Cited by 270Physical Activity and HealthDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and Research

Breaking Up Prolonged Sitting With Standing or Walking Attenuates the Postprandial Metabolic Response in Postmenopausal Women: A Randomized Acute Study

Open access
Henson, Joseph, Davies, Melanie J., Bodicoat, Danielle H., Edwardson, Charlotte L., Gill, Jason M.R., Stensel, David J., Tolfrey, Keith, Dunstan, David W. +2 more·2016·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether breaking up prolonged sitting with short bouts of standing or walking improves postprandial markers of cardiometabolic health in women at high risk of type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty-two overweight/obese, dysglycemic, postmenopausal women (mean ± SD age 66.6 ± 4.7 years) each participated in two of the following treatments: prolonged, unbroken sitting (7.5 h) or prolonged sitting broken up with either standing or walking at a self-perceived light intensity (for 5 min every 30 min). Both allocation and treatment order were randomized. The incremental area under the curves (iAUCs) for glucose, insulin, nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA), and triglycerides were calculated for each treatment condition (mean ± SEM). The following day, all participants underwent the 7.5-h sitting protocol. RESULTS: Compared with a prolonged bout of sitting (iAUC 5.3 ± 0.8 mmol/L ⋅ h), both standing (3.5 ± 0.8 mmol/L ⋅ h) and walking (3.8 ± 0.7 mmol/L ⋅ h) significantly reduced the glucose iAUC (both P < 0.05). When compared with prolonged sitting (548.2 ± 71.8 mU/L ⋅ h), insulin was also reduced for both activity conditions (standing, 437.2 ± 73.5 mU/L ⋅ h; walking, 347.9 ± 78.7 mU/L ⋅ h; both P < 0.05). Both standing (−1.0 ± 0.2 mmol/L ⋅ h) and walking (−0.8 ± 0.2 mmol/L ⋅ h) attenuated the suppression of NEFA compared with prolonged sitting (−1.5 ± 0.2 mmol/L ⋅ h) (both P < 0.05). There was no significant effect on triglyceride iAUC. The effects on glucose (standing and walking) and insulin (walking only) persisted into the following day. CONCLUSIONS: Breaking up prolonged sitting with 5-min bouts of standing or walking at a self-perceived light intensity reduced postprandial glucose, insulin, and NEFA responses in women at high risk of type 2 diabetes. This simple, behavioral approach could inform future public health interventions aimed at improving the metabolic profile of postmenopausal, dysglycemic women.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc15-1240

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Henson, J., Davies, M. J., Bodicoat, D. H., Edwardson, C. L., Gill, J. M. R., Stensel, D. J., Tolfrey, K., Dunstan, D. W., Khunti, K., & Yates, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • Loughborough University (GB)
  • Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute (AU)
Corresponding author
Henson, Joseph
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2015-12-01
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
130-138
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2184446545
Cited by
270
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 1
FWCI
28.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
  • Own your potential (DEAKIN) (submittedVersion)
  • Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
sitting breaks, prolonged sitting, standing, walking, postprandial blood glucose, insulin response, free fatty acids, triglycerides, postmenopausal women, type 2 diabetes risk, dysglycemia, overweight and obesity, cardiometabolic health, sedentary behavior, postprandial lipemia, postprandial hypertriglyceridemia, postprandial hyperglycemia, postprandial hyperinsulinemia
MeSH terms
Aged, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Fatty Acids, Nonesterified, Female, Humans, Insulin, Middle Aged, Obesity, Posture, Risk Factors, Triglycerides, Biomarkers, Multivariate Analysis, Linear Models, Walking, Postmenopause, Cross-Over Studies, Postprandial Period, Area Under Curve, Glucose Metabolism Disorders, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review