The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction
Abstract
Preface Part I. Research on Learning 1. Introduction to Research on Learning, Patricia A. Alexander and Richard E. Mayer 2. Learning to Read, Emily Fox and Patricia A. Alexander 3. Learning to Write, Susan De La Paz and Deborah McCutchen 4. Learning Mathematics, Ann R. Edwards, Indigo Esmonde, and Joseph F. Wagner 5. Learning Science, Richard Duschl and Richard Hamilton 6. Learning History, Linda Levstik 7. Learning a Second Language, Min Wang 8. Learning Motor Skill in Physical Education, Catherine D. Ennis and Ang Chen 9. Learning to Think Critically, Christina Bonney and Robert J. Sternberg 10. Learning to Self-Monitor and Self-Regulate, Marcel V. J. Veenman 11. Learning with Motivation, Eric M. Anderman and Heather Dawson Part II. Research on Instruction 12. Introduction to Research on Instruction, Patricia A. Alexander and Richard E. Mayer 13. Instruction Based on Feedback, John Hattie and Mark Gan 14. Instruction Based on Examples, Alexander Renkl 15. Instruction Based on Self-Explanation, Brenda A. Fonseca and Michelene T. H. Chi 16. Instruction Based on Peer Interaction, Kathryn R. Wentzel and Deborah E. Watkins 17. Instruction Based on Cooperative Learning, Robert E. Slavin 18. Instruction Based on Inquiry, Sofie M. M. Loyens and Remy M. J. P. Rikers 19. Instruction Based on Discussion, P. Karen Murphy, Ian A. G., Wilkinson, and Anna O. Soter 20. Instruction Based on Tutoring, Arthur C. Graesser, Sidney D'Mello, and Whitney Cade 21. Instruction Based on Visualizations, Richard E. Mayer 22. Instruction Based on Computer Simulation, Ton de Jong
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835
The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01 · Cited by 34,210
Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color
Crenshaw, K. (1991) · Stanford Law Review · doi:10.2307/1229039 · Cited by 32,792
Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020 · Cited by 18,666
A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.256 · Cited by 9,745
The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.363 · Cited by 9,564
Assessment and Classroom Learning
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050102 · Cited by 8,152 · cited 1×
“In this section we describe several research studies examining two skill learning variables, feedback and contextual interference, influential in motor skill learning.”
BackgroundA revision of bloom's taxonomy: an overview
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2 · Cited by 8,132
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1 · Cited by 7,776 · cited 1×
“Table 8.1 Features and Cues for Throwing (adopted from Knudson & Morrison, 1996)”
BackgroundInfluentialHuman Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes
Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60422-3 · Cited by 7,216
Cited by
The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes
Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2014.965823 · Cited by 2,911
Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020) · Applied Developmental Science · doi:10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791 · Cited by 2,733
Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., & Liu, T.-C. (2016) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008 · Cited by 1,574
Eight Ways to Promote Generative Learning
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2016) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9348-9 · Cited by 832
Van der Kleij, F. M., Feskens, R. C. W., & Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2015) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654314564881 · Cited by 714
Toward an Instructionally Oriented Theory of Example‐Based Learning
Renkl, A. (2014) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12086 · Cited by 509
Automatic feedback in online learning environments: A systematic literature review
Cavalcanti, A. P., Barbosa, A., Carvalho, R., Freitas, F., Tsai, Y.-S., Gašević, D., & Mello, R. F. (2021) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100027 · Cited by 440
A review of research on metacognition in science education: current and future directions
Zohar, A., & Barzilai, S. (2013) · Studies in Science Education · doi:10.1080/03057267.2013.847261 · Cited by 436
Learning with serious games: Is fun playing the game a predictor of learning success?
Iten, N., & Petko, D. (2016) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12226 · Cited by 294
Exploring feedback and student characteristics relevant for personalizing feedback strategies
Narciss, S., Sosnovsky, S., Schnaubert, L., Andrès, E., Eichelmann, A., Goguadze, G., & Melis, E. (2014) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.011 · Cited by 260
Non-cognitive predictors of academic achievement: Evidence from TIMSS and PISA
Lee, J., & Stankov, L. (2018) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2018.05.009 · Cited by 237
Student perceptions of classroom feedback
Gamlem, S. M., & Smith, K. (2013) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2012.749212 · Cited by 184
Evaluating the metacognitive awareness inventory using empirical factor-structure evidence
Harrison, G. M., & Vallin, L. M. (2018) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-017-9176-z · Cited by 182
Bannert, M., Sonnenberg, C., Mengelkamp, C., & Pieger, E. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.038 · Cited by 180
Barzilai, S., & Zohar, A. (2014) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2013.863265 · Cited by 169
GRAESSER, A., & McNAMARA, D. (2010) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2010.515933 · Cited by 153
Measuring strategy use with self-report instruments: theoretical and empirical considerations
Schellings, G., & Van Hout-Wolters, B. (2011) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-011-9081-9 · Cited by 143
Hanham, J., Lee, C. B., & Teo, T. (2021) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104252 · Cited by 141
Van der Kleij, F. M., Vermeulen, J. A., Schildkamp, K., & Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2015) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2014.999024 · Cited by 135
Quality Talk: Developing Students’ Discourse to Promote High-level Comprehension
Murphy, P. K., Greene, J. A., Firetto, C. M., Hendrick, B. D., Li, M., Montalbano, C., & Wei, L. (2018) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831218771303 · Cited by 130
Calvo‐Ferrer, J. R. (2017) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12387 · Cited by 120
Gielen, M., & De Wever, B. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.019 · Cited by 122
The Instrumental Value of Explanations
Lombrozo, T. (2011) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1747-9991.2011.00413.x · Cited by 118
Learning by Communicating in Natural Language With Conversational Agents
Graesser, A. C., Li, H., & Forsyth, C. (2014) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721414540680 · Cited by 118
Sung, E., & Mayer, R. E. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.022 · Cited by 116
Self-citationPolite web-based intelligent tutors: Can they improve learning in classrooms?
