Cited by 897Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Greater than the sum of its parts: a review of studies combining structural connectivity and resting-state functional connectivity

Damoiseaux, Jessica S., Greicius, Michael D.·2009·Brain Structure and Function

Abstract

It is commonly assumed that functional brain connectivity reflects structural brain connectivity. The exact relationship between structure and function, however, might not be straightforward. In this review we aim to examine how our understanding of the relationship between structure and function in the 'resting' brain has advanced over the last several years. We discuss eight articles that directly compare resting-state functional connectivity with structural connectivity and three clinical case studies of patients with limited white matter connections between the cerebral hemispheres. All studies examined show largely convergent results: the strength of resting-state functional connectivity is positively correlated with structural connectivity strength. However, functional connectivity is also observed between regions where there is little or no structural connectivity, which most likely indicates functional correlations mediated by indirect structural connections (i.e. via a third region). As the methodologies for measuring structural and functional connectivity continue to improve and their complementary strengths are applied in parallel, we can expect important advances in our diagnostic and prognostic capacities in diseases like Alzheimer's, multiple sclerosis, and stroke.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00429-009-0208-6

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The close relationship of the DMN and other resting state networks to task-based activation patterns implies an interconnectedness between brain networks and the underlying structural connectivity.

    “The close relationship of the DMN, and other resting state networks, to task-based activation patterns 84 implies an interconnect-edness between brain networks and the underlying structural connectivity.27,50”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Damoiseaux, J. S., & Greicius, M. D.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Damoiseaux, Jessica S.
Venue
Brain Structure and Function
Published
2009-06-30
Volume
213
Issue
6
Pages
525-533
ISSN
  • 1863-2653 (ISSN-L)
  • 1863-2661
OpenAlex
W2078152479
Cited by
897
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 79 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 75 · 2012: 54
FWCI
3.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Structure and Function (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
structural connectivity, resting-state functional connectivity, structure-function relationship, white matter connections, interhemispheric connections, Alzheimer's disease, multiple sclerosis, stroke
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neural Pathways

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review