The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy
Abstract
In Between Facts and Norms Jurgen Habermas works out the legal and political implications of his Theory of Communicative Action (1981), bringing to fruition the project announced with his publication of The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere in 1962. This new work is a major contribution to recent debates on the rule of law and the possibilities of democracy in postindustrial societies, but it is much more.The introduction by William Rehg succinctly captures the special nature of the work, noting that it offers a sweeping, sociologically informed conceptualization of law and basic rights, a normative account of the rule of law and the constitutional state, an attempt to bridge normative and empirical approaches to democracy, and an account of the social context required for democracy. Finally, the work frames and caps these arguments with a bold proposal for a new paradigm of law that goes beyond the dichotomies that have afflicted modern political theory from its inception and that still underlie current controversies between so- called liberals and civic republicans.The book includes a postscript written in 1994, which restates the argument in light of its initial reception, and two appendixes, which cover key developments that preceded the book. Habermas himself was actively involved in the translation, adapting the text as necessary to make it more accessible to English-speaking readers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance
Fung, A. (2006) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00667.x · Cited by 2,464
The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents, and Citizens
Benhabib, S. (2004) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790799 · Cited by 2,180
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00950.x · Cited by 2,131
(2002) · Cited by 1,687
Social Protection and the Formation of Skills: A Reinterpretation of the Welfare State
Estevez‐Abe, M., Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2001) · Varieties of Capitalism · doi:10.1093/0199247757.003.0004 · Cited by 1,568
Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union Revisited: Input, Output and ‘Throughput’
Schmidt, V. A. (2013) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00962.x · Cited by 1,213
On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory
Tamanaha, B. Z. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511812378 · Cited by 837
Schmidt, A., Ivanova, A., & Schäfer, M. S. (2013) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.020 · Cited by 753
Teegen, H., Doh, J. P., & Vachani, S. (2004) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400112 · Cited by 682
Public‐Value Failure: When Efficient Markets May Not Do
Bozeman, B. (2002) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00165 · Cited by 550
A problem-based approach to democratic theory
WARREN, M. E. (2017) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055416000605 · Cited by 478
The elective affinity between post-truth communication and populist politics
Waisbord, S. (2018) · Communication Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/22041451.2018.1428928 · Cited by 411
Does discourse matter? Discourse analysis in environmental policy making
Feindt, P. H., & Oels, A. (2005) · Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning · doi:10.1080/15239080500339638 · Cited by 394
Disinformation as a Threat to Deliberative Democracy
McKay, S., & Tenove, C. (2021) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912920938143 · Cited by 378
Rethinking the fragmentation of the cyberpublic: from consensus to contestation
Dahlberg, L. (2007) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444807081228 · Cited by 366
The boundary problem in democratic theory: why the demos should be bounded by the state
Song, S. (2012) · International Theory · doi:10.1017/s1752971911000248 · Cited by 329
Reflections and Hypotheses on a Further Structural Transformation of the Political Public Sphere
Habermas, J. (2022) · Theory, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/02632764221112341 · Cited by 319
Self-citation(2011) · Cited by 295
Users Polarization on Facebook and Youtube
Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Del Vicario, M., Puliga, M., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., Uzzi, B., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0159641 · Cited by 285
Discourse ethics and social accountability: The ethics of SA 8000
Gilbert, D. U., & Rasche, A. (2007) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.5840/beq200717230 · Cited by 270
Fraser, N. (2008) · Critical Inquiry · doi:10.1086/589478 · Cited by 236
Instrumental and/or deliberative? A typology of CSR communication tools
Seele, P., & Lock, I. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2282-9 · Cited by 202
Caine, K. J., & Krogman, N. (2010) · Organization & Environment · doi:10.1177/1086026609358969 · Cited by 198
Voting with your feet: Exit-based empowerment in democratic theory
WARREN, M. E. (2011) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055411000323 · Cited by 188
Democratizing Algorithmic Fairness
Wong, P.-H. (2020) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-019-00355-w · Cited by 182
Vesnic-Alujevic, L., Nascimento, S., & Pólvora, A. (2020) · Telecommunications Policy · doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101961 · Cited by 180
No Global Demos, No Global Democracy? A Systematization and Critique
Valentini, L. (2014) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592714002138 · Cited by 178
Ardèvol-Abreu, A., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2017) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1077699016654684 · Cited by 153
Protecting Democracy from Disinformation: Normative Threats and Policy Responses
Tenove, C. (2020) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/1940161220918740 · Cited by 147
