Cited by 184Cognitive Abilities and TestingMemory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Functions and Memory

Validating running memory span: Measurement of working memory capacity and links with fluid intelligence

Broadway, James M., Engle, Randall W.·2010·Behavior Research Methods

Abstract

We manipulated running memory span tasks to examine effects on recall and relations with criterion measures of working memory capacity and general fluid intelligence. The goal of the manipulations was to limit or enhance opportunities for active input processing and response preparation in advance of test. We manipulated presentation rate in Experiment 1. Recall was higher at slow than at fast rates, but correlations with criterion measures were much the same across rate conditions. In Experiment 2, we manipulated the time at which the number of items to report was made known to the participants. They were given that information in advance (precue) or at test (postcue). Recall scores and correlations with criterion measures were much the same across cuing conditions. We conclude that running memory span provides valid measurement of working memory capacity that is predictive of higher order cognition across a wide range of conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/brm.42.2.563

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Broadway, J. M., & Engle, R. W.
Affiliations
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Broadway, James M.
Venue
Behavior Research Methods
Published
2010-05
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
563-570
ISSN
  • 1554-351X (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-3528
OpenAlex
W2003481449
Cited by
184
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
8.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavior Research Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
working memory capacity, fluid intelligence, memory retrieval, presentation rate, precuing, response preparation, higher-order cognition, test validity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Psychomotor Performance, Mental Recall, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review