McLaren, B. M., DeLeeuw, K. E., & Mayer, R. E. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.019 · Cited by 98
Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback
Misiejuk, K., Wasson, B., & Egelandsdal, K. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106658 · Cited by 98
Sáiz-Manzanares, M. C., Marticorena-Sánchez, R., Martín-Antón, L. J., González Díez, I., & Almeida, L. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12843 · Cited by 96
Accounting for Beneficial Effects of Worked Examples in Tutored Problem Solving
Salden, R. J. C. M., Koedinger, K. R., Renkl, A., Aleven, V., & McLaren, B. M. (2010) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9143-6 · Cited by 96
What if pupils can assess their peers anonymously? A quasi-experimental study
Vanderhoven, E., Raes, A., Montrieux, H., Rotsaert, T., & Schellens, T. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.001 · Cited by 96
Alqassab, M., Strijbos, J.-W., & Ufer, S. (2018) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0342-0 · Cited by 92
Zheng, L., Zhong, L., & Niu, J. (2022) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1883549 · Cited by 75
Greene, J. A., Hutchison, L. A., Costa, L.-J., & Crompton, H. (2012) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.02.002 · Cited by 74
Hsiao, J.-C., & Chang, J. S. (2024) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2207187 · Cited by 73
Explaining the moral of the story
Walker, C. M., & Lombrozo, T. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.11.007 · Cited by 71
Lui, A. M., & Andrade, H. L. (2022) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.751548 · Cited by 71
Hefter, M. H., Berthold, K., Renkl, A., Riess, W., Schmid, S., & Fries, S. (2014) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-014-9320-y · Cited by 63
Valero Haro, A., Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., & Mulder, M. (2019) · Journal of Biological Education · doi:10.1080/00219266.2018.1472132 · Cited by 59
“Students’ Willingness to Practice Collaborative Learning.”
Weinberger, Y., & Shonfeld, M. (2020) · Teaching Education · doi:10.1080/10476210.2018.1508280 · Cited by 54
Individual preparation for collaborative learning: Systematic review and synthesis
Mende, S., Proske, A., & Narciss, S. (2021) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2020.1828086 · Cited by 47
Qian, Y., & Lehman, J. D. (2019) · Sage Open · doi:10.1177/2158244019885136 · Cited by 42
Mathematics practice without feedback: A desirable difficulty in a classroom setting
Fyfe, E. R., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2017) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-016-9401-1 · Cited by 37
Explanation recruits comparison in a category-learning task
Edwards, B. J., Williams, J. J., Gentner, D., & Lombrozo, T. (2019) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.12.011 · Cited by 34
Heckler, A. F., & Mikula, B. D. (2016) · Physical Review Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevphyseducres.12.010134 · Cited by 32
Spaced Retrieval Practice Imposes Desirable Difficulty in Calculus Learning
Lyle, K. B., Bego, C. R., Ralston, P. A. S., & Immekus, J. C. (2022) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-022-09677-2 · Cited by 31
Volchok, E. (2019) · Community College Journal of Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/10668926.2018.1556134 · Cited by 22
Knight, J. K., Weaver, D. C., Peffer, M. E., & Hazlett, Z. S. (2022) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.21-12-0341 · Cited by 18
Afghan English teachers’ and students’ perceptions of formative assessment: A comparative analysis
Golzar, J., Momenzadeh, S. E., & Miri, M. A. (2022) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2022.2107297 · Cited by 17
The use of AI disclosure statements in teaching: Developing skills for psychologists of the future
Overono, A. L., & Ditta, A. S. (2025) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1177/00986283241275664 · Cited by 14
Karen Murphy, P., Greene, J. A., Firetto, C. M., M. V. Croninger, R., Duke, R. F., Li, M., & Lobczowski, N. G. (2022) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2022.102099 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2011-02-15
- OpenAlex
- W642181786
- Cited by
- 916
- References
- 72
- FWCI
- 59.34
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