Introduction: Embedding participatory governance
Bussu, S., Bua, A., Dean, R., & Smith, G. (2022) · Critical Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/19460171.2022.2053179 · Cited by 144
From “Third Place” to “Third Space”: Everyday Political Talk in Non-Political Online Spaces
Wright, S. (2012) · Javnost - The Public · doi:10.1080/13183222.2012.11009088 · Cited by 142
Creating Friction: Infrastructuring Civic Engagement in Everyday Life
Korn, M., & Voida, A. (2015) · Aarhus Series on Human Centered Computing · doi:10.7146/aahcc.v1i1.21198 · Cited by 121
Deliberative Democracy and International Labor Standards
Fung, A. (2003) · Governance · doi:10.1111/1468-0491.t01-1-00204 · Cited by 120
Scholz, R. (2017) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su9060991 · Cited by 117
Public deliberation on government-managed social media: A study on Weibo users in China
Medaglia, R., & Zhu, D. (2017) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2017.05.003 · Cited by 114
Edwards-Groves, C., Grootenboer, P., & Ronnerman, K. (2016) · Educational Action Research · doi:10.1080/09650792.2015.1131175 · Cited by 111
Redefining second modernity for East Asia: a critical assessment
Han, S., & Shim, Y. (2010) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2010.01322.x · Cited by 97
Jiang, M., & Xu, H. (2009) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439308327313 · Cited by 96
Three dimensions of the public sphere on Facebook
Batorski, D., & Grzywińska, I. (2018) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2017.1281329 · Cited by 85
What Motivates Reasoning? A Theory of Goal‐Dependent Political Evaluation
Groenendyk, E., & Krupnikov, Y. (2021) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12562 · Cited by 85
Towards a unified approach to research on democratic backsliding
Jee, H., Lueders, H., & Myrick, R. (2022) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2021.2010709 · Cited by 80
Archaeology as Therapy: Connecting Belongings, Knowledge, Time, Place, and Well-Being
Schaepe, D. M., Angelbeck, B., Snook, D., & Welch, J. R. (2017) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/692985 · Cited by 79
Reporting Conventions: Journalists, Activists, and the Thorny Struggle for Political Visibility
Sobieraj, S. (2010) · Social Problems · doi:10.1525/sp.2010.57.4.505 · Cited by 73
Ideology in HRM Scholarship: Interrogating the Ideological Performativity of ‘New Unitarism’
Greenwood, M., & Van Buren, H. J. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3084-z · Cited by 66
Song, Y., Dai, X.-Y., & Wang, J. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.086 · Cited by 64
The effects of information and social conformity on opinion change
Mallinson, D. J., & Hatemi, P. K. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0196600 · Cited by 62
Global Democratization: Soup, Society, or System?
Dryzek, J. S. (2011) · Ethics & International Affairs · doi:10.1017/s0892679411000074 · Cited by 62
Berg, S., & Hofmann, J. (2021) · Internet Policy Review · doi:10.14763/2021.4.1612 · Cited by 64
Migrants as activist citizens in Italy: understanding the new cycle of struggles
Oliveri, F. (2012) · Citizenship Studies · doi:10.1080/13621025.2012.698509 · Cited by 61
Brüggemann, M., & Meyer, H. (2023) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1093/ct/qtad012 · Cited by 60
Directions for Mind, Brain, and Education: Methods, Models, and Morality
Stein, Z., & Fischer, K. W. (2011) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00708.x · Cited by 51
Valenti, E., Giacco, D., Katasakou, C., & Priebe, S. (2014) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2011-100370 · Cited by 49
Whelan, G. (2013) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1823-y · Cited by 49
Uncompensated emotional labor, racial battle fatigue, and (in)civility in digital spaces
Williams, A. A., Bryant, Z., & Carvell, C. (2019) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/soc4.12658 · Cited by 47
The Gender Gap in Political Discussion Group Attendance
Beauvais, E. (2020) · Politics & Gender · doi:10.1017/s1743923x18000892 · Cited by 34
Hate Speech and Distorted Communication: Rethinking the Limits of Incitement
Sorial, S. (2015) · Law and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10982-014-9214-9 · Cited by 31
Discourse ethics for computer ethics: A heuristic for engaged dialogical reflection
Rehg, W. (2015) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-014-9359-0 · Cited by 27
Simoniti, V. (2021) · British Journal of Aesthetics · doi:10.1093/aesthj/ayab018 · Cited by 25
Is Deliberative Democracy Feasible? Political Disengagement and Trust in Liberal Democratic States
Parvin, P. (2015) · The Monist · doi:10.1093/monist/onv021 · Cited by 25
Beyond Realism and Moralism: A Defense of Political Minimalism
Rodríguez‐Alcázar, J. (2017) · Metaphilosophy · doi:10.1111/meta.12259 · Cited by 24
Theoretical Perspectives on Bureaucrats: A Quest for Democratic Agents
Železnik, A., & Fink-Hafner, D. (2023) · Administration & Society · doi:10.1177/00953997231165998 · Cited by 21
Fry, D. P., & Souillac, G. (2013) · Journal of Moral Education · doi:10.1080/03057240.2013.817328 · Cited by 18
The New Ochlophobia?: Populism, Majority Rule, and Prospects for Democratic Republicanism
McCormick, J. P. (2019) · Republicanism and the Future of Democracy · doi:10.1017/9781108630153.008 · Cited by 15
Redefining Publics: Mosireen, State Crime and the Rise of a Digital Public Sphere
Kasm, S. (2018) · State Crime Journal · doi:10.13169/statecrime.7.1.0100 · Cited by 7
Lyons, N. (2014) · American Antiquity · doi:10.7183/0002-7316.79.2.183 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Habermas, J.
- Venue
- The MIT Press eBooks
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 1996
- OpenAlex
- W1977905103
- Cited by
- 9,998
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 166.59
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.