Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 927

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 132 of the 132 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA): rationale, objectives and methods

Open access
Penninx, Brenda W.J.H., Beekman, Aartjan T.F., Smit, Johannes H., Zitman, Frans G., Nolen, Willem A., Spinhoven, Philip, Cuijpers, Pim, De Jong, Peter J., Van Marwijk, Harm W.J., Assendelft, Willem J.J., Van Der Meer, Klaas, Verhaak, Peter, Wensing, Michel, De Graaf, Ron, Hoogendijk, Witte J., Ormel, Johan, Van Dyck, Richard·2008·International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
DOI 10.1002/mpr.256
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA) is a multi‐site naturalistic cohort study to: (1) describe the long‐term course and consequences of depressive and anxiety disorders, and (2) to integrate biological and psychosocial research paradigms within an epidemiological approach in order to examine (interaction between) predictors of the long‐term course and consequences. Its design is an eight‐year longitudinal cohort study among 2981 participants aged 18 through 65 years. The sample consists of 1701 persons with a current (six‐month recency) diagnosis of depression and/or anxiety disorder, 907 persons with life‐time diagnoses or at risk because of a family history or subthreshold depressive or anxiety symptoms, and 373 healthy controls. Recruitment took place in the general population, in general practices (through a three‐stage screening procedure), and in mental health organizations in order to recruit persons reflecting various settings and developmental stages of psychopathology. During a four‐hour baseline assessment including written questionnaires, interviews, a medical examination, a cognitive computer task and collection of blood and saliva samples, extensive information was gathered about key (mental) health outcomes and demographic, psychosocial, clinical, biological and genetic determinants. Detailed assessments will be repeated after one, two, four and eight years of follow‐up. The findings of NESDA are expected to provide more detailed insight into (predictors of) the long‐term course of depressive and anxiety disorders in adults. Besides its scientific relevance, this may contribute to more effective prevention and treatment of depressive and anxiety disorders. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mpr.256

Cites

132 of 132 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 927

Metadata

Authors
Penninx, B. W. J. H., Beekman, A. T. F., Smit, J. H., Zitman, F. G., Nolen, W. A., Spinhoven, P., Cuijpers, P., De Jong, P. J., Van Marwijk, H. W. J., Assendelft, W. J. J., Van Der Meer, K., Verhaak, P., Wensing, M., De Graaf, R., Hoogendijk, W. J., Ormel, J., & Van Dyck, R.
Venue
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-09
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
121-140
ISSN
  • 1049-8931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-0657
DOI
10.1002/mpr.256
OpenAlex
W2124084192
Cited by
927
References
132
FWCI
62.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.