Cited by 170Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Regional brain activation changes and abnormal functional connectivity of the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex during working memory processing in adults with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Open access
Wolf, Robert C., Plichta, Michael M., Sambataro, Fabio, Fallgatter, Andreas J., Jacob, Christian, Lesch, Klaus‐Peter, Herrmann, Martin J., Schönfeldt‐Lecuona, Carlos +3 more·2009·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

Previous studies on working memory (WM) function in adults with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) suggested aberrant activation of the prefrontal cortex and the cerebellum. Although it has been hypothesized that activation differences in these regions most likely reflect aberrant frontocerebellar circuits, the functional coupling of these brain networks during cognitive performance has not been investigated so far. In this study, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and both univariate and multivariate analytic techniques were used to investigate regional activation changes and functional connectivity differences during cognitive processing in healthy controls (n = 12) and ADHD adults (n = 12). Behavioral performance during a parametric verbal WM paradigm did not significantly differ between adults with ADHD and healthy controls. During the delay period of the activation task, however, ADHD patients showed significantly less activation in the left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC), as well as in cerebellar and occipital regions compared with healthy control subjects. In both groups, independent component analyses revealed a functional network comprising bilateral lateral prefrontal, striatal, and cingulate regions. ADHD adults had significantly lower connectivity in the bilateral VLPFC, the anterior cingulate cortex, the superior parietal lobule, and the cerebellum compared with healthy controls. Increased connectivity in ADHD adults was found in right prefrontal regions, the left dorsal cingulate cortex and the left cuneus. These findings suggest both regional brain activation deficits and functional connectivity changes of the VLPFC and the cerebellum as well as functional connectivity abnormalities of the anterior cingulate and the parietal cortex in ADHD adults during WM processing. Hum Brain Mapp, 2009. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In 12 ADHD adults and 12 matched controls, a parametric verbal working memory fMRI task showed no significant behavioral group differences, but ADHD adults had lower delay-period activation in left VLPFC, cerebellar, and occipital regions. ICA also revealed abnormal functional connectivity in a prefrontocerebellar/cingulate/parietal network, with both decreased and increased connectivity in ADHD.

Key findings

  • Behavioral performance during the fMRI verbal WM task did not significantly differ between ADHD adults and healthy controls: no significant group effect for reaction time, F(1,22)=0.334, P=0.857, or accuracy, F(1,22)=1.583, P=0.222.
  • During the delay period, ADHD adults showed significantly less activation than controls in the left VLPFC (inferior frontal gyrus, BA 47), right insula, right middle occipital gyrus (BA 18), right medial frontal gyrus (BA 6), and right cerebellum; between-group GLM threshold was P<0.005 uncorrected.
  • ICA identified a delay-related functional network including bilateral lateral prefrontal, striatal, and cingulate regions; ADHD adults had lower connectivity in bilateral VLPFC (BA 47), left anterior cingulate (BA 32), bilateral superior parietal lobule (BA 7), and bilateral cerebellum, and higher connectivity in right inferior frontal gyrus (BA 44), left dorsal cingulate (BA 24), right superior frontal gyrus (BA 6), and left cuneus (BA 17), at P<0.05 FDR corrected.
  • Exploratory correlations in ADHD showed a negative correlation between WURS score and right cerebellum function (r=−0.71, P<0.05 uncorrected) and a positive correlation between load-3 task accuracy and right inferior frontal gyrus BA 44 connectivity (r=0.66, P<0.05 uncorrected).

Methods

  • Event-related fMRI at 3T in 12 right-handed adult males with DSM-IV ADHD (combined type n=8; predominantly inattentive n=2; predominantly hyperactive-impulsive n=2) and 12 right-handed male healthy controls matched for age, education, and intelligence.
  • Participants performed a previously validated parametric verbal WM task with encoding, delay, and probe periods and WM load levels 1–3; analyses used a General Linear Model for regional activation and spatial independent component analysis (GIFT, Infomax, 19 ICs) for functional connectivity.
  • Neuropsychological tests assessed verbal/spatial WM, executive function, and inhibition; task performance was analyzed with repeated-measures ANOVA, and exploratory Spearman correlations linked brain measures to ADHD symptoms and task accuracy.

