Cited by 38Digital Mental Health InterventionsMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCOVID-19 and Mental Health

Investigating differential effects of socio-emotional and mindfulness-based online interventions on mental health, resilience and social capacities during the COVID-19 pandemic: The study protocol

Open access
Godara, Malvika, Silveira, Sarita, Matthäus, Hannah, Heim, Christine, Voelkle, Manuel, Hecht, Martin, Binder, Elisabeth B., Singer, Tania·2021·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Background: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has led to a mental health crisis on a global scale. Epidemiological studies have reported a drastic increase in mental health problems, such as depression and anxiety, increased loneliness and feelings of disconnectedness from others, while resilience levels have been negatively affected, indicating an urgent need for intervention. The current study is embedded within the larger CovSocial project which sought to evaluate longitudinal changes in vulnerability, resilience and social cohesion during the pandemic. The current second phase will investigate the efficacy of brief online mental training interventions in reducing mental health problems, and enhancing psychological resilience and social capacities. It further provides a unique opportunity for the prediction of intervention effects by individual biopsychosocial characteristics and preceding longitudinal change patterns during the pandemic in 2020/21. Methods: We will examine the differential effects of a socio-emotional (including ‘Affect Dyad’) and a mindfulness-based (including ‘Breathing Meditation’) intervention, delivered through a web- and cellphone application. Participants will undergo 10 weeks of intervention, and will be compared to a retest control group. The effectiveness of the interventions will be evaluated in a community sample (N= 300), which is recruited from the original longitudinal CovSocial sample. The pre- to post-intervention changes, potential underlying mechanisms, and prediction thereof, will be assessed on a wide range of outcomes: levels of stress, loneliness, depression and anxiety, resilience, prosocial behavior, empathy, compassion, and the impact on neuroendocrine, immunological and epigenetic markers. The multi-method nature of the study will incorporate self-report questionnaires, behavioral tasks, ecological momentary assessment (EMA) approaches, and biological, hormonal and epigenetic markers assessed in saliva. Discussion: Results will reveal the differential effectiveness of two brief online interventions in improving mental health outcomes, as well as enhancing social capacities and resilience. The present study will serve as a first step for future application of scalable, low-cost interventions at a broader level to reduce stress and loneliness, improve mental health and build resilience and social capacities in the face of global stressors. Trial registration: This trial has been registered on May 17, 2020 with the ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04889508 registration number (clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04889508).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0256323

Cites

233 of 233 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. G Brito, 2014, Secular Compassion Training: An Empirical Review, Journal of Transpersonal Research, 6, 61
  2. Singer T, Lamm C. The Social Neuroscience of Empathy The ReSource Project (www.resource-project.org) View project Understanding endogenous emotions View project. 2009 [cited 2021 Jun 1]; https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281218239

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Godara, M., Silveira, S., Matthäus, H., Heim, C., Voelkle, M., Hecht, M., Binder, E. B., & Singer, T.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
  • Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Godara, Malvika
  • Silveira, Sarita
  • Heim, Christine
  • Voelkle, Manuel
  • Hecht, Martin
  • Binder, Elisabeth B.
  • Singer, Tania
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2021-11-04
Volume
16
Issue
11
Pages
e0256323
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3211239622
Cited by
38
References
231
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7
FWCI
6.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • berlin university alliance (114_GC_Pandemie_23)
  • Max Planck Society, Germany
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, mindfulness-based interventions, psychological resilience, social capacity, loneliness, depression, anxiety, stress, prosocial behavior, empathy, compassion, epigenetic modifications, neuroendocrine markers, salivary biomarkers, breathing meditation
MeSH terms
Internet-Based Intervention, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Depression, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Behavior, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Meditation, Internet, Resilience, Psychological, Young Adult, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review