The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Social Construction of Reputation: Certification Contests, Legitimation, and the Survival of Organizations in the American Automobile Industry: 1895–1912
Abstract
Despite widespread agreement among organizational researchers that intangible resources underlie performance differences among organizations, little empirical evidence exists in the literature. Building on the idea that reputation is socially constructed, this paper depicts reputation as the outcome of the process of legitimation. It observes that organizational researchers have overlooked how certification contests legitimate organizations, generate status orderings, and create favorable reputations. This paper suggests that victories in certification contests are credentials that enable firms to acquire a reputation for competence. It predicts that cumulative victories improve the survival of organizations and better the life chances of startup organizations more than those of lateral entries. These predictions are analyzed in the American auto industry during 1895–1912 when special-purpose product rating agencies were absent and reliability and speed contests served as credentialing devices. The results show that cumulative victories in contests extend the life chances of winning organizations but there is no evidence that new startup organizations benefit more than lateral entries. These findings underscore the significance of intangible assets and point to the need for an institutionally informed theory of competences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation
Grant, R. M. (1991) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41166664 · Cited by 9,699
Strategic assets and organizational rent
Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250140105 · Cited by 8,425
The Matthew Effect in Science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered.
Merton, R. K. (1968) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.159.3810.56 · Cited by 6,720
Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy
Barney, J. B. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.10.1231 · Cited by 5,548
The Adolescence of Institutional Theory
Scott, W. R. (1987) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392880 · Cited by 3,699
The social control of impersonal trust
Shapiro, S. P. (1987) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/228791 · Cited by 1,725
Cited by
WHY COMPANIES GO GREEN: A MODEL OF ECOLOGICAL RESPONSIVENESS.
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556363 · Cited by 4,020
Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses
Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2011.590299 · Cited by 3,519
Interorganizational Endorsements and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Ventures
Stuart, T. E., Hoang, H., & Hybels, R. C. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2666998 · Cited by 2,751
Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation
Tyler, T. R. (2006) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038 · Cited by 2,381
Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: a study on technology‐based ventures
Lee, C., Lee, K., & Pennings, J. M. (2001) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.181 · Cited by 2,018
Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2015) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2268 · Cited by 1,124
Corporate image and corporate reputation in customers’ retention decisions in services
Nguyen, N., & Leblanc, G. (2001) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/s0969-6989(00)00029-1 · Cited by 1,072
Capaldo, A. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.621 · Cited by 986
Organizational Reputation: A Review
Lange, D., Lee, P. M., & Dai, Y. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206310390963 · Cited by 960
Optimal structure, market dynamism, and the strategy of simple rules
Davis, J. P., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bingham, C. B. (2009) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.2009.54.3.413 · Cited by 804
“Research indicates that entrepreneurs in these highly ambiguous markets often excel when they shape industry structure to their advantage (Rao, 1994; Rindova and Fombrun, 1999; Santos and Eisenhardt, 2009).”
BackgroundThe Liability of Good Reputation: A Study of Product Recalls in the U.S. Automobile Industry
Rhee, M., & Haunschild, P. R. (2006) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0175 · Cited by 743
Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change
Kaplan, S., & Tripsas, M. (2008) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.02.002 · Cited by 661
Zavyalova, A., Pfarrer, M. D., Reger, R. K., & Shapiro, D. L. (2012) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0608 · Cited by 646
How firms respond to being rated
Chatterji, A. K., & Toffel, M. W. (2010) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.840 · Cited by 547
Spinning gold: The financial returns to stakeholder engagement
Henisz, W. J., Dorobantu, S., & Nartey, L. J. (2014) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2180 · Cited by 546
Strategic Silence: Withholding Certification Status as a Hypocrisy Avoidance Tactic
Carlos, W. C., & Lewis, B. W. (2018) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0001839217695089 · Cited by 393
Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2015) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2015.0042 · Cited by 343
Rethinking the Relationship Between Reputation and Legitimacy: A Social Actor Conceptualization
King, B. G., & Whetten, D. A. (2008) · Corporate Reputation Review · doi:10.1057/crr.2008.16 · Cited by 343
Entrepreneurship in digital platforms: Anetwork‐centric view
Srinivasan, A., & Venkatraman, N. (2018) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.1272 · Cited by 331
ORGANIZATIONAL PERCEPTION MANAGEMENT
Elsbach, K. D. (2003) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0191-3085(03)25007-3 · Cited by 277
Janney, J. J., & Gove, S. (2011) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00984.x · Cited by 252
Sine, W. D., David, R. J., & Mitsuhashi, H. (2007) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0300 · Cited by 241
Garud, R. (2008) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00783.x · Cited by 236
Gatzert, N. (2015) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2015.10.001 · Cited by 256
Bastedo, M. N., & Bowman, N. A. (2010) · American Journal of Education · doi:10.1086/649437 · Cited by 198
Certifications and Reputation: Determining the Standard of Desirability Amidst Uncertainty
Graffin, S. D., & Ward, A. J. (2010) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0400 · Cited by 158
Hwang, K., & Choi, M. (2017) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2017.02.001 · Cited by 85
Measuring social performance in social enterprises: a global study of microfinance institutions
Beisland, L. A., Djan, K. O., Mersland, R., & Randøy, T. (2021) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04417-z · Cited by 84
Tiba, S., van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Hekkert, M. P. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121616 · Cited by 78
The Reverse Matthew Effect: Consequences of Retraction in Scientific Teams
Jin, G. Z., Jones, B., Lu, S. F., & Uzzi, B. (2019) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00780 · Cited by 41
Managing Customer Switching Behavior in the Banking Industry
Thaichon, P., Quach, S., Bavalur, A. S., & Nair, M. (2017) · Services Marketing Quarterly · doi:10.1080/15332969.2017.1325644 · Cited by 20
McDonnell, M.-H., & King, B. (2014) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2373974 · Cited by 5
Dess, G. G., Lumpkin, G. T., & Covin, J. G. (1997) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199710)18:9<677::aid-smj905>3.0.co;2-q
Metadata
- Authors
- Rao, H.
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 29-44
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W2073567370
- Cited by
- 1,468
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 5.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.