Limitations

  • Stated: the sample was relatively small (n=12 per group) and results need replication in a larger cohort; all ADHD patients had a history of methylphenidate treatment, with unknown long-term medication effects on brain function; motivational bias may have contributed because patients were highly motivated and received monetary compensation.
  • Stated: reading disability was not formally tested in the patient group; ICA has methodological limitations that prevent parsing the relative contribution of right VLPFC, anterior cingulate, parietal cortex, and cerebellum to distinct WM subprocesses.
  • Evident from the text: the sample was restricted to right-handed adult males, limiting generalizability to females, other age groups, and broader ADHD populations; patients were not medication-naive, and the cross-sectional design cannot establish causality.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.20665

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 68 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data
    § Regional Brain Activation Changes and Abnormal Functional Connectivity of the Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex During Working Memory Processing in Adults With Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder

    During the delay period of the activation task, ADHD patients showed significantly less activation in the left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) compared with healthy control subjects.

    “During the delay period of the activation task, however, ADHD patients showed significantly less activation in the left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC), as well as in cerebellar and occipital regions compared with healthy control subjects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Regional Brain Activation Changes and Abnormal Functional Connectivity of the Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex During Working Memory Processing in Adults With Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder

    During the delay period of the activation task, ADHD patients showed significantly less activation in cerebellar and occipital regions compared with healthy control subjects.

    “During the delay period of the activation task, however, ADHD patients showed significantly less activation in the left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC), as well as in cerebellar and occipital regions compared with healthy control subjects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Regional Brain Activation Changes and Abnormal Functional Connectivity of the Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex During Working Memory Processing in Adults With Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder

    ADHD adults had significantly lower connectivity in the bilateral VLPFC, the anterior cingulate cortex, the superior parietal lobule, and the cerebellum compared with healthy controls.

    “ADHD adults had significantly lower connectivity in the bilateral VLPFC, the anterior cingulate cortex, the superior parietal lobule, and the cerebellum compared with healthy controls.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Regional Brain Activation Changes and Abnormal Functional Connectivity of the Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex During Working Memory Processing in Adults With Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder

    Increased connectivity in ADHD adults was found in right prefrontal regions, the left dorsal cingulate cortex and the left cuneus.

    “Increased connectivity in ADHD adults was found in right prefrontal regions, the left dorsal cingulate cortex and the left cuneus.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Regional Brain Activation Changes and Abnormal Functional Connectivity of the Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex During Working Memory Processing in Adults With Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder

    Behavioral performance during a parametric verbal working memory paradigm did not significantly differ between adults with ADHD and healthy controls.

    “Behavioral performance during a parametric verbal WM paradigm did not significantly differ between adults with ADHD and healthy controls.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 3
  • May combine two claims. 28
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 39
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data
    § ICA: Within-group effects

    The COI revealed a pattern of functional connectivity comprising the bilateral VLPFC (bilateral inferior frontal gyrus 47 and left BA 44), DLPFC (superior and middle frontal gyrus, BA 9), frontopolar cortex (middle frontal gyrus, BA 10), cingulate cortex (BA 24 and 32), superior frontal cortex (BA 6 and 8), inferior parietal lobule (BA 40), precuneus, striatum (putamen and caudate), right thalamus

    “The COI revealed a pattern of functional connectivity comprising the bilateral VLPFC (bilateral inferior frontal gyrus 47 and left BA 44), the DLPFC (superior and middle frontal gyrus, BA 9), the frontopolar cortex (middle frontal gyrus, BA 10), the cingulate cortex (BA 24 and 32), the superior frontal cortex (BA 6 and 8), the inferior parietal lobule (BA 40), the precuneus, the striatum (putamen”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § DISCUSSION

    Regional activation differences between ADHD adults and healthy controls were confined to the delay period of the activation task and were not detected during the encoding or during the probe phase.

    “Regional activation differences were confined to the delay period of the activation task and were not detected during the encoding or during the probe phase.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § GLM analysis: Between-group comparisons

    Compared with healthy controls, ADHD adults showed lower activation during the delay period in the left VLPFC (BA 47), right insula, right middle occipital gyrus (BA 18), right medial frontal gyrus (BA 6), and right cerebellum.

    “Delay period. Compared with healthy controls, ADHD adults showed lower activation of the left VLPFC (inferior frontal gyrus, BA 47), the right insula, the right middle occipital gyrus (BA 18), the right medial frontal gyrus (BA 6), and the right cerebellum; Figure 2 (right), see also Table IV for detailed stereotaxic coordinates and Z -scores.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § DISCUSSION

    Lower activation in ADHD adults was found in the left VLPFC (BA 47) and the right cerebellum.

    “As predicted, lower activation in ADHD adults was found in the left VLPFC (BA 47) and the right cerebellum.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data
    § GLM analysis: Parametric effects of WM load within-group

    A similar parametric activation pattern to healthy controls was found in ADHD adults during the encoding period.

