Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 378

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Position paper Statin intolerance – an attempt at a unified definition. Position paper from an International Lipid Expert Panel

Open access
Banach, Maciej, Rizzo, Manfredi, Toth, Peter P., Farnier, Michel, Davidson, Michael H., Al-Rasadi, Khalid, Aronow, Wilbert S., Athyros, Vasilis, Djuric, Dragan M., Ezhov, Marat V., Greenfield, Robert S., Hovingh, G. Kees, Kostner, Karam, Serban, Corina, Lighezan, Daniel, Fras, Zlatko, Moriarty, Patrick M., Muntner, Paul, Goudev, Assen, Ceska, Richard, Nicholls, Stephen J., Broncel, Marlena, Nikolic, Dragana, Pella, Daniel, Puri, Raman, Rysz, Jacek, Wong, Nathan D., Bajnok, Laszlo, Jones, Steven R., Ray, Kausik K., Mikhailidis, Dimitri P.·2015·Archives of Medical Science
DOI 10.5114/aoms.2015.49807
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Statins are one of the most commonly prescribed drugs in clinical practice. They are usually well tolerated and effectively prevent cardiovascular events. Most adverse effects associated with statin therapy are muscle-related. The recent statement of the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) has focused on statin associated muscle symptoms (SAMS), and avoided the use of the term 'statin intolerance'. Although muscle syndromes are the most common adverse effects observed after statin therapy, excluding other side effects might underestimate the number of patients with statin intolerance, which might be observed in 10-15% of patients. In clinical practice, statin intolerance limits effective treatment of patients at risk of, or with, cardiovascular disease. Knowledge of the most common adverse effects of statin therapy that might cause statin intolerance and the clear definition of this phenomenon is crucial to effectively treat patients with lipid disorders. Therefore, the aim of this position paper was to suggest a unified definition of statin intolerance, and to complement the recent EAS statement on SAMS, where the pathophysiology, diagnosis and the management were comprehensively presented.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5114/aoms.2015.49807

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Banach, M., Rizzo, M., Toth, P. P., Farnier, M., Davidson, M. H., Al-Rasadi, K., Aronow, W. S., Athyros, V., Djuric, D. M., Ezhov, M. V., Greenfield, R. S., Hovingh, G. K., Kostner, K., Serban, C., Lighezan, D., Fras, Z., Moriarty, P. M., Muntner, P., Goudev, A., Ceska, R., Nicholls, S. J., Broncel, M., Nikolic, D., Pella, D., Puri, R., Rysz, J., Wong, N. D., Bajnok, L., Jones, S. R., Ray, K. K., & Mikhailidis, D. P.
Venue
Archives of Medical Science
Publisher
Termedia Sp. z.o.o.
Published
2015
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
1-23
ISSN
1734-1922 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.5114/aoms.2015.49807
OpenAlex
W1511974464
Cited by
378
References
33
FWCI
53.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.