Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 8,344

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Discovery of Grounded Theory

Glaser, Barney G., Strauss, Anselm L.·2017·The Discovery of Grounded Theory
DOI 10.4324/9780203793206-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This introduction presents an overview of the key concepts discussed in the subsequent chapters of this book. The book addresses the equally important enterprise of how the discovery of theory from data—systematically obtained and analyzed in social research—can be furthered. It deals with beginning formulation of some of the processes of research for generating theory. The book discusses theoretical sampling—the process of collecting data for comparative analysis designed to generate substantive and formal theory. It offers method for the comparative analysis of qualitative data. The book also discusses the contemporary emphasis on verification, the influential style of logico-deductive theorizing, which encourages the drive toward verification, and the distinction usually drawn between qualitative and quantitative data—a distinction useless for the generation of theory. Students are trained to master great-man theories and to test them in small ways, but hardly to question the theory as a whole in terms of its position or manner of generation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9780203793206-1

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Items 101–158 of 158

Metadata

Authors
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L.
Venue
The Discovery of Grounded Theory
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2017-07-05
Pages
1-18
DOI
10.4324/9780203793206-1
OpenAlex
W4299588845
Cited by
8,344
References
0
FWCI
2264.58
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.