    “A similar parametric activation pattern was found in ADHD adults; see also Supporting Information Figure S1a.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data
    § GLM analysis: Parametric effects of WM load within-group

    Both groups showed a linearly increasing activation pattern with increasing WM processing during the delay period in bilateral brain regions including the VLPFC (BA 44, 45, 47), DLPFC (BA 9, 46, 10), cingulate gyrus (BA 24/32, 31), premotor cortex, supplementary motor area, insula, superior and inferior parietal lobule (BA 7 and 40), precuneus, middle and inferior temporal gyrus (BA 21 and 22),中间

    “Delay period. Both groups showed a linearly increasing activation pattern with increasing WM processing in bilateral brain regions including the VLPFC (BA 44, 45, 47), the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC; BA 9, 46, 10), the cingulate gyrus (BA 24/32, 31), the premotor cortex, the supplementary motor area, the insula, the superior and inferior parietal lobule (BA 7 and 40), the precuneus, the”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § DISCUSSION

    ADHD adults included in this study did not differ from healthy controls with regard to IQ, years of education, and behavioral performance during a broad range of cognitive domains.

    “The ADHD adults included in this study did not differ from healthy controls with regard to IQ, years of education, and behavioral performance during a broad range of cognitive domains, indicating well-preserved cognitive function and academic achievement similar to healthy controls as demonstrated by the fact that verbal and spatial WM, card sorting, and inhibition during the Stroop task were not”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § DISCUSSION

    ADHD adults did not significantly differ from healthy controls with respect to both RT and accuracy at higher WM load levels during fMRI.

    “With regard to task performance during fMRI, ADHD adults did not significantly differ from healthy controls with respect to both RT and accuracy at higher WM load levels, in accordance with previous behavioral findings in adult ADHD patients during verbal WM performance [Hale et al., 2007; Valera et al., 2005].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § DISCUSSION

    Verbal and spatial WM, card sorting, and inhibition during the Stroop task were not significantly impaired in the ADHD patient group compared with healthy controls.

    “The ADHD adults included in this study did not differ from healthy controls with regard to IQ, years of education, and behavioral performance during a broad range of cognitive domains, indicating well-preserved cognitive function and academic achievement similar to healthy controls as demonstrated by the fact that verbal and spatial WM, card sorting, and inhibition during the Stroop task were not”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Functional Data Acquisition

    The stimuli were pseudorandomized and counterbalanced for the relative frequency of each letter per WM load, position, and probe.

    “The stimuli were pseudorandomized and counterbalanced for the relative frequency of each letter per WM load, position, and probe.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § INTRODUCTION

    Valera et al. reported no activation differences in an a priori identified right prefrontal region and decreased activation in cerebellar regions during n-back task performance in a relatively large sample of ADHD adults.

    “In contrast, Valera et al. reported no activation differences in an a priori identified right prefrontal region and decreased activation in cerebellar regions during n -back task performance in a relatively large sample of ADHD adults [Valera et al., 2005].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Valera et al., 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § Figure 1.

    Differences between controls and ADHD patients on neuropsychological tests were assessed by eight separate t tests, and all t tests were Bonferroni-corrected to avoid alpha-error accumulation.

    “Differences between controls and ADHD patients were assessed by calculating eight separate t tests ( P &lt; 0.05). In order to avoid a -error accumulation, all t tests were Bonferroni-corrected ( P &lt; 0.0064).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § INTRODUCTION

    In ADHD adults, increased activation in prefrontal areas associated with language processing was found in a recent fMRI study using the forward and backward digit span.

    “In ADHD adults, increased activation in prefrontal areas associated with language processing was found in a recent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study using the forward and backward digit span [Hale et al., 2007].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hale et al., 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § INTRODUCTION

    Frontoparietal, striatal, and cerebellar activation abnormalities have been frequently reported during tasks that tap executive function including response inhibition and WM.

    “In addition to the inferior frontal cortex, frontoparietal, striatal, and cerebellar activation abnormalities have been frequently reported during tasks that tap executive function including response inhibition and WM [Castellanos and Tannock, 2002; Clark et al., 2007; Dickstein et al., 2006].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Castellanos and Tannock, 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Clark et al., 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Dickstein et al., 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § INTRODUCTION

    Only a few functional imaging studies have attempted to examine the functional neuroanatomy underlying WM function in ADHD adults, yielding ambiguous results with regard to prefrontal and cerebellar activation abnormalities.

    “Although WM dysfunction is recognized as an important cognitive correlate of the disorder, only a few functional imaging studies have attempted to examine the functional neuroanatomy underlying WM function in ADHD adults [Hale et al., 2007; Schweitzer et al., 2000; Valera et al., 2005], yielding ambiguous results with regard to prefrontal and cerebellar activation abnormalities”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Hale et al., 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Schweitzer et al., 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Valera et al., 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation
    § Functional Data Acquisition

    The appearance of probes from the two immediately preceding trials was avoided in order to prevent proactive interference from preceding stimuli.

