Cited by 700Cardiovascular Disease and AdiposityCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

Echocardiographic epicardial fat: a review of research and clinical applications

Iacobellis, Gianluca, Willens, Howard J.·2009·Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography

Abstract

Epicardial fat plays a role in cardiovascular diseases. Because of its anatomic and functional proximity to the myocardium and its intense metabolic activity, some interactions between the heart and its visceral fat depot have been suggested. Epicardial fat can be visualized and measured using standard two-dimensional echocardiography. Standard parasternal long-axis and short-axis views permit the most accurate measurement of epicardial fat thickness overlying the right ventricle. Epicardial fat thickness is generally identified as the echo-free space between the outer wall of the myocardium and the visceral layer of pericardium and is measured perpendicularly on the free wall of the right ventricle at end-systole. Echocardiographic epicardial fat thickness ranges from a minimum of 1 mm to a maximum of almost 23 mm. Echocardiographic epicardial fat thickness clearly reflects visceral adiposity rather than general obesity. It correlates with metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, coronary artery disease, and subclinical atherosclerosis, and therefore it might serve as a simple tool for cardiometabolic risk prediction. Substantial changes in echocardiographic epicardial fat thickness during weight-loss strategies may also suggest its use as a marker of therapeutic effect. Echocardiographic epicardial fat measurement in both clinical and research scenarios has several advantages, including its low cost, easy accessibility, rapid applicability, and good reproducibility. However, more evidence is necessary to evaluate whether echocardiographic epicardial fat thickness may become a routine way of assessing cardiovascular risk in a clinical setting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.echo.2009.10.013

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iacobellis, G., & Willens, H. J.
Affiliations
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Iacobellis, Gianluca
Venue
Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-12
Volume
22
Issue
12
Pages
1311-1319
ISSN
0894-7317 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129744024
Cited by
700
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 29
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Keywords
epicardial adipose tissue, visceral fat, right ventricle, cardiovascular risk prediction, cardiometabolic risk, metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, coronary artery disease, subclinical atherosclerosis, weight loss
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Echocardiography, Humans, Image Enhancement, Pericardium, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review