PreprintCited by 2Memory Processes and InfluencesSpatial Cognition and NavigationMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Dramatic changes to well-known places go unnoticed

Open access
Rosenbaum, R. Shayna, Halilova, Julia G., Agnihotri, Sabrina, D'Angelo, Maria C., Winocur, Gordon, Ryan, Jennifer D., Moscovitch, Morris·2020·Neuropsychologia

Abstract

How well do we know our city? It turns out, much more poorly than we might imagine. We used declarative memory and eye-tracking techniques to examine people’s ability to detect modifications of landmarks in Toronto locales with which they have had extensive experience. Participants were poor at identifying which scenes contained altered landmarks, whether the modification was to the landmarks’ relative size, internal features, or surrounding context. To determine whether an indirect measure would prove more sensitive, we tracked eye movements during viewing. Changes in overall visual exploration, but not to specific regions of change, were related to participants’ explicit endorsement of scenes as modified. These results support the contention that very familiar landmarks are strongly integrated within the spatial context in which they were first experienced, so that any changes that are consciously detected are at a global or coarse, but not local or fine-grained, level.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31234/osf.io/ypg96

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Geometric resemblance might explain findings that people are less likely to detect changes in surface properties than geometric properties of highly familiar and extensively experienced landmarks and scenes; if such changes are detected, they are at a global or coarse level.

    “Geometric resemblance might explain findings that people are less likely to detect changes in surface properties than geometric properties of highly familiar and extensively experienced landmarks and scenes, whether tested directly by recognition or indirectly by eye-movements; if such changes are detected, the changes are at a global or coarse level 112 .”

    From From cognitive maps to spatial schemas (2023) · cites this paper as [112]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hannula, D.E. & Duff, M. (Eds), The Hippocampus from Cells to Systems: Structure, Connectivity, and Functional Contributions to Memory and Flexible Cognition. pp. 281-336.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosenbaum, R. S., Halilova, J. G., Agnihotri, S., D'Angelo, M. C., Winocur, G., Ryan, J. D., & Moscovitch, M.
Affiliations
  • York University (CA)
  • Baycrest Hospital (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Rosenbaum, R. Shayna
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Published
2020-10-30
Volume
196
Pages
108818-108818
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391768378
Cited by
2
References
53
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Canada First Research Excellence Fund
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (rgpin-2018-06399, RGPIN‐04238‐2015)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
scene memory, gist memory, local memory, visual exploration, eye movements, declarative memory, spatial memory, hippocampal-neocortical interaction, remote memory, urban landmarks
MeSH terms
Eye Movements, Hippocampus, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review