    “The appearance of probes from the two immediately preceding trials was avoided in order to prevent proactive interference from preceding stimuli [Jonides et al., 1998].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jonides et al., 1998

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data
    § Subjects

    The healthy control group consisted of 12 right-handed males matched for age, education and intelligence.

    “The healthy control group was recruited from the University of Ulm campus and consisted of 12 right-handed males matched for age, education and intelligence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation
    § Analysis of functional MRI data

    For between-group analyses, the statistical threshold was set at P < 0.005, and a spatial contiguity criterion of 25 adjacent voxels was used.

    “Being a priori driven, the statistical threshold for this between-group comparison was set at P &lt; 0.005, and a spatial contiguity criterion of 25 adjacent voxels [Forman et al., 1995].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Forman et al., 1995

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § Subjects

    To ensure diagnostic validity, additional information was collected from partners, relatives, friends, and from school report certificates.

    “To ensure diagnostic validity, additional information was collected from partners, relatives, friends, and from school report certificates.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation
    § Analysis of functional MRI data

    To account for interindividual variance and in order to generalize inferences, random-effects analyses were computed on the 2nd level.

    “To account for interindividual variance and in order to generalize inferences, random-effects analyses were computed on the 2nd level [Holmes and Friston, 1998].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Holmes and Friston, 1998

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § INTRODUCTION

    ICA is a statistical technique that maximizes the independence between output components, thus identifying a set of spatially nonoverlapping and temporally synchronous brain networks.

    “ICA is a statistical technique that maximizes the independence between the output components [Calhoun et al., 2001, 2004], thus identifying a set of spatially nonoverlapping and temporally synchronous brain networks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Calhoun et al., 2001, 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Subjects

    ADHD patients were excluded if they had a current axis-I mood, substance-related, psychotic, or anxiety disorder and/or a concurrent axis-II disorder, a history of dependence on illicit drugs or alcohol, current psychotropic medication other than psychostimulants, or sensorimotor deficits or other neurological disorders.

    “ADHD patients were excluded from participation if they (1) had a current axis-I mood, substance-related, psychotic, or anxiety disorder and/or a concurrent axis-II disorder according to DSM-IV”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § INTRODUCTION

    In a PET study using a paced auditory serial addition task, task-related changes in rCBF in men without ADHD were more prominent in prefrontal and temporal regions.

    “using positron emission tomography (PET) and a paced auditory serial addition task, Schweitzer et al. found that task-related changes in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in men without ADHD were more prominent in prefrontal and temporal regions [Schweitzer et al., 2000].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schweitzer et al., 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § Subjects

    Controls were excluded if they had a current axis-I and/or concurrent axis-II disorder, a first-degree relative with a neurologic or psychiatric disorder, a history of dependence on illicit drugs or alcohol, current psychotropic medication, or sensorimotor deficits or other neurological disorders.

    “Controls were excluded from participation if they (1) had a current axis-I and/or a concurrent axis-II disorder according to DSM-IV”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Subjects

    All patients were diagnosed by an experienced consultant in psychiatry.

    “All patients were diagnosed by an experienced consultant in psychiatry (C.J.).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § INTRODUCTION

    WM function has been widely studied on the behavioral level in children and adults with ADHD, showing both verbal and spatial WM deficits in affected individuals.

    “WM function has been widely studied on the behavioral level in children and adults with ADHD, showing both verbal and spatial WM deficits in affected individuals [Dowson et al., 2004; Lui and Tannock, 2007; Martinussen et al., 2005].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Dowson et al., 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lui and Tannock, 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Martinussen et al., 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Analysis of functional MRI data

    The estimation of the number of independent components performed directly on the data has been proven to effectively reduce the occurrence of over/underfitting the data.

    “The estimation of the number of the ICs performed directly on the data has been proven to effectively reduce the occurrence of over/underfitting the data [Li et al., 2007].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Li et al., 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § INTRODUCTION

    Brain activation abnormalities of the VLPFC, the anterior cingulate, and the cerebellum in children with ADHD have been associated with a deficit in inhibitory control.

    “Specifically, brain activation abnormalities of the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC), the anterior cingulate, and the cerebellum in children with ADHD have been associated with a deficit in inhibitory control [Durston et al., 2006; Schulz et al., 2004; Tauscher et al., 2002].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Durston et al., 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Schulz et al., 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Tauscher et al., 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Regional Brain Activation Changes and Abnormal Functional Connectivity of the Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex During Working Memory Processing in Adults With Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder

    These findings suggest both regional brain activation deficits and functional connectivity changes of the VLPFC and the cerebellum as well as functional connectivity abnormalities of the anterior cingulate and the parietal cortex in ADHD adults during WM processing.

