann, C., Brinkrolf, P., Flessa, S., & Hahnenkamp, K. (2023) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0280956 · Cited by 19
Teng, D., Zhou, X., Al‐Samarraie, H., & Fang, L. (2026) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1002/jcal.70176 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Webster, J., & Martocchio, J. J.
- Venue
- MIS Quarterly
- Publisher
- MIS Quarterly
- Published
- 1992-06-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 201-226
- ISSN
- 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-9730
- OpenAlex
- W1606169904
- Cited by
- 1,106
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 17.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.