Cited by 407Misinformation and Its ImpactsParanormal Experiences and BeliefsSocial and Intergroup Psychology

The Influence of Control on Belief in Conspiracy Theories: Conceptual and Applied Extensions

van Prooijen, Jan‐Willem, Acker, Michele·2015·Applied Cognitive Psychology

Abstract

Summary Threats to control have been found to increase belief in conspiracy theories. We argue, however, that previous research observing this effect was limited in two ways. First, previous research did not exclude the possibility that affirming control might reduce conspiracy beliefs. Second, because of artificial lab procedures, previous findings provide little information about the external validity of the control threat–conspiracy belief relationship. In Study 1, we address the first limitation and find that affirming control indeed reduces belief in conspiracy theories as compared with a neutral baseline condition. In Study 2, we address the second limitation of the literature. In a large‐scale US sample, we find that a societal threat to control, that citizens actually experienced, predicts belief in a range of common conspiracy theories. Taken together, these findings increase insight in the fundamental relationship between the human need for control and the tendency to believe in conspiracy theories. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/acp.3161

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Conspiracy belief is reduced when people's sense of control is affirmed.

    “and is reduced when their sense of control is affirmed (van Prooijen & Acker, 2015).”

    From The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories (2017) · cites this paper as van Prooijen & Acker, 2015

  • Compared with baseline conditions, conspiracy belief is heightened when people feel unable to control outcomes.

    “Experiments have shown that compared with baseline conditions, conspiracy belief is heightened when people feel unable to control outcomes”

    From The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories (2017) · cites this paper as van Prooijen & Acker, 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Prooijen, J., & Acker, M.
Affiliations
  • Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement; and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam the Netherlands
  • Otterbein University (US)
Venue
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-08-10
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
753-761
ISSN
  • 0888-4080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0720
OpenAlex
W1568080954
Cited by
407
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2
FWCI
80.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Cognitive Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
conspiracy theories, conspiracy beliefs, need for control, societal threats, generalizability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review