    “These findings suggest both regional brain activation deficits and functional connectivity changes of the VLPFC and the cerebellum as well as functional connectivity abnormalities of the anterior cingulate and the parietal cortex in ADHD adults during WM processing.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § INTRODUCTION

    Functional activation changes of the VLPFC have been associated with ADHD symptom persistence and genetic vulnerability for ADHD.

    “With regard to the VLPFC, functional activation changes of this region have been associated with ADHD symptom persistence [Schulz et al., 2005] and genetic vulnerability for ADHD [Durston et al., 2006].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Schulz et al., 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Durston et al., 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § INTRODUCTION

    Distinct WM subprocesses are mediated by frontoparietal, striatal and cerebellar regions.

    “distinct WM subprocesses have been shown to be mediated by frontoparietal, striatal and cerebellar regions [Baddeley, 2003; Owen et al., 2005; Postle and D'Esposito, 2000].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Baddeley, 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Owen et al., 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Postle and D'Esposito, 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Subjects

    At the time of the fMRI scanning, six patients were removed from medication for at least 6 weeks, and the remaining six discontinued their treatment with MPH at least 3 days prior to the scanning procedure.

    “At the time of the fMRI scanning, six patients were removed from medication for at least 6 weeks, whereas the remaining six patients discontinued their treatment with MPH at least 3 days prior to the scanning procedure.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION

    Previous studies in children and adults with ADHD have reported abnormal activation of the VLPFC and the anterior cingulate cortex during response inhibition and WM, as well as hypoactivation of the parietal cortex associated with task switching.

    “Moreover, previous studies in children and adults with ADHD have reported abnormal activation of the VLPFC and the anterior cingulate cortex during response inhibition [Bush et al., 1999; Durston et al., 2006] and WM [Schweitzer et al., 2000], as well as hypoactivation of the parietal cortex associated with task switching [Smith et al., 2006].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bush et al., 1999

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Durston et al., 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Schweitzer et al., 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION

    Evidence from functional neuroimaging studies of memory processes in humans suggests that the implementation of an intended act or plan to recall or remember a specific stimulus set may be the lowest common denominator of VLPFC activation.

    “Evidence from functional neuroimaging studies of memory processes in humans have suggested that the implementation of an intended act or plan to recall or remember a specific stimulus set may be the lowest common denominator of VLPFC activation [Courtney et al., 1997; Henson et al., 1999; Owen, 2000].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Courtney et al., 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Henson et al., 1999

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Owen, 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION

    VLPFC activation in healthy subjects occurs during tasks that require the active comparison of stimuli held in both working memory and long-term memory, stimulus selection, and holding online of both spatial and nonspatial information.

    “Consistent with this notion, VLPFC activation in healthy subjects has been demonstrated to occur during tasks that require the active comparison of stimuli held in both WM and long-term memory [Owen et al., 2005; Petrides, 1994; Wolf et al., 2006], stimulus selection [Rushworth et al., 1997], and holding online of both spatial and nonspatial information [Goldman-Rakic, 1990, 1996].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Owen et al., 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Petrides, 1994

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wolf et al., 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § DISCUSSION

    The functional connectivity results support the notion that in addition to regional activation abnormalities in the left VLPFC, a functional decoupling of right hemisphere VLPFC regions is also present during WM processing.

    “Our functional connectivity results support this notion by showing that in addition to regional activation abnormalities in the left VLPFC, a functional decoupling of right hemisphere VLPFC regions is also present during WM processing.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION

    Cerebellar contributions to cognition have been linked to the representation of precise temporal relationships and timing processes during sensory anticipation, and the role of the cerebellum during WM has been increasingly recognized.

    “Cerebellar contributions to cognition have been linked to the representation of precise temporal relationships and timing processes during sensory anticipation [Castellanos and Tannock, 2002], and the role of the cerebellum during WM has been increasingly recognized [Owen et al., 2005].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Castellanos and Tannock, 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Owen et al., 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § INTRODUCTION

    In its application to fMRI data, ICA has been demonstrated to be a viable method for revealing functionally related brain regions in healthy controls and patients with neuropsychiatric disorders.

    “In its application to fMRI data, ICA has been demonstrated to be a viable method for revealing functionally related brain regions in healthy controls and patients with neuropsychiatric disorders [Celone et al., 2006; Garrity et al., 2007; Sambataro et al., 2008].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Celone et al., 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Garrity et al., 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Sambataro et al., 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION

    A common neural mechanism for both WM and response inhibition deficits in ADHD adults has been suggested previously given common behavioral deficits during WM and inhibition processes in ADHD adults and patients with damage to the right inferior prefrontal cortex.

    “Indeed, a common neural mechanism for both WM and response inhibition deficits in ADHD adults has been suggested previously given common behavioral deficits during WM and inhibition processes in ADHD adults and patients with damage to the right inferior prefrontal cortex [Clark et al., 2007].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Clark et al., 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § INTRODUCTION

    The combination of univariate (GLM) and multivariate (ICA) statistical methods has been previously shown to explore different aspects of brain activity, where GLM-based methods are more sensitive to detect functional specificity, while ICA is better suited to define aspects of functional connectivity.

    “The combination of both univariate (GLM) and multivariate (ICA) statistical methods has been previously shown to explore different aspects of brain activity [Esposito et al., 2006], where GLM-based methods are thought to be more sensitive to detect functional specificity, while an ICA approach is better suited to define aspects of functional connectivity [Esposito et al., 2006; Sambataro et al., 2”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Esposito et al., 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Sambataro et al., 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION

    There is abundant evidence from functional neuroimaging studies suggesting that inhibitory control is associated with an activation pattern including the VLPFC, the anterior cingulate and the parietal cortex, and that these functionally heterogeneous regions also subserve WM processes.

    “There is abundant evidence from functional neuroimaging studies suggesting that inhibitory control is associated with an activation pattern including the VLPFC, the anterior cingulate and the parietal cortex, e.g. [Durston et al., 2002, 2006; Konishi et al., 1999; Smith et al., 2006], and that these functionally heterogeneous regions also subserve WM processes [Owen et al., 2005; Wolf and Walter,”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Durston et al., 2002, 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Konishi et al., 1999

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Smith et al., 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION

    Regional activation changes in both the VLPFC and the cerebellum have been linked to familial vulnerability to ADHD.

    “Furthermore, regional activation changes in both the VLPFC and the cerebellum have been linked to familial vulnerability to ADHD [Durston et al., 2006; Mulder et al., 2008].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Durston et al., 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Mulder et al., 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § DISCUSSION

    The ICA-derived results support the notion of aberrant ventrolateral prefrontal, cingulate, parietal, and cerebellar connectivity in ADHD and provide evidence for a common pathophysiologic mechanism underlying commonly observed deficits in cognitive and inhibitory control in ADHD patients.

    “Our ICA-derived results support the notion of aberrant ventrolateral prefrontal, cingulate, parietal, and cerebellar connectivity in ADHD [Castellanos and Tannock, 2002; Dickstein et al., 2006; Valera et al., 2005], and provide evidence for a common pathophysiologic mechanism underlying commonly observed deficits in cognitive and inhibitory control in ADHD patients.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Castellanos and Tannock, 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Dickstein et al., 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Valera et al., 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION

    Inferior frontal and cingulate regions have also been associated with attentional processes within the default-mode network.

    “However, inferior frontal and cingulate regions have also been associated with attentional processes within the so called ''default-mode'' network [Raichle et al., 2001; Weissman et al., 2006].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Raichle et al., 2001

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Weissman et al., 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § DISCUSSION

    Including only correctly performed trials in the functional analyses based on the GLM minimized the potentially relevant activation bias resulting from decreased task accuracy in both groups.

    “Eventually, as we included only correctly performed trials in the functional analyses based on the GLM, we sought to minimize the potentially relevant activation bias resulting from decreased task accuracy in both groups.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation
    § Analysis of functional MRI data

    The statistical threshold for between-group comparisons was set at P < 0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (qFDR).

    “The statistical threshold for these comparisons was set at P &lt; 0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (qFDR) [Genovese et al., 2002; Storey and Tibshirani, 2003].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Genovese et al., 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Storey and Tibshirani, 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given
    § DISCUSSION

    All ADHD patients included in this study had a history of MPH medication.

    “Moreover, all ADHD patients included in this study had a history of MPH medication.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § DISCUSSION

    We sought to exclude manifest reading disability in the patient sample by assessing subjective complaints and by obtaining independent information from parents, relatives, and school reports, thus minimizing potential inclusion bias.

    “However, we sought to exclude manifest reading disability in the patient sample not only by assessing subjective complaints but also by obtaining independent information from parents, relatives, and school reports and thus additionally minimizing potential inclusion bias.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Analysis of functional MRI data

    A nonparametric analysis was chosen in order to minimize potential effects of data outliers and of a nonGaussian distribution of the data.

    “A nonparametric analysis was chosen in order to minimize potential effects of data outliers and of a nonGaussian distribution of the data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § DISCUSSION

    We cannot rule out a motivational bias which may have additionally contributed to negative group effects in cognitive performance.

    “As such, we cannot rule out a motivational bias which may have additionally contributed to negative group effects in cognitive performance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § DISCUSSION

    The behavioral results are potentially limited by the relatively small sample size and by the patient group consisting of highly motivated ADHD patients who received monetary compensation.

    “However, the behavioral results are potentially limited by the relatively small sample size included in this study and by the fact that the patient group consisted of highly motivated ADHD patients, who received monetary compensation for their participation in this project.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § DISCUSSION

    This study suggests both regional brain activation deficits and functional connectivity changes of ventrolateral prefrontal and cerebellar regions in ADHD adults during cognitive processing.

    “Keeping these limitations in mind, this study suggests both regional brain activation deficits and functional connectivity changes of ventrolateral prefrontal and cerebellar regions in ADHD adults during cognitive processing.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation
    § DISCUSSION

    Although all patients were removed from medication at least three days prior to scanning, the long-term effects of medication on brain function are not yet well known and may have had an impact on cerebral activation and connectivity differences observed in the ADHD group.

    “Nevertheless, although all patients investigated in this study were removed from medication at least three days prior to scanning, the long-term effects of medication on brain function are not yet well known [Langleben et al., 2002], and may have had an impact on cerebral activation and connectivity differences observed in the ADHD group.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Langleben et al., 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data
    § DISCUSSION

    All 2nd level analyses were recalculated including individual IQ values as a nuisance variable.

    “In addition, although IQ measures did not significantly differ between ADHD patients and healthy controls ( P &lt; 0.31), all 2nd level analyses were nevertheless recalculated including the individual IQ values as a nuisance variable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data
    § DISCUSSION

    Reading disability was not formally tested in the patient group.

    “Another potential limitation of this study is that although patients with manifest subjective reading disability were excluded from participation, reading disability was not formally tested in the patient group.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
55 of 55
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The WURS, ASRS, and BIS scores validly measure ADHD psychopathology.

    “No significant correlations between regional brain activation, functional connectivity measures, and ADHD psychopathology were found when correlating the ASRS, BIS, and WURS scores with the VLPFC, the superior frontal and parietal cortex, the insula and the anterior cingulate cortex.”
1 of 1

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In adults with ADHD, reduced functional connectivity relative to healthy controls was observed between bilateral IFC, and between right IFC and striatal, cingulate, parieto-temporal and cerebellar regions during motor response inhibition and WM tasks.

    “In adults with ADHD, reduced functional connectivity relative to healthy controls was observed between bilateral IFC, and between right IFC and striatal, cingulate, parieto-temporal and cerebellar regions during motor response inhibition and WM tasks (Wolf et al., 2009; Cubillo et al., 2010).”

    From Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Its Clinical Translation (2018) · cites this paper as Wolf et al., 2009

    The Discussion reports lower connectivity in bilateral ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate, parietal cortex and cerebellum in adults with ADHD during a working-memory task. It does not report reduced connectivity between specific pairs of regions, a reduction involving the striatum or temporal cortex, or a motor-response-inhibition task; the Results instead report increased connectivity in one right inferior frontal region. The sentence also cites Cubillo et al. (2010), whose contribution is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In adults with ADHD, there is additional evidence for increased connectivity during WM between ACC, superior frontal lobe and cerebellum, presumably compensatory.

    “In adults, however, there is also additional evidence for increased connectivity during WM between ACC, superior frontal lobe and cerebellum, presumably compensatory (Wolf et al., 2009).”

    From Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Its Clinical Translation (2018) · cites this paper as Wolf et al., 2009

    The Discussion reports increased connectivity in the dorsal cingulate and right superior frontal gyrus during working-memory processing, and describes compensatory recruitment as a plausible explanation. But it reports decreased connectivity in the cerebellum, not increased connectivity involving the cerebellum; the findings also concern connectivity within a network rather than direct connections between all three regions. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In adults with ADHD, a more complicated pattern of regional increases and decreases in functional connectivity has been reported.

    “in adults with ADHD a more complicated pattern of regional increases and decreases in functional connectivity has been reported (Wolf et al., 2009).”
  • Wolf et al. 2009 found that ADHD and control groups did not differ in working memory task performance, but differed in brain activation patterns and functional connectivity during the delay phase.

    “The groups did not differ in performance of this task, but they did differ in the patterns of brain activation elicited by the task (ie, in the task-positive networks for working memory) and in the functional connectivity estimates during the delay phase of the task.”
  • Wolf et al. found the ADHD group had less functional connectivity for some brain regions and greater functional connectivity for others.

    “The ADHD group had less functional connectivity for some brain regions (ventrallateral PFC, anterior cingulate gyrus, superior parietal, and cerebellum) and greater functional connectivity for other brain regions (right PFC and left dorsal anterior cingulate gyrus, and cuneus).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Coordinates are identified as both MNI and Talairach

    Minor

    The analysis methods say cluster coordinates are according to the MNI template, whereas the Table V note calls its coordinates Talairach coordinates.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 65

  1. 10.1016/S0006-3223(99)00083-9 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1002/hbm.1048 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.mri.2004.09.004 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.06.025 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2250-06.2006 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.07.020 · DOI
  7. Correa N, 2005, Comparison of blind source separation algorithms for FMRI using a new Matlab toolbox: GIFT, Proc IEEE Int Conf Acoustics Speech Signal Process, 5, 401
  8. 10.1038/386608a0 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/s002210000395 · DOI
  10. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2004.00292.x · DOI
  11. 10.1006/nimg.2002.1074 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.12.020 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/978-3-7091-6792-2 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2006.06.012 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0006-3223(98)00240-6 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/S0006-3223(00)00889-1 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/hbm.460020402 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1006/nimg.1995.1007 · DOI
  19. 10.1176/ajp.2007.164.3.450 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1006/nimg.2001.1037 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)62688-6 · DOI
  22. 10.1098/rstb.1996.0129 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Gross J, 1999, Assessment of the attention‐deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults, Nervenarzt, 70, 20
  24. 10.1177/1087054706294101 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1093/brain/122.7.1367 · DOI
  26. Holmes AP, 1998, Generalisability, random effects and population inference, NeuroImage, 4, 754, 10.1016/S1053-8119(18)31587-8 · DOI
  27. Horn W, 1983, Leistungsprüfsystem (LPS)
  28. 10.1073/pnas.95.14.8410 · DOI
  29. 10.1098/rstb.1999.0475 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1017/S0033291799008338 · DOI
  31. 10.1093/brain/122.5.981 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Langleben DD, 2002, Effects of methylphenidate discontinuation on cerebral blood flow in prepubescent boys with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, J Nucl Med, 43, 1624
  33. 10.1002/hbm.20359 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00221.x · DOI
  35. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a070866 · DOI
  36. 10.1097/chi.0b013e31815a56dc · DOI
  37. 10.1016/S0010-9452(76)80035-4 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1007/s002210000398 · DOI
  40. 10.1002/1097-4679(199511)51:6<768::AID-JCLP2270510607>3.0.CO;2-1 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1037/0894-4105.12.3.414 · DOI
  42. Petrides M, 1994, Handbook of Neuropsychology, 59
  43. Postle BR, 2000, Evaluating models of the topographical organization of working memory function in frontal cortex with event‐related FMRI, Psychobiology, 28, 132, 10.3758/BF03331973 · DOI
  44. 10.1073/pnas.98.2.676 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1007/s00702-005-0366-5 · DOI
  46. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-12-04829.1997 · DOI
  47. 10.1177/00222194040370020601 · DOI
  48. 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.9.1650 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1097/01.chi.0000145551.26813.f9 · DOI
  50. 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.2.278 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.11.019 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.04.031 · DOI
  53. 10.1097/chi.0b013e31812eecf7 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.6.1044 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1016/S0028-3908(01)00060-0 · DOI
  56. 10.1073/pnas.1530509100 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Talairach J, 1988, Co‐Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain
  58. 10.1001/archpsyc.59.6.514 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/j.braindev.2007.10.005 · DOI
  60. 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.02.022 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1073/pnas.95.24.14494 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Ward MF, 1993, The Wender Utah Rating Scale: An aid in the retrospective diagnosis of childhood attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, Am J Psychiatry, 150, 885
  63. Wechsler D, 1981, Wechsler Intelligence Scale‐Revised
  64. 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2005.06.002 · DOI
  65. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.05.015 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wolf, R. C., Plichta, M. M., Sambataro, F., Fallgatter, A. J., Jacob, C., Lesch, K., Herrmann, M. J., Schönfeldt‐Lecuona, C., Connemann, B. J., Grön, G., & Vasic, N.
Affiliations
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
  • University of Würzburg (DE)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-12-23
Volume
30
Issue
7
Pages
2252-2266
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W2062205929
Cited by
170
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 15
FWCI
9.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (University of Udine) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, working memory, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, functional connectivity, cerebellum, anterior cingulate cortex, superior parietal lobule, regional brain activation, adult ADHD, verbal working memory
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Brain, Brain Mapping, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neural Pathways, Neuropsychological Tests, Multivariate Analysis, Linear Models, Prefrontal Cortex, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review